Re: /etc/apt/sources.list example [WAS Re: medically smart watches]

On 2/25/24 07:14, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: I have to agree, and pursuing that seems to disclose I do not have the non-frre in my configs. So I'm now asking for help to add it to my /etc/apt/sources *.list stuff. For apt sources.list - have a look at: https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList

/etc/apt/sources.list example [WAS Re: medically smart watches]

On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 05:16:21AM -0500, gene heskett wrote: > On 2/25/24 03:36, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 02:05:50PM -0500, Lee wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 12:06 PM gene heskett wrote: > > > > On 2/24/24 11:03, Loïc Grenié wrote: > > > > > On Sat Feb 24th, 2024,

Re: About /etc/apt/sources.list | Warehouse for users of the stable version

ce if > only bullseye and bullsey-updates were added to /etc/apt/sources.list and he > added all four bullseys to /etc/apt/sources.list at the same time? > > Please give me some of your professional advice. Hi.. This is my second attempt to help answer, LOL. After looking at your link th

Re: About /etc/apt/sources.list | Warehouse for users of the stable version

/tracker.debian.org/pkg/libisofs as "browse source code" to the right under the title "links".) > Would it make any difference if > only bullseye and bullsey-updates were added to /etc/apt/sources.list and he > added all four bullseys to /etc/apt/sources.list at th

About /etc/apt/sources.list | Warehouse for users of the stable version

/sources.list and he added all four bullseys to /etc/apt/sources.list at the same time? Please give me some of your professional advice. Thank! Best Regards, - Yunsheng Xie Email: c0ldz...@outlook.com

Re: xterm. Valid /etc/apt/sources.list [Was 26th pass]

a claim that in addition to all your *other* problems, > you have broken Debian sources on at least one of your systems. No > actual *proof*, mind you. Just a claim. > > Or... is it even Debian? Hell. It's probably not. It's probably > your heavily customized version of Raspbian tha

Re: pregunta sobre format línia deb a /etc/apt/sources.list

Ha funcionat!   Gràcies Josep

Re: pregunta sobre format línia deb a /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sat, 26 Feb 2022 at 08:37, Àlex wrote: > Bon dia, benvolguts/des > Hola, Àlex, > > a Debian Testing , a /etc/apt/sources.list tinc la línia: > > deb [arch=amd64] https://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/ > bullseye contrib > > Avui he tingut nec

pregunta sobre format línia deb a /etc/apt/sources.list

Bon dia, benvolguts/des a Debian Testing , a /etc/apt/sources.list tinc la línia:    deb [arch=amd64] https://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian/ bullseye contrib Avui he tingut necessitat d'afegir a la línia anterior el següent:    [signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/virtualbox-archive

Re: what's wrong with my "/etc/apt/sources.list"? Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default

Hi Evelyn, On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 06:00:08PM +0200, Evelyn Pereira Souza wrote: > E: The repository 'http://security.debian.org/debian-security > bullseye/updates Release' does not have a Release file. A few people have by now pointed out the specific cause of your problem, but the root cause

Re: what's wrong with my "/etc/apt/sources.list"? Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default

> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates main contrib > non-free > deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates main > contrib non-free I think you are missing bullseye-security. I have this: deb http://mirrors.linode.com/debian-security/

Re: what's wrong with my "/etc/apt/sources.list"? Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default

On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 12:06:18PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2021-08-15 at 12:00, Evelyn Pereira Souza wrote: > > > Hi > > > > apt-get update > > Ign:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates InRelease > > Err:2 http://security.debian.org/debian-security

Re: what's wrong with my "/etc/apt/sources.list"? Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default

pdating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is > therefore disabled by default. > N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user > configuration details. > > > cat /etc/apt/sources.list > # > > # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.10.0 _Buster_ - O

Re: what's wrong with my "/etc/apt/sources.list"? Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default

