On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 9:30 PM Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> You don't want a bond, you want a bridge.
>
> Bonding takes two interfaces that talk to the same switch on the
> other side, and makes them into one bond nic. You need support
> on the switch, too, which is unlikely in a D-Link 8-port unless
>
Hi! All:
For my Homebuilt NAS [specs below], I've decided on a very small 32GB
SanDisk flash drive for the system drive to keep the 6 available SATA
II connectors free for storage drives. But I'm concerned about writes
wearing out the flash drive too soon. I don't know if it has wear
leveling
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 20:10:50 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, August 21, 2020 04:11:19 PM Matthew Graybosch wrote:
> > I don't disagree, but how likely is it that local10's intended
> > recipient will...
> >
> > 1. Have GnuPG installed on their Windows machine?
> > 2. Know how to use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 22/8/20 3:46 am, local10 wrote:
> What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux
> and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able
> decrypt and read them?
>
> Any ideas? Thanks
Lots of
On Friday, August 21, 2020 04:11:19 PM Matthew Graybosch wrote:
> I don't disagree, but how likely is it that local10's intended
> recipient will...
>
> 1. Have GnuPG installed on their Windows machine?
> 2. Know how to use it to decrypt files using local10's public key?
Shouldn't this be just
Hello dear Debian users!
I'm a long time lurker of this newsletter, and a Debian user for about four
years now (on multiple machines). This is my very first post on this legendary
mailing list, so please, be forgiving. :)
For a couple of last months I've been planning to upgrade my old GTX 660Ti
Teemu Likonen writes:
* 2020-08-21 20:24:29+02, Linux-Fan wrote:
> GPG should also run on Windows, but is a little harder to use IMHO.
GnuPG it is pretty hard everywhere. Your recent signatures are reported
as "bad" (at least by Notmuch and Mutt). The signed data (message)
doesn't match with
* 2020-08-21 20:24:29+02, Linux-Fan wrote:
> GPG should also run on Windows, but is a little harder to use IMHO.
GnuPG it is pretty hard everywhere. Your recent signatures are reported
as "bad" (at least by Notmuch and Mutt). The signed data (message)
doesn't match with the signature.
About
Am Freitag, 21. August 2020, 22:24:48 CEST schrieb Hans:
Additional info:
Just see here
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19943903/build-windows-7z-self-extracting-installer-on-linux-server-how-to-change-exe-ic[1]
Good luck!
Hans
> Am Freitag, 21. August 2020, 19:46:13 CEST schrieb
Am Freitag, 21. August 2020, 19:46:13 CEST schrieb local10:
Don't know, how stupid the user is. Try to use a selfexttracting form, like
blapacked.exe. I suppose, to make a double click on this file, he will most
likely be able to manage.
Installing software, huh, much too hard for most windows
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 21:59:15 +0200
wrote:
> If you are somewhat serious about security, you better don't use this:
>
> "ZIP supports a simple password-based symmetric encryption
>system generally known as ZipCrypto. It is documented in
>the ZIP specification, and known to be seriously
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 02:42:23PM -0400, Matthew Graybosch wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 19:46:13 +0200 (CEST)
> local10 wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on
> > Linux and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she
> > would
john doe writes:
On 8/21/2020 9:11 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 2020-08-21 11:24, Linux-Fan wrote:
[...]
Encrypt on Linux:
$ 7z a -ptestwort -mhe=on secret.7z secret.txt
Decrypt on Windows: Double-Click or use commandline:
% 7z x -o. secret.7z
So, the recipient must install 7-Zip on
On 2020-08-21 12:10, Teemu Likonen wrote:
I forgot to say that the file names are not encrypted in Zip archives.
They can be seen without password. To protect against that use Zip
twice: the inner layer is unencrypted archive for all the files and
outer layer encrypts the inner Zip file.
On 8/21/2020 9:11 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 2020-08-21 11:24, Linux-Fan wrote:
local10 writes:
Hi,
What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on
Linux
and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able
decrypt and read them?
Any ideas?
On 2020-08-21 11:24, Linux-Fan wrote:
local10 writes:
Hi,
What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on
Linux
and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able
decrypt and read them?
Any ideas? Thanks
Consider 7-Zip from Debian package
* 2020-08-21 22:00:45+03, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> If your security is just about confidentiality (other's can't have the
> content) and you don't have really serious hackers targeting you then
> probably encrypted Zip archives are good enough. Obviously a good enough
> password is needed and
On 2020-08-21 10:46, local10 wrote:
Hi,
What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux and
then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able decrypt
and read them?
Any ideas? Thanks
I maintain a working Windows installation for use-cases like
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 13:31:00 -0500
Paul Johnson wrote:
> GnuPG. It's in Debian, there's Windows versions on its website, and
> it's not some mystery box like Signal.
