Hi all
Someone of the last remaing sparc dudes , write a how to test and
commit sparc issues on debian ?
I also have a few sparc boxes and i would like to spend some time fixing
things if possible...
Cheers
W.
--
William http://www.wbonnet.net
hi
First i have 4 Sparc Maschines on Debian , two of them Online and in use.
I m a user/sysadmin and i am sad about that testing drops , but i still no get
how i can get involed to geting sparc on debian forward.
Someone of the last remaing sparc dudes , write a how to test and commit sparc
BTW, the sparc buildd looks like gcc 4-8.2-21 is successful and so is
gcc-4.9.0-1. I've installed them from sid. Crisis averted?
Patrick
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Sébastien Bernard sbern...@nerim.netwrote:
Le 30/04/2014 20:36, Patrick Baggett a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at
Well it is a good start. =D
There are still complaints, though haven't seen the bug reports, that
modern kernel's are unstable on certain peices of hardware. Personally I
can't reproduce any of these issues, I have rolled out the latest kernel
for a while now on some of my sparc systems, my T2000
I have SILO v1.4.14, but it has the git [1] patches from 2012-08-19, which
includes quite a few fixes from the 2008-06-12 release. Particularly, it
includes a number of ext2/ext4 boot fixes and some sun4v and sun4u boot
fixes. The remaining patches after that are for tilo which is some kind
of
I kicked off a gcc build (gcc-4.8_4.8.2-21) last night. It didn't have an
errors for me. I now have a bunch of *.deb files:
figgles@ghost:~/src$ ls -1 *.deb
cpp-4.8_4.8.2-21_sparc.deb
g++-4.8-multilib_4.8.2-21_sparc.deb
g++-4.8_4.8.2-21_sparc.deb
gcc-4.8-base_4.8.2-21_sparc.deb
I have also been able to build the gcc 4.8.2-21 packages as well. I am not
sure what is causing the build systems so much grief when it comes to
building these packages.
Cheers,
Kieron
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Patrick Baggett
baggett.patr...@gmail.comwrote:
I kicked off a gcc build
I tried to build the gcc-4.8-4.8.2-20 and the build is broken. libstdc++
and lib64stdc++ are not build, neither are build libgcc1.
The last good build (with the missing libraries) is 4.8.2-16.
Something broken on -20 and -21.
Oh, I see what you're saying. I get lib64stdc++-dev /
What is also weird is you have the debug package for it. So I am sure it
compiled I think there might be something wrong with the packaging for it.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Patrick Baggett
baggett.patr...@gmail.comwrote:
I tried to build the gcc-4.8-4.8.2-20 and the build is broken.
Le 30/04/2014 15:39, Patrick Baggett a écrit :
I tried to build the gcc-4.8-4.8.2-20 and the build is broken.
libstdc++ and lib64stdc++ are not build, neither are build libgcc1.
The last good build (with the missing libraries) is 4.8.2-16.
Something broken on -20 and -21.
Oh,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Sébastien Bernard sbern...@nerim.netwrote:
Le 30/04/2014 15:39, Patrick Baggett a écrit :
I tried to build the gcc-4.8-4.8.2-20 and the build is broken.
libstdc++ and lib64stdc++ are not build, neither are build libgcc1.
The last good build (with the
Le 30/04/2014 16:19, Patrick Baggett a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Sébastien Bernard sbern...@nerim.net
mailto:sbern...@nerim.net wrote:
Le 30/04/2014 15:39, Patrick Baggett a écrit :
I tried to build the gcc-4.8-4.8.2-20 and the build is
broken.
On 30/04/14 15:19, Patrick Baggett wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Sébastien Bernard sbern...@nerim.net wrote:
Le 30/04/2014 15:39, Patrick Baggett a écrit :
I tried to build the gcc-4.8-4.8.2-20 and the build is broken.
libstdc++ and lib64stdc++ are not build,
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 03:42:39PM +0200, Sébastien Bernard wrote:
Indeed, the last good build seems to be gcc-4.8-4.8.2-19.
Look at the changelog for the -20 they seems to have done something on the
sparc
that blocks the generation of the libraries.
A number of binaries are now built
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Ivo De Decker ivo.dedec...@ugent.bewrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 03:42:39PM +0200, Sébastien Bernard wrote:
Indeed, the last good build seems to be gcc-4.8-4.8.2-19.
Look at the changelog for the -20 they seems to have done something on
the sparc
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:36:31 +0200, Joël BERTRAND wrote:
sun4u : kernel is stable until 2.6.32. [...]
sun4v : I have several T1000 for a long time. I haven't seen any stable
kernel on these servers.
Maybe someone could think about a k*bsd-sparc port ;)
Linux seems to be
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.orgwrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:36:31 +0200, Joël BERTRAND wrote:
sun4u : kernel is stable until 2.6.32. [...]
sun4v : I have several T1000 for a long time. I haven't seen any
stable
kernel on these servers.
Le 26/04/2014 21:33, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
Hello,
we currently have in unstable/main/sparc precisely 35491 packages, of
a total of 40634 available packages, that cannot be installed in the
current version of unstable:
% dose-debcheck --fg Packages --deb-ignore-essential
background-packages: 0
I still run Debian on three SPARC machines, so I am definitely interested.
Patrick
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.orgwrote:
Hi,
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
now that sparc has been dropped from testing, please decide on the fate
of sparc in
Hello,
we currently have in unstable/main/sparc precisely 35491 packages, of
a total of 40634 available packages, that cannot be installed in the
current version of unstable:
% dose-debcheck --fg Packages --deb-ignore-essential
background-packages: 0
foreground-packages: 40634
total-packages:
Hi,
thanks for taking me into Cc.
Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
now that sparc has been dropped from testing, please decide on the fate
of sparc in unstable.
Are there still people interested in the current sparc port?
Interested yes, as I do have and run
21 matches
Mail list logo
