ear the end trying to `umount` the
> `/tmp/SoMeThInG/proc` mount that it had created. `findmnt` showed me
> that it was mounted on itself, as was `/proc`!
>
> I got it unmounted with `--lazy`.
>
> I'm guessing that the Xen script was merely copying what it saw; the quest
I was running `xen-create-image` when it failed near the end trying to
`umount` the `/tmp/SoMeThInG/proc` mount that it had created. `findmnt`
showed me that it was mounted on itself, as was `/proc`!
I got it unmounted with `--lazy`.
I'm guessing that the Xen script was merely copying wh
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 04:54:26PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>
> Wasn't sudo echo the name of a pop group?
>
> :)
If it wasn't it should've been one.
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Wasn't sudo echo the name of a pop group?
:)
Bret Busby
Armadale
Western Australia
(UTC+0800)
.
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 08:37:16PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 13/05/2024 à 19:45, Stefan Monnier a écrit :
[...]
> > % sudo zsh -l
> > # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> > # ^D
> > logout
> > %
> >
> > 🙂
&
Le 13/05/2024 à 19:45, Stefan Monnier a écrit :
$ su -
Password:
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
# ^D
logout
$
I don't need no stinkin' sudo :-)
And if you only have `sudo`, but not the root password, of course:
% sudo zsh -l
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 01:45:40PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > $ su -
> > Password:
> > # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> > # ^D
> > logout
> > $
> >
> > I don't need no stinkin' sudo :-)
>
> And if you only have `
> $ su -
> Password:
> # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> # ^D
> logout
> $
>
> I don't need no stinkin' sudo :-)
And if you only have `sudo`, but not the root password, of course:
% sudo zsh -l
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/
On 5/13/24 18:52, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Now share your ideas :-)
$ su -
Password:
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
# ^D
logout
$
I don't need no stinkin' sudo :-)
regards,
chris
Since this happens so often, I'm trying to offer a recap.
As others have noted, the above
sudo echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
won't work, since it runs echo under sudo, but the file opening
(that pesky ">") happens in your shell, which is probably running
unp
On 01/10/2019 06:07 AM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:54:45AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
Is there somewhere that catalogs the function of the various "files" under that
directory? What are the functions of the sub-directories with a numeric name?
Choose an
Hi.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:54:45AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Is there somewhere that catalogs the function of the various "files" under
> that directory? What are the functions of the sub-directories with a numeric
> name?
Choose any:
proc(5).
filesystems/p
In another forum there was a discussion comparing execution times of
some different programs accomplishing the same task. The programs were
being run on different machines.
As part of the discussion the use of "grep MHz /proc/cpuinfo" was
suggested. That prompted me to investigate
Hi Andy,
Am 02.08.2018 um 13:01 schrieb Andy Smith:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 09:31:42AM +0200, Martin Drescher wrote:
[...]
>> 4.9. It is not a real problem, that Debian is running well.
>
> It is likely that the kernel's idea of what is a "runnable" process
> has changed since t
where migrated to a Debian 9 with a kernel version 4.9, also all
> patches applied. What I see is a tremendous difference in
> /proc/loadavg. It is like 3 ~ 4 in kernel 2.6 and like 15 ~ 20 in
> 4.9. It is not a real problem, that Debian is running well.
It is likely that the kernel
[...]
> Hi Martin,
>
> can you show real data from /proc/loadavg output? Which column do you
> compare?
I' talking about the 1/5/15 minute numbers.
> I wouldn't worry about difference in /proc/loadavg because everything is
> different between RHEL/CentOS 6 and Debia
On 07/31/2018 10:31 AM, Martin Drescher wrote:
> Hi ML members,
>
> I have a question about how the numbers compute which I get from
> /proc/loadavg.
> I'm running a bunch of HTTP servers, most of them running a RHEL 6, which is
> a kernel version 2.6. All patches applie
Hi ML members,
I have a question about how the numbers compute which I get from /proc/loadavg.
I'm running a bunch of HTTP servers, most of them running a RHEL 6, which is a
kernel version 2.6. All patches applied, so that Meltdown and Spectre stuff
should be included. Some of the servers
t;core" as root (no sudo).
