I think you looking for TOX!
Visit TOX Project website:
https://tox.chat
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Stefan Monnier
wrote:
> I'm looking for a decentralized instant message system (e.g. XMPP, SIP,
> ...) where I can be sure that I receive all messages, even if I'm not
> connected when the m
Hello guys,
This alias caused bash to crash:
http://sprunge.us/PMhe
The alias is now corrected to check if `$1` is empty (*), but still, bash
should not crash like this.
I'm not opening a bug report because I don't really know (nor have the time
to find out) how/where this things are correlated
rhkra...@gmail.com writes:
> On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:47:35 AM Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > >> I'm looking for a decentralized instant message system (e.g. XMPP, SIP,
> > >> ...) where I can be sure that I receive all messages, even if I'm not
> > >> connected when the message is sent [ Obvious
On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:47:35 AM Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> I'm looking for a decentralized instant message system (e.g. XMPP, SIP,
> >> ...) where I can be sure that I receive all messages, even if I'm not
> >> connected when the message is sent [ Obviously, I'll only receive them
> >> when
> What it does under jessie:
>
> (1) and (3) still work. (2) does not. I have never seen any mail to
root but
> the people who maintain smtp.ecn.purdue.edu claim that mail to root
on my
> machines gets sent to root@empty.
^
Thomas,
You said earlier that 512 is the default block size. But I looked up that "bs"
also refers to block size.
e.g.
"dd bs=1M count=613"
Analyzing:
bs=1M; 1M = 1Mibibyte;
1Mibibyte = 1048576 bytes; 1048576 bytes / 512 bytes/block = 2048 blocks
Thus
1M = 2048 blocks of 512 bytes/block
613 * 2048
Thanks for your help.
> # mail sent by smarthost; received via SMTP or fetchmail
> # default hostname
> # default 127.0.0.1 ; ::1
> # blank
> # blank
> # smtp.ecn.purdue.edu
> # yes
> # purdue.edu
> # no
> # mbox format in
On Tue 16 Aug 2016 at 22:45:29 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
[...Snip... The history is in previous mails].
> After a lot more wrong turnings and much agonising, thinking instead of
> panicking (at last!) and retrying:
>
> root@Eros:/home/lisi/Sane-Files# scanimage -L
> device `genesys:libusb:001:00
On Tuesday 16 August 2016 17:27:10 Brian wrote:
> On Tue 16 Aug 2016 at 15:39:00 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 August 2016 13:49:48 Brian wrote:
> > > Mea culpa. Please see the apt-get manual: build-dep (no "s").
> >
> > Thanks, both. :-)
> >
> > Everything now built, though there was
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:47:35AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> I'm looking for a decentralized instant message system (e.g. XMPP, SIP,
> >> ...) where I can be sure that I receive all messages, even if I'm not
> >> connected when the message is sent [ Obviously, I'll only receive them
> >> wh
Thanks Pascal!
On Aug 16, 2016, at 12:59 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 16/08/2016 à 09:03, Rick Thomas a écrit :
>>
>> Aug 14 17:02:41 sheeva systemd[1]: Starting Raise network interfaces...
>> Aug 14 17:02:46 sheeva ifup[893]: /sbin/ifup: waiting for lock on
>> /run/network/ifstate.eth0
>>
On Tue 16 Aug 2016 at 09:19:48 (-0400), Jeffrey Mark Siskind wrote:
> Appologies for the repost. I sent this yesterday and it hasn't yet appeared.
> It may have been filtered out for some reason.
>
> I would appreciate some help configuring exim4.
>
> What I want:
>
> I have multiple machines th
On Tuesday 16 August 2016 17:27:10 Brian wrote:
> Five .debs are built; only libsane, libsane-common and sane-utils need
> to be installed with 'dpkg -i'.
Ah! I don't know about senior moments. I need a rest, some sleep and a new
brain.
Lisi
>> I'm looking for a decentralized instant message system (e.g. XMPP, SIP,
>> ...) where I can be sure that I receive all messages, even if I'm not
>> connected when the message is sent [ Obviously, I'll only receive them
>> when I'm back online. ]
> I believe that's called "electronic mail" or "e
On Tue 16 Aug 2016 at 15:39:00 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 August 2016 13:49:48 Brian wrote:
> >
> > Mea culpa. Please see the apt-get manual: build-dep (no "s").
>
> Thanks, both. :-)
>
> Everything now built, though there was an error at the end:
>
> Now running lintian...
> warn
On Tuesday 16 August 2016 13:49:48 Brian wrote:
> On Tue 16 Aug 2016 at 12:57:50 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Monday 15 August 2016 14:25:58 Brian wrote:
> > > A good guide to backporting is at
> > >
> > >
> > > https://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/12/15/howto-to-rebuild-debian-packages/
> > >
> >
Appologies for the repost. I sent this yesterday and it hasn't yet appeared.
It may have been filtered out for some reason.
I would appreciate some help configuring exim4.
What I want:
I have multiple machines that I maintain and have root access on. They have
domain ecn.purdue.edu and names lik
On Tue 16 Aug 2016 at 12:57:50 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 15 August 2016 14:25:58 Brian wrote:
> >
> > A good guide to backporting is at
> >
> > https://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/12/15/howto-to-rebuild-debian-packages/
> >
> > A deb-src line in sources.list for unstable is needed to do
>
thanks for sharing information
http://usedlaptopsinhyderabad.in/
--
View this message in context:
http://debian.2.n7.nabble.com/Gigabyte-BRIX-with-Debian-Linux-tp3422783p3912426.html
Sent from the Debian User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Le 16/08/2016 à 13:57, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> I have got stuck. Only slightly further on than I had already got stuck.
> (apt-get said it wasn't downloading what I had already downloaded!)
>
> root@Eros:/home/lisi/Sane-Files# apt-get build-deps libsane-common/testing
> E: Invalid operation bui
On Monday 15 August 2016 14:25:58 Brian wrote:
> On Mon 15 Aug 2016 at 14:23:36 +0200, didier gaumet wrote:
> > Le 15/08/2016 à 12:42, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> > > Thanks, didier. That is nice to know.
> > >
> > > So it should be in the up-to-date tar ball, if I were to succeed in
> > > sorting that
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 23:17:15 +0200
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hello Rene,
>ihttps://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832495, maybe?
Yes, that's the one. Thanks for the pointer. I'm clearly going to have
to improve my search skills on the BTS, as that bug existed when I
looked for info. O
Le 16/08/2016 à 09:03, Rick Thomas a écrit :
Aug 14 17:02:41 sheeva systemd[1]: Starting Raise network interfaces...
Aug 14 17:02:46 sheeva ifup[893]: /sbin/ifup: waiting for lock on
/run/network/ifstate.eth0
Aug 14 17:02:49 sheeva ifup[893]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
"RTNETLINK answe
Hi Thomas,
yes, had this problem some time ago, but forgot about the reason. I believe,
it was something with my network settings and network-manager.
Your interfaces looks strange, is this correct? See my comments at your
configuration, but maybe I am wrong:
> Anybody else seen this? (Submitte
Anybody else seen this? (Submitted as Bug#834376)
Updated to latest debian Sid
After boot is completed we see:
rbthomas@sheeva:~$ systemctl status networking.service
* networking.service - Raise network interfaces
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/networking.service; enabled; vendor
pr
25 matches
Mail list logo
