Re: 2.0.33 is no good for lic6-dev ?

1998-05-16 Thread Rev. Joseph Carter
On Fri, May 15, 1998 at 04:11:46PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Hmm. if you use -I/usr/src/linux/include, then as far as I can see; it should link with those files (as you state further, it is linked to kernel-source-2.0.33). What toerh files you happen to have elsewhere should not

Re: 2.0.33 is no good for lic6-dev

1998-05-16 Thread adavis
On statistical anomalies. Add to that the fact that few programs really need the more volatile elements of the header files (that is, things that really change from kernel version to kernel version), [before you reject this,

Re: 2.0.33 is no good for lic6-dev ?

1998-05-16 Thread Luiz Otavio L. Zorzella
Rev. Joseph Carter writes: On Fri, May 15, 1998 at 04:11:46PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Thr problem with OSS/Linux is that it grep's autoconf.h to see if you have the right configuration for module support and versioning. Sorry I could not quite follow you all the way. Let's see if

Re: 2.0.33 is no good for lic6-dev ?

1998-05-16 Thread sjc
On Fri, May 15, 1998 at 04:11:46PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Hi, Well, try putting in -I/usr/src/linux/include for every file compiled in the tree; and see if that improves things. At the last resort, you can try mkdir /usr/src/tmp; mv the 2.0.32 headers there, and

Re: 2.0.33 is no good for lic6-dev ?

1998-05-16 Thread Luiz Otavio L. Zorzella
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well...you could do that...but it is MUCH simpler than that first go into /usr/include mv linux linux-deb mv asm asm-deb ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/linux linux ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/asm asm Change that for: ln -s

Re: 2.0.33 is no good for lic6-dev ?

1998-05-16 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Luiz == Luiz Otavio L Zorzella [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Luiz I wish to send a mail to the OSS tech support about this Luiz situation with debian. Is there anything you think I should Luiz suggest to fix the problem in a clean way (all the dists, Luiz including Debian)? Yes. Tell

Re: 2.0.33 is no good for lic6-dev

1998-05-16 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Alan == Alan Eugene Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Alan No thank you. Well, there are other distributions -- red hat makes a fine OS, you know. I just sent you Debian policy. Most programs, even if they include linux/something.h, do Alan ^ not really depend on the

Re: 2.0.33 is no good for lic6-dev ?

1998-05-16 Thread Luiz Otavio L. Zorzella
Manoj Srivastava writes: Hi, Luiz == Luiz Otavio L Zorzella [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Luiz I wish to send a mail to the OSS tech support about this Luiz situation with debian. Is there anything you think I should Luiz suggest to fix the problem in a clean way (all the dists, Luiz

Re: 2.0.33 is no good for lic6-dev ?

1998-05-16 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Luiz == Luiz Otavio L Zorzella [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Luiz Forgive my dumbness... I've been thinking exactly what are the Luiz implications of what your're saying. Please correct me if I'm Luiz wrong: Luiz 1) sndshield, at *compilation time*, greps autoconf.h to guess Luiz which kernel

2.0.33 is no good for lic6-dev ?

1998-05-15 Thread Luiz Otavio L. Zorzella
Hi, folks. Why does libc6-dev depend on kernel headers from 2.0.32? I have all the 2.0.33 stuff properly installed, but cannot uninstall 2.0.32 kernel headers because of this :^ nr# dpkg --no-act --purge kernel-headers-2.0.32 dpkg: dependency problems prevent removal of kernel-headers-2.0.32:

Re: 2.0.33 is no good for lic6-dev ?

1998-05-15 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Please read /usr/doc/kernel-headers-2.0.32/debian.README.gz. I have included a copy below for anyone who thinks reading stuff out of /usr/doc is way square and uncool. manoj -- Sink or swim, live or die, survive or perish, I give my heart and my hand to this vote. --

Re: 2.0.33 is no good for lic6-dev ?

1998-05-15 Thread Luiz Otavio L. Zorzella
Manoj Srivastava writes: Hi, Please read /usr/doc/kernel-headers-2.0.32/debian.README.gz. I have included a copy below for anyone who thinks reading stuff out of /usr/doc is way square and uncool. Thanks for the article. Very cool indeed. Now, I'm running into a problem that

Re: 2.0.33 is no good for lic6-dev ?

1998-05-15 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Hmm. if you use -I/usr/src/linux/include, then as far as I can see; it should link with those files (as you state further, it is linked to kernel-source-2.0.33). What toerh files you happen to have elsewhere should not make a difference. How is sndshield getting to know about