On Sat, 30 Apr 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
One way would be to run two instances of X, each with the respective
keyboard/layout combination. Not sure if this is feasible in your
situation though.
This is really a deficiency in the kernel input layer--it should be possible
to have a
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Sb, 30 apr 11, 14:19:03, Leonardo Ruoso wrote:
Will notebooks standardize on 16:9 or 16:10 aspect ratio?
In my (not very informed) opinion the trend seems to be towards 16:9.
In my somewhat informed opinion, you will only get 16:9 from Lenovo on
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011, Leonardo Ruoso wrote:
I'm quite sure they will compete with netbookd and e-readers, but I think
mosy people who is buying standard notebooks are those with eventual
mobility. Notebooks become an alternative do desktop because of silence,
size, power consumption and, just
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, sdc wrote:
Greetings, I was reading FSF distro review and I was shocked to see that
Debian isn't actually free software. FSF said that they are making a big
Don't be. We don't think FSF always provides free software either: we
consider documentation as part of the software
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
Non ASCII fonts with diacritical signs do not render correctly on-
screen.
Do you mean characters? I'm guessing a bug report would be appreciated
if you can reproduce the issue.
Yes, non ASCII characters - sorry.
...
I'll file a bug
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Jim Green wrote:
I have a asus p8p67 deluxe board and it has two nics and two ports, I
am thinking of bonding them to one nic, but I only have one cable so
will only use one port. Will this do much help to the
throughput/speed? If I have two cables connecting to both ports
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, shawn wilson wrote:
Can this even be done on a dumb switch? I remember there were quite a few
No. The switch needs to support LACP for auto-configuring bonded links.
You might even find an unmanaged switch capable of such, but it won't be a
dumb switch by any means.
Your
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Cleber Ianes wrote:
Conteúdo extremamente crítico:
A perda dos dados pode quebrar a empresa.
Parado por mais de 24 horas causará sérios transtornos.
...
Orçamento:
Até R$ 3.000,00
Isso é sério, ou você exagerou na avaliação de risco?
Transforme sérios
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011, Cleber Ianes wrote:
Ta, tudo bem. Eu exagerei um pouco na economia. rsrsrs
O orçamento gira em torno de R$ 5.000,00 aproximadamente agora e
deixando possibilidade para upgrade futuras. rsrsr
Agora fica mais fácil. rsrs
Quantos empregados tem essa empresa? Ou é por
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Cleber Ianes wrote:
Alguém usa linux em servidores com processadores Xeon ou Opteron???
Sim.
O Debian64 roda normalmente com esses processadores?
Sim.
Alguém conhece algum site que me mostre um comparativo entre os 2?
Depende do workload. Depende da placa mãe.
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011, Roberto wrote:
with SLAAC IPv6 address. No IPv4, no static, no dhcp. Problem is I
can't find a configuration that makes the interface to startup
without static or dynamic (dhcp) configurations.
1. Do not hijack threads.
2. Use the manual method.
auto foo
iface foo inet
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Dan Serban wrote:
So, I'm asking, what do most sysadmins use to diagnose IO problems?
dmesg, blktrace, perf tools (linux-tools-2.6), on top of those you already
mentioned.
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the
It did not get enough love. The poor thing spent some time in the death row
waiting for someone to adopt it, and give it some love, bugfixing, and a new
warm home in a VCS tree somewhere. Nobody came. It was put to sleep Sun,
27 Feb 2011 10:42:27 UTC, at the request of Debian QA.
--
One
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 4d71a670.4030...@gmail.com, Ryan David Larrowe wrote:
I had filed a bug report about my system not booting properly and
was unable to file it against the Debian version I was using for that
reason( it wouldn't boot ).
While bugs get
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011, Cleber Ianes wrote:
ext4, xfs, reiserfs ou algum outro
Fique longe do reiserfs se não for se manter no kernel 2.6.32 da distro, ou
se quiser ter certeza que não vai precisar reformatar tudo na próxima
stable.
E xfs é o único que desfragmenta online nessa lista. Pode
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011, Fábio Rabelo wrote:
Eu colocaria o xfs fora do jogo também, o histórico dele no quesito de
recuperação de falhas não é bom, o próprio Linus Torvalds já até ameaçou
retira-lo do mainline do Kernel por este motivo !
