On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 09:37:10AM +, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> My StrongARM-based Netwinder machine has been lying dormant for a while,
> but I was planning to bring it back up. It's ARMv4 without Thumb.
Does a netwinder have enough ram these days to run the installer (or
much of anything
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> If anyone is running stretch, buster or sid on ARMv4t hardware, then
> please let us know what device and kernel you are using and whether
> you intend to use buster.
My StrongARM-based Netwinder machine has been lying dormant for a while,
but I was planning to bring it back
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 09:37:10AM +, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > If anyone is running stretch, buster or sid on ARMv4t hardware, then
> > please let us know what device and kernel you are using and whether
> > you intend to use buster.
>
> My StrongARM-based Netwinder
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:56:03PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 12:52:05AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> >>
> >>... OMAP15xx is frequently tested and used
> >> by OMAP1 hackers (thanks to Amstrad
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 12:52:05AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
>>
>>... OMAP15xx is frequently tested and used
>> by OMAP1 hackers (thanks to Amstrad Delta).
>
> But is anyone still using Debian on OMAP15xx?
>
> Looking at the
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 12:52:05AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
>
>... OMAP15xx is frequently tested and used
> by OMAP1 hackers (thanks to Amstrad Delta).
But is anyone still using Debian on OMAP15xx?
Looking at the amount of RAM in the Amstrad Delta,
I'd be surprised if anyone is actually using
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:36:57PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> - TI OMAP15xx was based on ARM925, we support exactly one machine
>> with it (HTC Herald phone, a.k.a. T-Mobile Wing), I'd call it dead
>
>
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:36:57PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> - TI OMAP15xx was based on ARM925, we support exactly one machine
> with it (HTC Herald phone, a.k.a. T-Mobile Wing), I'd call it dead
Check again, Herald is OMAP850. OMAP15xx is frequently tested and used
by OMAP1 hackers
On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 20:44:08 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > for the armel port in buster the question of raising the baseline came up.
> > That has been a recurring question over the time, the reason to
> > maintain ARMv4t instruction set was OpenMoko mobile phone, which lot
> > of people was
To clarify which platforms are affected by moving from ARMv4T to ARMv5TE,
here is what the kernel supports in principle for people that just use the
debian packages but build their own kernels:
ARMv4 (prior to ARMv4t) machines are:
- StrongARM 110 based: RiscPC, EBSA110, Footbridge/NetWinder:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 01:43:50PM +0100, Héctor Orón Martínez wrote:
>...
> 2017-11-05 22:32 GMT+01:00 Adrian Bunk :
>
> > for the armel port in buster the question of raising the baseline came up.
>
> That has been a recurring question over the time, the reason to
> maintain
W dniu 07.11.2017 o 14:11, Thomas Goirand pisze:
> On 11/05/2017 10:32 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> 20 years ago you could go into a shop and buy a mobile phone
>> with a CPU supported by the armel port in stretch.
> I didn't know Stretch was released 20 years ago. :)
Stretch maybe not. But ARMv4t
On 11/05/2017 10:32 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 20 years ago you could go into a shop and buy a mobile phone
> with a CPU supported by the armel port in stretch.
I didn't know Stretch was released 20 years ago. :)
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 01:43:50PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
>
>Also build daemons are aging, those were initially donated by Marvell
>(some development boards) which then they replaced with other
>development boards. We have been unable to find suitable hardware to
>build armel port and current
>>>[+debian-embedded, feel free to adjust CC'd mailing lists on reply]
Hello,
Thanks for bringing up this discussion! And apologies for adding
more complexity to the initial question.
Find few comments inlined below,
2017-11-05 22:32 GMT+01:00 Adrian Bunk :
> for the armel
On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 02:49 -0800, Rick Thomas wrote:
> How do I know if a machine is ARMv4t? I have a sheevaplug and a
> couple of openrd machines (one “client”, the other “ultimate”) that
> are still doing useful work. Are they v4t?
They're ARMv5 (so still need armel). I too have similar
> On Nov 7, 2017, at 3:27 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 2017-11-07 11:49, schrieb Rick Thomas:
>> How do I know if a machine is ARMv4t? I have a sheevaplug and a
>> couple of openrd machines (one “client”, the other “ultimate”) that
>> are still doing useful
Hi,
Am 2017-11-07 11:49, schrieb Rick Thomas:
How do I know if a machine is ARMv4t? I have a sheevaplug and a
couple of openrd machines (one “client”, the other “ultimate”) that
are still doing useful work. Are they v4t?
cat /proc/cpuinfo should do the trick. It might not show the 't'
after
How do I know if a machine is ARMv4t? I have a sheevaplug and a couple of
openrd machines (one “client”, the other “ultimate”) that are still doing
useful work. Are they v4t?
Thanks,
Rick
> On Nov 5, 2017, at 1:32 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> for the armel port in
Hi,
for the armel port in buster the question of raising the baseline came up.
20 years ago you could go into a shop and buy a mobile phone
with a CPU supported by the armel port in stretch.
Roger Shimizu is doing a great job on ARMv5 hardware and I've seen bug
reports from users on ARMv5
20 matches
Mail list logo