On 2021-09-10 20:51, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2021-09-10 18:32, jeremy ardley wrote:
On 11/09/2021 6:26 am, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 11/9/21 5:39 am, Gary Dale wrote:
Does anyone have Thunderbird and Yahoo working together?
I have it running on thunderbird. Both imap and smtp use ssl/tls and
On 2021-09-10 20:51, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2021-09-10 18:32, jeremy ardley wrote:
On 11/09/2021 6:26 am, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 11/9/21 5:39 am, Gary Dale wrote:
Does anyone have Thunderbird and Yahoo working together?
I have it running on thunderbird. Both imap and smtp use ssl/tls and
On 2021-09-10 18:11, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
On 11.09.2021 02:39, Gary Dale wrote:
I've got a Yahoo mail account (among others) that I use for a
particular purpose. However it's been a while since I've been able to
send e-mail from it using Yahoo's smtp servers. Instead I've been
sending
On 2021-09-10 18:26, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 11/9/21 5:39 am, Gary Dale wrote:
I've got a Yahoo mail account (among others) that I use for a
particular purpose. However it's been a while since I've been able to
send e-mail from it using Yahoo's smtp servers. Instead I've been
sending e-mail v
On 2021-09-10 18:32, jeremy ardley wrote:
On 11/09/2021 6:26 am, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 11/9/21 5:39 am, Gary Dale wrote:
Does anyone have Thunderbird and Yahoo working together?
I have it running on thunderbird. Both imap and smtp use ssl/tls and
oauth2
smtp uses port 465 while ima
On 11/9/21 9:48 am, piorunz wrote:
Offtopic:
You sure you want to use Yahoo knowing what are they capable of, or,
what they are not capable of doing, where they should?
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/yahoo-admits-staff-knew-state-sponsored-hack-2014-1590924
https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/yahoo
Offtopic:
You sure you want to use Yahoo knowing what are they capable of, or,
what they are not capable of doing, where they should?
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/yahoo-admits-staff-knew-state-sponsored-hack-2014-1590924
https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/yahoo-breach-one-billion-state-government-act
I've got a Yahoo mail account (among others) that I use for a particular
purpose. However it's been a while since I've been able to send e-mail
from it using Yahoo's smtp servers. Instead I've been sending e-mail via
another smtp server so the "From" address doesn't match the login
domain. Gmai
On 11/09/2021 01:25, Steve Dondley wrote:
This may happen in a timely manner, or it may not. Your best bet at
this point is to wait a few days and see what happens. If nobody
fixes it up before then, you might consider replying to the bug and
supplying an actual description of the bug.
OK,
On 11/9/21 8:51 am, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2021-09-10 18:32, jeremy ardley wrote:
On 11/09/2021 6:26 am, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 11/9/21 5:39 am, Gary Dale wrote:
Does anyone have Thunderbird and Yahoo working together?
I have it running on thunderbird. Both imap and smtp use ssl/tls and
This may happen in a timely manner, or it may not. Your best bet at
this point is to wait a few days and see what happens. If nobody
fixes it up before then, you might consider replying to the bug and
supplying an actual description of the bug.
OK, sounds like a plan. I see in the link I pr
On 2021-09-10 08:15 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 08:10:41PM -0400, Steve Dondley wrote:
> Can I just leave this as is? Or can/should I correct it somehow?
Ok, while I was writing that last email, I got another confirmation:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 08:10:41PM -0400, Steve Dondley wrote:
>
> > Can I just leave this as is? Or can/should I correct it somehow?
>
> Ok, while I was writing that last email, I got another confirmation:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994068
>
> So I'm probably good?
Can I just leave this as is? Or can/should I correct it somehow?
Ok, while I was writing that last email, I got another confirmation:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994068
So I'm probably good?
I used reportbug for the first time. The experience was a little
confusing.
It appears to have gone through because I got an confirmation email:
Email subject:
1.4.11+dfsg.1-4: Please see issue at github:
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/issues/8198
Email body:
On 11/09/2021 6:26 am, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
On 11/9/21 5:39 am, Gary Dale wrote:
Does anyone have Thunderbird and Yahoo working together?
