RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

2001-02-21 Thread Joris Lambrecht
bian. True. -Original Message- From: Richard Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 1:32 PM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor > From: Joris Lambrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sorry for the ignorance but how does this

RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

2001-02-21 Thread Richard Taylor
> From: Joris Lambrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sorry for the ignorance but how does this template system work ? >I can't imagine the benefits from this kind of approach. I thought you knew Dreamweaver. It's just copy and paste... you build a basic form for the page. When you want a new page

RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

2001-02-21 Thread Joris Lambrecht
T] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor > From: "Keith G. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Steve wrote: >> It's like the argument that b4 good page layout apps like Quark were as >> good as they are that the pros used to write their own postcript. Now most >> pros use a

Re: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

2001-02-20 Thread Richard Taylor
> From: "Keith G. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Steve wrote: >> It's like the argument that b4 good page layout apps like Quark were as >> good as they are that the pros used to write their own postcript. Now most >> pros use a professional page layout app like Quark because it truly is >> WYSIWY

Re: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

2001-02-20 Thread Steve
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, ktb wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:24:16AM -0500, Steve wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Joris Lambrecht wrote: > > > > > if dreamweaver would be available on Linux i'm sure there would be a LOT > > > of > > > designer's making the transition, though i must add that Dream

Re: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

2001-02-20 Thread ktb
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:24:16AM -0500, Steve wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Joris Lambrecht wrote: > > > if dreamweaver would be available on Linux i'm sure there would be a LOT of > > designer's making the transition, though i must add that Dreamweaver (not > > UDev version) has it's flaws and

RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

2001-02-20 Thread Joris Lambrecht
is, too bad -Original Message- From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 4:24 PM To: Joris Lambrecht Cc: Richard Taylor; debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Joris Lambrecht wrote: > if dreamweave

RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

2001-02-20 Thread Steve
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Joris Lambrecht wrote: > if dreamweaver would be available on Linux i'm sure there would be a LOT of > designer's making the transition, though i must add that Dreamweaver (not > UDev version) has it's flaws and shortcomings it is still a very productive > program to work with

Re: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

2001-02-20 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Steve wrote: > > > It's like the argument that b4 good page layout apps like Quark were as > good as they are that the pros used to write their own postcript. Now most > pros use a professional page layout app like Quark because it truly is > WYSIWYG and almost no one writes their own postscript

RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

2001-02-19 Thread Joris Lambrecht
--- From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 4:51 PM To: Richard Taylor Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Richard Taylor wrote: > > From: Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On Mon, 1

[OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor

2001-02-19 Thread Steve
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Richard Taylor wrote: > > From: Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Richard Taylor wrote: > > > >> >Nothing in opensource is going to be close to DreamWeaver of course -yet > >> >anyways. > >> > >> That depends on whether you hand write your code or let a > >