Hi there
Артур Истомин wrote:
I am on testing and it work for me.
Which has the same dependencies. So I installed it on stable. It wants;
http://people.debian.org/~bartm/flashplugin-nonfree/fp.11.2.202.350.sha512.i386.pgp.asc
Which doesn't exist.
Cut
Regards,
Rob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
Dňa Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:31:01 + Артур Истомин art.is...@yandex.ru
napísal:
# update-flashplugin-nonfree --status
Flash Player version installed on this system : 11.2.202.335
Flash Player version available on upstream site: 11.2.202.350
To update this fucked proprietary software,
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 02:36:43PM +0200, Slavko wrote:
Hi,
Dňa Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:31:01 + Артур Истомин art.is...@yandex.ru
napísal:
# update-flashplugin-nonfree --status
Flash Player version installed on this system : 11.2.202.335
Flash Player version available on upstream
Hi there
Stephen Allen wrote:
+1 Not installed. :(
A manual install, as suggested by Arthur, works.
For i386, download;
http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/pdc/11.2.202.350/install_flash_player_11_linux.i386.tar.gz
I renamed /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so to
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 11:32:48AM +, Артур Истомин wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 01:05:53PM +0200, Rob van der Putten wrote:
Hi there
Rob van der Putten wrote:
Somehow this doesn't update the software.
Is just noticed that there is a bug reposrt;
teve problemas com o que
ele mesmo criou.
Em 7 de maio de 2013 21:20, Márcio Vinícius Pinheiro
marcioviniciu...@gmail.com escreveu:
Depois de muito bater cabeça por aí, procurando em diversos fóruns, blogs,
etc. desisti de tentar fazer o Adobe flash funcionar no Iceweasel (aliás,
diga-se
Em 07 de maio de 2013, 21:59h, Geowany Alves geowany.a...@gmail.com
escreveu:
Olá Geowany,
Aqui está a resposta para a história de não usar o Firefox
http://jogostech.com.br/comunidade-open-source-atirando-no-proprio-pe.html
Desculpe, sem querer gerar polêmica, mas pontos de vista todo
O articulista do blog realmente não entendeu muito bem o teor da polêmica,
na minha opinião. O que diferencia Debian de muitas distros é o zelo que
tem com a sua política de Software livre, expresso em seu contrato social
(http://www.debian.org/social_contract).
--
Flávio M. Matsumoto
UFPR - ET
Oq eu acho pior é que esses dois browsers já existem há tempos e ainda
ficam discutindo isso... fale sério...
As pessoas estão cada vez mais desaprendendo como buscar informações
úteis na web, isso já foi debatido e acho que até aqui mesmo nessa
lista... puuutz.
É um porre esse povo que não lê a
Além disso tem outros fatores relacionados ao uso de ferramentas com
licença proprietária no Debian,
ninguém é proibido de utilizar software proprietários, todos podem
escolher, mas a versão original do
Debian preza pelo uso de ferramentas livres.
Por exemplo, posso utilizar inúmeros softwares
Em 08/05/13, Leandro Henrique Steinleandro.h.st...@gmail.com escreveu:
Outras distribuições como o caso do Ubuntu usam conceitos diferentes, a
comunidade passa a ser um setor
que auxilia no desenvolvimento, enquanto as decisões são feitas pelas
empresas parceiras. E o voto de uma
empresa
Marcelo Santana,
Peço desculpas pois minha intenção foi de apenas apresentar uma informação
mastigadinha em português. Mas infelizmente, tudo que vem mastigadinho
também vem com saliva dos outros. Mesmo assim, acredito que uma leitura
com um pouquinho mais de atenção é possível separar o que é
Por isso eu digo: usem Epiphany
Em 8 de maio de 2013 10:53, Geowany Alves geowany.a...@gmail.com escreveu:
Marcelo Santana,
Peço desculpas pois minha intenção foi de apenas apresentar uma informação
mastigadinha em português. Mas infelizmente, tudo que vem mastigadinho
também vem com
.
Att.
Em 6 de maio de 2013 21:30, Jack Jr cska1...@gmail.com escreveu:
Uma dúvida,
Há muito tempo que uso o Gnash.
1. O Adobe Flash é realmente muito superior?
2. Em que condições anda o projeto Gnash?
3. Adobe acabando com Flash Player para Linux (quem não usa Chrome) ficará
na
Em 07 de maio de 2013, 08:20h, Deckardbot deckard...@gmail.com
escreveu:
Olá Deckarbot,
Acabei de instalar o Wheezy.