I have it running on thunderbird. Both imap and smtp use ssl/tls and
oauth2
smtp uses port 465 while imap uses port 993
I have some memory gettin
On 11/9/21 5:39 am, Gary Dale wrote:
I've got a Yahoo mail account (among others) that I use for a
particular purpose. However it's been a while since I've been able to
send e-mail from it using Yahoo's smtp servers. Instead I've been
sending e-mail via another smtp server so the "From" addres
On 11.09.2021 02:39, Gary Dale wrote:
I've got a Yahoo mail account (among others) that I use for a
particular purpose. However it's been a while since I've been able to
send e-mail from it using Yahoo's smtp servers. Instead I've been
sending e-mail via another smtp server so the "From" addres
On Friday, September 10, 2021 02:52:42 PM Dan Ritter wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > If you make a telephone call on speaker, and you have a tape recorder
> > in the room recording the conversation, the speaker at the other end
> > of the call doesn't need to have permission for their words to be
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 03:01:59PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, September 10, 2021 05:20:46 AM Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> > writes:
> > > (I'm just asking, because I've seen this complaint a couple
> > > of times for a well-formed multipart message: personally, I'd
> > > be OK with it
On 9/9/21 11:52 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 11:14 AM David Christensen
wrote:
On 9/8/21 11:07 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
Installing Debian 11 with netinst CD on a server with hardware raid.
Installer has no custom format parameters option for ext4, like stride
and st
On Friday, September 10, 2021 08:45:19 AM Joe wrote:
> Sadly, much html comes of of MS software, and takes about ten pages of
> markup to include three text lines.
That may be (or may be a slight exxageration ;-), but in my email client, if I
get a multipart message, the plain text part is displa
On Friday, September 10, 2021 05:20:46 AM Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> writes:
> > (I'm just asking, because I've seen this complaint a couple
> > of times for a well-formed multipart message: personally, I'd
> > be OK with it, but I'd like to know how the consensus is).
>
> I feel that it is okay now
David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 10 Sep 2021 at 16:05:26 (+0100), Adam Weremczuk wrote:
>
> > Would it be possible for another host to log to syslog without a prior
> > explicit manual configuration allowing that?
>
> If you make a telephone call on speaker, and you have a tape recorder
> in the roo
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 04:32:32AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
Russell L. Harris wrote:
On xfce terminal in Debian 11 I need a separate tab for each
instance of the terminal.
I would like you to read
https://docs.xfce.org/apps/xfce4-terminal/command-line in the section
called "Window or Tab Se
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 06:10:59PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> On 10/09/2021 17:46, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > Depends on which syslog daemon implementation you're using, I think.
>
> My environment: Linux deb10 5.4.44-1-pve #1 SMP PVE 5.4.44-1 (Fri, 12 Jun
> 2020 08:18:46 +0200) x86_64 GNU/Li
On 10/09/2021 17:46, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Depends on which syslog daemon implementation you're using, I think.
My environment: Linux deb10 5.4.44-1-pve #1 SMP PVE 5.4.44-1 (Fri, 12
Jun 2020 08:18:46 +0200) x86_64 GNU/Linux
Pretty minimalistic set up.
Rsyslog 8.1901.0-1 out of the box, no c
On 10/09/2021 17:51, David Wright wrote:
When you commence your call, both you and the person at the other end
probably exchange some pleasantries, which confirm that you're both
who you say you are. These all get recorded too.
Ssh is no different.
Are you saying these entries could belong to a
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 01:17:39PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> It's not clear which syslogd the OP is using. It's not even clear to me
> what *operating system* they're using, since their systemctl status output
> has at least one line that mine (bullseye) does not have.
I just checked on a bus
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:51:07AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 10 Sep 2021 at 16:05:26 (+0100), Adam Weremczuk wrote:
>
> > Would it be possible for another host to log to syslog without a prior
> > explicit manual configuration allowing that?
>
> If you make a telephone call on speaker,
On Fri 10 Sep 2021 at 16:05:26 (+0100), Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> Would it be possible for another host to log to syslog without a prior
> explicit manual configuration allowing that?
If you make a telephone call on speaker, and you have a tape recorder
in the room recording the conversation, the s
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 04:05:26PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> Would it be possible for another host to log to syslog without a prior
> explicit manual configuration allowing that?
Depends on which syslog daemon implementation you're using, I think.
On 10/09/2021 13:11, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Not matching what's in the file:
awk 'NR==25' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
awk 'NR==28' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
awk 'NR==29' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
# Lifetime and size of ephemeral version 1 server key
OK, so "it" is in fact "The warnings in syslog contain line n
On 2021-09-10, Charles Curley wrote:
> (I also think that if one must use colors, emphasis, etc. as part of
> one's writing, then one is not a very good writer. On the other
> tentacle, one should not expect good writing from nerds.)
>
I think there was at least one book--or article or series of
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:17:29 +0200
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 07:32:28AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > The absolute worst thing you can do is send HTML (with or without
> > text) and then act all arrogant and haughty [...]
