Re: compton and shadows

2014-03-06 Thread Peter Tynan
On 7 March 2014 02:46, Sharon Kimble wrote: > If you use 'compton' and a launcher like 'docky' or 'plank' in > 'fluxbox' you will find that there is a *shadow* extending to about one > inch above your launcher. In this shadow you are unable to click any > button or pane-descriptor like in 'tmux',

Re: anyone using shell-fm?

2013-05-08 Thread Peter Tynan
these days I'll learn to build my own kernel too, but > I'm not yet that advanced. > > On Tue, 7 May 2013, Peter Tynan wrote: > > > > Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 18:46:17 -0400 (EDT) > > > From: Jude DaShiell > > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org &g

Re: anyone using shell-fm?

2013-05-07 Thread Peter Tynan
> Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 18:46:17 -0400 (EDT) > From: Jude DaShiell > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: anyone using shell-fm? > Message-ID: > List-Id: > > I'm having no luck setting this package up to work on Debian and really > would prefer to avoid windows for use of lastfm. The pr

Re: MUA & Yahoo Mail (WAS:Re: Dist-upgrade or upgrade. Which?)

2013-04-25 Thread Peter Tynan
> On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 11:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > When I set up my Rocketmail accounts, Evolution automatically wanted to > > use IMAP, but I forced to use POP. > > > > This are my Rocketmail settings: > > > > Server: pop.mail.yahoo.com > > Port: 995 > > Security:

Re: Basic USB Automounter?

2013-01-16 Thread Peter Tynan
t; > List-Id: > > ----- Original Message - > > From: Peter Tynan > > To: "debian-user@lists.debian.org" > > Cc: > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 3:15 PM > > Subject: Re: Basic USB Automounter? > > > >> X-Mailer: YahooM

Re: Basic USB Automounter?

2013-01-16 Thread Peter Tynan
> X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.130.494 > Message-ID: <1358375269.30690.yahoomail...@web142301.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> > Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:27:49 -0800 (PST) > From: Patrick Bartek > Subject: Basic USB Automounter? > To: "debian-user@lists.debian.org" > List-Id: > > Building a Wheezy 64-b

Re: which version of debian to download

2012-12-18 Thread Peter Tynan
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:52:44 +0100 > From: berenger.mo...@neutralite.org > To: > Subject: Re: which version of debian to download > Message-ID: <420ee2b7cf1c65846e4c8d575f2f8...@neutralite.org> > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 > Thunderbird/7.0.1 > List-Id

Re: How to rip double discs albums?

2011-05-24 Thread Peter Tynan
On 24 May 2011 15:38, Leonardo Ruoso wrote: > Because I'll move to another state and I'd like to carry out all my music > without my old discs I'm trying to tip my original albums. > I'm having problems with Sound Juicer (Squeeze) and double disc albums like > Beatles Anthology. > When inserting b

Re: iceweasel 4 on squeeze?

2011-03-23 Thread Peter Tynan
On 23 March 2011 22:57, Andreas Rönnquist wrote: > On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:17:44 + > Peter Tynan wrote: > >> On 23 March 2011 15:04, Brad Alexander wrote: >> > Very cool site. However, I just added it, and added the key, and upgraded, >> > but got >> &

Re: iceweasel 4 on squeeze?

2011-03-23 Thread Peter Tynan
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Peter Tynan wrote: >> >> On 23 March 2011 15:04, Brad Alexander wrote: >> > Very cool site. However, I just added it, and added the key, and >> > upgraded, >> > but got >> > >> > [root@galaxy sources.

Re: iceweasel 4 on squeeze?

2011-03-23 Thread Peter Tynan
On 23 March 2011 15:04, Brad Alexander wrote: > Very cool site. However, I just added it, and added the key, and upgraded, > but got > > [root@galaxy sources.list.d]# apt-get install -t squeeze-backports iceweasel > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state informati

Re: iceweasel 4 on squeeze?

2011-03-23 Thread Peter Tynan
On 23 March 2011 13:31, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > On 2011-03-23 07:01:21 Brad Alexander wrote: >>I had thought about grabbing the one from experimental (rc2?), but decided >>against that for a squeeze system. You may want to try http://mozilla.debian.net/ Peter -- (\__/) (='.'=) This is

Re: Debian Wiki participation..?

2011-02-27 Thread Peter Tynan
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Simon Hollenbach wrote: - Original message - On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 12:26:57 +0100, Simon Hollenbach wrote: I hereby ask the OP to post the link when a bug was opened... At the moment it is way, way past my bed-time (I'm desperately trying to stay awake until the

Re: Debian Wiki participation..?

2011-02-27 Thread Peter Tynan
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Camaleón wrote: On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:28:44 +, Peter Tynan wrote: All valid concerns (#2 a bit paranoid, IMO), but I think they will be better managed and properly addressed in the right mailing list: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/Contact#content-admins

Re: Debian Wiki participation..?

