Hi,
I am in charge of a small office network. The server is running Debian
stable with some testing packages and the desktops are running mandrake
10.0.
Currently we are using NIS for authentication and NFS to share the home
directories.
I have been having some hassles with NIS and would like
Paul William wrote:
Hi,
I am in charge of a small office network. The server is running Debian
stable with some testing packages and the desktops are running
mandrake 10.0.
Currently we are using NIS for authentication and NFS to share the
home directories.
I have been having some hassles
On Monday 02 August 2004 04:24 pm, Paul William wrote:
Hi,
I am in charge of a small office network. The server is running Debian
stable with some testing packages and the desktops are running mandrake
10.0.
Currently we are using NIS for authentication and NFS to share the home
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 10:53, John Summerfield wrote:
Paul William wrote:
Hi,
I am in charge of a small office network. The server is running Debian
stable with some testing packages and the desktops are running
mandrake 10.0.
Currently we are using NIS for authentication and NFS
Paul William wrote:
NIS and NFS are differen tissues. What's your problem withNFS?
Can't anyone with a knoppix cd create the right uids/users and mount
the users home directory without any authentication?
Fair comment. I control my LANs, but I see how I could lose control.
If samba can
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 15:14 +1200, Paul William wrote:
Samba's not a goer. Doesn't do Unix permissions. It's a Windows/OS/2
sharing scheme.
what about http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/smbfs/ . smbfs with
unix extentions?
Recent versions of samba and linux support cifs and unix
Samba's not a goer. Doesn't do Unix permissions. It's a Windows/OS/2
sharing scheme.
I was wondering about that ...
There is nfs over ssl but its not yet ported to linux:
http://www.crufty.net/Products/sNFS.html
There is shfs, an ssh file system, but it seems too immuture to use on a
On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 23:31 -0400, Mark Roach wrote:
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 15:14 +1200, Paul William wrote:
Samba's not a goer. Doesn't do Unix permissions. It's a Windows/OS/2
sharing scheme.
what about http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/smbfs/ . smbfs with
unix extentions?
Paul William wrote:
Samba's not a goer. Doesn't do Unix permissions. It's a Windows/OS/2
sharing scheme.
I was wondering about that ...
There is nfs over ssl but its not yet ported to linux:
http://www.crufty.net/Products/sNFS.html
There is shfs, an ssh file system, but it seems too immuture
John Goerzen wrote:
At my location, we are dealing with a large Unix network composed of
machines from multiple vendors -- Debian, RedHat, Sun, DEC, etc. We are
moving largely in the direction of Debian and some of the legacy systems
will be dropped within a few years anyway (due to Y2K
On Tue, 30 Dec 1997, George Bonser wrote:
The latest version of NIS uses encryption and authentication. I don't
know if software is available for debian (or anyone other than Sun).
Sun calls it NIS Plus.
And you are best staying away from it unless you want to spend long hours
getting
grin wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 1997, George Bonser wrote:
The latest version of NIS uses encryption and authentication. I don't
know if software is available for debian (or anyone other than Sun).
Sun calls it NIS Plus.
And you are best staying away from it unless you want to spend
On Wed, 31 Dec 1997, Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:
The latest version of NIS uses encryption and authentication. I don't
know if software is available for debian (or anyone other than Sun).
Sun calls it NIS Plus.
And you are best staying away from it unless you want to spend long
grin wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 1997, Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:
The latest version of NIS uses encryption and authentication. I don't
know if software is available for debian (or anyone other than Sun).
Sun calls it NIS Plus.
And you are best staying away from it unless you
John Goerzen wrote:
At my location, we are dealing with a large Unix network composed of
machines from multiple vendors -- Debian, RedHat, Sun, DEC, etc. We are
moving largely in the direction of Debian and some of the legacy systems
will be dropped within a few years anyway (due to Y2K
At my location, we are dealing with a large Unix network composed of
machines from multiple vendors -- Debian, RedHat, Sun, DEC, etc. We are
moving largely in the direction of Debian and some of the legacy systems
will be dropped within a few years anyway (due to Y2K nonconformity).
We have
16 matches
Mail list logo