>
> root:~# sysctl -w kernel.core_pattern=core
> sysctl: permission denied on key 'kernel.core_pattern'
>
>
> root:~# echo "core" > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
> bash: /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern: Permission denied
>
> root:~#
rnel.core_pattern'
root:~# echo "core" > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
bash: /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern: Permission denied
root:~# rm /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
rm: cannot remove '/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern': Permission denied
Whats wrong? I have no acc
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 04:53:23PM -, miz...@elude.in wrote:
> selinux & grc do that automatically.
> lynis give 'suggestion' & tweaking without know what you do , break the
> security/anonymity/privacy.
Lynis is a security auditing tool. Are you complaining about
Debian's default policy, or a
selinux & grc do that automatically.
lynis give 'suggestion' & tweaking without know what you do , break the
security/anonymity/privacy.
Hi.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:22:10AM +0200, Brent Clark wrote:
> Good day Guys
>
> I came across this document:
>
> https://linux-audit.com/linux-system-hardening-adding-hidepid-to-proc/
>
> The idea is to increase security by hiding the display of running
&
Good day Guys
I came across this document:
https://linux-audit.com/linux-system-hardening-adding-hidepid-to-proc/
The idea is to increase security by hiding the display of running
processes, and their arguments, which belong to other users. This helps
avoid problems if users enter passwords on
Wakeup capable devices are listed in /proc/acpi/wakeup. For example, in my
sytem I've got:
~
solitone@alan:~$ cat /proc/acpi/wakeup
Device S-state Status Sysfs node
PEG0 S3*disabled
ECS4*disabled platform:PNP0C09:00
On 2016-04-30 10:06 -0400, Haines Brown wrote:
> I did a cross install of Jessie from Wheezy.
What does "cross install" mean?
> When the system is booted,
> there is a symlink from /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts, but /proc is empty or
> not mounted. This has some conseque
I did a cross install of Jessie from Wheezy. When the system is booted,
there is a symlink from /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts, but /proc is empty or
not mounted. This has some consequences.
I mount proc:
# mount /proc
Now mount displays what is mounted, and proc is mounted.
mount: /proc: mount
On 08/03/2013, David wrote:
> On 08/03/2013, Maroš Žilka wrote:
>>
>> when we list mounts with mount it shows is it but when we want to
>> umount it says path (dir) not found or doesnt exist.
>
> I would try, instead of mount, run
> cat /proc/mounts
> to s
ays path (dir) not found or doesnt exist.
>
> we tried to recreate test and then mount/umount it but that just
> created new entry and after umounting original mount was still listed
> by mount.
>
> If I am right mount reads info from /etc/mtab which is linked to /proc/mtab
&g
On 08/03/2013, Maroš Žilka wrote:
>
> when we list mounts with mount it shows is it but when we want to
> umount it says path (dir) not found or doesnt exist.
I would try, instead of mount, run
cat /proc/mounts
to see what is mounted.
Then umount anything you see there that is relat
to recreate test and then mount/umount it but that just
> created new entry and after umounting original mount was still listed
> by mount.
> If I am right mount reads info from /etc/mtab which is linked to /proc/mtab
> is there any way to flush/clear/update /proc/mtab ? Its important to
If I am right mount reads info from /etc/mtab which is linked to /proc/mtab
is there any way to flush/clear/update /proc/mtab ? Its important to
keep server running...
Sorry for long post and thanks for any ideas :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Matej Kosik:
>
> I am trying to figure out the meaning of:
>
> /proc/$PID/fd/*
>
> files.
These files represent the open files of a process. On recent systems you
can even see the associated "real" files, if any:
# ls -l /proc/6373/fd
total 0
lr-x-- 1
> I am trying to figure out the meaning of:
>
> /proc/$PID/fd/*
>
> files.
These are links that point to the open files of the process whose pid is
$PID. Fd stands for "file descriptors", which is an integer that
identifies any program input or output in UNIX-like
Hello,
I am trying to figure out the meaning of:
/proc/$PID/fd/*
files.
As:
- their name suggests
- as most of the descriptions on the web around indicate
- and consistently with wishful thinking
I thought that writing to /proc/$PID/0 would mean that designated
process will receive
Hi,
I've also been hit by this bug. (using wheezy as well)
>From what I've seen, it only adds a trailing slash when mounting
with the nfsvers=3 (or =2) option.