On Sun 15 Aug 2021 at 12:06:18 -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2021-08-15 at 12:00, Evelyn Pereira Souza wrote: > > > Hi > > > > apt-get update > > Ign:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates InRelease > > Err:2 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates

Re: what's wrong with my "/etc/apt/sources.list"? Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default

On 2021-08-15 at 12:00, Evelyn Pereira Souza wrote: > Hi > > apt-get update > Ign:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates InRelease > Err:2 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates Release >404 Not Found [IP: 199.232.138.132 80] > deb

what's wrong with my "/etc/apt/sources.list"? Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default

) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. cat /etc/apt/sources.list # # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.10.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 xfce-CD Binary-1 20210619-16:12]/ bullseye main #deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.10.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 xfce-CD Binary-1

Re: ¿Hay alguna diferecia en especificar las fuentes unstable o sid en el archivo /etc/apt/sources.list?.

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 01:25:12PM +0200, Julio Herrero wrote: > > > El 25 jun 2020, a las 12:55, Jose Luis Alarcon Sanchez > > escribió: > > > > Buenos dias. > > Buenos días > > > > Es una pequeña duda: en el archivo sources.list se puede especificar para el > > repositorio main (y para otros)

Re: ¿Hay alguna diferecia en especificar las fuentes unstable o sid en el archivo /etc/apt/sources.list?.

> El 25 jun 2020, a las 12:55, Jose Luis Alarcon Sanchez > escribió: > > Buenos dias. Buenos días > > Es una pequeña duda: en el archivo sources.list se puede especificar para el > repositorio main (y para otros) bien la distribucion sid o bien unstable, o > también otras experimentales o

¿Hay alguna diferecia en especificar las fuentes unstable o sid en el archivo /etc/apt/sources.list?.

Buenos dias. Es una pequeña duda: en el archivo sources.list se puede especificar para el repositorio main (y para otros) bien la distribucion sid o bien unstable, o también otras experimentales o las estables que existan en cada momento. Lo que no tengo claro es si el sistema resultante, la

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Fungi4All wrote: > LXDE is much more reliable than lxqt. LXQT was buggy and broken still a year or so ago. Now it works nicely and looks good. It will finally replace LXDE. It provides a light environment especially if you can use other

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:08 AM, Fungi4All wrote: > I don't think it says such a thing anywhere, buster can not change > to testing as there is nothing to change for the next 2 years. > > I say you cut that ftp.fi and make it into deb.debian and then > $ sudo apt update

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Fungi4All wrote: > Isn't Debian 9.1 Stretch? Ah damn, the "9.1" was a typo from me. I experimented with both Stretch and the testing installations under VirtualBox. My post was about "testing" which is now "buster", installed from:

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

h? > I wanted to use the testing branch also after buster goes stable. Isn't this Spring/Summer 2019? > According to this page: > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianTesting > it is possible by editing /etc/apt/sources.list. > I followed the instructions and changed "buster" to "

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

On 16 September 2017 at 23:25, Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 16.09.17 15:44, Juha Manninen wrote: >> BTW, the reply address of this mailing list is set wrong. In some >> other lists I can click Reply and it goes to the list. Here it would >> go to the person who sent the

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

On 16.09.17 21:28, Juha Manninen wrote: > On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Erik Christiansen > > List-Id: > > List-Post: ... > I use the browser interface for GMail. Ok, it is not very geeky but it > works for me. > I cannot see any GMail setting that would

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Erik Christiansen wrote: > The deficiency lies in your MUA settings. Take a look at the headers on > the list traffic you receive: > > List-Id: > List-Post: > > Without knowing which MUA you use, it's

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

Eero Volotinen wrote: > You need to import needed gpg key. > Try something like this > gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key 7638D0442B90D010 > gpg -a --export 7638D0442B90D010 | sudo apt-key add - No! You should *never* manually import any ReleaseKey. Those

