was used for multiplication
symbol so they continued on using a dot for decimal (as it should be).
God help the United States though with its continual reliance on the
Imperial system for measurement and it's crazy date/time setup.
On 2017-05-27 10:20, Curt wrote:
On 2017-05-27, gwmf...@openmailbox.org wrote:
This definitely explains the problem (Thanks for contributing!), but I
don't think it's a real solution because changing the Gnome region
like
described (although it does change LC_TIME) changes other variables
(i
Op 27-05-17 om 14:33 schreef gwmf...@openmailbox.org:
Denmark does LC_NUMERIC wrong (using a comma where there should be a
decimal point).
Really? When did Denmark start using a decimal point instead of a comma?
Regards,
Frank
On 2017-05-27, gwmf...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> This definitely explains the problem (Thanks for contributing!), but I
> don't think it's a real solution because changing the Gnome region like
> described (although it does change LC_TIME) changes other variables (in
> addition to LC_TIME) that
This definitely explains the problem (Thanks for contributing!), but I
don't think it's a real solution because changing the Gnome region like
described (although it does change LC_TIME) changes other variables (in
addition to LC_TIME) that make no sense for the United States (eg.,
LC_NUMERIC,
On 2017-05-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:57:22PM -0400, gwmf...@openmailbox.org wrote:
>> A virtual console (eg, Ctrl+Alt+F2) produces the correct result when I
>> type ncal.
>>
>> But if I type ncal in gnome-terminal, it starts the weeks with Sunday
>> (which is wrong).
You are correct. typing locale in the virtual (text) console produces
LC_TIME=en_DK. So GNOME is overriding PAM's environment.
Thank you so much for helping me discover this! I learned a lot in the
process.
On 2017-05-26 13:01, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:54:24PM -0400, gw
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:57:22PM -0400, gwmf...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> A virtual console (eg, Ctrl+Alt+F2) produces the correct result when I
> type ncal.
>
> But if I type ncal in gnome-terminal, it starts the weeks with Sunday
> (which is wrong). GNOME problem, right? That's why /etc/defau
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:54:24PM -0400, gwmf...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> I neglected to say my environment. Sorry! I am on GNOME and login via
> GDM.
>
> I do not use SSH and it says connection refused when I try.
>
> when I open a virtual console, and type ncal, the calendar begins with
> Mo
A virtual console (eg, Ctrl+Alt+F2) produces the correct result when I
type ncal.
But if I type ncal in gnome-terminal, it starts the weeks with Sunday
(which is wrong). GNOME problem, right? That's why /etc/default/locale
isn't working how I expected?
On 2017-05-26 12:54, gwmf...@openmailbo
I neglected to say my environment. Sorry! I am on GNOME and login via
GDM.
I do not use SSH and it says connection refused when I try.
when I open a virtual console, and type ncal, the calendar begins with
Monday--so this appears to be working.
The problem is with GNOME, then? I suppose Debi
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 06:31:29PM +0200, gwmf...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> ~/Desktop $ cat /etc/default/locale
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> LC_TIME=en_DK.UTF-8
> ~/Desktop $ locale
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> LANGUAGE=
> LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8"
> LC_NUMERIC=en_US.utf8
> LC_TIME=en_US.utf8
> LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-
I did #1 and #2 before posting here, before putting LC_TIME at
/etc/default/locale. I reconfirmed that it is as you say it should be
when running locale -a.
Here is what locale reports after I log back in:
~/Desktop $ locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=
LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NUMERIC=en_US.utf
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:54:14AM -0400, gwmf...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Thank you.
You forgot to include the mailing list.
> I have already done #1 and #2.
Did it work?
> #3 is what I need
Did it work?
> but I want them permanent. I am fine with it being
> system-wide for every login (ie,
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:30:15AM -0400, gwmf...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> This wiki is apparently out of date because it does not work:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Locale#First_day_of_week
I don't advise putting ANYTHING at all in /etc/default/locale. That
would affect all logins b
This wiki is apparently out of date because it does not work:
https://wiki.debian.org/Locale#First_day_of_week
I have the system default set to en_US.utf8. But I need sensical dates
and times (and en_US.utf8 uses nonsensical date & time format).