Em seguida instalei o flashplugin-nonfree, mas ao tentar assistir
um video flash com o Iceweasel o plugin carregado é o Gnash.
Recomendo fortemente que leia as notas de
tempo que uso o Gnash.
1. O Adobe Flash é realmente muito superior?
2. Em que condições anda o projeto Gnash?
3. Adobe acabando com Flash Player para Linux (quem não usa Chrome)
ficará na dependência do Gnash?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-**
requ
Em 06 de maio de 2013, 21:30h, Jack Jr cska1...@gmail.com escreveu:
Olá Jack,
Uma dúvida,
Há muito tempo que uso o Gnash.
1. O Adobe Flash é realmente muito superior?
Infelizmente o gnash suporta a maioria dos recursos da versão 7 do
flash e alguns recursos das versões 8 e 9, enquanto
Em 07 de maio de 2013, 08:53h, Marcelo Santana
marcgsant...@yahoo.com.br escreveu:
Por acaso precisa desinstalar o Gnash para utilizar o Flash?
Não tem como conviver com os dois? Pois no Squeeze eu não
desinstavala o Gnash.
Sim, é necessário desinstalar o gnash.
Desculpe mas na pressa
Ao rodar o comando aparece uma mensagem dizendo que não tem o que
configurar:
# update-alternatives --config flash-mozilla.so
Existe apenas uma alternativa no grupo de ligação flash-mozilla.so (que
disponibiliza /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flash-mozilla.so:
/usr/lib/gnash/libgnashplugin.so
Nada para
Depois de muito bater cabeça por aí, procurando em diversos fóruns, blogs,
etc. desisti de tentar fazer o Adobe flash funcionar no Iceweasel (aliás,
diga-se de passagem, até agora não entendi essa história de não usar o
Firefox, por causa de um logotipo, o uso do Iceweasel só dificulta mais
marcioviniciu...@gmail.com escreveu:
Depois de muito bater cabeça por aí, procurando em diversos fóruns, blogs,
etc. desisti de tentar fazer o Adobe flash funcionar no Iceweasel (aliás,
diga-se de passagem, até agora não entendi essa história de não usar o
Firefox, por causa de um logotipo, o uso do
Uma dúvida,
Há muito tempo que uso o Gnash.
1. O Adobe Flash é realmente muito superior?
2. Em que condições anda o projeto Gnash?
3. Adobe acabando com Flash Player para Linux (quem não usa Chrome)
ficará na dependência do Gnash?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ
Je lis cette info :
Firefox SSL : mettez-vous à jour :
Firefox Aurora Mozilla prévoit dans la version 23 de Firefox une mise à jour
dans l'interprétation des pages SSL :
les pages ne seront affichées que si les éléments qui la composent sont
intégralement en HTTPS.
Nous souhaitons vous
On 04/24/2013 11:12 PM, andre_deb...@numericable.fr wrote:
On Wednesday 24 April 2013 18:12:21 maderios wrote:
On 04/24/2013 05:53 PM, Baptiste GRANDHOMME wrote:
Il me semble que sous Linux Adobe Flash n'est plus maintenu et surtout
avec Firefox, sous Windows c'est la version 11.7, si tu veux
On Thursday 25 April 2013 19:06:07 maderios wrote:
On 04/24/2013 11:12 PM, andre_deb...@numericable.fr wrote:
On Wednesday 24 April 2013 18:12:21 maderios wrote:
On 04/24/2013 05:53 PM, Baptiste GRANDHOMME wrote:
Il me semble que sous Linux Adobe Flash n'est plus maintenu et surtout
avec
sous Linux Adobe Flash n'est plus maintenu et surtout
avec Firefox, sous Windows c'est la version 11.7, si tu veux la
dernière version, il te faut Chrome.
Firefox ne fonctionnait chez moi pas de la version 12 à 19 sous Squeeze.
Impossible de le lancer. (j'ai donc gardé la n°11).
Depuis la version 20
Le jeudi 25 avril 2013 à 22:46:24, maderios a écrit :
[…]
Avec le plugin flashplugin-nonfree et en retirant celui
d'Adobe : libflashplayer.so, le plugin s'affiche
maintenant correctement.
Le paquet flashplugin-nonfree ne fait qu'installer
libflashplayer.so
depuis le site
On Thursday 25 April 2013 22:46:24 maderios wrote:
Alors comment se fait-il que le plugin flash Adobe s'affiche
correctement maintenant ?