>
> Agreed. Arrogant and haughty is almost always wrong :-D
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 07:32:28AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 08:41:02AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > The original mail was a passable MIME multipart/alternative
> > with a plain text part. I /think/ that is OK, what do others
> > think?
>
> See below.
>
> On Fri,
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 02:16:31PM +0300, IL Ka wrote:
> >
> >
> > Moreover, the included things are files, and by convention they
> > have a suffix ".h", for "header". I'd expect the above to look
> > rather like
> >
> > #include
[...]
> This is true for C, but not for C++.
>
> With C++ head
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:41:55AM +0200, Linux-Fan wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de writes:
[...]
> Additionally, in this C++ question thread, the source code was given
> in HTML and text parts of the e-mail and while the `#include`
> statements were all on separate lines in the HTML, they appear as
>
On Fri 10 Sep 2021 at 08:11:02 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 10:33:47AM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> > Weeks later it happened again and I'm not any less puzzled:
>
> All right, now we're getting somewhere.
>
> Is it possible that these lines are being remotely syslog
Thomas,
thanks for these links. I guess the two mailing lists will be the ones
to go for.
Best regards
Bernd
Andy,
thanks for the suggestions.
I had tried the GParted image before. In fact, using their image first
brought up the boot error in my case and the GParted developers pointed
me to debian, as this is their underlying system.
I have now also tried to boot with "secure boot option" enabled, but
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021, 1:31 AM Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:28 AM IL Ka wrote:
> >>
> ...
>
> >
> > With full DVD installer in "Advanced Options -> Expert install" after
> "Load installer components" you can open the second console (ALT+F2) and
> run ``mkfs`` manually with
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 06:15:12 -0600
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 08:41:02 +0200
> wrote:
>
> > (I'm just asking, because I've seen this complaint a couple
> > of times for a well-formed multipart message: personally, I'd
> > be OK with it, but I'd like to know how the consensus is
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 08:41:02 +0200
wrote:
> (I'm just asking, because I've seen this complaint a couple
> of times for a well-formed multipart message: personally, I'd
> be OK with it, but I'd like to know how the consensus is).
I think it has problems. One case is where the author composes in H
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 10:33:47AM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> Weeks later it happened again and I'm not any less puzzled:
What's "it"?
> /var/log/syslog
>
> Aug 28 10:12:30 deb10 sshd[145]: /etc/ssh/sshd_config line 25: Deprecated
> option UsePrivilegeSeparation
Fine, just comment out the o
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 08:41:02AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> The original mail was a passable MIME multipart/alternative
> with a plain text part. I /think/ that is OK, what do others
> think?
See below.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 08:25:05AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 20
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:50:46 +0530
Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> writes:
>
> > (I'm just asking, because I've seen this complaint a couple
> > of times for a well-formed multipart message: personally, I'd
> > be OK with it, but I'd like to know how the consensus is).
>
> I feel that it is okay now
>
>
> Moreover, the included things are files, and by convention they
> have a suffix ".h", for "header". I'd expect the above to look
> rather like
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
This is true for C, but not for C++.
With C++ headers could
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 08:41:02AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
The original mail was a passable MIME multipart/alternative
with a plain text part. I /think/ that is OK, what do others
think?
I think that's perfectly reasonable. There /can/ be good reasons
for people to include a HTML part, i
Hi all,
Weeks later it happened again and I'm not any less puzzled:
/var/log/syslog
Aug 28 10:12:30 deb10 sshd[145]: /etc/ssh/sshd_config line 25:
Deprecated option UsePrivilegeSeparation
Aug 28 10:12:30 deb10 sshd[145]: /etc/ssh/sshd_config line 28:
Deprecated option KeyRegenerationInterval
to...@tuxteam.de writes:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 07:45:43PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
[...]
> First, most folks on tech mailinglists despise HTML email.
The original mail was a passable MIME multipart/alternative
with a plain text part. I /think/ that is OK, what do others
think?
Postel's
writes:
> (I'm just asking, because I've seen this complaint a couple
> of times for a well-formed multipart message: personally, I'd
> be OK with it, but I'd like to know how the consensus is).
I feel that it is okay now to send we formatted multipart messages. As
long as I am getting text part
Russell L. Harris wrote:
> On xfce terminal in Debian 11 I need a separate tab for each instance
> of the terminal.
I would like you to read
https://docs.xfce.org/apps/xfce4-terminal/command-line
in the section called "Window or Tab Separators", and
then ask a question.
-dsr-
On xfce terminal in Debian 11 I need a separate tab for each instance
of the terminal.
--
How should one chase a thousand, and two put ten thousand to flight,
except their Rock had sold them, and the Lord had shut them up?
- Deuteronomy 32:30
54 matches
Mail list logo
