Dave Scott, Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 09:12:44AM -0800:
> Yeah, I definitely have Libc6 2.2.5-3 in my system somehow and my relese
> is Potato, so I did a big no no I guess. And the part that sucks is
> that I upgraded to get squirrelmail on.
>
I wonder if there is an exisitng document/policy any
Yeah, I definitely have Libc6 2.2.5-3 in my system somehow and my relese
is Potato, so I did a big no no I guess. And the part that sucks is
that I upgraded to get squirrelmail on.
Might be best just to leave it be, since everything appears to work at
present?
Sucks, for a newb like me, ther
Dave Scott, Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 12:04:17PM -0800:
> I'm going to try the manual install today.
>
Very straightforward. There are some changes I make to the default
install (don't like db passwords in the DocumentRoot) but the
installation and configuration process is a snap.
> I'll let you kn
Rick Macdonald, Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 02:39:02PM -0700:
>
> I installed squirrelmail, but which IMAP should I use?
>
> Can I still keep running qpopper to provide POP3 for users on my lan (wife
> and kids)? Or does IMAP conflict somehow?
>
What SMTP server are you using? If you are using qmail
> I think my main problem was I couldn't find any version of
> squirrelmail
> up on debian's site, except for in testing, so I tried the testing
> version, opps.
The Squirrelmail on Debian's website is in:
pool/main/s/squirrelmail/
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/squirrelmail.html
It is
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 3:51 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: Best Email Web Application
>i think you had already covered that, but okay.
>it seems to me that you have 3 choices:
>
>1. upgrade to woody
>2. place a few lines into your sources.list
> f
i think you had already covered that, but okay.
it seems to me that you have 3 choices:
1. upgrade to woody
2. place a few lines into your sources.list
file and upgrade all the packages needed to
install squirrelmail
3. find a different web-based email application
Or just manually install S
I installed squirrelmail, but which IMAP should I use?
Can I still keep running qpopper to provide POP3 for users on my lan (wife
and kids)? Or does IMAP conflict somehow?
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Angus D Madden wrote:
> Dave Scott, Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:45:18PM -0800:
> > Anyone have any ideas o
Jerome Acks Jr, Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 04:13:56PM -0500:
> Looking at squirrelmail dependencies, I don't see a lot of testing
> version numbers listed. You could try installing squirrelmail source
> and compiling it yourself.
SquirrelMail depends on php4, perl, and debconf. Their dependencies a
Dave Scott, Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 10:58:55AM -0800:
> Ok, I tried to install SquirrelMail but didn't have too much luck.
>
> All I got were failed dependencies left and right. I had to manually
> download a bunch of them.
>
> I am stuck now with SquirrelMail telling me that I don't have Perl
> i
> Maybe my sources.list file just dosen't have the package in it because
> I
> get this when using apt-get install squirrelmail.
>
> CLOUD:/usr/lib/cgi-bin# apt-get install squirrelmail
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Package squirrelmail has no available versio
> Yeah, I'm using Potato.
>
> Is it a good idea to upgrade to Woody even if this is for a business?
>
> I tried apt-get -f install
Depends. I think that woody is just as
stable (if not more so) than RedHat, but
I use potato for my server. Woody is
best for a desktop OS.
As far as the -f option go
a lot more error messages.
Thanks for your help by the way.
-dave
-Original Message-
From: timothy bauscher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Dave Scott
Subject: RE: Best Email Web Application
> I installed PHP4 though, but it still tells me I need per
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 10:58:55AM -0800, Dave Scott wrote:
> Ok, I tried to install SquirrelMail but didn't have too much luck.
>
> All I got were failed dependencies left and right. I had to manually
> download a bunch of them.
>
> I am stuck now with SquirrelMail telling me that I don't have
tered while processing:
Squirrelmail
Weird Huh..
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: timothy bauscher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 12:11 PM
To: Dave Scott
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: Best Email Web Application
> I try to install Perl 5.6.1-7
> I try to install Perl 5.6.1-7 but get all kinds of conflicts with Perl
> 5.005
Why do you need Perl? That doesn't make any
sense. It is written in PHP4...
apt-get install squirrelmail
(==timothy==)
this mess.
Is it normal to have to update half of your packages to Testing packages
to get SquirrelMail installed?
Thanks
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: timothy bauscher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:27 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re:
Dave Scott wrote:
> Anyone have any ideas on what is the best Web Based email application.
mutt in mindterm?
--
see shy jo
At 1016235863s since epoch (03/15/02 18:44:23 -0500 UTC), Angus D Madden wrote:
> Dave Scott, Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:45:18PM -0800:
> > Anyone have any ideas on what is the best Web Based email application.
> >
> > I was using Neomail, but it's just too plain, is there anything with
> > more opt
Dave Scott, Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:45:18PM -0800:
> Anyone have any ideas on what is the best Web Based email application.
>
> I was using Neomail, but it's just too plain, is there anything with
> more options, etc, something more like Outlook Web Access 2000 in an
> open source alternative.
>
> Anyone have any ideas on what is the best Web Based email
application.
I like SquirrelMail. It has lots of extra features.
(==timothy==)
On Friday 15 March 2002 03:45 pm, Dave Scott wrote:
> Anyone have any ideas on what is the best Web Based email application.
Check out squirrelmail (squirrelmail.org) It's very stable and I consider it
to be feature-rich. Additionally, it has a plugin interface with several
third-party plugin
Title: Best Email Web Application
Anyone have any ideas on what is the best Web Based email application.
I was using Neomail, but it’s just too plain, is there anything with more options, etc, something more like Outlook Web Access 2000 in an open source alternative.
Thanks
-Dave
23 matches
Mail list logo
