Hello，
I have downloaded debian-6.0.4-i386-DVD-1.iso from debian.org,and I install it
to my computer.when the install finish,I got a AMD64 version debian.but my
computer’s CPU is 32bit and the DVD iso is i386,
could yout please tell me why? I just want to install a 32bit debian6 os.thank
you.
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 23:48:53 +
Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> Speaking as a Jessie user, changing to root and using lsblk -f is
> quicker and easier!
Sure, but the OP said that's not an option.
I think that the command Brian suggested:
udevadm info --query=property --name=/dev/sda1 | grep ID_FS_TY
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 23:48:53 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 07 November 2016 19:15:50 Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 18:42:37 +0100, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 04:09:24PM +, Brian wrote:
> > > > I get the same as you on Debian 8.6. On unstable the comm
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 23:24:31 (+), Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 14:20:57 -0600, David Wright wrote:
>
> > On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 19:40:00 (+), Brian wrote:
> > > On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 08:18:17 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +, davi
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 21:07:45 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 07/11/2016 à 15:18, Richard Owlett a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> tomas@rasputin:~$ ls -al /dev/sd*
> >>> brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 0 Nov 7 09:06 /dev/sda
> >>> brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 1 Nov 7 09:06 /dev/sda1
> >>> brw-rw 1 r
On Monday 07 November 2016 19:15:50 Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 18:42:37 +0100, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 04:09:24PM +, Brian wrote:
> > > I get the same as you on Debian 8.6. On unstable the command 'lsblk -f'
> > > shows all the fields populated. I wonder wha
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 14:20:57 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 19:40:00 (+), Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 08:18:17 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +, david...@freevolt.org wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Brian wrote:
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 19:40:00 (+), Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 08:18:17 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +, david...@freevolt.org wrote:
> > > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Brian wrote:
> > > >Wheezy is an unsupported distribution, just like hamm, etch,
Le 07/11/2016 à 15:18, Richard Owlett a écrit :
tomas@rasputin:~$ ls -al /dev/sd*
brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 0 Nov 7 09:06 /dev/sda
brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 1 Nov 7 09:06 /dev/sda1
brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 2 Nov 7 09:06 /dev/sda2
brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 5 Nov 7 09:06 /dev/s
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 08:18:17 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +, david...@freevolt.org wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Brian wrote:
> > >Wheezy is an unsupported distribution, just like hamm, etch, potato etc.
> > >Irrespective of whether it was thought to be w
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 18:42:37 +0100, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 04:09:24PM +, Brian wrote:
> >
> > I get the same as you on Debian 8.6. On unstable the command 'lsblk -f'
> > shows all the fields populated. I wonder what Felipe Salvador is using?
>
> ~$ apt-show-versio
Design Brains is a digital studio,
providing Vector Artwork, Embroidery Digitizing, Product Mock ups and other
graphic related services.
VECTOR ART - $6.95
PRODUCTS MOCK UPS - $1.99
EMB. DIGITIZING - $1.99/1000 stcs.
Designing SERVICES
+61 03 9015 7865 | i...@designbrains.net | www.design
On 2016-11-06, Dan Hitt wrote:
> Thanks Miles (and also Dan P and Celejar for other solutions).
>
> Indeed Firefox has an archive format (maybe called 'maff'?), but how
> could you mail it to yourself?
>
> That is, how could you mail the maff without taking your hands off the
> keyboard, or switch
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:59:56AM -0700, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Felipe Salvador writes:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:37:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> On 11/7/2016 6:20 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> > > *HOWEVER*
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:32:24PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 16:32:24 +0200, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
>
> > On 7 November 2016 at 15:52, David Wright wrote:
> > >
> > > Did you encode it in Base64, or is what you type it into
> > > doing this on your behalf?
> > >
> >
> > Just t
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 04:09:24PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 09:27:47 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> > On 11/7/2016 8:19 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> > >
> > >I don't see this behaviour
> > >
> > >~$ lsblk -fr
> > >NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT
> > >sda
> > >sda1 ext2 ...
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 16:32:24 +0200, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> On 7 November 2016 at 15:52, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > Did you encode it in Base64, or is what you type it into
> > doing this on your behalf?
> >
>
> Just typed the password, as always. Meaning unencoded.
> This is another part t
[snip]
file -s /dev/sda{1..5} | awk '{print $5}'
I was just about to post a very similar followup when I discovered a
gaping security hole (really, about as big as it gets) on my machine:
snowball:404$ ls -l /dev/sda2
brw-rw-rw- 1 root root 8, 2 Nov 7 07:54 /dev/sda2
I use stretch, but I
Hi.