Il était peut-être mal installé ? Pas clair
Maderios
Oui car apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree
doit installer le package Flash au bon endroit.
Bonjour,
J'ai Firefox 20.0.
J'ai pourtant bien updaté le plugin adobe flash
mais à chaque fois Firefox me demande
de l'updater :
ce plugin est vulnérable et doit être mis à jour
Je le ré-update (version 11-2) et pareil !
André
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http
Il me semble que sous Linux Adobe Flash n'est plus maintenu et surtout
avec Firefox, sous Windows c'est la version 11.7, si tu veux la dernière
version, il te faut Chrome.
Le 24/04/2013 17:46, andre_deb...@numericable.fr a écrit :
Bonjour,
J'ai Firefox 20.0.
J'ai pourtant bien updaté le
On 04/24/2013 05:46 PM, andre_deb...@numericable.fr wrote:
Bonjour,
J'ai Firefox 20.0.
J'ai pourtant bien updaté le plugin adobe flash
mais à chaque fois Firefox me demande
de l'updater :
ce plugin est vulnérable et doit être mis à jour
Je le ré-update (version 11-2) et pareil !
Salut
En ces
On 04/24/2013 05:53 PM, Baptiste GRANDHOMME wrote:
Il me semble que sous Linux Adobe Flash n'est plus maintenu et surtout
avec Firefox, sous Windows c'est la version 11.7, si tu veux la dernière
version, il te faut Chrome.
Flash fonctionne bien avec Iceweasel/Firefox (wheezy)
flashplugin
On Wednesday 24 April 2013 18:12:21 maderios wrote:
On 04/24/2013 05:53 PM, Baptiste GRANDHOMME wrote:
Il me semble que sous Linux Adobe Flash n'est plus maintenu et surtout
avec Firefox, sous Windows c'est la version 11.7, si tu veux la dernière
version, il te faut Chrome.
Firefox ne
:
ENVIRONMENT
TMPDIR Directory in which temporary files are created.
En in .bashrc heb
export TMPDIR=/srv/ami/stapperstemp
staan, waarbij /srv/ami/stapperstemp een directory is op
een filesystem met volop ruimte.
Als het meezit dan heeft de opvolger van Adobe Flash ook zo iets.
Dus iets waar
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 14:46 -0400, John L. Cunningham wrote:
dpkg-reconfigure flashplugin-nonfree
And once again this marvelous list has come thru for me.
Thanks John!!
That did the trick. I'm surprised I have not heard of this b/4 but will
file it away in my tips/tricks area.
frosty
BTW: I use
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 03:45:14PM -0500, John W. Foster wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 14:46 -0400, John L. Cunningham wrote:
dpkg-reconfigure flashplugin-nonfree
And once again this marvelous list has come thru for me.
Thanks John!!
That did the trick. I'm surprised I have not heard of
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:05:16 -0500, John W. Foster wrote:
Far a while now the adobe flash player/plugin in Debian's Chromium
browser has been 'out of date' with the approriate warnings popping up ,
asking to update the flashplayer. I thought the flashplayer was 'built
in' in Chromium
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 16:46 +, Camaleón wrote:
Iceweasel slow? At least for me Firefox 13 is fast as hell :-)
Firefox is very fast, fast enough for my needs, but it can't compare to
browsers with less features on my machine. Firefox 13 sometimes force me
to kill it and sometimes to reset the
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 19:29 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 16:46 +, Camaleón wrote:
Iceweasel slow? At least for me Firefox 13 is fast as hell :-)
Firefox is very fast, fast enough for my needs, but it can't compare to
browsers with less features on my machine.
the
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:29:08 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 16:46 +, Camaleón wrote:
Iceweasel slow? At least for me Firefox 13 is fast as hell :-)
(...)
BOT, yes, Iceweasel and Firefox are slow. It doesn't matter on fast
machines with fast Internet access.
That can
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 17:48 +, Camaleón wrote:
That can be because you are using too many addons within Firefox, IIRC.
3 addons + an Ubuntu-plug + Personas.
Is this much?
Iceweasel 12 for Debian is empty and regarding to the speed, it's the
same as for Firefox 13 on Ubuntu with add-ons.
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:33:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 17:48 +, Camaleón wrote:
That can be because you are using too many addons within Firefox, IIRC.
3 addons + an Ubuntu-plug + Personas.
Is this much?
