Bug#220644: installation-reports: Can't install with scsi cd-rom without floppy drive

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal I have a floppy-less system with scsi cd-rom. Thus, the sarge-installer is a no-go for me. I guess it's not that many floppyless scsi-systems out there, but it sure causes headache for me. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/uns

Bug#220644: installation-reports: Can't install with scsi cd-rom without floppy drive

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal I have a floppy-less system with scsi cd-rom. Thus, the sarge-installer is a no-go for me. I guess it's not that many floppyless scsi-systems out there, but it sure causes headache for me. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/uns

Bug#220615: installation-reports: beta-1 hp kayak

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: beta-1 (sarge netinst 100M) uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 13 Nov 2003, 7:00 Method: Boot off atapi cdrom, install

Bug#220615: installation-reports: beta-1 hp kayak

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: beta-1 (sarge netinst 100M) uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 13 Nov 2003, 7:00 Method: Boot off atapi cdrom, install

Bug#220612: installation-reports: Ignores my request to start without using framebuffer

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal I am installing under Bochs. As noted by #202684, the installation dies with RAM<=32MB - I tried to boot with: boot: linux video=vga16:off but the installation still proceeds with the framebuffer on. Please check this. Also, by the way (

Bug#220612: installation-reports: Ignores my request to start without using framebuffer

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal I am installing under Bochs. As noted by #202684, the installation dies with RAM<=32MB - I tried to boot with: boot: linux video=vga16:off but the installation still proceeds with the framebuffer on. Please check this. Also, by the way (

Bug#220518: installation-reports: routing broken with netboot via PXE install

Glenn McGrath wrote: > On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:27:43 -0500 > Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anyone seen this before or have any clue what the problem could be?? > > There was a bug with busybox relating to round-robin dns > http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/2003-October/009579.html >

Bug#220518: installation-reports: routing broken with netboot via PXE install

Glenn McGrath wrote: > On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:27:43 -0500 > Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anyone seen this before or have any clue what the problem could be?? > > There was a bug with busybox relating to round-robin dns > http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/2003-October/009579.html >

Processed: reassign 220571 to installation-reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 220571 installation-reports Bug#220571: installation-report: Sarge netinst.iso failure on Dell Precision 360 w. SATA hard disk Warning: Unknown package 'installation-report' Bug reassigned from package `installation-report'

Processed: reassign 220571 to installation-reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 220571 installation-reports Bug#220571: installation-report: Sarge netinst.iso failure on Dell Precision 360 w. SATA hard disk Warning: Unknown package 'installation-report' Bug reassigned from package `installation-report'

Bug#220555: installation-reports: Installation Try: Asus P4C800 Deluxe Mainboard + P4 2.6

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Hi! I want to install my new workstation but I can't get the debian installer to proceed. It boots up nicely but then it stopps while trying to load the 'ide-detect' module. The system just hangs there and i have to hardreset. The B

Bug#220555: installation-reports: Installation Try: Asus P4C800 Deluxe Mainboard + P4 2.6

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Hi! I want to install my new workstation but I can't get the debian installer to proceed. It boots up nicely but then it stopps while trying to load the 'ide-detect' module. The system just hangs there and i have to hardreset. The B

Bug#220518: installation-reports: routing broken with netboot via PXE install

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:27:43 -0500 Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone seen this before or have any clue what the problem could be?? There was a bug with busybox relating to round-robin dns http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/2003-October/009579.html The bug has been fixed in busybox cv

Bug#220518: installation-reports: routing broken with netboot via PXE install

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:27:43 -0500 Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone seen this before or have any clue what the problem could be?? There was a bug with busybox relating to round-robin dns http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/2003-October/009579.html The bug has been fixed in busybox cv

Bug#220518: installation-reports: routing broken with netboot via PXE install

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Tags: d-i INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: netboot image from daily build on 2003-11-12 uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 unknown Date: 2003-11-12 9:30p Method: netboot via PXE Machine: Dell Inspiron

Bug#220518: installation-reports: routing broken with netboot via PXE install

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Tags: d-i INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: netboot image from daily build on 2003-11-12 uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 unknown Date: 2003-11-12 9:30p Method: netboot via PXE Machine: Dell Inspiron

