John Hasler wrote:
> It's not clear what you are trying to do. For a PPP link you want pppd
> on both ends.
I assume Peter is having ppp on one end login to the other end at the
login: prompt as the ppp user which starts up the pppd as the login
shell on the other end. That will result in two pp
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> PPP over a serial crossover cable between two machines.
Fun retro! :-)
What clues are found in the mgetty debug log file?
> If mgetty is started interactively by root, PPP works, including PAP.
> I haven't found any effect when the mgetty command is in /etc/inittab.
It's not clear what you are trying to do. For a PPP link you want pppd
on both ends.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
From: Reco
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 01:49:35 +0300
> Are you trying to setup a dial-up old fashioned way?
PPP over a serial crossover cable between two machines.
If mgetty is started interactively by root, PPP works, including PAP.
I haven't found any effect when the mgetty command is in
Hi.
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:09:37 -0700
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> Traditionally, mgetty was started with a line such as this in /etc/inittab.
> T0:23:respawn:/sbin/mgetty ttyS1
In Debian it's customary to use getty for the serial console. That line
got the job done since etch was testing:
T0:2
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> Traditionally, mgetty was started with a line such as this in /etc/inittab.
> T0:23:respawn:/sbin/mgetty ttyS1
> Not working in wheezy and this seems relevant.
> From: Don Armstrong
> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 11:15:32 -0800
> Message-id: <20150222191532.gm6.
Traditionally, mgetty was started with a line such as this in /etc/inittab.
T0:23:respawn:/sbin/mgetty ttyS1
Not working in wheezy and this seems relevant.
From: Don Armstrong
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 11:15:32 -0800
Message-id: <20150222191532.gm6...@teltox.donarmstrong.com>
> 1. The C
László Kohári writes:
> Dear Pal, Dear Debian users,
>
> Did you able to find something with this problem?
> I have an RTL8192CU, but I'm not able to m make it work.
>
> It's working as a client, but not as an Access point.
>
> If I try to start hostapd with minimal config I got the following:
>
Hi,
Since Mar 10th, I seem to have trouble installing Debian testing on a
virtual machine or a physical machine, always fails at step 'Partition
disk' with partman, it complains:
The attempt to mount a file system with type ext4 in SCSI1(0,0,0),
partition #1 (sda) at / failed.
You may resume part
Op Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:22:56 +0100 schreef venkat
:
HI
I have installed DEBIAN 7.8 in N2600 board.
"http://www.jetway.com.tw/ru/ipcboard_view.asp?productid=939&proname=NF9C-2600/2800";
.
On the installed system, we were trying to connect multiple displays
(Monitor 1 - HDMI port) (Monito
Hello,
I want to boot a computer from network by PXE, with an NFS filesystem as
root fs, install a basic system on the local disk and then boot the
computer from the disk. After booting from disk, the names of the network
interfaces should be the same as before with the NFS root. So, I thought
tha
On 25 March 2015 at 05:57, Sven Hartge wrote:
> No, there is not chance of a collision. If DAD thinks there is another
> device with the same address (and hence MAC) then there _is_ another
> device with the same address or another anomaly (network loop, like you
> already wrote).
>
> Using a snif
Dear Pal, Dear Debian users,
Did you able to find something with this problem?
I have an RTL8192CU, but I'm not able to m make it work.
It's working as a client, but not as an Access point.
If I try to start hostapd with minimal config I got the following:
*"Could not open file /sys/class/net/w
On Wednesday 25 March 2015 13:23:02 Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> All I know is that synaptic shows me the latest iceweasel as 31.5.3 while
> firefox is at 36.0.4, or five major versions more recent...
As I say, I have backported 36.0.1. So the same major version.
> Another is that I am informed imme
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:31:13 +1300
Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > What doe 36 have that 33 doesn't?
> > Security (and other) upgrades...
> What other upgrades?
> I'd be interested to know.
> You do know that security fixes are backported, right?
All I know is that synaptic shows me the lat
On 03/25/2015 02:06 PM, Linux4Bene wrote:
> Op Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:46:21 +0100, schreef Diogene Laerce:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a strange behavior of iptables lately : all rules are cleaned up
>> after a few minutes.
>>
>> iptables-persistent is installed and if I reboot just after restoring
>> all
Op Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:46:21 +0100, schreef Diogene Laerce:
> Hi,
>
> I have a strange behavior of iptables lately : all rules are cleaned up
> after a few minutes.
>
> iptables-persistent is installed and if I reboot just after restoring
> all rules,
> all rules are still loaded. But a few minu
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 05:55:14PM -0400, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> With so much still to learn, I didn't think I had ALSA installed.
> Turned out what he did know'd was. I did so, too, have ALSA
> installed on my system else pavucontrol would (apparently) not have
> worked.
No, pavucontrol is
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:19:54AM -0400, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:01:23 -0500
> John Hasler wrote:
>
> > What doe 36 have that 33 doesn't?
>
> Security (and other) upgrades...
What other upgrades?
I'd be interested to know.
You do know that security fixes are backported,
Hi,
I have a strange behavior of iptables lately : all rules are cleaned up
after a few minutes.
iptables-persistent is installed and if I reboot just after restoring
all rules,
all rules are still loaded. But a few minutes later, they are all
cleaned up.
The same happens whenever I load them man
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:57:46AM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Darac Marjal wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 01:49:31AM +, Michael Graham wrote:
>
> >>I've been trying to understand what I should do about my current IPv6
> >>wows.
> >>
> >>I have an IPv6 enabled network but whe
Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 01:49:31AM +, Michael Graham wrote:
>>I've been trying to understand what I should do about my current IPv6
>>wows.
>>
>>I have an IPv6 enabled network but when on a clean boot I don't get an
>>IPv6 address (in Jessie BTW), I've t
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 01:49:31AM +, Michael Graham wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've been trying to understand what I should do about my current IPv6
>wows.
>
>I have an IPv6 enabled network but when on a clean boot I don't get an
>IPv6 address (in Jessie BTW), I've tracked this d
Hello venkat, sorry I don't have an answer to your question, but I wanted to
point out that because you replied to someone else's question, it's quite
possible that your message will be missed by some readers of the list (for
example, if they have already decided to ignore the discussion to which y
24 matches
Mail list logo
