On 2019-08-18 08:10 +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Judah Richardson wrote:
>
>> In FreeBSD and derived OSes, you can use @n, where n is a number, to
>> indicate that a task should be started n seconds after its previous
>> invocation completed.
>
>> I couldn't find anything like that in the Debian c
On 8/17/2019 8:15 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 13 Aug 2019 at 20:07:49 +0200, john doe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> While upgrading the dbus deamon, I get the following:
>>
>> "A reboot is required to replace the running dbus-daemon.
>> Please reboot the system when convenient."
>>
>>
>> I have no plan to re
On Sun 18 Aug 2019 at 12:17:59 +0200, john doe wrote:
> On 8/17/2019 8:15 PM, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 13 Aug 2019 at 20:07:49 +0200, john doe wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> While upgrading the dbus deamon, I get the following:
> >>
> >> "A reboot is required to replace the running dbus-daemon.
> >>
On 8/18/2019 3:19 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 18 Aug 2019 at 12:17:59 +0200, john doe wrote:
>
>> On 8/17/2019 8:15 PM, Brian wrote:
>>> On Tue 13 Aug 2019 at 20:07:49 +0200, john doe wrote:
>>>
Hi,
While upgrading the dbus deamon, I get the following:
"A reboot is required t
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 04:56:34PM +0200, john doe wrote:
> On 8/18/2019 3:19 PM, Brian wrote:
> > On Sun 18 Aug 2019 at 12:17:59 +0200, john doe wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/17/2019 8:15 PM, Brian wrote:
> >>> On Tue 13 Aug 2019 at 20:07:49 +0200, john doe wrote:
> >>>
> Hi,
>
> While upgra
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be happy
with the popup of unwanted ads which cannot be blocked permanently: and the last thing makes me suspicious. please, if it is possible, an
expert op
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
> DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
> happy with the popup of unwanted ads which cannot be blocked
> permanently: and the last thing m
Hello today, I've got an Ideapad and after I suspend I cannot get the
audio to work when the system resumes.
lspci -v returns the following for the audio section:
00:0e.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Device 3198 (rev 03)
Subsystem: Lenovo Device 3807
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0,
On 18-08-19 19:16, nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
happy with the popup of unwanted ads which cannot be blocked
perman
On 08/18/2019 01:34 PM, steef wrote:
On 18-08-19 19:16, nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
happy with the popup of unwan
On 18-08-19 21:20, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/18/2019 01:34 PM, steef wrote:
On 18-08-19 19:16, nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', other
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 01:16:59 PM nektarios wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
>
> steef wrote:
> > hi folks,
> >
> > last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
> > DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
> > happy with the popup of
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:20:08 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I personally find that JavaScript and cookies rarely provide *ME* any
> functionality of interest. I surf with both disabled. I don't
> experience problems I see often reported. YMMV
It does vary indeed. It seems to me that hardly
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:35:53PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:20:08 -0500
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>
>
> >
> > I personally find that JavaScript and cookies rarely provide *ME* any
> > functionality of interest. I surf with both disabled. I don't
> > experience problems I see o
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:02:57PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:24:49 +
> > loredana wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > secure applications, this is likely not to be a viable solution (it
> > > seems that google is going to forbit l
On 18-08-19 22:04, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 01:16:59 PM nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
h
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200
> wrote:
[...]
> > > less secure apps" option, and then configure POP3 / SMTP normally.
> >
> >
> > Google's evil comes through the backdoor, without making any noise,
> > like Wormt
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:06:57 -0400
John Kerr Anderson wrote:
> Hello today, I've got an Ideapad and after I suspend I cannot get the
> audio to work when the system resumes.
>
> lspci -v returns the following for the audio section:
>
> 00:0e.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Device 3198 (rev 0
Here is the output when it is working:
aplay -l
List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 0: ALC269VC Analog [ALC269VC Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 3: HDMI 0 [HDMI 0]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:35:53PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:20:08 -0500
> > Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I personally find that JavaScript and cookies rarely provide *ME* any
> > > functionality of interest. I surf
On 19/08/2019 08:52, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
This is actually for me a filter criterion: if a site doesn't work
with javascript, chances are high that I avoid it. I do make some
exceptions, but very few.
I use NoScript to enable JavaScript only where I want it.
Kind regards,
--
Ben Caradoc-Da
On 8/18/19 5:16 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> I use NoScript to enable JavaScript only where I want it.
Yeah. And Firefox has a checkbox in the prefs to block pop-ups. I rarely
see a pop-up any more.
I have a hard time believing DDG is what's doing your pop-ups. It'd
destroy their reputation.
I am allergic to ads.
So I use an adblocker, ublock origin.
I have squid and privoxy proxy's running.
Have a local searx as search engine.
99.% of the visited sites are without ads, no tracking.
Hope this helps.
> Question: is this due to a belief that such sites are (at least for
> your
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200
> > wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > less secure apps" option, and then configure POP3 / SMTP normally.
> > >
> > >
> > > Google's evil come
Thanks all, I wound up just using @monthly instead.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 4:56 AM Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2019-08-18 08:10 +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
>
> > Judah Richardson wrote:
> >
> >> In FreeBSD and derived OSes, you can use @n, where n is a number, to
> >> indicate that a task should be
On Debian Buster, I have a shared folder that lives on a btrfs raid1 array.
It's located at
/mnt/ToshibaL200BtrfsRAID1/@/Backup/luckyBackup/HPProBook4530s
I would like to ensure that my samba user and mine alone has read/write
access to that folder.
I cloned the permissions from my home folder to
Solution here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/debian/comments/csc3vt/buster_i_can_access_smb_share_from_windows_10/exe050g/
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 11:07 PM Judah Richardson
wrote:
> On Debian Buster, I have a shared folder that lives on a btrfs raid1
> array. It's located at
> /mnt/ToshibaL200BtrfsRA
27 matches
Mail list logo