Yes. One is even too much ;-P
Iceweasel 12 for Debian
Far a while now the adobe flash player/plugin in Debian's Chromium
browser has been 'out of date' with the approriate warnings popping up ,
asking to update the flashplayer. I thought the flashplayer was 'built
in' in Chromium as it is in Google Chrome. I have both installed and
that appears
On 2012-06-15, John W. Foster jfoster81...@gmail.com wrote:
Far a while now the adobe flash player/plugin in Debian's Chromium
browser has been 'out of date' with the approriate warnings popping up ,
asking to update the flashplayer. I thought the flashplayer was 'built
in' in Chromium
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:05:16AM -0500, John W. Foster wrote:
Far a while now the adobe flash player/plugin in Debian's Chromium
browser has been 'out of date' with the approriate warnings popping up ,
asking to update the flashplayer. I thought the flashplayer was 'built
in' in Chromium
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 14:46 -0400, John L. Cunningham wrote:
dpkg-reconfigure flashplugin-nonfree
And once again this marvelous list has come thru for me.
Thanks John!!
That did the trick. I'm surprised I have not heard of this b/4 but will
file it away in my tips/tricks area.
frosty
--
To
How do I get Iceweasel (under Lenny) to recognize or use Adobe
Flashplayer 10.1 or better. I can't get any CNN or BBC videos to play as
they keep telling me I need 10.1.
I've done some searching and tried the various methods mentioned in
various sites. I have DLed the tar from Adobe. I've
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:14:37 -0500, John Lindsay wrote:
How do I get Iceweasel (under Lenny) to recognize or use Adobe
Flashplayer 10.1 or better. I can't get any CNN or BBC videos to play as
they keep telling me I need 10.1.
(...)
You can drop the plugin file (libflashplayer.so) inside your
will automatically download and
install Adobe Flash. Then periodically when I know I need to upgrade
the Adobe Flash I run the update script manually.
# update-flashplugin-nonfree --install
That checks the file checksums and if an update is available will
download and install the update.
You can verify
To Camaleon and Bob
Many thanks for your input. Placing libflashplayer.co into my
/.mozilla/plugins folder worked 100%. That was the information I was
missing.
Have a Happy and prosperous New Years
John
On 28/12/11 02:14 PM, John Lindsay wrote:
How do I get Iceweasel (under Lenny) to
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 23:48 -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 09/11/11 Paul Johnson said:
Why bother with non-free software when we're talking about a technology
that's dying like BSD these days?
'cause people like it when their systems...work?
Given it's stability, i wouldn't define
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
And it didn't for me when I installed Lenny. I have just installed it
manually. I have not got task-desktop, so do not need its
dependencies.
lisi@Junior:~$ aptitude search task-desktop
lisi@Junior:~$
Keep in mind
On Jo, 10 nov 11, 08:56:46, Walter Hurry wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by
default?
Interesting question. Which distributions do that?
Debian of course :)
It didn't for me when I installed Squeeze. Maybe I did it differently.
$ apt-cache
On Jo, 10 nov 11, 11:29:08, Bob Proulx wrote:
Really this more than anything illustrates that nonfree programs and
protocols are bad for us. It is important to prevent nonfree software
from being required. This is what makes the need for HTML5 to be
completely free so important. We can
On 12 November 2011 09:56, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jo, 10 nov 11, 08:56:46, Walter Hurry wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by
default?
Interesting question. Which distributions do that?
Debian of course :)
It didn't for
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:51:06AM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On 12 November 2011 09:56, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jo, 10 nov 11, 08:56:46, Walter Hurry wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by
default?
Interesting question.
On 12 November 2011 14:04, Rob Owens row...@ptd.net wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:51:06AM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On 12 November 2011 09:56, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jo, 10 nov 11, 08:56:46, Walter Hurry wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:04:30 -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:51:06AM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On 12 November 2011 09:56, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jo, 10 nov 11, 08:56:46, Walter Hurry wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:18:53 +, T o n g wrote:
Well, not exactly now but at lease Adobe flash is dead for all mobile
devices:
Adobe confirms Flash Player is dead for mobile devices
http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/adobe-confirms-flash-player-is-dead-
for-mobile-devices/
Steve Jobs
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 05:47:21PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Robert Holtzman wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
A .deb package for firefox? Where?
The Debian Mozilla team makes Firefox deb packages available for
Stable that tracks the current release.
http://mozilla.debian.net/
On 09/11/2011 19:18, T o n g wrote:
Well, not exactly now but at lease Adobe flash is dead for all mobile
devices:
Adobe confirms Flash Player is dead for mobile devices
http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/adobe-confirms-flash-player-is-dead-
for-mobile-devices/
Steve Jobs wins: Flash being
On 10/11/11 15:46, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 09/11/11 T o n g said:
Adobe flash is one of the tech-inventions that I resent the most.