2011-02-27 Thread Peter Tynan
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Camaleón wrote: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/EditorQuickStart#Account Thanks for the link, three thoughts... 1: II think it would be helpful if there were links to the Privacy and Copyright pages on the registration page. 2: Still does not answer my primary conce

Debian Wiki participation..?

2011-02-26 Thread Peter Tynan
One of the things I've never understood about Debian is why the wiki is so inactive when compared to other distributions, the simple fact of life is that nine times out of ten I find the information I'm looking for on the Arch or Gentoo wikis - not the Debian wiki. I am now beginning to understand

Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)

2011-02-22 Thread Peter Tynan
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Petrus Validus wrote: I interpret the "if used correctly" bit to mean "using the GMail web interface, not a 3rd party client such as Evolution or Mutt." Am I correct in this interpretation? No, I mean, AFAICT, IMAP was not designed for this paradigm (same message present

Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)

2011-02-21 Thread Peter Tynan
On 21 February 2011 21:24, Andrei Popescu wrote: > Maybe this is mutt specific, but if I just delete the mail from Inbox in > All Mail the message is still marked as unread (a.k.a new). If I mark it > as read and sync, then it's also marked as read in All Mail. I assume > Gmail takes the delete f

Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)

2011-02-21 Thread Peter Tynan
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Andrei Popescu wrote: If you send via Gmail's SMTP you always have a copy in Gmail's sent, so it should be enough to tell alpine not to save its own copy. Check the headers - I use a local sendmail. I've been doing some digging and it is in a sub-folder named "Google Mail

Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)

2011-02-21 Thread Peter Tynan
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Lu, 21 feb 11, 12:59:56, Petrus Validus wrote: This one of the better "innovation" brought by Gmail, if used correctly. Unfortunately it's not very usable via IMAP. Example: How do I tell mutt to tag the message as read in All Mail when I delete it

Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)

2011-02-21 Thread Peter Tynan
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Petrus Validus wrote: Get away from the web interface. Install Icedove/Evolution/Mutt and use Google's IMAPs interface. I use Evolution and Mutt with Google's IMAP interface. It works nicely but I've noticed this quirky behavior when using a client via IMAP. My messages

Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)

2011-02-20 Thread Peter Tynan
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ron Johnson wrote: Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 23:54:27 -0600 From: Ron Johnson To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use) Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:54:49 + (UTC) Resent-Fro

Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)

2011-02-20 Thread Peter Tynan
-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org On 02/20/2011 11:01 PM, Peter Tynan wrote: On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ron Johnson wrote: Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:02:48 -0600 From: Ron Johnson To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router

Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)

2011-02-20 Thread Peter Tynan
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ron Johnson wrote: Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:02:48 -0600 From: Ron Johnson To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use) Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 04:03:05 + (UTC) Resent-From: de

Re: Iceweasel 3 and gopher?

2008-06-14 Thread Peter Tynan
2008/6/15 Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Does Google even index gopher sites? > Yes, via the HTTP to Gopher proxy at http://gopher.floodgap.com/gopher/ e.g. A search at google.com on "gopher sdf happy" resulted in the 8th hit being a gopher site. but if you want to search gopherspace you ar

Re: Iceweasel 3 and gopher?

2008-06-14 Thread Peter Tynan
2008/6/15 John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Iceweasel 3.0~rc2-1 still seems to support Gopher. > It was in the early RC's of FireFox as well, as I understand it the final decision to pull it from FF3 was taken quite late in the day. Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: Iceweasel 3 and gopher?

2008-06-14 Thread Peter Tynan
2008/6/14 Koh Choon Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Just curious, what advantage does Gopher offers over other protocols? > I'd suggest reading gopher://gopher.floodgap.com/0/gopher/relevance.txt for a full answer. I think "advantage" is probably the wrong word it's an alternative, an example of the

Re: Iceweasel 3 and gopher?

2008-06-14 Thread Peter Tynan
2008/6/14 Andrew Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Evidently the gopher-internet is not at all dead. > It's alive a kicking with active development of several gopher servers (including pygopherd in the Debian repositories), on the client side there is the console client under active development and as

Re: Iceweasel 3 and gopher?

2008-06-14 Thread Peter Tynan
2008/6/14 Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > If the gopher protocol still has life in it (and I gather > that it does), then the community will be better served by having > motivation to pick up development of the other browsers, or perhaps > incorporate better gopher support into the oth

Re: Iceweasel 3 and gopher?

2008-06-14 Thread Peter Tynan
2008/6/14 Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 04:42:08PM +0100, Peter Tynan wrote: >> >> Iceweasel (and FireFox) prior to version 3 despite a few bugs were >> the most convenient GUI gopher browser available and the loss of >> g

Re: Iceweasel 3 and gopher?

2008-06-14 Thread Peter Tynan
2008/6/14 Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 01:31:07PM +0100, Peter Tynan wrote: >> I noted from a recent discussion on this list that iceweasel 3.0-rc2 >> has been made available in Sid and I was wondering what the plans are >> for sup

Iceweasel 3 and gopher?

