On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 20:06 IL Ka wrote:
>
>> $ sudo su
>> # telnet 80
>> Trying 0.0.0.80...
>>
>
> 1. You are using telnet wrong: it should be "telnet [host] [port]". Please
> read "man telnet".
> 2. You do not need sudo to use telnet, do not do that
> 3. You should also check
Bonjour,
J'ai une expérience avec "Private Internet Access".
Fonctionne bien en mode CLI avec le client 'piactl' et le tar fourni une
fois installé démarre le démon au login de la session.
Pas cher mais dans mon cas (presque aveugle) ,sans IP dédiée (51€ pour 1
an) on rencontre beaucoup de
>
>
> $ sudo su
> # telnet 80
> Trying 0.0.0.80...
>
1. You are using telnet wrong: it should be "telnet [host] [port]". Please
read "man telnet".
2. You do not need sudo to use telnet, do not do that
3. You should also check that Apache is running and listening to this port,
use ``ss
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 19:10 Timothy M Butterworth <
timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
…
On the local host try running `telnet 127.0.0.1 80`
>
I was able to connect, thanks, Timothy!
Now what? I would really like to use ufw.
-Tom
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 19:01 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 05:51:38PM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> …
>
> ... wow. Just wow. How can such a short excerpt contain so many failures?
Greg, calm down. I get it, but I haven’t unlearned years of muscle
memory—sorry.
And the
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 7:52 PM Tom Browder wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 17:51 Tom Browder wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 17:30 IL Ka wrote:
>>
>>> I am running an Apache server and using Qualys Lab’s server checker. It
shows no access to the server.
Have you tried
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 05:51:38PM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> $ sudo su
> # telnet 80
> Trying 0.0.0.80...
... wow. Just wow. How can such a short excerpt contain so many failures?
1) "sudo su" is stupid. You don't need TWO setuid programs to get a root
shell. Either use
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 17:51 Tom Browder wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 17:30 IL Ka wrote:
>
>> I am running an Apache server and using Qualys Lab’s server checker. It
>>> shows no access to the server.
>>>
>>> Have you tried to telnet to port 80 from home? Do you see apache
>> listening
Entendo, porem se tiver muitas instalações um USB atualizado ajudaria um
pouco.
Em 28/05/2022 06:30, debian.jb...@simplelogin.co escreveu:
Olá Vitor,
Se não lembro mal (a minha última instalação do Debian foi há 2 meses)
não precisas de usar o apt no USB se tens conexão à internet. Há um
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 17:30 IL Ka wrote:
> I am running an Apache server and using Qualys Lab’s server checker. It
>> shows no access to the server.
>>
>> Have you tried to telnet to port 80 from home? Do you see apache
> listening this port using ``ss``?
>
On the new host I did:
$ sudo
>
> I am running an Apache server and using Qualys Lab’s server checker. It
> shows no access to the server.
>
> Have you tried to telnet to port 80 from home? Do you see apache
listening this port using ``ss``?
>
> Whatever attempt I make to change the ports disappears when I reboot.
>
> Sure,
Tom Browder wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 14:11 Tom Browder wrote:
>
> > As the bare-iron server came from my long-time cloud provider (since
> > Debian 6), incoming ports 80 and 443 are blocked.
>
>
> A little more digging shows the new server is using fail2ban and nft
> tables, so I
>
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 17:08 Dan Ritter wrote:
…
Therefore, something outside of your machine is blocking the
> ports, or you are misreading or misusing the tools that are
> telling you the ports are blocked.
Tell us how you are checking the ports
I am running an Apache server and using
>
>
>
> A little more digging shows the new server is using fail2ban and nft
> tables, so I
> need help on how to properly allow https and http inbound.
>
>
I am not familiar with nft, bit you can switch to iptables using
``update-alternatives``
# update-alternatives --set iptables
On 2022-05-28 at 17:11, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 04:02:39PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2022-05-28 at 15:40, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>> > I have a file of regex patterns and I use grep like so:
>> >
>> >~$ grep -f patterns.txt /var/log/syslog
>> >
>> > What I'd
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 04:02:39PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2022-05-28 at 15:40, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> > I have a file of regex patterns and I use grep like so:
> >
> >~$ grep -f patterns.txt /var/log/syslog
> >
> > What I'd like to get is a listing of all lines, specifically the
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 14:11 Tom Browder wrote:
> As the bare-iron server came from my long-time cloud provider (since
> Debian 6), incoming ports 80 and 443 are blocked.
A little more digging shows the new server is using fail2ban and nft
tables, so I
need help on how to properly allow https
On 2022-05-28 at 15:40, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> Not exactly Debian specific, but hoping that someone here can help.
>
> I have a file of regex patterns and I use grep like so:
>
>~$ grep -f patterns.txt /var/log/syslog
>
> What I'd like to get is a listing of all lines, specifically the
>
>
>
> -P INPUT ACCEPT
> -P FORWARD ACCEPT
> -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
> -N f2b-sshd
> -A INPUT -p tcp -m multiport --dports 22 -j f2b-sshd
> -A f2b-sshd -s 62.204.41.56/32 -j REJECT --reject-with
> icmp-port-unreachable
> -A f2b-sshd -s 61.177.173.48/32 -j REJECT --reject-with
> icmp-port-unreachable
>
Not exactly Debian specific, but hoping that someone here can help.