How can I set my Debian 8 stable to
sebast...@reuter.pw wrote:
> [snip]
> Dan, I've just noticed you are part of Github: https://github.com/dpurger.
>
> Maybe you can recommend that the above commands could be considered for
> Debian?
I'm not a Debian maintainer, nor do I really care about whether Debian
has drivers for a specific c
Hello Debian Support,
Thank you Dan Purgert for your answer. I asked whether RealTek drivers for
rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux, can be approved for Debian, because in Tails
documentation it says the following...
Install additional software
https://tails.boum.org/doc/advanced_topics/additional_software/
date for Debian?
Seb,
I had the similar issue with my Realtek NIC. What I did, I added the
"contrib non-free" to my source.list file.
Then I updated the repositories.
Finally I installed "firmware-realtek"
That&#x
sebast...@reuter.pw wrote:
> Hello Debian Support team,
>
> QUESTION...
>
> Please can you tell me whether the RealTek drivers for
> rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux, can be approved for Debian, so Tails is able to
> work with this fast wireless dongle?
Seems that they're already widely available -- you jus
Hello Debian Support team,
QUESTION...
Please can you tell me whether the RealTek drivers for
rtl8812AU_8821AU_linux, can be approved for Debian, so Tails is able to
work with this fast wireless dongle?
--
More details.
I'm a new c
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:44:58 -0400 Gene Heskett
wrote:
> On Monday 15 August 2016 11:23:17 Curt wrote:
>
> > On 2016-08-15, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > >> No problem. I didn't realise that 'release' was not available on
> > >> wheezy. That is slightly worrying as it suggests that a time will
> >
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:23:17 + (UTC) Curt wrote:
> On 2016-08-15, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >>
> >> No problem. I didn't realise that 'release' was not available on
> >> wheezy. That is slightly worrying as it suggests that a time will
> >> come when esr is no longer available either on wheez
On Monday 15 August 2016 11:23:17 Curt wrote:
> On 2016-08-15, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >> No problem. I didn't realise that 'release' was not available on
> >> wheezy. That is slightly worrying as it suggests that a time will
> >> come when esr is no longer available either on wheezy. In the
> >>
On 14/08/16 19:00, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> It seems that "release" is the only version available for Wheezy and it
> is available in the standard "security" repository for Wheezy, so it
> wouldn't be necessary to add some other repository.
Sorry, when I said "release" I wanted to say "Firefox 45
On 2016-08-15, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>>
>> No problem. I didn't realise that 'release' was not available on
>> wheezy. That is slightly worrying as it suggests that a time will
>> come when esr is no longer available either on wheezy. In the
>> meantime, Gene won't have to add new respositories t
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:02:20 +0100 Liam O'Toole
wrote:
> On 2016-08-14, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Sunday 14 August 2016 21:19:55 Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> >> On 14/08/16 16:40, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> > Greetings all;
> >>
> >> Hi, Gene.
> >>
> >> > It seems the mozilla.wheezy-backports link has b
On 2016-08-14, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 14 August 2016 21:19:55 Daniel Bareiro wrote:
>> On 14/08/16 16:40, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> > Greetings all;
>>
>> Hi, Gene.
>>
>> > It seems the mozilla.wheezy-backports link has been nuked. Can anyone
>> > tell me where to get the latest FF for wheezy?
On 2016-08-15, Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
> Some where about 6 weeks back I wound up with both, and I don't seem
> to be able to make the -esr version work as default, it runs the
> 47.0.1 version anyway. But wheezy is stuck on the older version. And
> I don't care which is running, 5 minutes o
On Sunday 14 August 2016 17:37:09 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 14 August 2016 21:15:40 Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > On 2016-08-14, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > Greetings all;
> > >
> > > It seems the mozilla.wheezy-backports link has been nuked. Can
> > > anyone tell me where to get the latest FF for wh
On Sunday 14 August 2016 16:19:55 Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> On 14/08/16 16:40, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greetings all;
>
> Hi, Gene.
>
> > It seems the mozilla.wheezy-backports link has been nuked. Can
> > anyone tell me where to get the latest FF for wheezy?
> >
> > Thanks all.
>
> Did you try using
Hi, Lisi.
On 14/08/16 18:39, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>> It seems the mozilla.wheezy-backports link has been nuked. Can anyone
>>> tell me where to get the latest FF for wheezy?