2008-06-14 Thread Peter Tynan
I noted from a recent discussion on this list that iceweasel 3.0-rc2 has been made available in Sid and I was wondering what the plans are for support of the gopher protocol in Iceweasel 3? I ask this because support for the gopher protocol has been pulled from the core of FireFox 3 and I was hopin

Re: Help - /usr not mounting!

2008-04-22 Thread Peter Tynan
2008/4/23 Peter Tynan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm currently operating from a live CD as my /usr partition is > refusing to mount at boot. more info # fsck.jfs -v /dev/hda5 fsck.jfs version 1.1.10, 19-Oct-2005 processing started: 4/23/2008 6.39.46 Using default parameter: -p The

Help - /usr not mounting!

2008-04-22 Thread Peter Tynan
I'm currently operating from a live CD as my /usr partition is refusing to mount at boot. fsck is not working - output below. # fsck -r /dev/hda5 fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005) fsck.jfs version 1.1.10, 19-Oct-2005 processing started: 4/23/2008 6.10.34 The current device is: /dev/hda5 Block size in byte

Re: CPU frequency scaling

2008-04-22 Thread Peter Tynan
On 22/04/2008, Sam Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Athlon XP processors don't support frequency scaling on desktop > motherboards. > > Sam Is it an Athlon XP $ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 4 model name : AMD At

Re: CPU frequency scaling

2008-04-22 Thread Peter Tynan
On 22/04/2008, Peter Tynan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 22/04/2008, Vikki Roemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Probably a dumb question, but what processor do you have? > > -- > > Vikki Roemer > > > > "cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep name"

Re: CPU frequency scaling

2008-04-22 Thread Peter Tynan
On 22/04/2008, Vikki Roemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Probably a dumb question, but what processor do you have? > -- > Vikki Roemer "cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep name" gives "model name : AMD Athlon(tm) Processor" Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "un

CPU frequency scaling

2008-04-21 Thread Peter Tynan
I came across an article over at http://polishlinux.org/linux/debian/green-pcs-cpu-frequency-scaling-in-linux/ about CPU frequency scaling and thought I's give it a try but whenever I run the command "modprobe powernow_k7" or "modprobe acpi_cpufreq" I get the response along the lines of "FATAL:

Re: dpkg unable to write to /var/lib/dpkg/status, /var partition full

2008-04-20 Thread Peter Tynan
On 20/04/2008, Kyle Barbour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello there, > > I booted up my system this morning and tried to install something with > aptitude, only to get the error message: > > W: Could not lock the cache file. Opening in read-only mode; any > changes you make to the states of p

Re: debian utility question

2008-04-20 Thread Peter Tynan
On 20/04/2008, Jude DaShiell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does debian have a utility I can run to check and repair disk permissions? > On a mac under applications and utilities and under disk repair utility > there's a function for repair disk permissions which can check permissions > against a kno

Re: Idea of a Debian Mascot [Was: FW: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections]

2008-02-27 Thread Peter Tynan
On 28/02/2008, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:41:24PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > This message was posted by Sam Hocevar (current Debian Project Leader) > > ... > > > > >I also would like to spend some Debian money on a contest, similar to >

Re: Screen and GPM

2007-11-25 Thread Peter Tynan
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Michael Pobega wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:05:04AM +, Peter Tynan wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Michael Pobega wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to get GPM clicking to work from w

Re: Screen and GPM

2007-11-25 Thread Peter Tynan
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Michael Pobega wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to get GPM clicking to work from within screen; So far I've been without luck. I stumbled upon one page[0] that contained a 'patch' for GPM, but I'm hesitant to try it (First off being that I h

Re: Sending email using Alpine and gmail

2007-11-05 Thread Peter Tynan
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Andrei Popescu wrote: To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Sending email using Alpine and gmail Resent-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 09:06:51 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 01:17:12PM +, Peter Tynan wrote: I'm tryi

Sending email using Alpine and gmail

2007-11-04 Thread Peter Tynan
I'm trying to configure Alpine to send email either using gmails smtp server or the local mail-server (exim4 configured to use gmails smtp server via smarthost). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

media icon and mounting partition

2007-09-11 Thread Peter Tynan
First of all as I an new to both Debian and this list (but not new to Linux) - Hi My problem is that when I added a partition (hdb2) on my hard drive to the fstab file a new icon titled "media" appeared on my desktop. I am sure this is a wonderful idea for removable hard drives it is not what I wa

media icon and mounting partition

2007-09-11 Thread Peter Tynan
First of all as I an new to both Debian and this list - Hi My problem is that when I added a partition (hdb2) on my hard drive to the fstab file a new icon titled "media" appeared on my desktop. I am sure this is a wonderful idea for removable hard drives it is not what I want for a partition on p