I have a file of regex patterns and I use grep like so:
~$ grep -f patterns.txt /var/log/syslog
What I'd like to get is a listing of all lines, specifically the line
numbers of the regexps in patterns.txt, that match
On 5/28/22 22:11, Tom Browder wrote:
> As the bare-iron server came from my long-time cloud provider (since
> Debian 6), incoming ports 80 and 443 are blocked.
>
> I ran my usual iptables command for new servers from them, but this
> time the default settings were different so it didn't work.
Tom Browder wrote:
> As the bare-iron server came from my long-time cloud provider (since
> Debian 6), incoming ports 80 and 443 are blocked.
>
> I ran my usual iptables command for new servers from them, but this
> time the default settings were different so it didn't work.
>
> Output from
As the bare-iron server came from my long-time cloud provider (since
Debian 6), incoming ports 80 and 443 are blocked.
I ran my usual iptables command for new servers from them, but this
time the default settings were different so it didn't work.
Output from "sudo iptables -S" before my attempt:
On Sat, May 28, 2022, 11:08 AM Cindy Sue Causey
wrote:
> On 5/28/22, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Brian wrote:
> >> > Careful! If you go on like this you will end up installing bullseye
> :).
> >
> > Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> >> Bookworm?
> >> SID?
> >
> > In any case: Not Testing !
>
On 28/05/2022 19:25, k6dedi...@free.fr wrote:
Bonjour Basile,
Je profite te ta demande pour signaler que sur github, je ne trouve pas de
description succincte des utilitaires proposés sur le site.
Comment un utilisateur peut-il être attiré ?
Il y a un README.md (au format markdown).
Bonjour Basile,
Je profite te ta demande pour signaler que sur github, je ne trouve pas de
description succincte des utilitaires proposés sur le site.
Comment un utilisateur peut-il être attiré ?
Bien cordialement,
Cassis
- Mail d'origine -
De: Basile Starynkevitch
À: Debian user
On 5/28/22, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Brian wrote:
>> > Careful! If you go on like this you will end up installing bullseye :).
>
> Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>> Bookworm?
>> SID?
>
> In any case: Not Testing !
>
> Currently a zillion of packages get marked for autoremovial from Testing
>
Le 28/05/2022 à 15:31, jafiv a écrit :
Lors de l'upgrade de Linux Mint Debian Edition 4 vers la 5, un choix
hasardeux lors de la sélection de GRUB2 m'a planté tout le démarrage.
J'ai été très content de pouvoir redémarrer avec un LMDE4 sur DVD, puis
restaurer à la sauvegarde TIMESHIFT
Le 28/05/2022 à 00:44, didier gaumet a écrit :
Le vendredi 27 mai 2022 à 18:30:03 UTC+2, Jean Bernon a écrit :
Alors la, si un jour tu trouve ca je suis preneur !!!
Il me semble que sur Linux Mint l'utilitaure TimeShift fait ce job.
Pourquoi Debian ne le pourrait-il pas ?
Je m'aperçois à
Le Sat, 28 May 2022 11:15:06 +0200
hamster écrivait:
>
> J'ai pas une grande experience des VPN mais je pense que openvpn répond
> a tes besoins.
>
> Mais je pense qu'il faut commencer par voir a quels serveurs tu veux te
> connecter, et qu'est-ce qui est compatible avec ces serveurs.
>
Olá Vitor,
Se não lembro mal (a minha última instalação do Debian foi há 2 meses) não
precisas de usar o apt no USB se tens conexão à internet. Há um paso da
inatalação no que o próprio instalador pesquisa pacotes mais recentes nos
repositorios e faz o upgrade se os atopar.
Saudações,
Le 28/05/2022 à 08:42, deb...@padoly.besaba.com a écrit :
Bonjour à tous,
Comme vous le savez, je vais passer de la version 8.11 de Debian à la
version 11 cet été en faisant probablement une installation complète.
Dès l'installation du système, je souhaite installer un VPN dont je
souhaite
Hi,
Brian wrote:
> > Careful! If you go on like this you will end up installing bullseye :).
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> Bookworm?
> SID?
In any case: Not Testing !
Currently a zillion of packages get marked for autoremovial from Testing
because of
Le Sat, 28 May 2022 09:42:12 +0300
deb...@padoly.besaba.com écrivait:
> Bonjour à tous,
>
> Comme vous le savez, je vais passer de la version 8.11 de Debian à la
> version 11 cet été en faisant probablement une installation complète.
>
> Dès l'installation du système, je souhaite installer un
On 24/5/22 23:23, Brian wrote:
Hi,
After my surrender to Jessie I've thought of moving on with Stretch.
Careful! If you go on like this you will end up installing bullseye :).
Bookworm?
SID?
--
All the best
Keith Bainbridge
keithrbaugro...@gmail.com
Bonjour à tous,
Comme vous le savez, je vais passer de la version 8.11 de Debian à la
version 11 cet été en faisant probablement une installation complète.
Dès l'installation du système, je souhaite installer un VPN dont je
souhaite qu'il ait les caractéristiques suivantes :
- pas
36 matches
Mail list logo