>>>
>>> Thanks all.
>> Did you try using http://mozilla.debian.net ?
>>
>> There you can find Firefox ESR 45 for oldstable,
On Sunday 14 August 2016 21:19:55 Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> On 14/08/16 16:40, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greetings all;
>
> Hi, Gene.
>
> > It seems the mozilla.wheezy-backports link has been nuked. Can anyone
> > tell me where to get the latest FF for wheezy?
> >
> > Thanks all.
>
> Did you try using
On Sunday 14 August 2016 21:15:40 Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2016-08-14, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greetings all;
> >
> > It seems the mozilla.wheezy-backports link has been nuked. Can anyone
> > tell me where to get the latest FF for wheezy?
> >
> > Thanks all.
> >
> > Cheers, Gene Heskett
>
> Go to
On 14/08/16 16:40, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
Hi, Gene.
> It seems the mozilla.wheezy-backports link has been nuked. Can anyone
> tell me where to get the latest FF for wheezy?
>
> Thanks all.
Did you try using http://mozilla.debian.net ?
There you can find Firefox ESR 45 for old
On 2016-08-14, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> It seems the mozilla.wheezy-backports link has been nuked. Can anyone
> tell me where to get the latest FF for wheezy?
>
> Thanks all.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
Go to http://mozilla.debian.net/ and use the drop-down lists to generate
the app
Greetings all;
It seems the mozilla.wheezy-backports link has been nuked. Can anyone
tell me where to get the latest FF for wheezy?
Thanks all.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdersh
Le mardi 19 juillet 2016 à 15:04 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit :
> Am 19.07.2016 um 14:42 schrieb David Guyot:
>
> Have you tried running the applications from a console so you get the
> output from stdout/stderr? Do you have any specific error messages?
>
> Does journalctl list any errors?
Well,
Le mardi 19 juillet 2016 à 15:04 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit :
> Have you tried running the applications from a console so you get the
> output from stdout/stderr? Do you have any specific error messages?
No, I started the applications from the graphical interface; I just
started them from termina
Am 19.07.2016 um 14:42 schrieb David Guyot:
> should I fill a bug ticket, or how to figure out? Else, what information
> should I retrieve to examine the bug from all sides?
Have you tried running the applications from a console so you get the
output from stdout/stderr? Do you have any specific e
Hello, there.
I run my up-to-date Jessie the whole week, starting it on Monday morning
and shutting it down on Friday evening. I noticed strange bugs occurring
after a few days running, i.e. often on Wednesday in my case: SSH begins
behaving like there is no SSH agent and insists asking my key
Nevermind, I found that I had renamed the init.d script but systemd
doesn't use it, so it was not sending the correctly named command to
systemd to shut it off.
# systemctl# listed running services
# systemctl stop openvpn.service # service stopped.
If I start it by hand with th
Hi.
I have OpenVPN with a tunnel that I use occasionally, and since the
upgrade to Jessie, with systemd, I cannot stop it from starting on
boot, and once running I cannot stop it.
The only way to turn the tunnel off is to uninstall OpenVPN, and then
reinstall it the next time I want to use it.
S
So, is there anyway to downgrade the gcc lib?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/6a260941-e65f-4a40-8f58-b06c17cbb...@icloud.com
On 2015-08-02 11:06:24, Alex Yang wrote:
> I am using debian sid. After a recent list-upgrade, gnome-shell was removed.
> I found this is because the libstdc++6_5.2.1-14_amd64 package breaks the
> libboost-date-time1.55.0.
>
> Console output as below:
>
> # aptitude inst
On 8/1/15, Alex Yang wrote:
> I am using debian sid. After a recent list-upgrade, gnome-shell was
> removed.
> I found this is because the libstdc++6_5.2.1-14_amd64 package breaks the
> libboost-date-time1.55.0.
>
> Console output as below:
>
> # aptitude install gnome-s
I am using debian sid. After a recent list-upgrade, gnome-shell was removed.
I found this is because the libstdc++6_5.2.1-14_amd64 package breaks the
libboost-date-time1.55.0.