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

On 16.09.17 15:44, Juha Manninen wrote: > BTW, the reply address of this mailing list is set wrong. In some > other lists I can click Reply and it goes to the list. Here it would > go to the person who sent the last message. I have to edit the > recipient field. The deficiency lies in your MUA

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

# export LC_MESSAGES=C root@debian:/home/juha# gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key 7638D0442B90D010 key 7638D0442B90D010: 10 signatures not checked due to missing keys gpg: key 7638D0442B90D010: "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (8/jessie) " not changed gpg: Total

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

Juha Manninen [2017-09-16 11:57:32+03] wrote: > # apt-get update > Nouda:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing InRelease [135 kB] > Vrhe:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing InRelease > Seuraavia allekirjoituksia ei voinut varmentaa koska julkista > avainta ei ole saatavilla: NO_PUBKEY

Re: Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

DebianTesting > it is possible by editing /etc/apt/sources.list. > I followed the instructions and changed "buster" to "testing" and > commented out security update lines. > It now looks like this : > deb http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/ testing main >

Editing /etc/apt/sources.list breaks update

it is possible by editing /etc/apt/sources.list. I followed the instructions and changed "buster" to "testing" and commented out security update lines. It now looks like this : deb http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/ testing main deb-src http://ftp.fi.debian.org/debian/ test

Re: how to get xvid codec even though non-free is there in my /etc/apt/sources.list

Le tridi 23 prairial, an CCXXV, shirish शिरीष a écrit : > Vlc gives me this - > > [7fa1180009c8] vdpau_avcodec generic error: decoder profile not > supported: 7 This means that it is trying to use a hardware-accelerated decoder, and the hardware does not support decoding that particular

Re: how to get xvid codec even though non-free is there in my /etc/apt/sources.list

at bottom :- On 11/06/2017, shirish शिरीष wrote: > Dear Friends, > > Please CC me as I'm not subscribed to the list. I am trying to watch a > video which unfortunately uses xvid codec. I do have libxvidcore4 > installed (using stretch) but it still complains about not

how to get xvid codec even though non-free is there in my /etc/apt/sources.list

Dear Friends, Please CC me as I'm not subscribed to the list. I am trying to watch a video which unfortunately uses xvid codec. I do have libxvidcore4 installed (using stretch) but it still complains about not having the right codec. Can anyone help ? -- Regards, Shirish

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

Yo creo que los novatos de ahora somos más perezosos para leer documentación que los de antes. No voy a negar que yo he preguntado en listas cosas sin leer quizá con la suficiente atención y tiempo la documentación que al final tengo que leer para entender como funciona tal o cual cosa; así que

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

El 13/01/16 a las 21:47, Aradenatorix Veckhôm Awecaelus escribió: Yo creo que los novatos de ahora somos más perezosos para leer documentación que los de antes. No voy a negar que yo he preguntado en listas cosas sin leer quizá con la suficiente atención y tiempo la documentación que al final

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

El Wed, 13 Jan 2016 21:59:54 -0300 Angel Claudio Alvarez escribió: > El Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:10:12 -0300 > "alparkom ." escribió: > > > 2016-01-11 21:24 GMT-03:00 Angel Claudio Alvarez > > : > > > > > > Por que no LEES

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

El 11/01/16 a las 20:40, alparkom . escribió: Si la leo mijo, pasa que prefiero leer el resumen escrito de alguien de aquí, a leerme 10 páginas de alguna wiki. Tu sabes... 30 minutos leyendo la wiki y 45 segundos el mensaje por la lista. Además, para que esta la lista si responderás de esa

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

El 11/01/16 a las 20:21, Debia Linux escribió: Excelentisima respuesta. Me agrado, sabe lo que dice, es breve y conciso. ¡Mis felicitaciones!. Gracias por la aportación. (Otros ubieran dicho... "Googlea" y esta bien, pero esta respuesta ayuda mucho a la lista). Debianeromx Es un nuevo, se