Deve ter sido muito tempo atrás...
Se você quer máxima
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011, Tiago Saboga wrote:
Obrigado pelo post. Só peço, se você tiver tempo, para esclarecer um
pouco o ponto seguinte:
E pode esquecer qualquer tecnologia
de armazenagem baseada em FLASH, porque o padrão de destruição de mídia
nesses casos é mortal para todas as
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011, Steven Ayre wrote:
Great, thanks! Perhaps checkrestart could be updated to check that file too?
Please file a wishlist bug. It will depend on whether the maintainer thinks
it is something the tool should warn you about or not.
checkrestart is commonly used to *avoid*
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011, Rafael Henrique da Silva Correia wrote:
Então a única saída é backup mesmo né? (no caso de redução de tamanho)
Como assim? Se a filesystem permite reduzir tamanho, você:
1. Faz o backup
2. Livra espaço, precisa estar com no máximo 90% do NOVO TAMANHO
utilizados
3.
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011, Rafael Henrique da Silva Correia wrote:
Se eu pegar os 2 GB e esvaziar 1 GB os outros 1 GB restantes não se
corrompem fiz o teste usando md5sum e arquivos bestas gerados com
Você está confiando no limbo. Se por exemplo, o gerenciador de volumes
gravar metadata no FINAL do
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
An unpatched machine [for whatever reason], behind NAT has a
fighting chance, but one which is directly addressable from the
The protection offered by NAT is equivalent to a statefull firewall that
only allow sessions to be initiated by the
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, The Suspect wrote:
From where comes the trust for your archive?
In the end, it all amounts to thin, dirty air.
That said, the archive keys are signed by several DDs, whose keys are part
of the strong set of the gpg public web-of-trust.
So, if you're troubled by the trust
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Paul Fraser wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:41, Nate Bargmann n...@n0nb.us wrote:
Not only that but as we move to IPv6 there is no such thing as NAT.
Oh, how I wish that were true... The IPv6 spec includes NAT.
Which RFC?
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, shawn wilson wrote:
On Feb 22, 2011 6:10 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Paul Fraser wrote:
Oh, how I wish that were true... The IPv6 spec includes NAT.
Which RFC?
Lmgtfy - 4684 and 5902 - don't know off hand, you'll
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, dann frazier wrote:
http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-2943
It is supposed to be vulnerable.
I've backported a fix for this, but it was too late to make the
initial release of squeeze. The fix is queued for the first update to
squeeze, see:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Saul Lima wrote:
Tenho um domínio antigo que redirecionava para uma pasta do servidor
que tenho contratado. Resolvi criar uma nova versão do site, e criei
uma nova pasta no servidor. No cpanel eu apaguei a antiga entrada
nos domínios suplementares e adicionei uma nova onde
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Johan Grönqvist a écrit :
2011-02-15 22:46, Kelly Dean skrev:
http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2010-2943 was
published Sept 30, 2010, and says that Linux 2.6.32.5 is vulnerable.
Squeeze uses 2.6.32-5, built on Jan 12, 2011. Is
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:35:27 +0100, Michael Kress wrote:
Hi, my 3ware 9650SE-8LPML is degrading exactly ONE drive every day at
exactly 2:08:49 AM in the morning (at exactly THAT second even)
(...)
I also get, from time to time, a degraded array
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011, Chris Jones wrote:
Well http://www.google.com/search?q=linux+meminfo gives 137,000 results.
Are you suggesting I do your research for you?
This is not an easy question to answer, a search won't help if the person
has no clue about the Linux VM.
This is a question for the
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Rafael Henrique da Silva Correia wrote:
Boa tarde a todos, estou estudando para a LPIC201, e um dos tópicos cobrados
é RAID. Estou lendo o livro Certificação LPI-2 da Linux New Media e
fuçando algumas coisas por fora. Na parte de RAID o autor cita sobre o
raidtools e o
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011, Navdeep Bhatia wrote:
This code should be updated to call inet_ntop and should be checked whether
the ut_addr field contains IPV4 or IPV6 address. The check can be made
either by checking ut_addr_v6[1:3] for zero (this is based on the assumption
that login program zeroes
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Mark a écrit :
I have read the Squeeze Release Notes, here is what it says about
non-free firmware. So the RTFM responses can stop now...