Bug#220163: marked as done (installation-reports: netboot install attempt via PXE)

nsfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: installation-reports: netboot install attempt via PXE X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36 Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:43:56 -0500 Message

Bug#220163: marked as done (installation-reports: netboot install attempt via PXE)

nsfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: installation-reports: netboot install attempt via PXE X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36 Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:43:56 -0500 Message

Bug#220163: installation-reports: netboot install attempt via PXE (fwd)

Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > Am Die, den 11.11.2003 schrieb Joe Nahmias um 09:16: > > > Alright, here are the highlights of how this install went: > > > > 0) OK, after much struggling (and dealing with my nemesis error message > > 'VFS: Cannot open root device "" or 3a:04') I managed to get the d-i

Bug#220163: installation-reports: netboot install attempt via PXE (fwd)

Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > Am Die, den 11.11.2003 schrieb Joe Nahmias um 09:16: > > > Alright, here are the highlights of how this install went: > > > > 0) OK, after much struggling (and dealing with my nemesis error message > > 'VFS: Cannot open root device "" or 3a:04') I managed to get the d-i

Bug#220160: marked as done (installation-reports: cfdisk in endless loop)

t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:34:57 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "J.R. Blain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: installation-repo

Bug#220160: marked as done (installation-reports: cfdisk in endless loop)

t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:34:57 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "J.R. Blain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: installation-repo

Bug#220163: installation-reports: netboot install attempt via PXE (fwd)

Am Die, den 11.11.2003 schrieb Joe Nahmias um 09:16: > Alright, here are the highlights of how this install went: > > 0) OK, after much struggling (and dealing with my nemesis error message > 'VFS: Cannot open root device "" or 3a:04') I managed to get the d-i > netboot image to work via PXE. Fo

Bug#220163: installation-reports: netboot install attempt via PXE (fwd)

Am Die, den 11.11.2003 schrieb Joe Nahmias um 09:16: > Alright, here are the highlights of how this install went: > > 0) OK, after much struggling (and dealing with my nemesis error message > 'VFS: Cannot open root device "" or 3a:04') I managed to get the d-i > netboot image to work via PXE. Fo

Bug#220163: installation-reports: netboot install attempt via PXE

* Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-11 01:43]: > 0) OK, after much struggling (and dealing with my nemesis error message > 'VFS: Cannot open root device "" or 3a:04') I managed to get the d-i > netboot image to work via PXE. For posterity (and the installation > guide) the magic kernel opti

Bug#220163: installation-reports: netboot install attempt via PXE

Package: installation-reports Version: netboot daily image from 2003-11-10 Severity: normal Tags: d-i INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: daily netboot image from <http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/2003-11-10/> uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 ES

Bug#220160: installation-reports: cfdisk in endless loop

Package: installation-reports Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Installation on a Toshiba Satellite 4010CTD 64 mb ram, pII 266, 4 gb ide hd, ide cdrom. Used boot floppies from sid

Bug#220163: installation-reports: netboot install attempt via PXE

* Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-11 01:43]: > 0) OK, after much struggling (and dealing with my nemesis error message > 'VFS: Cannot open root device "" or 3a:04') I managed to get the d-i > netboot image to work via PXE. For posterity (and the installation > guide) the magic kernel opti

Bug#220163: installation-reports: netboot install attempt via PXE

Package: installation-reports Version: netboot daily image from 2003-11-10 Severity: normal Tags: d-i INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: daily netboot image from <http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/2003-11-10/> uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 ES

Bug#220160: installation-reports: cfdisk in endless loop

Package: installation-reports Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Installation on a Toshiba Satellite 4010CTD 64 mb ram, pII 266, 4 gb ide hd, ide cdrom. Used boot floppies from sid

Bug#172247: marked as done (installation-reports: Selecting netcfg-dhcp should automatically select pump-udeb)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:55:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#196293: marked as done (installation-reports: trying debian-installer (2003-06-04))

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#179428: marked as done (installation-reports: tries to fetch Packages file from http:///debian/dists/... ; choose-mirror not offered)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:21:29 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#173721: marked as done (installation-reports: Network installation report)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#204299: marked as done (installation-reports: Installation report, 5 Aug 2003)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#172242: marked as done (installation-reports: library missing?)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#172247: marked as done (installation-reports: Selecting netcfg-dhcp should automatically select pump-udeb)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:55:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#196293: marked as done (installation-reports: trying debian-installer (2003-06-04))