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

El Fri, 8 Jan 2016 17:11:16 -0300 "alparkom ." escribió: > Me explican que es ese archivo y para que sirve? El mio contiene: > > # > > # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 8.2.0 _Jessie_ - Official amd64 DVD > Binary-1 20150906-11:13]/ jessie contrib main > #deb cdrom:[Debian

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

2016-01-08 14:21 GMT-06:00 Jose Maldonado : > El 08/01/16 a las 15:41, alparkom . escribió: > >> Me explican que es ese archivo y para que sirve? El mio contiene: >> >> # >> >> # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 8.2.0 _Jessie_ - Official amd64 DVD >> Binary-1 20150906-11:13]/

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

2016-01-11 21:24 GMT-03:00 Angel Claudio Alvarez : > > Por que no LEES la documentacion > Si la leo mijo, pasa que prefiero leer el resumen escrito de alguien de aquí, a leerme 10 páginas de alguna wiki. Tu sabes... 30 minutos leyendo la wiki y 45 segundos el

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

El 11/01/16 a las 20:56, alparkom . escribió: No se a que le llamas mala actitud. De todas formas no seguiré, con este hilo, sino probablemente digas que te estoy provocando. Por cierto, las reglas dicen que no ocupes HTML para los mensajes. Porque lo ocupabas, o no? Saludos. Ocupar HTML?

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

2016-01-10 15:48 GMT-03:00 alparkom . : > 2016-01-10 15:21 GMT-03:00 Felix Perez : >> 2016-01-08 17:11 GMT-03:00 alparkom . : >>> Me explican que es ese archivo y para que sirve? El mio contiene: >>> >> >> ¿Es en serio la

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

2016-01-08 17:11 GMT-03:00 alparkom . : > Me explican que es ese archivo y para que sirve? El mio contiene: > ¿Es en serio la pregunta? > # > > # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 8.2.0 _Jessie_ - Official amd64 DVD > Binary-1 20150906-11:13]/ jessie contrib main > #deb

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

2016-01-10 15:21 GMT-03:00 Felix Perez : > 2016-01-08 17:11 GMT-03:00 alparkom . : >> Me explican que es ese archivo y para que sirve? El mio contiene: >> > > ¿Es en serio la pregunta? > No, como se te ocurre. Jajaja. Ya leí bastante sobre ello.

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

El Fri, 08 Jan 2016 17:11:16 -0300, alparkom . escribió: > Me explican que es ese archivo y para que sirve? (...) ¿Eso de buscar documentación como que no te va mucho, verdad? :-) https://debian-handbook.info/browse/es-ES/stable/apt.html#sect.apt-sources.list Saludos, -- Camaleón

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

2016-01-08 17:11 GMT-03:00 alparkom . : > Me explican que es ese archivo y para que sirve? El mio contiene: Claro: https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList -- Luis Eduardo Arevalo ReyesUser #354770 http://linuxcounter.net Fono +56 9 54012831

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

El ene. 8, 2016 17:23, "alparkom ." escribió: > > Ai not spik inglich. Jajaja. OMG! Bueno, ya te lo explicaron en la respuesta anterior. Sólo agregar que lo que tú tienes es las fuentes de los DVDs. Eso sólo te va a servir si tienes los DVDs puestos en tu unidad óptica.

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

> > OMG! > > Bueno, ya te lo explicaron en la respuesta anterior. Sólo agregar que lo que > tú tienes es las fuentes de los DVDs. Eso sólo te va a servir si tienes los > DVDs puestos en tu unidad óptica. Buena opción si quieres instalar algo y no > tienes acceso a internet. Mala opción si quieres

/etc/apt/sources.list

Me explican que es ese archivo y para que sirve? El mio contiene: # # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 8.2.0 _Jessie_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-1 20150906-11:13]/ jessie contrib main #deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 8.2.0 _Jessie_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-1 20150906-11:13]/ jessie contrib main #deb