2.1.2. Firmware moved to the non-free section
Some drivers included in the
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
No, this is what those of you who do not care to read the release notes
should expect when upgrading to the new stable release.
I initially thought so as well, but I went and checked. The release
notes _fail_ to warn users to install _BOTH_ firmware
On Sun, 06 Feb 2011, Pier Paolo wrote:
Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 x86_64
Yea! Squeeze is stuck with 2.6.32...patched sup., as per standard
distribution's kernel?
As in what Debian is shipping, so yes, standard distro kernel. You
can build a custom kernel using the distro kernel sources if you
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 02:30:10 +0100, Pier Paolo wrote:
Fresh installation of squeeze here, machine AMD Athlon II x2, board Asus
M4A78LT-M LE with integrated Radeon 3000.
I sure hope the discrete Radeon 3000 is supported by KMS (should be, it is
supposed to
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
In the process, I lost ability to remotely ssh into the machine and get
sudo apps to run, instead I am getting this error;
You need xauth installed. Is it?
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 06:52:09PM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Why in emacs, iceweasel, etc. is RIGHT ALT ignored? LEFT ALT is
processed as ALT, but RIGHT ALT is treated like I didn't press it.
Set as a compose key?
Does 'RightAlt o c' give
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-02-03 16:41 +0100, T o n g wrote:
KMS is indeed not required yet, but I bet it will be sooner or later.
Hmm? IME Squeeze is absolutely UNUSABLE without KMS on a Radeon X300
(ThinkPad T43p). Besides, Mesa/DRI in Squeeze is incompatible with
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011, PMA wrote:
But two items puzzle me:
/srv I gather this is important to have, but I have yet
to find anything *in* it. Will Squeeze put stuff in
there if I haven't expressly told it too?
No, it won't put stuff in there.
/tmp As a rule of thumb --
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Camaleón wrote:
You mean the message about a connected device when there is none attached
to any of the USB ports? Yep, that seems to be common:
sm01@stt008:~$ dmesg | grep -i new | tail -5
[ 10.588574] usb usb7: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0001
[
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011, Krzysztof Bieniasz wrote:
You mean my messages or Cameleón's? The ones you quoted aren't mine. But
Yes.
mine are related to the hub (i guess) and they are showing up all the time
repeatedly. Should I file a bug report to the Debian maintainer or to the
linux kernel team?
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, T o n g wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 23:01:09 -0500, Celejar wrote:
I've given up on s2ram, the kernel method (echo mem /sys/power/state)
works fine for me, at least with Kernel Mode Setting.
I just tried that method. At first, it seemed to work wonderfully -
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Anand Sivaram wrote:
If you are using tar, then try xz instead of 7-zip. Both xz and 7-zip use
lzma2 compression. But xz command line utility is very similar to
gzip/bzip2, so most of the gzip options could be used. In fact tar has a
filter also for xz which is 'J'. It
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Alfonso Ruiz wrote:
The ST2000DL003 is 4096 bytes per sector, can this have problems with
squeeze?
Squeeze tries to align everything to 1MB boundaries, so it shouldn't cause
problems. OTOH, I doubt anyone tested it with 4096/4096 disks, so make sure
the HD is just 512/4096
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Alfonso Ruiz wrote:
The ST2000DL003 is 4096 bytes per sector, can this have problems with
squeeze?
Squeeze tries to align everything to 1MB boundaries, so it shouldn't cause
problems.
Do
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Alfonso Ruiz wrote:
The ST2000DL003 is 4096 bytes per sector, can this have problems with
squeeze?
Squeeze tries to align
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, will trillich wrote:
In kern.log there's only
Jan 23 23:04:59 darth kernel: [64084756.601774] exploit[25161]: segfault at
10c00b ip sp deadc01d error 6
Jan 23 23:05:08 darth kernel: [64084765.528734] NET: Registered protocol
family 5
There is no mistery. Your
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, elbbit wrote:
On 27/01/11 16:21, will trillich wrote:
That's quite an assertion. How can I confirm it HAS been compromised, as
opposed to thinking it's a possibility?
There is no way to know for sure unless you dissect the code running the
machine. Depending on your
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Camaleón wrote:
At least in my experience, xrandr modes are *not* remembered. I have to
The X server certainly isn't supposed to store it anywhere.
