On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:48:50AM +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote:
Allan Wind wrote:
On 2008-02-14T19:53:13-0500, Steve Kleene wrote:
Can someone here explain why the choice of web server determines whether the
movie plays or not? I would have thought that the web server would just
copy
I'm perplexed by the following.
My wife made a movie (WMV suffix) with Windows MovieMaker. She posted it on
a machine running Novell's Novonix web server. If I typed the file's URL
into a browser window, it just displayed a full page of non-ASCII junk. This
was true from both XP Explorer and
On Thu Feb 14, 2008 at 19:53:13 -0500, Steve Kleene wrote:
Can someone here explain why the choice of web server determines whether the
movie plays or not? I would have thought that the web server would just copy
the WMV file to the browser, which would then decide whether to play it or
On 2008-02-14T19:53:13-0500, Steve Kleene wrote:
Can someone here explain why the choice of web server determines whether the
movie plays or not? I would have thought that the web server would just copy
the WMV file to the browser, which would then decide whether to play it or
display it as
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:53:13 -0500, I wrote:
Can someone here explain why the choice of web server determines whether the
movie plays or not? I would have thought that the web server would just copy
the WMV file to the browser, which would then decide whether to play it or
display it as text.
Allan Wind wrote:
On 2008-02-14T19:53:13-0500, Steve Kleene wrote:
Can someone here explain why the choice of web server determines whether the
movie plays or not? I would have thought that the web server would just copy
the WMV file to the browser, which would then decide whether to play it
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:11:08 +0200
Marcus Blumhagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
First of all, please CC me when replying, since I am not subscribed to
this list.
[...]
And as I rarely decompress files, I have forgotten the command to
decompress tar/bz2 files .
[...]
I just
Hi,
First of all, please CC me when replying, since I am not subscribed to
this list.
[...]
And as I rarely decompress files, I have forgotten the command to
decompress tar/bz2 files .
[...]
I just wanted to add my ¢2. You may want to evaluate the package named
unp and you will never
El Mar, 14 de Agosto de 2007, 8:29 pm, Frank McCormick escribió:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 -0400
Jose Luis Rivas Contreras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel,
which aptitude dumped into /usr/src. Reading the
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:36:52 +0900
Takehiko Abe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
Well, I always store there all the sources related with my
kernel, modules, etc... I haven't get any problem... BTW,
remember doing the symlink to /usr/src/linux from your
kernel-source.
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 21:27, Wayne Topa wrote:
Anybody? Where do people dump their kernel source anyway???
I have always put my kernels in /usr/src. First time I've _ever_
heard of DO NOT USE THE /usr/src area. Just what readme did you
see _that_ in?
From
Ed Jabbour([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 21:27, Wayne Topa wrote:
Anybody? Where do people dump their kernel source anyway???
I have always put my kernels in /usr/src. First time I've _ever_
heard of DO NOT USE THE /usr/src area. Just what
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 -0400
Jose Luis Rivas Contreras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel,
which aptitude dumped into /usr/src. Reading the readme, one of
the first things it says is DO NOT USE THE
Frank McCormick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 -0400
Jose Luis Rivas Contreras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel,
which aptitude dumped into /usr/src. Reading
thats where the debian kernel source files will go if I need
to download them and I dont want things to get confused.
-+-
8 out of 10 Owners who Expressed a Preference said Their Cats Preferred Techno.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
Frank McCormick wrote:
Well, I always store there all the sources related with my kernel,
modules, etc... I haven't get any problem... BTW, remember doing
the symlink to /usr/src/linux from your kernel-source.
Well then why the warning from the Kernel developers? And what's
this about
I have taken the first steps towards compiling an Nvidia module for my
Quadro-pro card...
I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel, which
aptitude dumped into /usr/src. Reading the readme, one of the first
things it says is DO NOT USE THE /usr/src area because that is
Frank McCormick wrote:
I have taken the first steps towards compiling an Nvidia module for my
Quadro-pro card...
I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel, which
aptitude dumped into /usr/src. Reading the readme, one of the first
things it says is DO NOT USE THE
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:41 -0400
Jose Luis Rivas Contreras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
I have taken the first steps towards compiling an Nvidia module for
my Quadro-pro card...