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 04:05:17PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:35:32AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > I started writing that in my previous message, but then I actually
> > tested it on my own system. Good thing I did, because I got the
> > same result
On Monday 07 November 2016 14:48:29 Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/7/2016 7:57 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:12:00AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>> Debian is trying to protect you from someon
Le septidi 17 brumaire, an CCXXV, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
> There is a minuscule decrease
> in efficiency when another directory in PATH has to be searched, but
> it's probably not going to be noticeable.
What will be noticeable, though, it the namespace p
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 09:27:47 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/7/2016 8:19 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> >
> >I don't see this behaviour
> >
> >~$ lsblk -fr
> >NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT
> >sda
> >sda1 ext2 ... /boot
> >sda2 ext4 ... /
> >sda3 ext2 ... /tmp
> >etc etc etc
> >
> >or
>
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:57:14AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> In any case, off-list someone suggested using
>/sbin/blkid /dev/sda*
> That works. *BUT* I wonder about unknown implications of "/sbin"
> being required if not explicitly running as root.
It's simply because /sbin is not in you
On Monday 07 November 2016 12:52:30 Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> - update the corresponding debian's wiki page on reportbug
Since you obviously don't want to use any of what has been suggested, and
since reportbug seems to be the only/main(?) bugbear, why not:
Purge reportbug
Make sure you have rem
On 11/7/2016 8:27 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:18:28AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
Evidently not a solution. Added myself to both "disk" and "root"
groups.
Had no effect when attempting to run either lsblk or parted.
Is there a reason you can't use sudo?
Not a matter
On 11/7/2016 8:19 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:37:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 11/7/2016 6:20 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
*HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
Suggestio
Mark,
thank you for your reply!
> Random thought -- if ehci_pci is already loaded for some other device
> early in the boot process, in a way that doesn't require the ehci_hcd
> module, and then udev detects the keyboard and mouse, determines it
> needs ehci_pci... and concludes all is well becau
Felipe Salvador writes:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:37:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> On 11/7/2016 6:20 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> > > *HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
>> > > Suggestio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:48:29AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/7/2016 7:57 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:12:00AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
> I doubt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:35:32AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 03:27:12PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > Two things:
[...]
> I started writing that in my previous message, but then I actually
> tested it on my own system
On 11/7/2016 7:57 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:12:00AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
Debian is trying to protect you from someone taking over your...
say Apache [...]
My Debian machines do not physically have netwo
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 03:27:12PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> Two things:
> - check that your disk devices are actually readable (and probably
>writable, I botched that, cf. David's mail) by group disk
> - your being added to disk is effective *after* logging in after
>you'd made th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:27:11AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:18:28AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > Evidently not a solution. Added myself to both "disk" and "root"
> > groups.
> > Had no effect when attempting to run
On 7 November 2016 at 15:52, David Wright wrote:
>
> Did you encode it in Base64, or is what you type it into
> doing this on your behalf?
>
Just typed the password, as always. Meaning unencoded.
This is another part that maybe I haven't cleared out.
I never had an MTA setup, I always had the po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:18:28AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/7/2016 7:25 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >On 11/7/2016 6:47 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >>Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:18:28AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Evidently not a solution. Added myself to both "disk" and "root"
> groups.
> Had no effect when attempting to run either lsblk or parted.
Is there a reason you can't use sudo?
Sample output on my system at work:
$ lsblk -f
NAME
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:37:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/7/2016 6:20 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > *HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
> > > Suggestions?
> > > TIA
> >
> > lsblk -fr
On 11/7/2016 7:25 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 11/7/2016 6:47 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
whether mounted or not.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:02:30AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 13:47:27 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > I need to identify file system on all partitions o
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 13:47:27 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
> > whether mounted or not.
> > parted /dev/sda print | grep ext | grep -v exte
> > reports the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:25:33AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
> >>*HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
> >>Suggestions?
[...]
> >So you'd have to be associated to the "disk" group to read those
> >things and yo
On Monday, November 07, 2016 07:11:50 AM Richard Owlett wrote:
> I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
> whether mounted or not.
> parted /dev/sda print | grep ext | grep -v exte
> reports the desired information [partitions formatted ext?] in a
> convenient format.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:12:00AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
> >Debian is trying to protect you from someone taking over your...