Yes, they do... and so I asked :-)
So, something is trying to be too smart in your desktop environment
(KDE/gnome most
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, kellyremo wrote:
to memory means: mounting a ~2 GByte filesystem [ tmpfs?, or ramfs? ],
and put the /tmp on it. [ e.g.: 4 GByte ram in the pc ]. what to write
in the /etc/fstab?
tmpfs /tmptmpfs defaults,nosuid,nodev,mode=1777,size=1G
In squeeze,
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 12:02:31 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Yes, they do... and so I asked :-)
So, something is trying to be too smart in your desktop environment
(KDE/gnome most likely). Find it, Nuke it, and file a bug report
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Bruno Ayub wrote:
Se tiverem interesse, respondam mais essa assertiva da mesma prova, se
possível justifiquem com base em seus conhecimentos:
Considere que, ao ligar um computador cujo processador tem barramento de
endereçamento de 16 bits, o programa de carga libere a
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Monte Milanuk wrote:
On 1/19/11 10:23 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
I'm somewhat inclined to go with option 'C': an HP Proliant
Microserver N36L - comes without OS (certified for RHEL5), 1GB ECC
memory + 160gb SATA drive. Move the OEM drive to the optical drive
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Moksha Tux wrote:
Primeiramente peço do fundo do coração desculpas ao senhor se me parece ser
um tanto incisivo na minha pergunta. A minha intenção de longe não foi esta,
Sem problemas...
Alguém já falou a data nessa thread: início de Fevereiro. Se nada
inesperado
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Moksha Tux wrote:
Já está demais essa demora e a quantidade de arquivos e bibliotecas já
utrapassadas pelo debian 5. Já não estava na época do Squeeze sair não?
Eu sou a moska que pousou na sua sopa...
Alguém tem alguma notícia dele?
Sim, mas como você usou um tom
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Felipe Cabral wrote:
[image: Debianelitism.jpg]
Não se aplica à ocasião. Deixe para me acusar de elitismo quando eu
agir de forma elitista.
A data foi publicada ontem, e mesmo que não tivesse sido, é extremamente
irritante ler cobranças com o tom usado pelo Moska. O tom
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Monte Milanuk wrote:
4-bay enclosure w/ eSATA card + cable:$130
Hitachi 2TB SATA HDD ($120x4):$480
Grand total: $610
vs...
4-bay enclosure: $279
Areca 1300x4 card + cable:$197
Hitachi
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
Both /etc/fstab and /etc/mtab show entries for /dev/md126..
What the ... ?
After you modified thei files in the real filesystem, did you update the
initramfs?
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Monte Milanuk wrote:
On 1/17/11 5:57 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Monte Milanuk wrote:
My big question is... most of these external drive boxes seem to
claim support for JBOD, RAID 0, 1, 10, 5, etc. - should I presume
that is simply fake
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
And most expensive enterprise-grade equipment doesn't describe a small
SAS jbod enclosure and a SAS HBA. You can probably get both for well
below US$ 1k, and you can populate it with SATA disks just fine.
It is really well bellow US$ 1k
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Monte Milanuk wrote:
My big question is... most of these external drive boxes seem to
claim support for JBOD, RAID 0, 1, 10, 5, etc. - should I presume
that is simply fake RAID like many commodity mobos have, and not
Either that, or worse: data-eating crap like many
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I have no axe to grind with the translation taking place at the drive level.
There's nothing technically wrong with it. My axe grinding regards the Linux
partitioning utilities and their current inability to properly handle proper
sector alignment of
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the kernel
will change the mdX designations.
Use blkid to find out the UUID's of your partitions.
Whatever you do, NEVER
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Tom H wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
h...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011, Doug wrote:
There's a better way. It uses a subset of Unicode and the compose
key. On a normal PC keyboard, you have to make a compose key out
You must be joking. That will work well only if you're writing english
text, which will require the use of the compose key rarely.
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010, Andrei Popescu wrote:
This is the first thing to do as soon as I have my Debian running on
the other machine ;) Is WD40 suitable for such fans?
No. WD40 is never suitable for bearing lubrication.
