On Wed 05 Jul 2017 at 11:34:20 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 July 2017 07:58:26 Matthew Crews wrote:
>
> > >Now that I know that I'm 64 bit capable. Would I see any benefit in
> > >switching?
> >
> > I would switch to AMD64 if you are comfortable with reinstalling
> > Debian. You
On Wednesday 05 July 2017 07:58:26 Matthew Crews wrote:
> >Now that I know that I'm 64 bit capable. Would I see any benefit in
> >switching?
>
> I would switch to AMD64 if you are comfortable with reinstalling
> Debian. You will see a performance increase, even on a minimally
> spec'd system. (I'm
>Now that I know that I'm 64 bit capable. Would I see any benefit in
>switching?
I would switch to AMD64 if you are comfortable with reinstalling Debian. You
will see a performance increase, even on a minimally spec'd system. (I'm not
sure its possible to convert a live install from 32-bit to 64-b
Richard Owlett composed on 2017-07-05 06:26 (UTC-0500):
> Now that I know that I'm 64 bit capable. Would I see any benefit in
> switching?
> [I don't have any interest in grapic intensive apps. I don't do anything
> that my old WinXP machine didn't handle OK.]
Is more than 3G RAM is installed?
On 07/04/2017 02:10 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2017-07-04 20:19 +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
On 04-07-17, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2017-07-04 17:33 +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
Several. To see your cpu, type lscpu. Architecture is first in output.
That's not correct, or at least not useful. The a
On 07/04/2017 01:20 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Curt composed on 2017-07-04 17:53 (UTC):
Richard Owlett wrote:
Thank you. I've i686 processors on both machines within reach
[as I suspected] I'll have to spend some time on man page for
inxi to fully appreciate it.
But i686 is 32 bit isn't it?
On 2017-07-04 20:19 +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> On 04-07-17, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2017-07-04 17:33 +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
>> >
>> > Several. To see your cpu, type lscpu. Architecture is first in output.
>>
>> That's not correct, or at least not useful. The architecture is what
>> uname(2
On 2017-07-04 18:39 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2017-07-04, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>>
>>> Several. To see your cpu, type lscpu. Architecture is first in output.
>>
>> That's not correct, or at least not useful. The architecture is what
>> uname(2) reports, and if the system is currently running a 32-b
On 2017-07-04, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> Several. To see your cpu, type lscpu. Architecture is first in output.
>
> That's not correct, or at least not useful. The architecture is what
> uname(2) reports, and if the system is currently running a 32-bit
> kernel, it will be "i686" no matter if the
Curt composed on 2017-07-04 17:53 (UTC):
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>> Thank you. I've i686 processors on both machines within reach ]as I
>> suspected]
>> I'll have to spend some time on man page for inxi to fully appreciate it.
> But i686 is 32 bit isn't it?
Some are 32, others are 64. 'cat /pr
On 04-07-17, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2017-07-04 17:33 +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
>
> > On 04-07-17, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> I have been running Debian i386 since Squeeze. At that time it was required
> >> as I was considering supporting some donated 32 bit machines at church. I
> >> don't recal
On 2017-07-04 17:33 +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> On 04-07-17, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> I have been running Debian i386 since Squeeze. At that time it was required
>> as I was considering supporting some donated 32 bit machines at church. I
>> don't recall what processor was in my personal machine a
On 2017-07-04, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> informations.
>>
>
> Thank you. I've i686 processors on both machines within reach ]as I
> suspected]
> I'll have to spend some time on man page for inxi to fully appreciate it.
But i686 is 32 bit isn't it?
> I'm not aware of anything I routinely use that
On 07/04/2017 10:33 AM, Dejan Jocic wrote:
On 04-07-17, Richard Owlett wrote:
I have been running Debian i386 since Squeeze. At that time it was required
as I was considering supporting some donated 32 bit machines at church. I
don't recall what processor was in my personal machine at that time.
On 04-07-17, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I have been running Debian i386 since Squeeze. At that time it was required
> as I was considering supporting some donated 32 bit machines at church. I
> don't recall what processor was in my personal machine at that time. I've
> never had cause to investigate t
I have been running Debian i386 since Squeeze. At that time it was
required as I was considering supporting some donated 32 bit machines at
church. I don't recall what processor was in my personal machine at that
time. I've never had cause to investigate the processors in my current
laptops and
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Charles Kroeger <
ckro...@frankensteinface.com> wrote:
>
>
> You're right Angus, and I did take precautions, that is why I was still
> able
> to post to the newsgroup, however I thought maybe an extra emphasis
> wouldn't
> hurt. I'm not confident that getting the u
> I think I'll just wait for:
>
> aptitude -a amd64 --arch_upgrade
>
> Surely that's right around the corner... Maybe for Squeeze?
>
> :)
>
> James
Damn right, keep a watch on your /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg file for an upgrade.
--
C.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.
> Anyway, I think the huge **WARNING** notes should have been enough to let
> you know the whole thing was not without risk ;)
>
> Regards,
>
> Angus
>
You're right Angus, and I did take precautions, that is why I was still able
to post to the newsgroup, however I thought maybe an extra emphas
I think I'll just wait for:
aptitude -a amd64 --arch_upgrade
Surely that's right around the corner... Maybe for Squeeze?