If you can confirm this behavior then I see no reason not to call it a
bug ! :-)
--
Laurent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
I just upgraded from Squeeze to Wheezy and noticed that now NFS exports
have an extra trailing slash in /proc/mounts (aka /etc/mtab, aka
/proc/self/mounts).
> server:/vol/export1/ on /server/mountpath type nfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime…)
But the trailing slash is not originated in /etc/fs
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:47:12 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
(...)
> My questions are:
>
> . why only one char. is represented w/ '?' - and not all of them?
It can be a single accented "á" (or another special character) which fails
to render properly.
> . I use utf-8 env. how I can fetch the path usin
Good time of the day.
Please help me to fix my problem. I will start w/ its description.
I need to fetch a file path. I can do so by:
. ps -AHf | grep [...] (as it is visible from command parameters)
. cat /proc/n/cmdline (same command arguments)
Problem is that as the path contains UTF-8
lina wrote:
> du: cannot access `./proc/6535/task/6535/fd/4': No such file or directory
> du: cannot access `./proc/6535/task/6535/fdinfo/4': No such file or directory
> du: cannot access `./proc/6535/fd/4': No such file or directory
> du: cannot access `./proc/6535
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2011-12-25 00:44:51 +0800, lina wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 12:42 AM, lina wrote:
>> > du: cannot access `./proc/6535/task/6535/fd/4': No such file or directory
>> > du: cannot access `./proc/6
On 2011-12-25 00:44:51 +0800, lina wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 12:42 AM, lina wrote:
> > du: cannot access `./proc/6535/task/6535/fd/4': No such file or directory
> > du: cannot access `./proc/6535/task/6535/fdinfo/4': No such file or
> > directory
> >
On 2011-12-25 00:42:25 +0800, lina wrote:
> du: cannot access `./proc/6535/task/6535/fd/4': No such file or directory
> du: cannot access `./proc/6535/task/6535/fdinfo/4': No such file or directory
> du: cannot access `./proc/6535/fd/4': No such file or directory
> du:
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 12:42 AM, lina wrote:
> du: cannot access `./proc/6535/task/6535/fd/4': No such file or directory
> du: cannot access `./proc/6535/task/6535/fdinfo/4': No such file or directory
> du: cannot access `./proc/6535/fd/4': No such file or directory
>
du: cannot access `./proc/6535/task/6535/fd/4': No such file or directory
du: cannot access `./proc/6535/task/6535/fdinfo/4': No such file or directory
du: cannot access `./proc/6535/fd/4': No such file or directory
du: cannot access `./proc/6535/fdinfo/4': No such file or dire
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 17:38:41 +0200, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 20:31:03 + (UTC), Camaleón writes:
>> What's the output of "ls -l /sys/class/backlight"?
>>
>> If I follow the instructions of the section named "The /sys/class/
>> backlight interface" I can indeed see and set the
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 20:31:03 + (UTC), Camaleón writes:
> What's the output of "ls -l /sys/class/backlight"?
>
> If I follow the instructions of the section named "The /sys/class/
> backlight interface" I can indeed see and set the backlight values as
> stated. For instance, to put the backligh
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:43:23 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:01:12 + (UTC), Camaleón writes:
>> I'm running a Debian stock kernel (3.0.0-1) and neither have that entry
>> under "/proc/acpi" but can control the brigthness of my netbook eit
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:01:12 + (UTC), Camaleón writes:
> I'm running a Debian stock kernel (3.0.0-1) and neither have that entry
> under "/proc/acpi" but can control the brigthness of my netbook either
> from GNOME or using the hotkeys.
>
> Maybe this Ubuntu
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:19:43 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> I'm using a custom built vanilla Linux kernel of version 3.0.0. Despite
> I loaded every available ACPI related module, I still cannot see any
> "video" folder under /proc/acpi directory, hence I cannot alter d
Hello,
I'm using a custom built vanilla Linux kernel of version 3.0.0. Despite
I loaded every available ACPI related module, I still cannot see any
"video" folder under /proc/acpi directory, hence I cannot alter display
brigthness, etc. Any ideas? What might I be missing?