(In case someone is wondering, I'm talking about FRU 42W2780 for
Thinkpad
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010, lbml...@hethcote.com wrote:
of the backup routine I've used for several years.) I have logs of
the test runs, and there is a difference in the wodim output between
the 2.6.26 and 2.6.35 runs.
Report a bug against the kernel.
The difference in Version of 0 versus 5 is one
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
linux-manual-2.6.26: /usr/share/man/man9/atomic_add.9.gz
linux-manual-2.6.26: /usr/share/man/man9/atomic_add_negative.9.gz
linux-manual-2.6.26: /usr/share/man/man9/atomic_add_return.9.gz
linux-manual-2.6.26:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, T. Alex Chen wrote:
I want to do atomic operation and find there is already such implementation
in
Linux, e.g. atomic_add, atomic_set, atomic_cmpset, etc, after I google on the
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Caio Abreu Ferreira wrote:
Recentemente mudei de provedor e mudei de e-mail e queria saber como
mudar o e-mail que esta na chave de criptografia que eu criei com o gnupg.
Para cria a chave de criptografia eu utilizei o tutorial[1]. Utilizo a chave
de criptografia
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Sthu Deus wrote:
I have some trouble with growing number of
Load_Cycle_Count
parameter of my HDD. And the
Tell the HD to stop unloading its heads, and to stop spinning down (it
*has* to unload heads when it will spin down). It will increase power
consumption, and it
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, steef wrote:
when i do on the evo n115: $lynx www.knmi.nl it ens up bij telling
me something like:
i cannot get into *file://localhost/home/steef/www.knmi.nl*:
something seems to be not exactly how i should want it.
The http://; part of the URL is likely not optional.
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, jmhenri...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
find /diretorio -atime +8 -exec rm -f {} \;
[...]
O meu problema está em uma regra do setor de TI em que todos os arquivos não
acessados há mais de 7 dias, devem ser excluídos para economizar espaço.
Existe alguma forma de eu verificar
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
Anytime and subscribed :). That may even be an RC as full ipv6 was a
release goal of squeeze. Also, if it really was corrupting your
It is clearly something that requires testing on UP, probably on a i486 to
reproduce (otherwise, our kernels would be
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Jason Heeris wrote:
On 12 October 2010 10:36, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Jason Heeris wrote:
CPU: Vortex86 SoC (800MHz) - I *think* this is pretty much a 486, I
could be wrong
Yikes. You really need to track this one
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Celejar wrote:
Interesting, thanks. The look I don't really care about, and switching
users isn't relevant for me, since I'm the only user of the system.
The xscreensaver author has a low opinion of gnome-screensaver:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Helio Loureiro wrote:
Só pra reforçar...
O sistema pega as tentativas repetidas. Mas se você mandar isso aí como um
batch-job para uma botnet ou coisa que o valha, funcionaria :p
Se um envio for o suficiente, então já basta...
É necessário que várias pessoas
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Helio Loureiro wrote:
To até pensando em botar algo como:
#! /bin/sh
i=500
while [ $i -gt 0 ]
do
lynx -dump
http://lists.debian.org/cgi-bin/spam-report.pl?listname=debian-user-portuguesemsg=msg00114.htmldate=2010/10;
i=`expr $i - 1`
done
Só pra
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Jason Heeris wrote:
My system is a Helios single-board computer, with specs:
CPU: Vortex86 SoC (800MHz) - I *think* this is pretty much a 486, I
could be wrong
Yikes. You really need to track this one down, and find out whether it is
any different from a regular 486.
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010, Adauto Serpa wrote:
Então posso instalar o Kernel amd64 que meu sistema terá mais desempenho do
que utilizando PAE ou
é melhor perder cerca de 1Gb de memória ?
Em 32-bits, você precisa de PAE para ter o bendito bit NX (e acho que
para ter PAT também). Aqui, sempre usei
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, lee wrote:
how useful is enabling
RAID-4/RAID-5/RAID-6 Multicore processing
in the kernel configuration?
It does get faster. But is it the bottleneck in your system? Do you
have a slow CPU, or extremely fast backing storage for it to matter?
Has anyone enabled
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Welington R. Braga wrote:
Estive de férias nas últimas semanas e agora é que estou me interando
do assunto e uma das notícias que li hoje no site da INFO [1] menciona
o bug RHSA-2010:0704-1 e também há um comentário de um leitor que
sugeriu o link [2] onde tem uma
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Dan Serban wrote:
[1012115.235704] ipmi_devintf: Unknown symbol compat_alloc_user_space
This module and the running kernel are not compatible with each other.