++
It also has the advantage that the cryptext will stay encrypted on any
intermediate servers. WhatsApp and Signal claim their
On 8/21/2020 9:00 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 08:51:44PM +0200, john doe wrote:
Okay, it uses the same syntax as for a subshell '$()'.
No, one of them is $'' and the other is $(). They have nothing in common.
One of them is a form of quoting. It acts just like ''
* 2020-08-21 19:46:13+02, local wrote:
> What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on
> Linux and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would
> be able decrypt and read them?
If your security is just about confidentiality (other's can't have the
content)
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 08:51:44PM +0200, john doe wrote:
> Okay, it uses the same syntax as for a subshell '$()'.
No, one of them is $'' and the other is $(). They have nothing in common.
One of them is a form of quoting. It acts just like '' except that it
performs various backslash
On 8/21/2020 8:37 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 02:35:35PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
No. Use $'...' instead of '...'.
sed '/line1/{N;N;a line-to-add\n}' input-file
Crap. Of course I meant to write
sed $'/line1/{N;N;a line-to-add\n}' input-file
Okay, it uses the
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 19:46:13 +0200 (CEST)
local10 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on
> Linux and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she
> would be able decrypt and read them?
The "zip" command has an "--encrypt" option. As long
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 02:35:35PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> No. Use $'...' instead of '...'.
>
> sed '/line1/{N;N;a line-to-add\n}' input-file
Crap. Of course I meant to write
sed $'/line1/{N;N;a line-to-add\n}' input-file
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 08:09:26PM +0200, john doe wrote:
> On 8/21/2020 7:51 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > If you're doing this from bash, you could use bash's special $'...'
> > quoting to pass a newline encoded as \n .
>
> So something like the following:
>
> $ sed '/line1/{N;N;a
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:46 PM local10 wrote:
> What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux
> and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able
> decrypt and read them?
>
GnuPG. It's in Debian, there's Windows versions on its website, and
local10 writes:
Hi,
What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux
and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able
decrypt and read them?
Any ideas? Thanks
Consider 7-Zip from Debian package p7zip-full and available for Windows
syswtems:
On 8/21/2020 7:46 PM, local10 wrote:
Hi,
What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux and
then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able decrypt
and read them?
Any ideas? Thanks
Veracrypt could be one option.
--
John Doe
On 8/21/2020 7:51 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 07:49:07PM +0200, john doe wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to use the command provided at (1):
$ sed '/pattern{N;N;a try\d10}' input-file
sed: -e expression #1, char 0: unmatched `{'
Are you missing a second / character after
On 21/08/2020 18:46, local10 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux
> and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able
> decrypt and read them?
Signal (signal.org)
Signal is an instant messaging application. It uses a
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 07:49:07PM +0200, john doe wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to use the command provided at (1):
>
> $ sed '/pattern{N;N;a try\d10}' input-file
> sed: -e expression #1, char 0: unmatched `{'
Are you missing a second / character after the pattern?
Why are you
Hello all,
I'm trying to use the command provided at (1):
$ sed '/pattern{N;N;a try\d10}' input-file
sed: -e expression #1, char 0: unmatched `{'
As I understanded, I should make a newline before the right brace.
I thought that '\d10' should do it but as shown above it does not.
What am I
Hi,
What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux and
then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able decrypt
and read them?
Any ideas? Thanks
Dan Ritter wrote:
> You don't want a bond, you want a bridge.
>
> Bonding takes two interfaces that talk to the same switch on the
> other side, and makes them into one bond nic. You need support
> on the switch, too, which is unlikely in a D-Link 8-port unless
> it has a management interface --
Hi,
Semih Ozlem wrote:
> However I do not know how to install new programs in knoppix
> (still there is apt-get install as a command, but debian packages
> no longer seem to work, and I do not know which packages work with
> knoppix system, [...]
Hi Thomas,
Thank you for your email and recommendation. It seems that knoppix uses
less ram. However I do not know how to install new programs in knoppix
(still there is apt-get install as a command, but debian packages no longer
seem to work, and I do not know which packages work with knoppix
Jaikumar Sharma wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm using Debian 10 (point release 5) and i've set up the bonding for
> eth0 and eth1 in 'active-backup' mode, i'm using virtualbox VM for
> testing it, if i disconnect cable (virtually from first ethernet -
> eth0) ping to bond0 IP stops and if i
Hi folks,
I'm using Debian 10 (point release 5) and i've set up the bonding for
eth0 and eth1 in 'active-backup' mode, i'm using virtualbox VM for
testing it, if i disconnect cable (virtually from first ethernet -
eth0) ping to bond0 IP stops and if i disconnect it from eth1 and
reconnect on eth0
On 8/21/2020 3:33 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
john doe wrote:
I just installed apache2 on Debian Buster.
I'm trying to use SSI in an html page:
$ cat try.shtml
This file last modified
When accessing the page through my web browser, I only get 'This file
last modified' without the date
john doe wrote:
> I just installed apache2 on Debian Buster.
