Hello,
I don't know if this is the wrong form but I'm using dwm and trying to add the
centermaster patch but I get errors
---
- joe@debian:~/dwm$ sudo make install clean
- dwm build options:
- CFLAGS = -std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Os
-I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/includ
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 06:07, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:01:52AM +0100, Mario Marietto wrote:
For most users it makes no real difference using closed or open
source
code [...]
This is a very dangerous fallacy. Free software does make a
difference for all. I have i
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:28:00AM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:03:00PM +, mick.crane wrote:
> > I love open source, more than you might think, but I have a niggling feeling
> > it's been infiltrated to make user control difficult.
> > If I was a spook it's
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 06:17:23PM -0500, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 16:05:31 -0500
> Jeremy Hendricks wrote:
>
> > I have no idea what you mean. It’s open source and you can analyze
> > the code line by line.
>
> Does that include the blobs we're forced to run to make
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:01:52AM +0100, Mario Marietto wrote:
> For most users it makes no real difference using closed or open source
> code [...]
This is a very dangerous fallacy. Free software does make a
difference for all. I have installed and maintained free software
for many friends who a
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:03:00PM +, mick.crane wrote:
> I love open source, more than you might think, but I have a niggling feeling
> it's been infiltrated to make user control difficult.
That is no different from everything else in society. There are spooks,
there are folks with good inten
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 08:08:46PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 7:28 PM Andy Smith wrote:
> > ...
> > I think the most obvious counter-argument is that it would be a waste of
> > effort and human assets to put exploits in open source software where
> > they stand
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 06:17:23PM -0500, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 16:05:31 -0500
> Jeremy Hendricks wrote:
>
> > I have no idea what you mean. It’s open source and you can analyze
> > the code line by line.
>
> Does that include the blobs we're forced to run to make
Have problem with my printer HP Deskjet 3510 series
Output format is not set, using pnm as a default.
> scanimage: open of device escl:http://127.0.0.1:6 failed: Out of
> memory
>
*Can print, copy but I can't scan. *
*XSANE 0.999*
*Debian 5.10.149-2 (2022-10-21) x86_64 GNU/Linux*
--
Wit
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 7:28 PM Andy Smith wrote:
> ...
> I think the most obvious counter-argument is that it would be a waste of
> effort and human assets to put exploits in open source software where
> they stand a good chance of being found, while there is so much closed
> source software (fir
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022, 6:28 PM Mario Marietto wrote:
> Everytime I say to someone That are skilled I always get the same reply.
> Im not. So what ? there arent skilled people all around anymore ? there are
> many. but likely they dont want to be called like this. Most of the times
> there isnt a l
Its not totally wrong to think that the software do what it wants to do
even if you dont want. A software is a piece of code that respect the
directives of the creator, so its easy that it did what he wants and not
what you want. At least partially.
-- Forwarded message -
Da: Andy
Everytime I say to someone That are skilled I always get the same reply. Im
not. So what ? there arent skilled people all around anymore ? there are
many. but likely they dont want to be called like this. Most of the times
there isnt a large numbers of choices when the time to chose a job is came.
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:03:00PM +, mick.crane wrote:
> I love open source, more than you might think, but I have a niggling feeling
> it's been infiltrated to make user control difficult.
> If I was a spook it's what I'd do.
> Please prove me wrong.
Conspiracy theories aren't falsif
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 00:51, Mario Marietto
wrote:
you missed the fact that Im not Talking about you or about the users
that are very skilled. I use linux from the '90s and I never used one
of the tools you are using. But im not a total newbie. So,think About
how many categories of users
you missed the fact that Im not Talking about you or about the users that
are very skilled. I use linux from the '90s and I never used one of the
tools you are using. But im not a total newbie. So,think About how many
categories of users can use linux without to have a good understanding
about what
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 4:53 PM Alain D D Williams
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 04:05:31PM -0500, Jeremy Hendricks wrote:
> > I have no idea what you mean. It’s open source and you can analyze the
> code
> > line by line.
>
> Very true ... but how much code have you analyzed line by line
Ov
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 16:05:31 -0500
Jeremy Hendricks wrote:
> I have no idea what you mean. It’s open source and you can analyze
> the code line by line.
Does that include the blobs we're forced to run to make Nvidia cards
run really well?
I also have to wonder why Ubuntu (a Debian derivative) s
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 00:01, Mario Marietto
wrote:
For most users it makes no real difference using closed or open
source code,because yes,they can look inside the code,but to
understand what the code does they need a master degree. So,for all
these users,maybe it's a better idea to use t
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:43:19PM +, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>
> >
> > Even if you have it can be very hard to find carefully constructed back
> > doors.
>
> Shrug.. as opposed to installing closed source programmes where you know you
> are spied upon ? Which may of course have back doors
For most users it makes no real difference using closed or open source
code,because yes,they can look inside the code,but to understand what the
code does they need a master degree. So,for all these users,maybe it's a
better idea to use the closed source OS,at least they will be able to use
the OS
This is my point of view also.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 5:43 PM Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>
> >
> > Even if you have it can be very hard to find carefully constructed back
> doors.
>
> Shrug.. as opposed to installing closed source programmes where you know
> you are spied upon ? Which may of cours
>
> Even if you have it can be very hard to find carefully constructed back doors.
Shrug.. as opposed to installing closed source programmes where you know you
are spied upon ? Which may of course have back doors but thanks tk being closed
you I’ll not even learn about?
>
> Some code
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 04:05:31PM -0500, Jeremy Hendricks wrote:
> I have no idea what you mean. It’s open source and you can analyze the code
> line by line.
Very true ... but how much code have you analyzed line by line ?
Even if you have it can be very hard to find carefully constructed back
I have no idea what you mean. It’s open source and you can analyze the code
line by line.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 4:03 PM mick.crane wrote:
> I love open source, more than you might think, but I have a niggling
> feeling it's been infiltrated to make user control difficult.
> If I was a spook it
I love open source, more than you might think, but I have a niggling
feeling it's been infiltrated to make user control difficult.
If I was a spook it's what I'd do.
Please prove me wrong.
mick
On 2022-11-24 07:24, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
On 2022-11-23 15:35, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
is there another scanning package I could use in the meantime?
My scanning needs are very simple, black and white and occasional
only. I use gnome’s simple-scan.
It works well enough for me. Including us
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022, 5:26 PM David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 23 Nov 2022 at 20:18:43 (+0100), Nathanael Schweers wrote:
> > > It doesn't look like this exact problem is known at
> https://github.com/search?q=org%3Aansible+X509_V_FLAG_CB_ISSUER_CHECK+is%3Aissue&type=issues,
> but there are a few sug
Yes, you are right. Thanks! Copy and Past, humm, I'll be more careful
next time.
On 11/24/22 8:06 a.m., Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 9:33 PM Amn wrote:
In my Debian 11, I entered this command :
wget
https://downloads.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-10/v10.0.18/bin/apache-tomcat-1
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 9:33 PM Amn wrote:
>
> In my Debian 11, I entered this command :
> wget
> https://downloads.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-10/v10.0.18/bin/apache-tomcat-10.0.18.tar.gz
>
> After that I get this message
>
> --2022-11-23 21:24:54--
> https://downloads.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-10
Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
...
> - install needed packages you uninstalled in previous step. In this
> step Debian will install packages from testing and you probably won't
> have problems.
>
> Good luck!
what i would do before anything else is create a new
partition with plenty of space and
31 matches
Mail list logo