The CVE-2010-3081 fixes added to every distro kernel (and also to the latest
stable kernels) changed the internal
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Dan Serban wrote:
On 09/22/10 07:54, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Dan Serban wrote:
[1012115.235704] ipmi_devintf: Unknown symbol compat_alloc_user_space
This module and the running kernel are not compatible with each other.
snip
So what
Of course, it helps if I actually use the correct address for the
debian-kernel ML...
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Dan Serban wrote:
On 09/22/10 07:54, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Dan Serban wrote:
[1012115.235704
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, edmarcos wrote:
Com ext3 o mesmo não acontece. a maquina está perfeita.
os discos estão perfeitos. é um bug que ja foi relatado no
forum do ubuntu, so nao achei a solução.
Você está usando o RTC (relógio da CMOS/BIOS) em UTC?
Seu RTC está funcionando? (o BIOS está sempre
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
I have found the reason:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585395
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586156
The first also has a workaround/patch that works for me.
Do yourself a huge favour, and switch to
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 10:17 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
I have found the reason:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585395
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Du, 05 sep 10, 11:01:13, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 10:17 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
[snip]
I'm
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010, Carlos Drehmer wrote:
Resumindamente, tenho a intenção de fazer RAID 1 em um servidor HP Proliant
DL 160 G5 que tem o Debian 4 instalado, e segundo o fabricante dá suporte no
hardware para realizar esta operação. Atualmente existe um disco que ja esta
Qual a placa de RAID
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010, Celejar wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:32:03 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:
...
That said, I don't trust hybernation. Your data is much safer in the
long run if you restrain yourself to suspend-to-RAM and shutdowns.
Can you elaborate
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Jo, 02 sep 10, 07:39:09, Camaleón wrote:
Amount of ram should not be a relevant key value for benefiting of
hibernation.
Unless there's something I'm missing, copying the contents of the RAM to
HDD and back heavily depends on the total data
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Harlei Liguori Marcelino wrote:
puderem me ajudar eu agradeço. Tenho uma empresa que é responsável pelo meu
domínio, onde fica o DNS que resolve o dominio da minha empresa e onde tem a
página. Eu estava querendo configurar um servidor postfix para criar contas
de e-mail
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010, Merciadri Luca wrote:
always on the same: /dev/sdc5. Well, this is where I have all my docs,
my university stuff, and this is even more annoying. I could do backups,
I sure hope you *DID* extensive backups. Often. And stored some of
them for permanent archival.
but I
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010, T o n g wrote:
I.e., --delete-before is the default action. It only affect the files
to be copied over. Nothing else.
rsync --delete a b c d 192.168.1.99:/tmp/
could remove a b c or d from /tmp in 192.168.1.99, if they don't exist
in the source location.
If a, b, c or d
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Sb, 31 iul 10, 14:46:55, Thomas H. George wrote:
It is grub2. I checked and the # kopt is in the new format and the
UUID is that of the root partition. I ran update-grub just to be sure
and now the system will boot from a MBR written by grub.
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
Still, when I put a couple of my flash drives into a usb slot, very little
happens.
[1183228.208121] hub 4-0:1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on port 4
Bad cable, bad/crappy USB hub, bad device, or fried USB port. Note that if
it is not an
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Tuesday 06 July 2010 13:04:27 Alan Chandler wrote:
On 06/07/10 18:15, Miles Fidelman wrote:
part2 primary Linux RAID 3G for swap
Personally. I can't see the point in using RAID for swap.
If your system is actively using swap
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
software... What is NCQ? (in this context, of course) What is
A way to have various requests in flight and let the disk itself order
them to get better performance. Whether it helps performance or not
depends on the IO workload, the kind of device,
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010, kzsyz wrote:
it should be Lenovo ThinkPad x100e, sorry...
Make sure you have upgraded to the latest firmware before you attempt it.
Does anyone have experience on installing Debian(5.0) on laptop Lenovo x1004?
Thanks.
You'll probably have better luck if you use Squeeze
601 - 700 of 1528 matches
Mail list logo