Now it is dead for all mobiles, and I wish it is dead on the web tomorrow.
I like watching youtube videos. Silverlight is a problem for me on Linux, so
On 10/11/11 19:07, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
On 09/11/2011 19:18, T o n g wrote:
Well, not exactly now but at lease Adobe flash is dead for all mobile
devices:
Adobe confirms Flash Player is dead for mobile devices
http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/adobe-confirms-flash-player-is-dead
On Mi, 09 nov 11, 20:14:28, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:51:14 +, Andrew Wood wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by default?
Interesting question. Which distributions do that?
Debian of course :)
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions
On 10/11/2011 09:22, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 10/11/11 19:07, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
On 09/11/2011 19:18, T o n g wrote:
Well, not exactly now but at lease Adobe flash is dead for all mobile
devices:
Adobe confirms Flash Player is dead for mobile devices
http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:28:53 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 09 nov 11, 20:14:28, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:51:14 +, Andrew Wood wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by
default?
Interesting question. Which distributions do that?
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:10:13 +1100
Scott Ferguson prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/11/11 15:46, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 09/11/11 T o n g said:
Adobe flash is one of the tech-inventions that I resent the most.
Now it is dead for all mobiles, and I wish it is dead
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:02:55 -0500
Celejar cele...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:10:13 +1100
Scott Ferguson prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/11/11 15:46, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 09/11/11 T o n g said:
Adobe flash is one of the tech-inventions that I
On 10/11/11 Scott Ferguson said:
Choices are nice :-)
http://www.youtube.com/html5
(let youtube/google know *you* would prefer a choice).
Nice link. I'm using Squeeze so I have FF 3.5. I could update outside of the
.deb package though to something more recent.
Remember when Firefox was
On 10/11/11 Celejar said:
And of course, there's always youtube-dl, cclive, etc.
when they work...
fetch config ...done.
verify video link ...error: libquvi: server returned http/404
I get that for cclive on every url...
and I don't see youtube-dl packaged for squeeze.
Mike
signature.asc
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 00:07, Lorenzo Sutton lorenzofsut...@gmail.com wrote:
youtube ... is still very 'betqaish' with html5
You must be using a different YouTube than me. I have had very little
in the way of problems with HTML5 on YT, and nothing recently. Not
all videos are available in
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 07:10:13PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Choices are nice :-)
http://www.youtube.com/html5
(let youtube/google know *you* would prefer a choice).
Thanks for the link, didn't know about that.
Cheers,
Tom
--
Mike: The Fourth Dimension is a shambles?
Bernie:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:39:30AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 10/11/11 Scott Ferguson said:
Choices are nice :-)
http://www.youtube.com/html5
(let youtube/google know *you* would prefer a choice).
Nice link. I'm using Squeeze so I have FF 3.5. I could update outside of
)
license. This is deeply important to a core value of Debian. It is
more important to Debian than other values such as interoperating with
popular proprietary programs such as Adobe Flash.
http://www.debian.org/social_contract
What do you do in that case? Do you avoid GNU Flash gnash too simply
Robert Holtzman wrote:
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
Nice link. I'm using Squeeze so I have FF 3.5. I could update outside of the
.deb package though to something more recent.
A .deb package for firefox? Where?
The Debian Mozilla team makes Firefox deb packages available for
Stable that
/11/11 T o n g said:
Adobe flash is one of the tech-inventions that I resent the most.
Now it is dead for all mobiles, and I wish it is dead on the web
tomorrow.
I like watching youtube videos. Silverlight is a problem for me on
Linux, so I
find flash to be a good
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:45:49 -0500
Michael P. Soulier msoul...@digitaltorque.ca wrote:
On 10/11/11 Celejar said:
And of course, there's always youtube-dl, cclive, etc.
when they work...
fetch config ...done.
verify video link ...error: libquvi: server returned http/404
Beats me -
Celejar wrote:
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
Celejar said:
And of course, there's always youtube-dl, cclive, etc.
when they work...
fetch config ...done.
verify video link ...error: libquvi: server returned http/404
Beats me - they usually work for me (I usually use youtube-dl),
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:26:50 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
...
Because of this I always use the youtube-dl from Sid. It is a script.