Hi everyone,
Quick question for all of you:
Here is the weird behavior:
--
[root@]:~ # ls -al /proc/2574*
ls: cannot access /proc/2574*: No such file or directory
[root@]:~ # ls -ald /proc/25740
dr-xr-xr-x 7 mysql mysql 0 Oct 12 10:40 /proc/25740
[root@]:~ # cd /proc/25740
[root
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:57:49 +0900, J.Hwan Kim wrote:
> > When I read /proc/interrupts, it displays interrupt type of my ethernet
> > card with "PCI-MSI-edge".
>
> Mmm, I get two modes for each of my ethernet devices:
>
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011, J.Hwan Kim wrote:
> ethernet card with "PCI-MSI-edge".
> Does it mean MSI-X interrupt or MSI interrupt?
It could be either. Use lspci -vvv as root to check whether MSI or MSI-X is
active on the device.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to brin
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:57:49 +0900, J.Hwan Kim wrote:
> When I read /proc/interrupts, it displays interrupt type of my ethernet
> card with "PCI-MSI-edge".
Mmm, I get two modes for each of my ethernet devices:
sm01@stt008:~$ grep -i eth /proc/interrupts
20: 1
Hi, everyone
When I read /proc/interrupts, it displays interrupt type of my ethernet
card with "PCI-MSI-edge".
Does it mean MSI-X interrupt or MSI interrupt?
I set to my ethernet driver operates with MSI-X interrupt.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
J.Hwan Kim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:43:37 +, Lisi wrote:
> On my main desktop running Lenny and KDE 3.5.10, I can open files in
> /proc with cat, vi or OOo. I can open them neither with KWord nor with
> KWrite, neither of which can even see them.
>
> Can anyone explain this??
Hum... may
unning Lenny and KDE 3.5.10, I can open files in
> > > > /proc with cat, vi or OOo. I can open them neither with KWord nor
> > > > with KWrite, neither of which can even see them.
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone explain this??
> > >
> >
on 00:56 Fri 28 Jan, Lisi (lisi.re...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:41:06 Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> > on 17:43 Thu 27 Jan, Lisi (lisi.re...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > On my main desktop running Lenny and KDE 3.5.10, I can open files in
> > > /proc with
On Thursday 27 January 2011 19:41:06 Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> on 17:43 Thu 27 Jan, Lisi (lisi.re...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On my main desktop running Lenny and KDE 3.5.10, I can open files in
> > /proc with cat, vi or OOo. I can open them neither with KWord nor with
> > KWrite,
on 17:43 Thu 27 Jan, Lisi (lisi.re...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On my main desktop running Lenny and KDE 3.5.10, I can open files in /proc
> with cat, vi or OOo. I can open them neither with KWord nor with KWrite,
> neither of which can even see them.
>
> Can anyone explain this??
Th
On my main desktop running Lenny and KDE 3.5.10, I can open files in /proc
with cat, vi or OOo. I can open them neither with KWord nor with KWrite,
neither of which can even see them.
Can anyone explain this??
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi,all
I want make a readonly ROOT following the guide
http://wiki.debian.org/ReadonlyRoot
/etc/mtab is a symlink to /proc/mounts.
and the udev-mtab is disabled.
But I got the error when boot:
'Mounting local filesystems... failed.'
Where is the problem?
Thank you!
OS: debian 5.04 lenny x86
Camaleón schreef:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:04:08 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
On a Dell Precision T7400 machine running Debian Lenny (stable) with
2.6.26-2-amd64 kernel, I find that /proc/acpi/fan directory is empty. Is
there any package to install, module to load to populate this directory
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:04:08 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> On a Dell Precision T7400 machine running Debian Lenny (stable) with
> 2.6.26-2-amd64 kernel, I find that /proc/acpi/fan directory is empty. Is
> there any package to install, module to load to populate this directory?
On 2010-03-30 14:04, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
On a Dell Precision T7400 machine running Debian Lenny (stable) with
2.6.26-2-amd64 kernel, I find that /proc/acpi/fan directory is empty.
Is there any package to install, module to load to populate this
directory?
[snip]
However, if I reboot
On a Dell Precision T7400 machine running Debian Lenny (stable) with
2.6.26-2-amd64 kernel, I find that /proc/acpi/fan directory is empty.
Is there any package to install, module to load to populate this
directory?
The actual problem is like this:
Initially when the machine is rebooted it is
Thanks, I wasn't paying attention to the 'bash' part, only to the
'permission denied' part. :> PEBKAC on my part.
