XFree86 3.2A?

1997-02-23 Thread Stephen Early
Robert Nicholson writes: > I've heard that the acceleration is worth it. Particularly on my Tecra. > > So are the .deb's available for 3.2A? No. Debian only includes software for which source is available; the XFree86 betas are binary only releases. If you are only interested in the accelerat

What's the trick with X 3.2?

1996-11-29 Thread Stephen Early
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I've looked through the dependencies and I think xlib6 should be installed > first. Turns out there is something called "xlib" that is blocking an > easy upgrade. I get the following few errors: In this particular case it's a bug in the gwm package; it depends on x

Re: Odd X message

1996-11-27 Thread Stephen Early
Guy Maor writes: > Add this to your XF86Config file: > > Section "Modules" > Load "pex5.so" > Load "xie.so" > EndSection Alternatively, if you don't use PEX and XIE then don't add the Load lines. Save yourself a bit of memory... Steve Early -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIS

xdm -- Second X Session

1996-11-26 Thread Stephen Early
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > So far, I've only been able to manually get a second X session going for > root (doesn't seem to work for a normal user :( ) by using the following > command line: "startx -- /usr/X11R6/bin/XF86_Mach64 :1" How about something like 'X :1 -query machinename' where mach

What Debian packages do I need to grab to upgared to Xfree 3.2

1996-11-19 Thread Stephen Early
Stan Brown writes: > Could someone give me a complete list of the Debian packages neededto > upgradeto XFree 3.2 ? Filenames and md5sums: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2027180 Nov 10 05:23 xbase_3.2-0_i386.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14588186 Nov 10 05:36 xbooks_3.2-0_all

X is painful

1996-11-15 Thread Stephen Early
[no-longer CCed to debian-devel because this isn't a developer issue really] Bill Bumgarner writes: > > I have to vent. > > I cannot believe that after HOW MANY years of development, X windows is > still such a completely inconsistent and painful user interface. Ah. The X Window System i

XFree86 3.2 Initial Reports

1996-11-15 Thread Stephen Early
Bill Bumgarner writes: > 1) XF86Setup doesn't provide for resolutions beyond 1280x1024 [though it > does a nice job of ensuring that the server chooses the HIGHEST available > resolution]. Resolutions beyond 1280x1024 are not yet a common case. I suspect that most people using higher resolution

Re: problems with X

1996-10-06 Thread Stephen Early
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >I have installed Debian 1.1.9 and xbase, xlib, xserver-svga, and fvwm >packages. I chose during xbase to use xdm to start x.. and during boot-up >I see the message "starting xdm".. however typing "xdm" at a root prompt >doesn't do anything. I tried xinit a

Re: X authorization

1996-09-15 Thread Stephen Early
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >How is the X authorization set up in Debian? > >I am running xdm and I discovered that only the login user can >start an X window. The 'MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE' authentication method is being used; only X clients with access to the appropriate 'cookie' (an autom

Re: X-window keys

1996-06-16 Thread Stephen Early
On Fri, 14 Jun 1996, Max Hyre wrote: >Martin Alonso Soto Jacome's <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> answer got to > me first: > > > Well, that's exactly what xdm is intended for. xdm tries to keep an > > xserver running permanently, so that you can always login to the system > > using a nice graphical l

Re: .xinitrc

1996-06-13 Thread Stephen Early
On Wed, 12 Jun 1996, David M. Cooke wrote: > I ran into this. Reading /etc/X11/Xsession told me enough to > fix it. > > Edit /etc/X11/config and add the following lines: > allow-user-resources > allow-user-modmap > allow-user-xsession > > I think this should be concidered a bug. These lines sh

Re: xdm problem

1996-06-12 Thread Stephen Early
On Wed, 12 Jun 1996, Zachary DeAquila wrote: > I can't seem to log in through xdm into my newly upgraded from .93 to 1.1 > system. I log in, the screen freaks out as it swaps video modes to > the correct one that I'm running (or is it restarting the X server? > whatever) and then... it comes back

Re: security hole in X????