Console output as below:
# aptitude install gnome-shell
The following NEW packages will be installed:
evolution-data
Anil Duggirala wrote:
> Im a newbie and would like to know why libraries in Jessie are some much
> more up to date than in wheezy ? If the libraries have been tested and
> are stable then why arent they available in the wheezy repositories. I
> had a terrible time, trying to get a newe
On 16/05/15 08:18 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2015-05-16, Anil Duggirala wrote:
Im a newbie and would like to know why libraries in Jessie are some much
more up to date than in wheezy ? If the libraries have been tested and
are stable then why arent they available in the wheezy repositori
On 2015-05-16, Anil Duggirala wrote:
> Im a newbie and would like to know why libraries in Jessie are some much
> more up to date than in wheezy ? If the libraries have been tested and
> are stable then why arent they available in the wheezy repositories. I
> had a terrible time, try
Im a newbie and would like to know why libraries in Jessie are some much
more up to date than in wheezy ? If the libraries have been tested and
are stable then why arent they available in the wheezy repositories. I
had a terrible time, trying to get a newer version of glibc to play some
games in
got it!
songbird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/vh0g1c-ga7@id-306963.user.uni-berlin.de
aside from systemd adjusting hwclock on the
shutdown, there is also a call to hwclock.sh in
/etc/rcS.d/S07hwclock.sh which runs on the start
up, so i'm hoping to find out this afternoon if
i've finally solved this. hope so. :)
songbird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lis
Michael Biebl wrote:
>schrieb songbird:
>> will it stay masked when updates to systemd come through?
>
> The mask is created in /etc/systemd/system, which is admin territory,
> i.e. not overwritten by the package.
>
> So your answer is yes.
thanks again!
i really appreciate having you and
Am 29.04.2015 um 16:54 schrieb songbird:
> will it stay masked when updates to systemd come through?
The mask is created in /etc/systemd/system, which is admin territory,
i.e. not overwritten by the package.
So your answer is yes.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent
mask the unit via
> $ systemctl mask hwclock-save.service
thank you for your quick answer, i never searched the
systemdctl output for hwclock keyword (just time and date).
duh <- me... :)
done, and we'll see what tomorrow brings...
will it stay masked when updates to
Am 29.04.2015 um 16:28 schrieb songbird:
> help? any futher things to try that come to mind?
That's most likely hwclock-save.service, which is run on shutdown.
This was added due to [1]. Some users where quite adamant, that they
needed it.
You can mask the unit via
$ systemctl mask hwclock-sav
i reboot this system several times a day, it is
not always connected to the network, it makes no
sense to try to adjust the time or drift factors
when it isn't connected...
a while ago i had things working exactly as i wanted.
which means, the system clock only gets adjusted when i
manually en
On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 22:01 +0200, Linux-Fan wrote:
> Sorry for not posting this to the list in the first place :(
> I just sent it again for the record.
>
> Linux-Fan
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:19:31 +0200
> From: Linux-Fan
> T
On 2015-04-13 20:22 +0200, Gene Heskett wrote:
> ISTR Jessie was supposed to be "stable" as a debian 8 release on the
> 15th.
No, the only announce I noticed[1] mentions the 25th.
> Is that still the plan?
I haven't heard otherwise.
Cheers,
Sven
1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-dev
Sorry for not posting this to the list in the first place :(
I just sent it again for the record.
Linux-Fan
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:19:31 +0200
From: Linux-Fan
To: Gene Heskett
Subject: Re: Jessie= stable date?
[Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:22:12 -0400] Gene Heskett
wrote
Hello all;
ISTR Jessie was supposed to be "stable" as a debian 8 release on the
15th.
Is that still the plan?
Thanks.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web pa
data' if you don't like the time after the upgrade.
>
> I presume you mean timezone, for changing the time I used to use 'date
> -s' but with ntp installed that is no longer necesssary.
In a way, both. Apt talks about 'Current default time zone', but then
shows
the official website,
> > and I did not find such an information.
>
> Every time you upgrade tzdata - apt tells you to run 'dpkg-reconfigure
> tzdata' if you don't like the time after the upgrade.
I presume you mean timezone, for changing the time I used to us
> Nothing is missing. But we all miss things at some time or the other. :)
> 9.4.5. System and hardware time
My fault :) Bye
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debi
On Fri 03 Apr 2015 at 15:54:03 +0200, Racla Grillyz wrote:
> > You didn't try very hard, did you? This list is not intended as a
> > replacement for google!