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

El 08/01/16 a las 15:41, alparkom . escribió: Me explican que es ese archivo y para que sirve? El mio contiene: # # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 8.2.0 _Jessie_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-1 20150906-11:13]/ jessie contrib main #deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 8.2.0 _Jessie_ - Official amd64 DVD

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

El 08/01/16 a las 16:35, alparkom . escribió: OMG! Bueno, ya te lo explicaron en la respuesta anterior. Sólo agregar que lo que tú tienes es las fuentes de los DVDs. Eso sólo te va a servir si tienes los DVDs puestos en tu unidad óptica. Buena opción si quieres instalar algo y no tienes acceso

Re: Consulta /etc/apt/sources.list

El Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:24:10 -0300, Javier Argentina escribió: El día 21 de noviembre de 2012 12:46, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: (...) Los automatismos están bien pero sólo hasta cierto punto y para ciertas cosas :-) Nada que no se solucione en 3 o 4 horas de reinstalar el

Consulta /etc/apt/sources.list

Buenas, tengo una pequeña duda. Mi /etc/apt/sources.list apunta a los repositorios stable Hoy la estable es squeeze, pero en algun tiempo va a ser wheezy Mi sistema cambiara de squeeze a wheezy o debo modificar algo?, tendre algun problema? Muchas Gracias -- Juan Martin Villanueva

RE: Consulta /etc/apt/sources.list

/apt/sources.list apunta a los repositorios stable Hoy la estable es squeeze, pero en algun tiempo va a ser wheezy Mi sistema cambiara de squeeze a wheezy o debo modificar algo?, tendre algun problema? Muchas Gracias -- Juan Martin Villanueva -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ

Re: Consulta /etc/apt/sources.list

El 21/11/12 12:20, Juan Martin escribió: Buenas, tengo una pequeña duda. Mi /etc/apt/sources.list apunta a los repositorios stable Hoy la estable es squeeze, pero en algun tiempo va a ser wheezy Mi sistema cambiara de squeeze a wheezy o debo modificar algo?, tendre algun problema? Muchas

Re: Consulta /etc/apt/sources.list

El Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:20:54 -0300, Juan Martin escribió: Buenas, tengo una pequeña duda. Mi /etc/apt/sources.list apunta a los repositorios stable Hoy la estable es squeeze, pero en algun tiempo va a ser wheezy Mi sistema cambiara de squeeze a wheezy o debo modificar algo?, tendre algun

RE: Consulta /etc/apt/sources.list

/apt/sources.list apunta a los repositorios stable Hoy la estable es squeeze, pero en algun tiempo va a ser wheezy Mi sistema cambiara de squeeze a wheezy o debo modificar algo?, tendre algun problema? Muchas Gracias -- Juan Martin Villanueva -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ

Re: Consulta /etc/apt/sources.list

El 21 de noviembre de 2012 19:24, Javier Argentina javier.debian.bb...@gmail.com escribió: El día 21 de noviembre de 2012 12:46, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:20:54 -0300, Juan Martin escribió: Buenas, tengo una pequeña duda. Mi /etc/apt/sources.list

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Mon, 09 May 2011 00:12:23 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 13:28, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: There is a point when I don't care about being right or wrong, I made my say and I'll not argue over trivial things with people who I'd really rather get along with.

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sunday 08 May 2011 22:12:23 Dotan Cohen wrote: That does not mean that I intend to debate the subject for three days over tens of posts. So why are you doing it?? Here's a revolutionary idea: you could let someone else have the last word and get on with your life. No-one but you yourself

Re: URL shortening (was Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list)

On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 01:33, Arno Schuring aelschur...@hotmail.com wrote: However, this mailing list is archived. That means that links given on this mailing list are not simply fire-and-forget, they should be able to be resolved years from now. And while we cannot guarantee that any link

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 23:34, Heddle Weaver weaver2wo...@gmail.com wrote: I appreciate your willingness to help, don't get me wrong. But just as I am here to learn, I thought that you might also be interested in learning the error of using url-shortening services. Oh, I remember you now.