> I'm trying to use SSI in an html page:
> $ cat try.shtml
>
> This file last modified
> When accessing the page through my web browser, I only get 'This file
> last modified' without the date being displayed.
> the command
On 2020-08-21 at 08:39, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> using this silly batch code I got (what I believe to be) all errosr
> reported by dmesg:
Wow. That's some dense, opaque code.
> and they look like:
> ~
> [ 38.468249] [ cut here ]
> [ 38.468287] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID:
Hi,
I just installed apache2 on Debian Buster.
I'm trying to use SSI in an html page:
$ cat try.shtml
This file last modified
When accessing the page through my web browser, I only get 'This file
last modified' without the date being displayed.
the command 'a2enmod mime' tells me that
something I haven't still been able to do is reset the clock of the
mac book air 1,1 on which I installed Debian Linux.
If I go:
1) type your root password on a RAM based text
K -> Computer -> System Settings -> Personalization -> Regional
Settings -> Date et Time
2) enter password
3)
using this silly batch code I got (what I believe to be) all errosr
reported by dmesg:
_OFL_PRFX=dmesg_$(whoami)_$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S);
_OFL="${_OFL_PRFX}.log"; time(dmesg > "${_OFL}") 2>> "${_OFL}"
ls -l ${_OFL}
wc -l ${_OFL}
_OFL2="${_OFL_PRFX}_2check.log";
Hi,
Semih Ozlem wrote:
> I used "dd if=isofilename of=devicename"
So the partition table afterwards is the one which came with the ISO.
MBR based, but accompanied by an invalid GPT.
Further, this implies that your Live system is only running on RAM
and not using a writable system disk.
Also if one creates a partition on some device, say /dev/sda becomes
/dev/sda1 /dev/sda2 /dev/sda3 after partitioning (which can be done with
gnome disk utility, or gparted, or from the command line, and I forget the
exact commands now probably "parted mkpart") then "dd if=isofilename.iso
I used "dd if=isofilename of=devicename" and when using this command I use
a blank usb or one with a partition, and device name gets filled with the
partition that will be overwritten if anything was previously on it.
Thomas Schmitt , 21 Ağu 2020 Cum, 14:14 tarihinde şunu
yazdı:
> Hi,
>
> Semih
Hi,
Semih Ozlem wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
(You need to reply to the list, not to my mail address directly.)
> the computer has 4gb RAM
This should suffice for a RAM based session.
But if you add large software packages, then 4 GB for everything will at
some point not be enough.
>
On 2020-08-21 02:35, Semih Ozlem wrote:
Hi,
When I try installing some programs while running debian live from a usb, I
get a message saying that there is no space left on device.
I presume this means that the space allocated on the usb for debian is not
enough to install the program in
Hi Brian,
It helps partially, but I think (I have not yet tried it in a particular
case) the problem is not in var/cache/apt/archives ... Even if the
necessary packages are stored someplace else, if the system you are running
is low on space, then the system won't be able to complete the
Hi,
Semih Ozlem wrote:
> When I try installing some programs while running debian live from a usb, I
> get a message saying that there is no space left on device.
> I presume this means that the space allocated on the usb for debian is not
> enough to install the program in question.
More people
On Fri 21 Aug 2020 at 12:35:02 +0300, Semih Ozlem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I try installing some programs while running debian live from a usb, I
> get a message saying that there is no space left on device.
> I presume this means that the space allocated on the usb for debian is not
> enough to
On 2020-08-20 14:58, Andy Smith wrote:
... dm-integrity can now be used with LUKS (with or
without encryption) to add checksums that force a read error when
they don't match. When there is redundancy (e.g. LVM or MD) a read
can then come from a good copy and the bad copy will be repaired.
So,
Hi,
When I try installing some programs while running debian live from a usb, I
get a message saying that there is no space left on device.
I presume this means that the space allocated on the usb for debian is not
enough to install the program in question.
I am wondering if there is a way to
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 01:34:58PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> On 2020-08-20 08:32, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> >On Thursday, August 20, 2020 03:43:55 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >>Contraty to the other (very valid) points, my backups are always on
> >>a LUKS drive, no partition table.
On 2020-08-20 14:30, Dan Ritter wrote:
> David Christensen wrote:
>> On 2020-08-20 08:32, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I have been pondering bit-rot mitigation on non-checksumming
filesystems.
>>
>>
>> Some people have mentioned md RAID. tomas has mentioned LUKS. I
believe
>> both of them
Am 21.08.20 um 06:52 schrieb Georgi Naplatanov:
> On 8/20/20 4:53 PM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know I have a problem with ipv6 on one machine where ipv6 is enabled but
>> cannot reach outside the local network and ipv4 has a proper working network
>> connection to the outside
58 matches
Mail list logo
