I was just reading over the NDA agreement (for fun) that the I2O
organization (http://www.i2osig.org/) makes people sign before they
THINK about the technology in I2O, and I recall reading somewhere that
the Linux community was NOT in favor of the whole concept (for obvious
reasons, given the
On Wed, 12 Nov 1997, Dan Hugo wrote:
I was just reading over the NDA agreement (for fun) that the I2O
organization (http://www.i2osig.org/) makes people sign before they
THINK about the technology in I2O, and I recall reading somewhere that
the Linux community was NOT in favor of the whole
Hello!
The guys from I2O left the specifications a good while on their server for
anonymous ftp :)
Many people that writes hardware drivers for linux should have this
document, I can imagine there was a good rush on their server before they
removed the access to it...
I2O is neither a problem
The i20 group left their specification on their anonymous FTP server and we
all have a copy now. They then took it back off the server. Go figure. We
have no problem with them now, there is no possible non-disclosure case
and when the hardware comes out we will write drivers for it.
On Wed, 12 Nov 1997, Wojciech Zabolotny wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 1997, Dan Hugo wrote:
I was just reading over the NDA agreement (for fun) that the I2O
organization (http://www.i2osig.org/) makes people sign before they
THINK about the technology in I2O, and I recall reading somewhere
5 matches
Mail list logo