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 07:50, Freeman hew...@gmail.com wrote: Craigevil is very cool but his sources.list has open lines so I cleaned it up, I hope. It's late here. Check it. Especailly for something that wrapped. That's great, thanks! I will go cherry-pick through there. -- Dotan Cohen

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:41, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: I just tried tinyurl with wget and got the same IP address (and 200 response) as you. I didn't check the links, though. Then? Are you still getting trouble to reach the tinyurl web site? If yes, there could be a filter/proxy in

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sun, 08 May 2011 09:42:49 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:41, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: I just tried tinyurl with wget and got the same IP address (and 200 response) as you. I didn't check the links, though. Then? Are you still getting trouble to reach the

Re: URL shortening (was Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list)

On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 09:28:54AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: There were actually a few cases of these link-shortening services going under. Tr.im went under and was bought, Canonical and Google both bought and saved one (I don't remember the names) and for a while bit.ly was under threat for

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 13:28, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 08 May 2011 09:42:49 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:41, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: I just tried tinyurl with wget and got the same IP address (and 200 response) as you. I didn't check the

Re: URL shortening (was Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list)

On Sb, 07 mai 11, 00:33:59, Arno Schuring wrote: In other words, please do not use (unnecessary) URL mangling. It needlessly makes your message useless for posterity. +1 Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, 06 May 2011 23:07:15 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: I just tried tinyurl with wget and got the same IP address (and 200 response) as you. I didn't check the links, though. Then? Are you still getting trouble to reach the tinyurl web site? If yes, there could be a filter/proxy in between of

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 04:54, Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote: There is a sample /etc/apt/sources.list file on my kernel-building web page:   http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/Kernel.htm Look for it under Step 1: Update Your sources.list File That is a terrific page, Stephen

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:57, Heddle Weaver weaver2wo...@gmail.com wrote: The tinyurl server is giving a 500 error. Why on earth would you add an unreliable, third-party link to the already fragile chain of HTTP? It didn't then and it doesn't now. Still is for me. I for one do not want

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, 06 May 2011 14:02:47 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:57, Heddle Weaver weaver2wo...@gmail.com wrote: The tinyurl server is giving a 500 error. Why on earth would you add an unreliable, third-party link to the already fragile chain of HTTP? It didn't then and it

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 15:28, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: Still is for me. It works here but anyway, you can use a TinyURL decoder: http://kiserai.net/turl.pl Still 500. That's a server error, not a network error. I'm surprised that it works for anybody. All I can think of here is

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, 06 May 2011 15:47:42 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 15:28, Camaleón wrote: Still is for me. It works here but anyway, you can use a TinyURL decoder: http://kiserai.net/turl.pl Still 500. That's a server error, not a network error. I'm surprised that it works

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 16:32, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 06 May 2011 15:47:42 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 15:28, Camaleón wrote: Still is for me. It works here but anyway, you can use a TinyURL decoder: http://kiserai.net/turl.pl Still 500. That's a

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On 6 May 2011 21:02, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote: Big snip I appreciate your willingness to help, don't get me wrong. But just as I am here to learn, I thought that you might also be interested in learning the error of using url-shortening services. Oh, I remember you now. I

URL shortening (was Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list)

Dotan Cohen (dotanco...@gmail.com on 2011-05-06 23:07 +0300): No, this is not a matter of preference. There is no reason to pipe the links through some third party service [..] What advantage exists at all to use tinyURL? While I share your sentiment in general (I would never click on a

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:04:22AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: Obviously I've done something wrong because on a virgin Squeeze install /etc/apt/sources.list has no repos other than the disc! Can someone please send to me a copy of this file. Custom added repos are fine, I'll be able to figure

Need /etc/apt/sources.list

Obviously I've done something wrong because on a virgin Squeeze install /etc/apt/sources.list has no repos other than the disc! Can someone please send to me a copy of this file. Custom added repos are fine, I'll be able to figure it out. Thanks. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/05/11 09:04, Dotan Cohen wrote: Obviously I've done something wrong because on a virgin Squeeze install /etc/apt/sources.list has no repos other than the disc! Can someone please send to me a copy of this file. Custom added repos are fine