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#179428: marked as done (installation-reports: tries to fetch Packages file from http:///debian/dists/... ; choose-mirror not offered)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:21:29 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#173721: marked as done (installation-reports: Network installation report)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#204299: marked as done (installation-reports: Installation report, 5 Aug 2003)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#172242: marked as done (installation-reports: library missing?)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#219525: marked as done (installation-reports: installation report: "configure the network" failed)

Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: installation-reports: installation report: "configure the network" failed X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 03:17:21 + Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Philip Mart

Bug#219525: marked as done (installation-reports: installation report: "configure the network" failed)

Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: installation-reports: installation report: "configure the network" failed X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 03:17:21 + Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Philip Mart

Processed: sorting installation reports

gned from package `installation-reports' to `discover-data-udeb'. > retitle -1 discover selects wrong module in d-i Bug#220113: Installation report Changed Bug title. > tags -1 d-i Bug#220113: discover selects wrong module in d-i There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > reassi

Processed: sorting installation reports

gned from package `installation-reports' to `discover-data-udeb'. > retitle -1 discover selects wrong module in d-i Bug#220113: Installation report Changed Bug title. > tags -1 d-i Bug#220113: discover selects wrong module in d-i There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i > reassi

Bug#220023: marked as done (installation-reports: install report: manual mirror selection fails)

Nov 2003 10:28:09 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Paul Telford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: installation-reports: install report: manual mirror selectio

Bug#220023: marked as done (installation-reports: install report: manual mirror selection fails)

v 2003 10:28:09 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Paul Telford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: installation-reports: install report: manual mirror selectio

Bug#220023: installation-reports: install report: manual mirror selection fails

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal File: installation-reports -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Debian-installer-version: "debian-installer and doc only, requires net access (50MB)" retrieved from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ this morning uname

Bug#220014: installation-reports: Installation report (beta-1): DHCP, drives problems

Sebastien Bacher wrote: > * displaying the devfs path for a drive ... how an user can handle that ? You > should > have "MBR on boot disk" and "Others disk" choices ... > > * the ide-scsi/fstab bug create a sort of loop ... no way to quit in a > correct way > (just hit ctrl+C several times ...

Bug#220014: installation-reports: Installation report (beta-1): DHCP, drives problems

Package: installation-reports Version: 2003-11-10 Severity: normal Tags: d-i INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-10 (beta-1) uname -a: "Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-i386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux" Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:10:00 +0100 Method: How did y

Bug#220023: installation-reports: install report: manual mirror selection fails

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal File: installation-reports -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Debian-installer-version: "debian-installer and doc only, requires net access (50MB)" retrieved from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ this morning uname

Bug#220014: installation-reports: Installation report (beta-1): DHCP, drives problems

Sebastien Bacher wrote: > * displaying the devfs path for a drive ... how an user can handle that ? You should > have "MBR on boot disk" and "Others disk" choices ... > > * the ide-scsi/fstab bug create a sort of loop ... no way to quit in a correct way > (just hit ctrl+C several times ...), no

Bug#220014: installation-reports: Installation report (beta-1): DHCP, drives problems

Package: installation-reports Version: 2003-11-10 Severity: normal Tags: d-i INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-10 (beta-1) uname -a: "Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-i386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux" Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:10:00 +0100 Method: How did y

Bug#219613: installation-reports: 4 Nov 2003: reiserfs really hard to get; maybe grub issue; interface glitch

Package: installation-reports Version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso, 5 nov 2003 Severity: normal Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso, 5 nov 2003 uname -a: Linux galadriel 2.4.22 #1

Bug#219613: installation-reports: 4 Nov 2003: reiserfs really hard to get; maybe grub issue; interface glitch

Package: installation-reports Version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso, 5 nov 2003 Severity: normal Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso, 5 nov 2003 uname -a: Linux galadriel 2.4.22 #1

Bug#219525: installation-reports: installation report: "configure the network" failed