:)
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://li
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Charles Kroeger <
ckro...@frankensteinface.com> wrote:
> Thanks for all the suggestions.
>
> I had a go with the above site using the powerful command:
>
> #dpkg --force-depends --force-architecture --force-overwrite -i
>
> to install the suggested libs:
>
> ia32-l
> You were already told that a reinstall is most definitely the easiest,
> fastest and safest procedure. But if you want to try it:
>
> http://teddyb.org/~rlpowell/hobbies/debian_arch_up/
Thanks for all the suggestions.
I had a go with the above site using the powerful command:
#dpkg --force-d
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 17:44 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> I would hope someone knows a command line solution. Is there a way
> to safely morph the old architecture into the new, like purging the i686
> kernel for instance or configuring APT or dpkg to upgrade with amd64
> versions.
You were a
> However, it has transpired that it wasn't that simple to change from the i686
> kernel to amd64 even though my 32 packages will work under the amd64 kernel
> Apt and Dpkg for instance don't seem to know this has happened.
Others have already answered the "how to move
Andrew Sackville-West put forth on 2/27/2010 7:53 PM:
> It's been a while, but as I understand it, there is an -amd64 kernel
> available in the -i686 repos, but that doesn't mean you're running in
> the 64 bit architecture. That requires a number of other things to
> happen, including changing to
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 05:44:46PM -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
[...]
> Before moving an image of the old [i686] partition to the new computer I
> installed the amd64 kernel. I completed the install by using gparted from a
> rescue disk to merge the larger new partition with the old smaller one fr
I've made a new computer my first ever and I'm very pleased with it. It uses
an AMD phenon II 505 build cpu on an Ausus board with 8GB ram.
I used an amd64 net-installer to create the partitions and swap file
on the new and larger hard drive of the new machine.
Before moving an image of the old [
Hey Boyd,
Putting back the discussion on the list. =)
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. escreveu:
On Sunday 09 November 2008 21:03, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. escreveu:
Looks like mangle doesn't like the (a) the system it is running on or (b)
your lists of Packages. I'm betting
Sven Joachim escreveu:
On 2008-11-10 02:04 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Well, then maybe you can help me out here:
vinicius:/home/vinicius# apt-get install ia32-libs-tools
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
ia32-libs-tools is already
On 2008-11-10 02:04 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
> Well, then maybe you can help me out here:
>
> vinicius:/home/vinicius# apt-get install ia32-libs-tools
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> ia32-libs-tools is already the newest ve
Thanks Boyd,
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. escreveu:
On Sunday 09 November 2008 19:04, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Sven Joachim escreveu:
Setting up ia32-libs-tools (11) ...
mangle: ia32-libs-tools/mangle.cc:231: size_t
PkgDepAnd::parse(std::string&, size_t): Assertion `is_name(s[offset])'
failed.
/va
On Sunday 09 November 2008 19:04, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
> Sven Joachim escreveu:
> Setting up ia32-libs-tools (11) ...
> mangle: ia32-libs-tools/mangle.cc:231: size_t
> PkgDepAnd::parse(std::string&, size_t): Assertion `is_name(s[offset])'
> failed.
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/ia32-libs-tools.postin
Sven Joachim escreveu:
On 2008-11-09 03:51 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Sven Joachim escreveu:
On 2008-11-08 17:06 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Is there any way to build amd64 packages from i386?
There is probably more than one way, but assuming you have a 64-bit
processor (if n
On 2008-11-09 03:51 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
> Sven Joachim escreveu:
>> On 2008-11-08 17:06 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any way to build amd64 packages from i386?
>>
>> There is probably more than one way, but assuming you have a 64-bit
>> processor (if not, why w
Sven Joachim escreveu:
On 2008-11-08 17:06 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
Is there any way to build amd64 packages from i386?
There is probably more than one way, but assuming you have a 64-bit
processor (if not, why would you want to build packages for it?), the
easiest solution is to bo
On 2008-11-08 17:06 +0100, Vinicius Massuchetto wrote:
> Is there any way to build amd64 packages from i386?
There is probably more than one way, but assuming you have a 64-bit
processor (if not, why would you want to build packages for it?), the
easiest solution is to boot with a 64-bit kernel a
Hi!
Is there any way to build amd64 packages from i386?
Thanks!
--
Vinicius
http://vinicius.soylocoporti.org.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 01:44:51PM -0700, Shane wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've installed the etch amd64 distribution before but now I
> have an install i386 machine which is getting its board/cpu
> changed out for an em64t unit. I'd like to migrate to
> amd64 on this machine if possible but is rein
On (06/08/06 13:44), Shane wrote:
> I've installed the etch amd64 distribution before but now I
> have an install i386 machine which is getting its board/cpu
> changed out for an em64t unit. I'd like to migrate to
> amd64 on this machine if possible but is reinstalling the
> distribution my only o
39 matches
Mail list logo
