El Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:21:54 +0400, Dennis Beltrán Romero escribió:
Unsuscription denied :-P
Saludos,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
El 20/08/2012 11:35, Camaleón escribió:
El Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:21:54 +0400, Dennis Beltrán Romero escribió:
Unsuscription denied :-P
Saludos,
¡Y marche preso también!
¡Salud Camaleón! Hace 4 años que estaba sin conexión y te recuerdo de la
lista de Suse. Me alegro mucho de que ahora estés
2012/8/20 Camaleón noela...@gmail.com:
El Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:21:54 +0400, Dennis Beltrán Romero escribió:
Unsuscription denied :-P
LOL
Amigo se debe enviar a esta lista:
debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
Saludos,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Buenas,
El 20/08/2012, a las 20:55, Juan Pablo Jaramillo Pineda
juanpablo...@gmail.com escribió:
2012/8/20 Camaleón noela...@gmail.com:
El Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:21:54 +0400, Dennis Beltrán Romero escribió:
Unsuscription denied :-P
LOL
Amigo se debe enviar a esta lista:
El Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:43:34 -0600, Alejandro Perez escribió:
No more debian mailing list
Me temo que así no ;-P
List-Unsubscribe:
mailto:debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe
Saludos,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
El Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:16:07 -0300, Leroy Alejandro Ruiz Sartor escribió:
Me parece que así no podrás darte de baja :-)
List-Unsubscribe:
mailto:debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe
Saludos,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:38:30 +0200, Diego Martínez Castañeda wrote:
Nope, wrong recipient ;-P
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:45:25 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:38:30 +0200, Diego Martínez Castañeda wrote:
Nope, wrong recipient ;-P
And wrong spelling.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Mon 17 Oct 2011 at 16:38:31 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:45:25 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:38:30 +0200, Diego Martínez Castañeda wrote:
Nope, wrong recipient ;-P
And wrong spelling.
Mails pointing out speling mistaikes and misdirected
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:17:43 +0100, Brian wrote:
On Mon 17 Oct 2011 at 16:38:31 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:45:25 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:38:30 +0200, Diego Martínez Castañeda wrote:
Nope, wrong recipient ;-P
And wrong spelling.
Sure
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 19:59:14 -0400, Randy Kramer wrote:
On Friday 02 September 2011 07:27:09 am Camaleón wrote:
Let's take Lisi's posting messages as sample:
- They're non-GPG/PGP signed (or at least I can't see it from headers
:-?) - They're text based
- They have no e-mail footer
Having
On 02/09/11 07:29, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:01:51PM +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 01/09/11 15:55, Chris Brennan wrote:
Every e-mail I've gotten so far, has had the foot on it... So I think
it's safe to say, always does apply in my case.
... but this one didn't
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 08:44:13AM +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 02/09/11 07:29, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:01:51PM +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 01/09/11 15:55, Chris Brennan wrote:
Every e-mail I've gotten so far, has had the foot on it... So I think
it's safe
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 03:01:51PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On Qui, 01 Set 2011, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
This one didn't (here).
Is there any concensus on what/how/when these footers are added?
It seems quite random to me.
That message was GPG-signed, the footer is not added
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:46:41 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
FWIW, I don't receive list emails (since I opted out), and neither do I
post directly. I both read and post via gmane; I find that far more
convenient.
Me neither (I don't receive mailing list e-mails), I'm also a Pan
user ;-)
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:01:51 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On Qui, 01 Set 2011, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
This one didn't (here).
Is there any concensus on what/how/when these footers are added? It
seems quite random to me.
That message was GPG-signed, the footer is not added because
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:23:03 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
appended at their messages but subscribed users do not. But this is not
a scientific statement, just a wild theory I concluded by observing the
for debian-user@lists.debian.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:32:40 +
From: Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: unsuscribe
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:32:37 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
References: 4e5f187d.2000...@nuevaeralatam.com
201109011551.07590.lisi.re
On Friday 02 September 2011 12:27:09 Camaleón wrote:
Let's take Lisi's posting messages as sample:
- They're non-GPG/PGP signed (or at least I can't see it from headers :-?)
- They're text based
- They have no e-mail footer
That is just a quirk of Gmane. My own postings arrive in my inbox
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:39:11 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 02/09/11 12:27, Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:23:03 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the
footer appended at their messages but subscribed users do
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:04:13 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Friday 02 September 2011 12:27:09 Camaleón wrote:
Let's take Lisi's posting messages as sample:
- They're non-GPG/PGP signed (or at least I can't see it from headers
:-?) - They're text based
- They have no e-mail footer
That is just a
On Friday 02 September 2011 07:27:09 am Camaleón wrote:
Let's take Lisi's posting messages as sample:
- They're non-GPG/PGP signed (or at least I can't see it from headers :-?)