Package: installation-reports Version: N/A; reported 2003-11-07 Severity: normal I downloaded the network install ISO from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/daily/ dated Nov 6. I am installing on an dual PIII box (i.e. SMP) with aic7xxx SCSI and two via-rhine ethernet cards

Bug#219525: installation-reports: installation report: "configure the network" failed

Package: installation-reports Version: N/A; reported 2003-11-07 Severity: normal I downloaded the network install ISO from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/daily/ dated Nov 6. I am installing on an dual PIII box (i.e. SMP) with aic7xxx SCSI and two via-rhine ethernet cards

Bug#219375: Acknowledgement (installation-reports - Hard drive not detected)

I wrote: > (...) >My hard drive was not detected because of conflicts between basic ide >(ide0/ide1 with cdrom) and extended ide (htp366 aka ide2/ide3 with hard drive). > (...) I don't think there really is a conflict. My hard drive simply isn't detected.

Bug#219375: Acknowledgement (installation-reports - Hard drive not detected)

I wrote: > (...) >My hard drive was not detected because of conflicts between basic ide (ide0/ide1 with >cdrom) and extended ide (htp366 aka ide2/ide3 with hard drive). > (...) I don't think there really is a conflict. My hard drive simply isn't detected. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR

Bug#219375: installation-reports - Hard drive not detected

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: October 2003. (I don't know how to get the version from the cd in my hand!) uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #5 Sun Sep 28 13:21:31 EST 2003 i686 unknown prompt: BusyBox v1.00-pre3 (2003.09.36-13:15+000) Built-in shell (ash) M

Bug#219375: installation-reports - Hard drive not detected

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: October 2003. (I don't know how to get the version from the cd in my hand!) uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #5 Sun Sep 28 13:21:31 EST 2003 i686 unknown prompt: BusyBox v1.00-pre3 (2003.09.36-13:15+000) Built-in shell (ash) M

Bug#216218: installation-reports: report 20 oct 2003

INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: uname -a: Date: <20 oct 2003 19:32> Method: I use sarge-netinstall I try first with orinoco_cs pcmcia wireless card and then with the interla int

Bug#216218: installation-reports: report 20 oct 2003

INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: uname -a: Date: <20 oct 2003 19:32> Method: I use sarge-netinstall I try first with orinoco_cs pcmcia wireless card and then with the interla inte

Bug#216218: installation-reports: INSTALL REPORT

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Debian-installer-version: 2003-10-17 uname -a: Linux bredele 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 GNU/Linux Date: see above Method: bootfloppy and floppy images Machine: Gateway2000 Processor: Pentium Pro Memory: 128Mo Root Device: IDE

Bug#216218: installation-reports: INSTALL REPORT

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Debian-installer-version: 2003-10-17 uname -a: Linux bredele 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 GNU/Linux Date: see above Method: bootfloppy and floppy images Machine: Gateway2000 Processor: Pentium Pro Memory: 128Mo Root Device: IDE

Bug#212967: installation-reports: i386 installation, broken partitioning and base install

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Tue Sep 23 13:36:10 CEST 2003 http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/daily/floppy-image.img http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/daily/net_drivers-image.img uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.20-1-386

Bug#212967: installation-reports: i386 installation, broken partitioning and base install

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Tue Sep 23 13:36:10 CEST 2003 http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/daily/floppy-image.img http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/daily/net_drivers-image.img uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.20-1-386

Bug#142732: marked as done (installation-reports: Dependency botch between exmh/metamail/apache?)

-5) id g3DLHmUe000677; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 17:17:48 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: PASSWD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: installation-reports: Dependency botch between exmh/metamail/apache? X-Mailer: reportbug 1.4

Bug#142732: marked as done (installation-reports: Dependency botch between exmh/metamail/apache?)