--
_
ASCII Ribbon Campaign Against ( ) Brian Ryans
HTML E-mail and V-cards Xbrianlry...@gmail.com
www.asciiribbon.org
On 2009-12-06 06:22 +0100, Brian Ryans wrote:
> I am attempting to adjust brightness via '/proc/acpi/ibm/brightness',
> but I get permission denied if I do it via sudo -- I have to su to root
> in order to do the adjustments. Log at [1].
>
> [1]
> bry...@esterhazy:~$ s
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 11:22:37PM -0600, Brian Ryans wrote:
bry...@esterhazy:~$ sudo echo up > /proc/acpi/ibm/brightness
bash: /proc/acpi/ibm/brightness: Permission denied
The redirection is set up by the current shell, i.e. with non-elevated
privileges. Try this instead:
sudo sh -c &#
I am attempting to adjust brightness via '/proc/acpi/ibm/brightness',
but I get permission denied if I do it via sudo -- I have to su to root
in order to do the adjustments. Log at [1].
[1]
bry...@esterhazy:~$ sudo echo up > /proc/acpi/ibm/brightness
bash: /proc/acpi/ibm/brightnes
can easily navigate
into /
proc (both with Nautilus and Gnome-Commander). When I try to run
these
browsers with gksu or su, however, they never let me into /proc
--
if I
try to enter there, they just stop responding. Ideas, anyone
nning a fully updated Lenny with Gnome) I can easily navigate
> > into /
> > > proc (both with Nautilus and Gnome-Commander). When I try to run
> > these
> > > browsers with gksu or su, however, they never let me into /proc
> --
> > if I
> > > try to
Dne, 28. 10. 2009 15:12:42 je Aioanei Rares napisal(a):
> Klistvud wrote:
> > Howdy, fellow Debianites,
> >
> > I have bumped into a most peculiar situation lately. On my laptop
> > (running a fully updated Lenny with Gnome) I can easily navigate
> into /
> >
Klistvud wrote:
Howdy, fellow Debianites,
I have bumped into a most peculiar situation lately. On my laptop
(running a fully updated Lenny with Gnome) I can easily navigate into /
proc (both with Nautilus and Gnome-Commander). When I try to run these
browsers with gksu or su, however, they
Howdie, fellow Debianites!
A recent thread here about an overheating notebook gave me the idea to
try and slightly adjust the thermal trip points on my notebook;
however, the trick of simply echoing a string to /proc/acpi/
thermal_zone/TZ1/trip_points, as suggested by many internet howtos from
Howdy, fellow Debianites,
I have bumped into a most peculiar situation lately. On my laptop
(running a fully updated Lenny with Gnome) I can easily navigate into /
proc (both with Nautilus and Gnome-Commander). When I try to run these
browsers with gksu or su, however, they never let me into
On 2009-04-15 18:07 +0200, Jukka Salmi wrote:
> I'm not sure wheter this is a bug or a feature... However, I just noticed
> that cp(1) fails to copy /proc/cpuinfo to the file system (tested on i686 and
> x86_64 lenny systems):
>
> $ wc -l /proc/cpuinfo 200 /proc/cpuinfo
>
Hello,
I'm not sure wheter this is a bug or a feature... However, I just noticed
that cp(1) fails to copy /proc/cpuinfo to the file system (tested on i686 and
x86_64 lenny systems):
$ wc -l /proc/cpuinfo 200 /proc/cpuinfo
$ cp /proc/cpuinfo /tmp
$ echo $?
0
$ wc -l /tmp/cpuinfo
125 /tmp/cp
am found the sensors nicely and 'pwmconfig' seemed
to control the fans ok.
Everything looked fine, but fancontrol didn't work (and still doesn't). Then
I found that /proc/acpi/fan/ was empty (modules 'thermal' and 'fan' were
loaded).
Any suggestions? - I su
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:29:02AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2008-08-19 10:39 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It looks like any programs using the /proc interface are now broken, at
> > least with the later kernels.
>
> No, only those
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-08-19 10:39 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote:
Hi,
It looks like any programs using the /proc interface are now broken, at
least with the later kernels.
No, only those that read /proc/acpi/battery. That directory does not
exist in current Debian kernels because of
On 08/19/08 04:29, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-08-19 10:39 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote:
Hi,
It looks like any programs using the /proc interface are now broken, at
least with the later kernels.