It only depends upon ffmpeg being installed. It runs just fine on
And ffmpeg is not even a hard dependency, only a recommends (not sure
what happens
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
and I don't see youtube-dl packaged for squeeze.
The reason for this, as stated by the maintainer of youtube-dl himself,
is given in this post:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2009/12/msg00433.html
But the wheezy version appears to be working well in squeeze.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:31:29AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Robert Holtzman wrote:
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
Nice link. I'm using Squeeze so I have FF 3.5. I could update outside of
the
.deb package though to something more recent.
A .deb package for firefox? Where?
The
Robert Holtzman wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
A .deb package for firefox? Where?
The Debian Mozilla team makes Firefox deb packages available for
Stable that tracks the current release.
http://mozilla.debian.net/
Nothing about FF here or in any of the backport sites I looked at.
On 11/11/11 11:47, Bob Proulx wrote:
Robert Holtzman wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
A .deb package for firefox? Where?
The Debian Mozilla team makes Firefox deb packages available for
Stable that tracks the current release.
http://mozilla.debian.net/
Nothing about FF here or in any of the
Well, not exactly now but at lease Adobe flash is dead for all mobile
devices:
Adobe confirms Flash Player is dead for mobile devices
http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/adobe-confirms-flash-player-is-dead-
for-mobile-devices/
Steve Jobs wins: Flash being phased out from mobile devices
http
T o n g wrote:
Well, not exactly now but at lease Adobe flash is dead for all mobile
devices:
Adobe confirms Flash Player is dead for mobile devices
http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/adobe-confirms-flash-player-is-dead-
for-mobile-devices/
Steve Jobs wins: Flash being phased out from mobile
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by default?
I understand the desire to have a free flash player but Gnash is a very
poor implementation and I think it tarnishes Linux's image rather than
enhances it.
Its buggy, a lot of content it cant display, or displays
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:51:14 +, Andrew Wood wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by default?
Interesting question. Which distributions do that?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:51:14 +, Andrew Wood wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by default?
Interesting question. Which distributions do that?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 11/09/2011 02:51 PM, Andrew Wood wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by default?
I understand the desire to have a free flash player but Gnash is a very
poor implementation and I think it tarnishes Linux's image rather than
enhances it.
Its buggy, a lot of
On 11/09/2011 02:51 PM, Andrew Wood wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by default?
I understand the desire to have a free flash player but Gnash is a very
poor implementation and I think it tarnishes Linux's image rather than
enhances it.
Its buggy, a lot of
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 19:51 +, Andrew Wood wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by
default? I understand the desire to have a free flash player but Gnash
is a very poor implementation and I think it tarnishes Linux's image
rather than enhances it.
Why bother
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 16:10:31 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
Why bother with non-free software when we're talking about a technology
that's dying like BSD these days?
Because right now, realistically it's the only game in town if one wants
to watch flash content. When HTML5 comes along and I am
On 10/11/11 11:10, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 19:51 +, Andrew Wood wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by
default?
Because most GNU/Linux distributions try and provide a secure user
experience. FFflash is the antidote for security.
Gnash can
Why bother with non-free software when we're talking about a technology
that's dying like BSD these days?
Because right now, realistically it's the only game in town if one wants
to watch flash content. When HTML5 comes along and I am able to get rid
of
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 16:10:31 -0800
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 19:51 +, Andrew Wood wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by
default? I understand the desire to have a free flash player but
Gnash is a very poor
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 16:10:31 -0800
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 19:51 +, Andrew Wood wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by
default? I understand the desire to have a free flash player but
Gnash is a very poor
On 10/11/11 13:38, Weaver wrote:
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 16:10:31 -0800
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 19:51 +, Andrew Wood wrote:
Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by
default? I understand the desire to have a free flash player but
On 09/11/11 Paul Johnson said:
Why bother with non-free software when we're talking about a technology
that's dying like BSD these days?
'cause people like it when their systems...work?
Mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 09/11/11 T o n g said:
Adobe flash is one of the tech-inventions that I resent the most.
Now it is dead for all mobiles, and I wish it is dead on the web tomorrow.
I like watching youtube videos. Silverlight is a problem for me on Linux, so I
find flash to be a good thing by comparison
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 21:25 +0200, Andrej Kacian wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:50:13 +0100
Wolodja Wentland babi...@gmail.com wrote:
$ LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libc/memcpy-preload.so /usr/bin/iceweasel
$ LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libc/memcpy-preload.so /usr/bin/chromium
Thanks for this! I
301 - 400 of 454 matches
Mail list logo
