On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:15:17PM -0500, Christopher Mosley wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, will trillich wrote:
when using mutt under termtype 'linux' (i.e. `setenv TERM linux`)
mutt's headers and 'active selection' bars flash, driving me
nuts. when i change to `setenv TERM vt220-color`
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, will trillich wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:15:17PM -0500, Christopher Mosley wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, will trillich wrote:
when using mutt under termtype 'linux' (i.e. `setenv TERM linux`)
mutt's headers and 'active selection' bars flash, driving me
At Wed, 28 Feb 2001 18:22:16 -0600 , will trillich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 11:25:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In muc.lists.debian.user, you wrote:
i did? hmm! i sent it to debian-user, and maybe it's got some
cool filters to propagate it around to various
when using mutt under termtype 'linux' (i.e. `setenv TERM linux`)
mutt's headers and 'active selection' bars flash, driving me
nuts. when i change to `setenv TERM vt220-color` it's a nice,
calm green and blue, with no flash.
but then less complains that my terminal type 'is not fully
functional'
In muc.lists.debian.user, you wrote:
when using mutt under termtype 'linux' (i.e. `setenv TERM linux`)
mutt's headers and 'active selection' bars flash, driving me
nuts. when i change to `setenv TERM vt220-color` it's a nice,
calm green and blue, with no flash.
Not sure, but if you have the
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 11:25:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In muc.lists.debian.user, you wrote:
i did? hmm! i sent it to debian-user, and maybe it's got some
cool filters to propagate it around to various pertinent
newsgroups...?
when using mutt under termtype 'linux' (i.e. `setenv
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, will trillich wrote:
when using mutt under termtype 'linux' (i.e. `setenv TERM linux`)
mutt's headers and 'active selection' bars flash, driving me
nuts. when i change to `setenv TERM vt220-color` it's a nice,
calm green and blue, with no flash.
Since vt220-color is
7 matches
Mail list logo