-5) id g3DLHmUe000677; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 17:17:48 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: PASSWD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: installation-reports: Dependency botch between exmh/metamail/apache? X-Mailer: reportbug 1.4

Bug#212258: installation-reports: Sarge Installation Report

Package: installation-reports Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-22 Severity: normal *** install-report.template Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 2003-09-16 uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.21-5-386 #1 Sun Sep 21 14:15:10 CDT 2003 i686 GNU/Linux Date

Bug#212258: installation-reports: Sarge Installation Report

Package: installation-reports Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-22 Severity: normal *** install-report.template Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 2003-09-16 uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.21-5-386 #1 Sun Sep 21 14:15:10 CDT 2003 i686 GNU/Linux Date

Processed: reassign 212141 to installation-reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 212141 installation-reports Bug#212141: installation-report: Sarge Installation Report Warning: Unknown package 'installation-report' Bug reassigned from package `installation-report' to `installation-reports'. >

Processed: reassign 212141 to installation-reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 212141 installation-reports Bug#212141: installation-report: Sarge Installation Report Warning: Unknown package 'installation-report' Bug reassigned from package `installation-report' to `installation-reports'. >

Bug#212143: installation-reports: Sarge Installation Report

Package: installation-reports Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-22 Severity: normal INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 20030921 http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/ uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.21-5-386 #1 Sun Aug 24 13:14:58 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2003/09

Bug#212143: installation-reports: Sarge Installation Report

Package: installation-reports Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-22 Severity: normal INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 20030921 http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/ uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.21-5-386 #1 Sun Aug 24 13:14:58 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2003/09/22

Bug#204299: installation-reports: Installation report, 5 Aug 2003

ons 2003-08-06 klockan 03.54 skrev David Z Maze: > http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso > Initial attempt was a network install, which threw me into the text-mode > interface. Notes: What do you mean "network install"? Did you explicitly pick 'net' as boot

Bug#204299: installation-reports: Installation report, 5 Aug 2003

Martin Sjögren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ons 2003-08-06 klockan 03.54 skrev David Z Maze: >> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso > >> Initial attempt was a network install, which threw me into the text-mode >> interface. Notes: > > What do you mean "net

Bug#204299: installation-reports: Installation report, 5 Aug 2003

Martin Sjögren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ons 2003-08-06 klockan 03.54 skrev David Z Maze: >> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso > >> Initial attempt was a network install, which threw me into the text-mode >> interface. Notes: > > What do you mean "net

Bug#204299: installation-reports: Installation report, 5 Aug 2003

ons 2003-08-06 klockan 03.54 skrev David Z Maze: > http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso > Initial attempt was a network install, which threw me into the text-mode > interface. Notes: What do you mean "network install"? Did you explicitly pick 'net' as boot

Bug#204299: installation-reports: Installation report, 5 Aug 2003

Package: installation-reports Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-05 Severity: normal Debian-installer-version: Downloaded http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso around 2 PM eastern (18:00 UTC) Tue 5 Aug 2003 uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.21-3-386 #3 Sun Jul

Bug#204299: installation-reports: Installation report, 5 Aug 2003

Package: installation-reports Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-05 Severity: normal Debian-installer-version: Downloaded http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso around 2 PM eastern (18:00 UTC) Tue 5 Aug 2003 uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.21-3-386 #3 Sun Jul

Bug#196293: installation-reports: trying debian-installer (2003-06-04)

Hi, On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:04:11AM +0200, Martin Sjögren wrote: > > I selected German (Germany) as language. The German Umlauts don't work. Some > > are just not printed, some look like UTF8 on non UTF-8 aware consoles. > > Indeed, the Unicode support is sketchy at best right now. Another ti

Bug#196293: installation-reports: trying debian-installer (2003-06-04)

Hi, On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:04:11AM +0200, Martin Sjögren wrote: > > I selected German (Germany) as language. The German Umlauts don't work. Some > > are just not printed, some look like UTF8 on non UTF-8 aware consoles. > > Indeed, the Unicode support is sketchy at best right now. Another ti

Bug#196293: installation-reports: trying debian-installer (2003-06-04)

fre 2003-06-06 klockan 21.12 skrev Henning Meier-Geinitz: > > I need the rtl8139 kernel module > > That's what the automatic detection says. But it looks like it's wrong. > I tried to select "8139too" from the list, but that failed with an > error message like "An error has occured". After some lo

Bug#196293: installation-reports: trying debian-installer (2003-06-04)

tor 2003-06-05 klockan 23.35 skrev Henning Meier-Geinitz: > I'm a debian-installer novice but have some experience in installing older > Debian systems. I'm trying this installation from the user perspective without > reading too much documentation. So I may miss some basic stufff. Anyway, here > a