No, only those that read /proc/acpi/battery. That directory does not
exist in current Debian
On 2008-08-19 10:39 +0200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like any programs using the /proc interface are now broken, at
> least with the later kernels.
No, only those that read /proc/acpi/battery. That directory does not
exist in current Debian kernels because of
Hi,
It looks like any programs using the /proc interface are now broken, at
least with the later kernels.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uname -a
Linux box 2.6.25-2-686 #1 SMP Fri Jul 18 17:46:56 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
Compare:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# acpi -b
Battery 0: Charging, 100%, until charged
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When attempting to run
sudo lh_config && lh_build
I am eventually given error messages saying something about not being
able to mount /proc:
P: Begin caching chroot stage...
P: Begin mounting /proc...
E: lh_chroot_proc missing
There is a
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 11:21 +, Paul Csanyi wrote:
> > How can I know whether is Intel Core 2 CPU with EM64T extension?
>
> Well this was a stupid question, sorry!
>
> The answer can be find with Google, and yes,
> Intel Core 2 CPU is with EM64T extension.
/proc
Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:33:43 +0100 keltezéssel Paul Csanyi azt írta:
> Hello!
>
> I red on the web page http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ that:
> "The port consists of a kernel for all AMD 64bit CPUs
> with AMD64 extension and all Intel CPUs with EM64T
> extension, .."
>
> Before I go to download
uot;The port consists of a kernel for all AMD 64bit CPUs
> with AMD64 extension and all Intel CPUs with EM64T
> extension, .."
>
> Before I go to download and install amd64 Debian distribution,
> I whish to know that my Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU is with
> EM64T e
Core(TM)2 CPU is with
EM64T extension.
cat /proc/cpuinfo don't show this feature:
>
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6320 @ 1.86GHz
stepping: 6
cpu MHz
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 21:11:24 +0530, Bhasker C V wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was thinking why not the kernel which is packaged with the debian
> can export /proc/config.gz so that the config can be used to setup
> new kernels by the newbies and learners ?
The configs for all
Hi all,
I was thinking why not the kernel which is packaged with the debian
can export /proc/config.gz so that the config can be used to setup
new kernels by the newbies and learners ?
--
Bhasker C V
Registered Linux user: #306349 (counter.li.org)
The box said "Requires Windows 95, N
According to http://lartc.org/ chapter 13 you can find more info in
Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt of linux kernel documentation, and
they also mention http://ipsysctl-tutorial.frozentux.net/
2007/9/28, chloe K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all
>
> How can I find out all info
chloe K([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Hi all
>
> How can I find out all info about /proc/net ?
>
> eg: rt_cache and softnet_stat are for what purpose
>
> Thank you
>
> -
> Be smarter than spam. See ho
Hi all
How can I find out all info about /proc/net ?
eg: rt_cache and softnet_stat are for what purpose
Thank you
-
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot
with the All-new Yahoo! Mail
Hi folks,
I'm trying to set up usb devices on 2.6.21.5 but for some
reason /proc/scsi is missing.
I've enabled -scsi device support, -legacy /proc/scsi support,
-scsi disk support, and scsi generic support in the kernel.
There is no scsi controller in hw but scsi is needed for usb.
I
This is my problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /proc/kmsg
-r-r-- 1 root root 0 2007-05-01 07:38 /proc/kmsg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /proc/kmsg
cat: /proc/kmsg: Operation not permitted
In other words, now matter how I try to set permissions on /proc/kmsg, I
can't read from it unless I&#
. If you use
> the -k7 kernel it will build, but you lose some of the special features
> of the processor, not sure which but you can compare the output of 'cat
> /proc/cpuinfo' on both kernels and google for any differences.
>
> I compile my own kernel and select the K
of the special features
of the processor, not sure which but you can compare the output of 'cat
/proc/cpuinfo' on both kernels and google for any differences.
I compile my own kernel and select the K8 processor type, but this does
not change the architecture of the kernel so the module buil
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 04:58:17 -0700
"Michael M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 12:40 -0700, Bill Thompson wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:13:23 +0200
> > Andreas Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Etch/i386 also comes with an AMD64 kernel package. It should run fin
1 - 100 of 363 matches
Mail list logo