1996-06-04 Thread Stephen Early
On Tue, 4 Jun 1996, Carlos Carvalho wrote: > The problem is that, with telnet, windows started on the remote > machine open without problems in the local display, even without > giving a xhost on the local machine. Is this correct? It only > happens if you are the same user on both machines. How

Re: installation

1996-05-20 Thread Stephen Early
On Mon, 20 May 1996, Steven Boothe wrote: > Here's the copy that followed the result of inserting my > root disk at the prompt: > > "RAMDISK 1474560 starting 0x0024 > insert root > VFS: Disk change detected on device 210 > RAM disk trying oldstyle RAM image > RAM disk trying oldstyle RAM ima

Re: regular (aka bsd) compress distribution?

1996-05-20 Thread Stephen Early
On Mon, 20 May 1996, Yves Arrouye wrote: > Is it impossible to distribute a real compress program? I know there > may be problems with an LZW patent, but I don't know how they relate > to the distribution of a compress program for say personal use. > If this is possible I'll make a package for i

Re: Imake problems.

1996-05-20 Thread Stephen Early
On Mon, 20 May 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote: > I have tried to use imake on several packages recently. If I try xmkmf I > get something like: > > imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config > Imakefile.c:3: Imake.tmpl: No such file or directory > imake: Exit code 33. Stop. > > Anyone know what

Re: X and ELF/a.out

1996-05-20 Thread Stephen Early
On Mon, 20 May 1996, Scott Barker wrote: > I've noticed that, so far, I can virtually indiscriminately mix and match ELF > and a.out on a partially updated debian system. I'm now wanting to upgrade > X. Will I still be able to use a.out and ELF binaries under X? Yes. The xcompat package contains

Re: dselect complaints

1996-05-20 Thread Stephen Early
On Sun, 19 May 1996, William S. Gribble wrote: > Ian Jackson wrote: > > I'm not interested in hearing any more complaints or even extensive > > suggestions for improvement, unless the person complaining is > > volunteering to do the work on a new interface. > > If you don't want feedback about th

X font server instructions

1996-05-19 Thread Stephen Early
On Fri, 17 May 1996, Olaf Erb wrote: > Loading emacs freezes X11 completely for > about 5 seconds, with a.out everything slowed down during emacs-startup, too, > but not like now. That's the price we pay for new features.. Maybe the new version of emacs is requesting more fonts? The X server do

Re: X Windows

1996-05-17 Thread Stephen Early
On Thu, 16 May 1996, Carlos Carvalho wrote: > Stephen Early ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 16 May 1996 12:45: > >> e.g. have xdm login screens on vc 3,4,5,6 > >Yes, it's possible. Bear in mind that it will be necessary to run an X > >server for each VC, wh

Re: X Windows

1996-05-16 Thread Stephen Early
On Thu, 16 May 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote: > > /etc/init.d/xdm stop > > > When I run the script it seems to run ok, produces no output, and returns > the prompt. However, killing fvwm2 still produces a new login screen (even > when you do it several times). 'ps a' still shows no xdm process. I see

Re: X Windows

1996-05-16 Thread Stephen Early
On Thu, 16 May 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote: > OK, so, I used xdm to start X and things work fine. When I exit fvwm2 I > get a login prompt. Now, I want to shut down the server. > > A. I can find no xdm process either with ps a or top. Is it hiding? No, it should be there. You should be able to kill

Re: X Windows

1996-05-16 Thread Stephen Early
On Thu, 16 May 1996, Craig Sanders wrote: > i don't use xdm at the moment, just startx. > > Is it possible to get xdm to put a login prompt on more than one vc? > > e.g. have xdm login screens on vc 3,4,5,6 > > so i can login on vc3 but let other people share my machine in X windows > without