Bug#196293: installation-reports: trying debian-installer (2003-06-04)

fre 2003-06-06 klockan 21.12 skrev Henning Meier-Geinitz: > > I need the rtl8139 kernel module > > That's what the automatic detection says. But it looks like it's wrong. > I tried to select "8139too" from the list, but that failed with an > error message like "An error has occured". After some lo

Bug#196293: installation-reports: trying debian-installer (2003-06-04)

tor 2003-06-05 klockan 23.35 skrev Henning Meier-Geinitz: > I'm a debian-installer novice but have some experience in installing older > Debian systems. I'm trying this installation from the user perspective without > reading too much documentation. So I may miss some basic stufff. Anyway, here > a

Bug#196293: installation-reports: trying debian-installer (2003-06-04)

On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:35:02PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Package: installation-reports > Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-05 > Severity: normal > > INSTALL REPORT [...] I had another try. > I need the rtl8139 kernel module That's what the automatic

Bug#196293: installation-reports: trying debian-installer (2003-06-04)

On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:35:02PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Package: installation-reports > Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-05 > Severity: normal > > INSTALL REPORT [...] I had another try. > I need the rtl8139 kernel module That's what the automatic

Bug#196293: installation-reports: trying debian-installer (2003-06-04)

Package: installation-reports Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-05 Severity: normal INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-businesscard.iso from gluck (2003-06-04) uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.20-1-386 #3 Sat Mar 22 12:11:40 EST 2003 i686 unknown Date: 2003-06-05 18:00 Method

Bug#196293: installation-reports: trying debian-installer (2003-06-04)

Package: installation-reports Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-05 Severity: normal INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-businesscard.iso from gluck (2003-06-04) uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.20-1-386 #3 Sat Mar 22 12:11:40 EST 2003 i686 unknown Date: 2003-06-05 18:00 Method

Re: installation-reports

tor 2003-04-03 klockan 17.59 skrev Christoph Löffler: > Detect a keyboard and select layout: > I chose 28 [de-latin1-nodeadkeys] German which led to > Segmentation faultkbd-chooser' postinst exited with status 35584 > installer[48]: Setting main menu question priority to crititcal Known issue with

Bug#190178: installation-reports: Feature Request: x86 tftpboot including rescue.bin and drivers.tgz

Package: installation-reports Version: n/a Severity: wishlist The x86 tftpboot.img appears to contain only a kernel. As such it is necessary to copy root.bin over to /tftpboot. Even then users cannot install kernel & driver modules as the rescue.bin and drivers.tgz files are not available

installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso 02-Apr-2003 from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/ uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.20-386 #1 Mon Jan 13 20:53:07 EST 2003 i686 unknown Date: 03-Apr-2003 15:00 MESZ Method: How did you install? What did you boot off?

installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso 02-Apr-2003 from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/ uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.20-386 #1 Mon Jan 13 20:53:07 EST 2003 i686 unknown Date: 03-Apr-2003 15:00 MESZ Method: How did you install? What did you boot off?

Bug#179423: marked as done (installation-reports: debian-installer net image from CVS does not fit on a floppy)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2003 00:09:15 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#179423: installation-reports: debian-installer net image from CVS does not fit on a floppy has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#179428: installation-reports: tries to fetch Packages file from http:///debian/dists/... ; choose-mirror not offered

Hi, On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 04:40:23PM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote: > sön 2003-02-02 klockan 08.23 skrev Joost van Baal: > > I've fetched > > http://people.debian.org/~tfheen/d-i/images/2003-01-31/archive/net-1440.img, > > which seems to be the same as > > http://people.debian.org/~tfheen/d-i/imag

Bug#179423: installation-reports: debian-installer net image from CVS does not fit on a floppy

Hi, On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 01:38:04PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > * Joost van Baal > > | # vi /etc/fstab ( as noted in build/Makefile ) > | % vi Makefile( uncomment USER_MOUNT_HACK ) > | % fakeroot make floppy_image > | > | ... > | cp dest/net-initrd.gz `pwd`/mnt//initrd.gz > |

Bug#179423: marked as done (installation-reports: debian-installer net image from CVS does not fit on a floppy)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2003 00:09:15 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#179423: installation-reports: debian-installer net image from CVS does not fit on a floppy has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

  1   2   >