Re: unresolved symbols on Woody with a RH module

2002-05-28 Thread whbell
Quoting Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 03:29:02PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am running Woody with my own 2.4.18 kernel based on the 2.4.18-5 deb > > package. I have a supplier that has delivered a kernel module for a > special > > software modem that was

unresolved symbols on Woody with a RH module

2002-05-28 Thread whbell
Hello everyone, I am running Woody with my own 2.4.18 kernel based on the 2.4.18-5 deb package. I have a supplier that has delivered a kernel module for a special software modem that was developed using RH 7.2 with the default 2.4.7 kernel. I have set CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y but when I try to ins

passwd segfaulting

2002-02-03 Thread whbell
Hello, I am running up to date woody on a small firewall box. I have had this problem for some time where passwd ALWAYS segfaults when it is called. I have searched archives, looked at the /etc/passwd to see if it may be corrupt. I have password shadowing turned on and cannot find any proble

passwd segfaults on woody

2001-12-08 Thread whbell
Hello all, I have a current Woody box with a 2.2.19 kernel. When I run the passwd command I always get a Segmentation fault. I have searched the Deb User archives and bug list for passwd to no help. Please let me know what else I could do on this system to trouble shoot this problem. Thanks, B

Re: boot problem

1999-03-25 Thread whbell
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >boot=/dev/hda1 > >root=/dev/hda1 > >append="ether=10,0x300,eth0 ether=11,0x310,eth1" > >compact > >install=/boot/boot.b > >delay=20 > >map=/boot/map > >vga=normal > >image=/vmlinuz > >label=Linux > >read-only > > I would remove the compact option. I n

boot problem

1999-03-25 Thread whbell
Hello all, I seem to be causing myself problems in my boot somewhere. Sometime after installing a new kernel and before my next reboot. I do something that breaks my boot process, (I am not used to uptimes of weeks instead of hours ;-). I am using slink with lilo for my boot on a dedicated lin

Re: IP-aliasing scripts - in /etc/rc.boot?

1999-03-10 Thread whbell
Matthew, I have just added an aliased interface to my system. What I did, (anyone, correct me if I am wrong), was to add another section to the bottom of the /etc/init.d/network script. I just followed the syntax used for the two real interfaces but gave the aliased interface the name- ADPT=eth

Re: portforwarding question

1999-03-09 Thread whbell
Ralf, That takes of this issue then. I added a port of my choosing to the /etc/services and everything is working as expected. Yesterday I did the same trial with forwarding port 80 to the internal service. It was successful for me though, (of course my real site was gone). Are you asking for

Re: portforwarding question

1999-03-09 Thread whbell
Hello again Ralf, You are correct in the assumption of using port 8080 below. That is exactly what I am doing now, (it works great BTW!). Is 8080 the correct port to use? Now that 8080 will be in use, can I just start pulling ports out of the air for other web services, (that is if I had any ot

Re: portforwarding question

1999-03-09 Thread whbell
Anyone? I will try one more post with these questions. Thanks, -Bill > Hello again, > > I have a web site on my Debian box visible to the > world. Of course this is using xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80. > > I also have an internal web site visible to the world > using portforwarding xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:. > >

portforwarding question

1999-03-08 Thread whbell
Hello again, I have a web site on my Debian box visible to the world. Of course this is using xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80. I also have an internal web site visible to the world using portforwarding xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:. Question 1- Which port(s) should I forward to allow this visibility and not overrun my r

Re:[SOLVED] ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread whbell
Quoting "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 19:52:34 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >I checked with dselect and found I have ipmasq 3.3.1 installed already. > >There is NO sign of ipmasqadm on my system anywhere. > > > >I have run 'find / -name ipmasqadm' with no hi

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread whbell
Quoting Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Are you sure you don't mean ipfwadm (which is part of netbase)? > > Bob > > On Thu, 4 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I checked with dselect and found I have ipmasq 3.3.1 installed already. > > There is NO sign of ipmasqadm on my system anywher

Re: question regarding this news group and accessing it.

1999-03-05 Thread whbell
Quoting Ramiel Givergis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > thanks, I just did it > do I need to now unsubscribe to this email so I don't get the messages? > > At 07:45 PM 3/4/99 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Quoting Ramiel Givergis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> I really hate having to download all of th

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread whbell
Quoting "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 15:51:51 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Please help me find this beast :-) > > I *think* it's > > http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary- > i386/net/ipmasq_3.3.1.deb > > Unfortunately I'm still

Re: question regarding this news group and accessing it.

1999-03-05 Thread whbell
Quoting Ramiel Givergis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I really hate having to download all of these messages every day > when I read only a handfull. I do all my email on my side > NT computer with Eudora and filter all the debian user emails to > another folder. > > I was wondering if there is a place

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-04 Thread whbell
Quoting "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 13:25:07 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >1- Am I on the right track with the ipmasqadm? > > Yes. YOu invoke it like this: > > ipmasqadm portfw ... > > >2- Is there a .deb out there for ipmasqadm? > > Yes. I'm pretty

ipmasqadm question

1999-03-04 Thread whbell
Hello all, I seem to be lost on this issue, but here goes. I am running a mostly slink system with a 2.2.1 kernel. How do I enable port forwarding with this setup? I have the kernel built correctly, (I believe), so I am not concerned in that area. My question has to do with the tool(s) used

Re: ifconfig, ipaliased interface question

1999-02-25 Thread whbell
Further study on my part reveals that forcing ipchains to use the interface of eth1:0 is not correct. The more I look at this issue, the less I understand the workings of ipmasq, (which I think does a very good job :-). I need to retract my statement of the possible bug in ifconfig and I will wai

ifconfig, ipaliased interface question

1999-02-25 Thread whbell
Hello, I am finding a problem with my system in the interaction between ifconfig and ipmasq, (enumerate-if specifically). System configuration- Debian 2.1, (mostly) Kernel 2.2.1 eth0, internal 192.168.1.1 eth1, external 206.xxx.xxx.xxx eth1:0, internal 192.168.2.1 Problem, (feature?) When ip

Re: Web email packages question

1999-02-22 Thread whbell
>> What packages are available that would allow me to get >> to my email from the web server on my system? > > Run -- don't walk! -- to http://www.tdyc.com/~rkrusty/Debian/ and grab Ivan >Moore's IMP setup. When I did an overview of all the web-based systems IMP >stood out as at least one of the