> >
> > LMGTFU: http://bit.ly/1NGl5FG
>
> I would rather say "I didn't _google_ very hard" -- has it turned to
> be mandatory? Debian has i
> You didn't try very hard, did you? This list is not intended as a
> replacement for google!
>
> LMGTFU: http://bit.ly/1NGl5FG
I would rather say "I didn't _google_ very hard" -- has it turned to
be mandatory? Debian has its own documentation [1], and if something (quite
basic)
is missing on it
On Fri 03 Apr 2015 at 13:30:35 +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Racla Grillyz wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, it worked like a charme.
> > Just want to point out that I checked on the
> > official debian manual/reference from the official website,
> > and I did
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 03:02 -0700, Racla Grillyz wrote:
> Hi, during installation (of Wheezy) I picked the wrong time
> zone respect to my own.
>
> So: where does that information live in the system?
> How can I set it to a new one?
You can reset it from the "Date &am
On 03/04/15 12:24, Racla Grillyz wrote:
>
> Thanks, it worked like a charme.
> Just want to point out that I checked on the
> official debian manual/reference from the official website,
> and I did not find such an information.
>
>
You didn't try very hard, did you? This list is not intende
Hi.
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Racla Grillyz wrote:
>
> Thanks, it worked like a charme.
> Just want to point out that I checked on the
> official debian manual/reference from the official website,
> and I did not find such an information.
Every time you upgrade tzdata - apt
Thanks, it worked like a charme.
Just want to point out that I checked on the
official debian manual/reference from the official website,
and I did not find such an information.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On 03/04/15 12:02, Racla Grillyz wrote:
>
> Hi, during installation (of Wheezy) I picked the wrong time
> zone respect to my own.
>
> So: where does that information live in the system?
> How can I set it to a new one?
>
> Thanks
>
>
dpkg-reconfigure tzdata
--
Tony van der Hoff | mailto:t
Hi.
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 03:02:08AM -0700, Racla Grillyz wrote:
>
> Hi, during installation (of Wheezy) I picked the wrong time
> zone respect to my own.
>
> So: where does that information live in the system?
> How can I set it to a new one?
Short version is - run 'dpkg-reconfigure tzdata'
Hi, during installation (of Wheezy) I picked the wrong time
zone respect to my own.
So: where does that information live in the system?
How can I set it to a new one?
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
Hi all,
Context: Wheezy x86_64 fresh install, plus all available updates,
plus systemd-sysv from wheezy-backports.
Is it possible to change the date format used by the GNOME Classic
Clock Applet? It seems nothing i do will get it change from the US
month-before-day format.
In GNOME
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Abdelkader Belahcene wrote:
> I want to use my mirror for more long time,
> for example the release contains the lines
>
> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 02:49:54 UTC
> Valid-Until: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 02:49:54 UTC
>
> and then I can't update the system afte
Hi,
I used apt-get mirror to create a local mirror ( for testing ), it runs
fine,
but I have a valid-date problem.
I want to use my mirror for more long time,
for example the release contains the lines
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 02:49:54 UTC
Valid-Until: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 02:49:54 UTC
and then
lacing the libtool in the package's root directory by a
symbolic link to /usr/bin/libtool. This would give me the up-to-date one
in my system.
No luck there; now I get complaints that it can't open the file. Since
the file there has read and execute permissions, I conclude that it's
On 08/04/2014 08:11 AM Michael Kjörling wrote:
On 4 Aug 2014 21:59 +1200, from cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz (Chris Bannister):
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 05:08:38AM -0400, ken wrote:
It was quite awhile ago, but I used gthumb to offload photos from my Nikon.
I didn't like it though because the
2014-08-04 11:08 keltezéssel, ken írta:
> It was quite awhile ago, but I used gthumb to offload photos from my
> Nikon. I didn't like it though because the date&time of the photos were
> all changed to the date&time of the download. I much prefer to keep the
> date&
On 4 Aug 2014 21:59 +1200, from cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz (Chris Bannister):
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 05:08:38AM -0400, ken wrote:
>> It was quite awhile ago, but I used gthumb to offload photos from my Nikon.
>> I didn't like it though because the date&time of the photo
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 05:08:38AM -0400, ken wrote:
> It was quite awhile ago, but I used gthumb to offload photos from my Nikon.