> >say Apache [...]
>
> My Debian machines do not physically have networking capability.
> See my email hearder
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 14:46:01 (+0200), Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> On 7 November 2016 at 00:51, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 03:44:49PM +, Brian wrote:
> >>
> >> I'd agree with that (it can be tested if needs be). In his reportbug
> >> preferences file Sophoklis Goumas has
>
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 07:59:25 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 10:42:46AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > The current working directory is included here three times???at the
> > beginning, middle and end.
> >
> > :/usr/bin::/bin:.
>
> Including the current directory in one'
On 11/7/2016 6:47 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
whether mounted or not.
parted /dev/sda print | grep ext | grep -v e
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 03:01:14PM -0700, Dan Hitt wrote:
> Does anybody know of a piece of software that you can give an URL to,
> and it will then fetch the url and email the contents to you?
#!/bin/sh
# Usage: scriptname URL recipient [...]
url=$1
shift
lynx -dump "$url" | mail -s "Web page: $u
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:25:02PM +, david...@freevolt.org wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Brian wrote:
> >Wheezy is an unsupported distribution, just like hamm, etch, potato etc.
> >Irrespective of whether it was thought to be wonderful in its day it is
> >now moribund apart from LTS.
>
> We se
On 11/7/2016 6:51 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:37:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 11/7/2016 6:20 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
*HOWEVER* parted requires ro
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 10:42:46AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> The current working directory is included here three times???at the
> beginning, middle and end.
>
> :/usr/bin::/bin:.
Including the current directory in one's PATH (either by using "."
explicitly, or by using an empty string) is con
On 6 November 2016 at 17:48, Henning Follmann wrote:
>
> You are submitting directly to googles MTA.
> You have to figure out, how google expects you to authenticate.
>
This is exactly the purpose of this thread, let's investigate of a way that one:
- could sent directly to Google's MTA but
- wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:37:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/7/2016 6:20 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >>*HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
> >
On 6 November 2016 at 17:07, Brad Rogers wrote:
> ...
>
> It's google being google. It's their servers, their rules. Like I said,
> it is possible to configure a google account to allow connections to
> non-google software, but where to find the right box to (un)tick, I have
> no idea.
>
http:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
> whether mounted or not.
> parted /dev/sda print | grep ext | grep -v exte
> reports the desired information [parti
On 7 November 2016 at 00:51, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 03:44:49PM +, Brian wrote:
>>
>> I'd agree with that (it can be tested if needs be). In his reportbug
>> preferences file Sophoklis Goumas has
>>
>> smtphost "smtp.gmail.com:587"
>> smtpuser "olspookishma...@gmail.co
On 11/7/2016 6:20 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
*HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
Suggestions?
TIA
lsblk -fr ?
Debian is perverse ;{
man page suggested good things.
However when run as other than r
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
whether mounted or not.
parted /dev/sda print | grep ext | grep -v exte
reports the desired information [partitions formatted ext?] in a
convenient format.
*HOWE
Op 07-11-16 om 13:11 schreef Richard Owlett:
I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
whether mounted or not.
parted /dev/sda print | grep ext | grep -v exte
reports the desired information [partitions formatted ext?] in a
convenient format.
*HOWEVER* parted requires
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> *HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
> Suggestions?
> TIA
lsblk -fr ?
--
Felipe Salvador
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 03:01:14PM -0700, Dan Hitt wrote:
Does anybody know of a piece of software that you can give an URL to,
and it will then fetch the url and email the contents to you?
This sounds like you want a www4mail server.
www4mail servers are (were? I'm not sure if any still exist
I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
whether mounted or not.
parted /dev/sda print | grep ext | grep -v exte
reports the desired information [partitions formatted ext?] in a
convenient format.
*HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
Su
This was originally posted to debian-devel-announce minutes ago. I'm
forwarding it to debian-user in order to reach out to users who also
contribute to Debian (e.g., with bug reports), but do not follow more
developer-oriented Debian mailing lists.
Cheers.
- Forwarded message from Stefano Zac
steve wrote on 11/06/16 20:47:
> Le 06-11-2016, à 10:43:58 +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz a écrit :
>
>> What is the output of
>>
>> aptitude -F "%p" '~o'
>
> gives an error (unknown command « ~o »)
>
Sorry, this should be
aptitude -F "%p" search '~o'
>> ? Seems to me, there are packages installed
63 matches
Mail list logo
