ok, ethan. you've made some very good points on all counts.
i concede and have changed my knowledge base accordingly. :-)
pete
On Thu 14 Dec 00, 5:41 PM, Ethan Benson said...
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 02:50:21PM -0200, Christoph Simon wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I did use this since quite a w
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 17:41:23 -0900
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 02:50:21PM -0200, Christoph Simon wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I did use this since quite a while, but then, there is at
> > least one situation, when it doesn't (can't) work: If I compile the
> > sam
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 02:50:21PM -0200, Christoph Simon wrote:
>
> Actually, I did use this since quite a while, but then, there is at
> least one situation, when it doesn't (can't) work: If I compile the
> same kernel with different options (for instance to test tuning
> options), calling them,
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:14:29AM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> ethan, i had another thought about this issue.
>
> you claim that:
>
> "my system finds System.map-kernelversion just fine."
>
> i think that's inaccurate. looking over what you _actually_ said, i think
> what you actua
ethan, i had another thought about this issue.
you claim that:
"my system finds System.map-kernelversion just fine."
i think that's inaccurate. looking over what you _actually_ said, i think
what you actually meant to say is:
"nothing seems to complain about not finding a Syst
actually, this is a really good point. i typically have a couple of
versions of each kernel i compile.
for instance, for awhile, quake3 was balking at the free OSS sound driver my
girlfriend was using, but not the 4front sound driver. so my quick fix was
to compile one kernel with sound and anot
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 08:35:50 -0800
Peter Jay Salzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed 13 Dec 00, 11:28 PM, Ethan Benson said...
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:07:18PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > > i wrote a very nice piece on the System.map file. you can find it at my
> > > personal w
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 08:19:17AM -0800, Henry House wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:28:23PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:07:18PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > > what's most likely happening is that the System.map file that klogd is
> > > finding is in /boot/
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 08:35:50AM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
>
> ethan, this is fantastic news if true.
>
> i tried to verify your claim by looking at the man page for klogd.
> couldn't find anything about looking for System.map-version.
>
> i also looked in /usr/src/Documentation/oops-tra
On Wed 13 Dec 00, 11:28 PM, Ethan Benson said...
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:07:18PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > i wrote a very nice piece on the System.map file. you can find it at my
> > personal website, along with other bits and pieces of linux knowledge:
> >
> > http://www.dira
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:28:23PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:07:18PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > what's most likely happening is that the System.map file that klogd is
> > finding is in /boot/System.map, since that's the first location klogd will
> > look by de
that has to be the problem.
somehow, the wrong map is being loaded for your kernel. there's simply no
other possibility.
use ls to determine the last access time of each kernel and System.map pair.
make sure the right pair was loaded last time you rebooted the system.
peter
On Thu 14 Dec 00,
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:07:18PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> i wrote a very nice piece on the System.map file. you can find it at my
> personal website, along with other bits and pieces of linux knowledge:
>
> http://www.dirac.org/p/linux/systemmap.html
>
> what's most likely happ
i wrote a very nice piece on the System.map file. you can find it at my
personal website, along with other bits and pieces of linux knowledge:
http://www.dirac.org/p/linux/systemmap.html
what's most likely happening is that the System.map file that klogd is
finding is in /boot/System.ma
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 05:30:41AM +, Pollywog wrote:
> Is anyone else having problems with the latest test kernel
> (2.4.0-test12)?
> Every time I compile it and reboot, I get errors about the system map
> not matching the kernel.
> I don't have this problem with the test11 kernel.
Are you ru
Is anyone else having problems with the latest test kernel
(2.4.0-test12)?
Every time I compile it and reboot, I get errors about the system map
not matching the kernel.
I don't have this problem with the test11 kernel.
thanks
--
Andrew
16 matches
Mail list logo