- They're text based
- They have no e-mail footer
Having a mbox archive would help to diagnose such cases :-)
The
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:04:35 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 01/09/11 11:51, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 23:30:37 -0600, Esteban Monge wrote:
Nice try... but not that way :-)
If the OP is incapable of reading the footer on every post to the list,
what makes you think (s)he is
On 01/09/11 12:53, Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:04:35 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 01/09/11 11:51, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 23:30:37 -0600, Esteban Monge wrote:
Nice try... but not that way :-)
If the OP is incapable of reading the footer on every post to the
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:10:10 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 01/09/11 12:53, Camaleón wrote:
If the OP is incapable of reading the footer on every post to the
list, what makes you think (s)he is able to read your instructions?
;-)
I'd say he is he (Esteban looks like a typical male
On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
appended at their messages but subscribed users do not. But this is not a
scientific statement, just a wild theory I concluded by observing the
messages that reach the
On 9/1/2011 10:51 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
appended at their messages but subscribed users do not. But this is not a
scientific statement, just a wild theory I concluded by
On 01/09/11 15:55, Chris Brennan wrote:
On 9/1/2011 10:51 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
appended at their messages but subscribed users do not. But this is not a
scientific
On Thursday 01 September 2011 16:01:51 Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 01/09/11 15:55, Chris Brennan wrote:
On 9/1/2011 10:51 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
appended at their
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:51:07 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
appended at their messages but subscribed users do not. But this is not
a scientific statement, just a wild theory I
On Thursday 01 September 2011 16:21:10 Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:51:07 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
appended at their messages but subscribed users do not. But
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Lisi [mailto:lisi.re...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. September 2011 16:51
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: [OT] Re: unsuscribe
On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
My guess is that non-subscribers users
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:21:10 +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
While my messages are always fted :-)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user/416330/focus=416354
Ooops, this is the correct link:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:53:17 + (UTC)
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Camaleón,
Okay, but not all of the messages I receive from this list append the
footer... or maybe is just me? :-?
Not just you. However, the vast majority of messages *do* contain the
footer.
--
Regards _
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 16:30 +,
debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org wrote:
[snip]
Didn't read the whole thread, but it would be great if Debian users list
would switch to mailman.
0,02€
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Thursday 01 September 2011 18:08:06 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
it would be great if Debian users list
would switch to mailman.
Why? What's wrong with it as it is? I like it.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:21:10 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:51:07 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camaleón wrote:
My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
appended at their messages but subscribed users do not. But this
On 01/09/11 13:30, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:53:17 + (UTC)
Camaleónnoela...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Camaleón,
Okay, but not all of the messages I receive from this list append the
footer... or maybe is just me? :-?
Not just you. However, the vast majority of messages
On Qui, 01 Set 2011, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
This one didn't (here).
Is there any concensus on what/how/when these footers are added? It
seems quite random to me.
That message was GPG-signed, the footer is not added because it would
break the signature. (Actually, it was added to another
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:39:17 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 01 September 2011 18:08:06 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
it would be great if Debian users list would switch to mailman.
Why? What's wrong with it as it is? I like it.
+1. Using Pan and posting via gmane works for me. Plus I can killfile
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:01:51 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
That message was GPG-signed, the footer is not added because it would
break the signature. (Actually, it was added to another part of the
multi-part message, but I could only see that by looking at the message
source.)
I
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:01:51 -0300
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br wrote:
Hello Eduardo,
That message was GPG-signed, the footer is not added because it would
break the signature. (Actually, it was added to another part of the
multi-part message, but I could only see that
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:51:07 +0100 Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com
suggested this:
Sorry to kybosh your theory, Camaleón, but I am subscribed and I
usually (I would have said always, but I just checked) get the
footers. :-)
As do I
Charlie
--
Registered Linux User:- 329524
On 02/09/11 01:01, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 01/09/11 15:55, Chris Brennan wrote:
On 9/1/2011 10:51 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 01 September 2011 15:25:56 Camale�n wrote:
My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
appended at their messages but subscribed users
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br writes:
On Qui, 01 Set 2011, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
This one didn't (here).
Is there any concensus on what/how/when these footers are added? It
seems quite random to me.
That message was GPG-signed, the footer is not added because it
Camaleón wrote:
My guess is that non-subscribers users (like me) do receive the footer
appended at their messages but subscribed users do not. But this is not a
scientific statement, just a wild theory I concluded by observing the
messages that reach the list.
Simple plain text messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
El 16/07/07 15:58, Rafael escribió:
Para desuscribirte, has de mandar un mensaje en blanco, como te indica en tu
mensaje:
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hay que mirar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
El 23/04/07 23:23, gustavo adolfo gomez escribió:
Gustavo:
para darte de baja de la lista, hay que hacerlo al e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] con el asunto que acabaste de dar.
Ya te lo pone normalmente en cada mensaje. Ah, y no escribas en HTML.
- --
48 matches
Mail list logo