Re: X Windows

1996-05-16 Thread Stephen Early
On Wed, 15 May 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote: > When I try xdm as a user (with the server up and running via root) I get > told: > Only root wants to use xdm > Have I got some permissions wrong? Or have I just missunderstood...again. You have misunderstood. When it is set up correctly, xdm can be star

Re: X Windows

1996-05-14 Thread Stephen Early
On Mon, 13 May 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote: > I am somewhat put off by the hodge podge of packages in the x11 section. I > know I need: > xserver_x I chose xserver_svga > xlib > xbase > xfntbase > xmanpages > fvwm2 Actually you don't need the xmanpages package; it contains the manpages to do wi

Re: xconsole for 1.1?

1996-05-12 Thread Stephen Early
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[~] >dpkg -S xconsole >xbase: /usr/X11R6/bin/xconsole >xbase: /usr/X11R6/man/man1/xconsole.1x > >Hope that answers your question... That's the unstable xbase. It is, of course, in the stable xbase as well. Steve Early [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 1.1 X setup default: bs/del don't work with motif apps.

1996-05-11 Thread Stephen Early
On Fri, 10 May 1996, Martin Konold wrote: > I did a ln -s /usr/X11R6 /usr/X386 > in order to get the motif application netscape running. > This way it will find the > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XKeysymDB > for wihich netscape looks at > /usr/X386/lib/X11/XKeysymDB > > May the debian team will include th

Re: xconsole

1996-05-07 Thread Stephen Early
> when I start X through xdm, I get a nice xconsole that displays all kind > of messages. When I start xconsole by hand from an X-session (or from my > .xsession-file), I don't get them. How do I get them anyway? Messages from syslogd to xconsole are sent through the named pipe /dev/xconsole. Y

Re: 1.1 fresh installation report

1996-05-07 Thread Stephen Early
On Tue, 7 May 1996, Yves Arrouye wrote: > - Xconsole is still not anywhere. You mean the xconsole program, or the named pipe in /dev? I think that /dev/xconsole should be managed by the syslogd package, as the default syslogd configuration refers to it. > - Having chosen my X server and answer

Re: xbase doesn't setup the server

1996-05-07 Thread Stephen Early
On Thu, 2 May 1996, Carlos Carvalho wrote: > I upgraded X to ELF from .99R6, and after going through xbase, xfnt*, > xlib and some clients, xdm didn't start the server. I had to > re-decipher all the mess of xdm which I obviously had forgotten :-( This is fixed in xbase-3.1.2-9, uploaded today.

Re: xdm config after install

1996-05-06 Thread Stephen Early
On Mon, 6 May 1996, Douglas Bates wrote: > When xbase was being installed I thought I responded that I wanted xdm > to be started at boot time. Now I can see that after a reboot an xdm > process is running but no X-server is started on the default display. It's a known bug in the current X packa

Re: installing debian1.1 in a free partition

1996-05-02 Thread Stephen Early
On Thu, 2 May 1996, Francisco Avelino da Silva wrote: > * The X configuration: hh. I run X well when I try startx xinit or > xdm with fvwm. When I used openwin upon xdm was more complicated, but with > some effort now it works (at home I have a new atlantis-intel > motherboard with a AtiMach64

Re: upgrading from 0.93R6 to 1.1 beta

1996-05-02 Thread Stephen Early
On Thu, 2 May 1996, James D. Freels wrote: > Can I install v 1.1 over the existing v 0.93R6 installation as a usual > package (or whole sets of packages) upgrade? I could not find > instructions on how to do that. Yes, you can. Two sets of instructions have been posted to debian-user recently d

Re: problem upgrade to 1.1

1996-05-02 Thread Stephen Early
On Thu, 2 May 1996, gli wrote: > Then I joyfully upgraded the rest of the system. I upgraded the X11 from > the unstable tree, after I fetched all the packages that I need such as > xbase, xserver-mach32, etc, and install it, also using dselect and > dpkg-ftp, but I got some error messages at the