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:07, kuLa deb...@kulisz.net wrote: deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free deb-src http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free deb-src

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On 5 May 2011 18:04, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote: Obviously I've done something wrong because on a virgin Squeeze install /etc/apt/sources.list has no repos other than the disc! Can someone please send to me a copy of this file. Custom added repos are fine, I'll be able to figure

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 14:44, Heddle Weaver weaver2wo...@gmail.com wrote: Why not install netselect-apt and let that do it for you? Regards, 1) I've never heard of it! 2) It doesn't seem to be on the disc, so I'd need a configured repo anyway. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il

Re: Need /etc/apt/sources.list

anyway. There is a sample /etc/apt/sources.list file on my kernel-building web page: http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/Kernel.htm Look for it under Step 1: Update Your sources.list File -- .''`. Stephen Powell : :' : `. `'` `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Vi, 11 feb 11, 15:33:30, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: The testing repositories need not be used either. They are mostly for when the version in testing differs from the version in unstable, the unstable version can't or shouldn't be force-migrated, and the testing version needs

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote: On Vi, 11 feb 11, 15:33:30, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: The testing repositories need not be used either.  They are mostly for when the version in testing differs from the version in unstable, the unstable

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

In 20110212102917.GK18225@think.homelan, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Vi, 11 feb 11, 15:33:30, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: The testing repositories need not be used either. They are mostly for when the version in testing differs from the version in unstable, the unstable version can't or

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sb, 12 feb 11, 05:54:55, Tom H wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote: On Vi, 11 feb 11, 15:33:30, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: The testing repositories need not be used either.  They are mostly for when the version in testing differs

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

://mirror.aarnet.edu.au unstable Release E: Release file expired, ignoring http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/debian/dists/unstable/Release (invalid since 9h 53min 14s) This is after reducing my /etc/apt/sources.list down to just the one line for 'unstable'. Should I re-enter the 'testing' security line back

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:10:49 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Sb, 12 feb 11, 05:54:55, Tom H wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: As far as I understand sid/unstable users should always have testing in their sources.lists, since the Release Managers sometimes remove

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sb, 12 feb 11, 13:40:58, Camaleón wrote: So, should people running sid also add the whole testing repo under all circumstances (as default policy) or just when some package is broken and is in the need of back to the previous version or something is missing? :-? Can you think of a

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:10:49 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Sb, 12 feb 11, 05:54:55, Tom H wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: As far as I understand sid/unstable users should always have testing

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:04:49 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Sb, 12 feb 11, 13:40:58, Camaleón wrote: So, should people running sid also add the whole testing repo under all circumstances (as default policy) or just when some package is broken and is in the need of back to the previous

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

9h 53min 14s) This is after reducing my /etc/apt/sources.list down to just the one line for 'unstable'. Should I re-enter the 'testing' security line back in? The standard 'testing' line also? Re-entering those lines will not cure the problem if unstable's Release file is invalid. Try

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote: On Sb, 12 feb 11, 05:54:55, Tom H wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I understand sid/unstable users should always have testing in their

Re: /etc/apt/sources.list

In AANLkTi=xEVFeQoyF=dav+o92v6nxqgcuugyq36h6y...@mail.gmail.com, Heddle Weaver wrote: E: Release file expired, ignoring http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/debian/dists/unstable/Release (invalid since 9h 53min 14s) This error indicates a bad mirror. Should I re-enter the 'testing' security line back

/etc/apt/sources.list

Hello, I've searched the wiki, reference and google like an idiot but can't seem to find a .list specification for unstable. I've upgraded from Lenny to Squeeze but want to go a little further. Does Unstable require a 'security' resource in the list at all. I'm assuming there isn't an unstable

  1   2   3   >