> I didn't like it though because the date&time of the photos were all changed
> to the date&time of the download. I much prefer to keep th
On 04/08/2014, ken wrote:
> It was quite awhile ago, but I used gthumb to offload photos from my
> Nikon. I didn't like it though because the date&time of the photos were
> all changed to the date&time of the download. I much prefer to keep the
> date&time wh
It was quite awhile ago, but I used gthumb to offload photos from my
Nikon. I didn't like it though because the date&time of the photos were
all changed to the date&time of the download. I much prefer to keep the
date&time when the photo was taken. What experience do others
On Friday 13 December 2013 10:29 PM, Rares Aioanei wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have a question : since I usually make debs for myself from the
latest vanilla kernels, I wondered if those would help somebody else,
for example in cases of needed hardware support or some bugfixes. I
know about Debian'
Hello everyone,
I have a question : since I usually make debs for myself from the
latest vanilla kernels, I wondered if those would help somebody else,
for example in cases of needed hardware support or some bugfixes. I
know about Debian's policy about untrusted software sources as well as
the th
Hello everyone,
I have a question : since I usually make debs for myself from the
latest vanilla kernels, I wondered if those would help somebody else,
for example in cases of needed hardware support or some bugfixes. I
know about Debian's policy about untrusted software sources as well as
the th
On 20/11/13 21:35, Ldten K wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to change a date format in LibreOffice Calc (LOC). I thought it
> would be a simple thing to do but for some reason it doesn't work for me.
> What I did:
>
> 1. Open LOC, start a new spreadsheet
> 2. En
On 20 November 2013 21:35, Ldten K wrote:
>
> I am trying to change a date format in LibreOffice Calc (LOC). I thought it
> would be a simple thing to do but for some reason it doesn't work for me.
> What I did:
>
> 1. Open LOC, start a new spreadsheet
> 2. Enter
Hi,
I am trying to change a date format in LibreOffice Calc (LOC). I thought it
would be a simple thing to do but for some reason it doesn't work for me. What
I did:
1. Open LOC, start a new spreadsheet
2. Enter 6 new rows in column A as follows:
20.11.2013
21.11.2013
22.11
(Subject was: SOLVED - aka How to quickly override 'apt-get update'
gpg repo check - was - local (old) sid repo - manually updating
Release date ?)
On 7/13/13, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 7/13/13, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> ...
>> Anyone know what's changed, that is s
On 7/13/13, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
...
> Anyone know what's changed, that is stopping me from temporarily
> ignoring the out of date Release file in my local repo, and/ or how to
> get around this problem, since my previous workaround no longer works?
>
> Very much looking f
(6.0/squeeze)
W: Failed to fetch file:/public/debian/debian/dists/sid/Release
W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old
ones used instead.
Anyone know what's changed, that is stopping me from temporarily
ignoring the out of date Release file in my local
Dear Markus,
Markus Schönhaber wrote:
> Thanks for your answer, Claudius!
Welcome :)
> 19.05.2013 14:41, Claudius Hubig:
> > You are now supposed to compare the Debian package version reported
> > by uname (3.2.41-2 in the example above) against the one currently
> > installed (e.g. using dpkg -
0-4-amd64
>> ~#
>>
>> There is no date in the uname output anymore, which I could compare to
>> the kernel image file's timestamp.
>
> You are now supposed to compare the Debian package version reported
> by uname (3.2.41-2 in the example above) against the one c
Dear Markus,
Markus Schönhaber wrote:
> ~# uname -a
> Linux wheezy 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.41-2 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> ~# ls -l /boot/vm*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2833376 May 15 23:58 /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-4-amd64
> ~#
>
> There is no date in the uname output anymore, whi
ot 2833376 May 15 23:58 /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-4-amd64
~#
There is no date in the uname output anymore, which I could compare to
the kernel image file's timestamp.
Can someone please explain what exactly the "improvement" is in removing
information from uname's output?
If I
I see from debian-devel-announce that the release date is finally fixed:
From: Neil McGovern
To: debian-devel-announce-AT-lists.debian.org
Subject:FINAL release update
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:22:21 +0100
Message-ID: <20130418142
<>
301 - 400 of 1381 matches
Mail list logo