I downloaded and installed the source for the current kernel, which
aptitude dumped
i have Debian Etch amd64 using netinst CD. i want to disable Ipv6 as
it causes problems. i know what i need to add:
alias net-pf-10 off
alias ipv6 off
on Fedora i add these lines to /etc/modprobe.conf and internet
troubles go away :-) now on debian i have these 3 files:
/etc/modprobe.conf
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:21:15PM +0530, arnuld wrote:
i have Debian Etch amd64 using netinst CD. i want to disable Ipv6 as
it causes problems. i know what i need to add:
alias net-pf-10 off
alias ipv6 off
on Fedora i add these lines to /etc/modprobe.conf and internet
troubles go away
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Scott wrote:
H.S. wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
Oh, terribly sorry for the lack of information. It was late at
night and
it had been a long day.
I use lightning extension in Icedove.
Interesting.
I tried to install Lightning 0.3.1,
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/07/07 08:19, H.S. wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/06/07 23:35, H.S. wrote:
Hello,
I notice that if I create an appointment in Icedove (on Etch) during the
How do you do that?
Oh, terribly sorry
Paul Scott wrote:
Oh, terribly sorry for the lack of information. It was late at night and
it had been a long day.
I use lightning extension in Icedove.
Interesting.
I tried to install Lightning 0.3.1, but it complains about not being
compatible with Iceweasel.
I just tried and got
H.S. wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
Oh, terribly sorry for the lack of information. It was late at
night and
it had been a long day.
I use lightning extension in Icedove.
Interesting.
I tried to install Lightning 0.3.1, but it complains about not being
compatible with Iceweasel.
I just
Paul Scott wrote:
Did you try installing it in Icedove?
That's a good question! I went to the IceDove Tools menu and chose
Extensions. Then I chose Get More Extensions which took me to
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions.php?app=%7b3550f703-e582-4d05-9a08-453d09bdfdc6%7d
using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/07 23:35, H.S. wrote:
Hello,
I notice that if I create an appointment in Icedove (on Etch) during the
How do you do that?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/06/07 23:35, H.S. wrote:
Hello,
I notice that if I create an appointment in Icedove (on Etch) during the
How do you do that?
I'd like to know that too, AFAIK, Icedove is a MUA, not a PIM.
Joe
- --
Registerd Linux
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/07 23:35, H.S. wrote:
Hello,
I notice that if I create an appointment in Icedove (on Etch) during the
How do you do that?
Oh, terribly sorry for the lack of information. It was late at night and
it had been a long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/07/07 08:19, H.S. wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/07 23:35, H.S. wrote:
Hello,
I notice that if I create an appointment in Icedove (on Etch) during the
How do you do that?
Oh,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/07/07 08:19, H.S. wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/07 23:35, H.S. wrote:
Hello,
I notice that if I create an appointment in Icedove (on Etch) during the
How do you do
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/07/07 08:19, H.S. wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/07 23:35, H.S. wrote:
Hello,
I notice that if I create an appointment in Icedove (on Etch) during the
How do you do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/07/07 09:28, H.S. wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/07/07 08:19, H.S. wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/07 23:35, H.S. wrote:
Hello,
I notice
Ron Johnson wrote:
I use lightning extension in Icedove.
Interesting.
I tried to install Lightning 0.3.1, but it complains about not being
compatible with Iceweasel.
And it complains correctly. Lightning is an extension for Icedove
(Debian version of Thunderbird), not of the browser
Hello,
I notice that if I create an appointment in Icedove (on Etch) during the
next week, the event is shown one hour ahead of the time I specify. For
example, if I specify an event for next week's Tue, 10h00~11h00, it is
shown at 09h00~10h00. I have to drag that even one hour to correct
José Alburquerque wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I'm confused. I thought the debian kernel was preemptive, and
has been as far as I can remember.
Am I wrong? Or do I have a misunderstanding of what preemptive
means in this context?
What the posters are talking about is a new
is to my knowlege more widly spread on the server side then
on the desktop side...
I guess I'm confused. I thought the debian kernel was preemptive, and
has been as far as I can remember.
Am I wrong? Or do I have a misunderstanding of what preemptive means
in this context?
-- hendrik
side then
on the desktop side...
I guess I'm confused. I thought the debian kernel was preemptive, and
has been as far as I can remember.
Am I wrong? Or do I have a misunderstanding of what preemptive means
in this context?
-- hendrik
What the posters are talking about is a new
Hello. I'm a long time unix/linux geek, debian newbie. And I'm
confused about installs.
I understand that the stable distribution line is intended to be a
series of integrated packages.
I understand that testing is a set of newer packages, which have met a
set of stability criterion which
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 05:10:34PM -0700, K. Richard Pixley wrote:
Hello. I'm a long time unix/linux geek, debian newbie. And I'm
confused about installs.
I understand that the stable distribution line is intended to be a
series of integrated packages.
welcome!
I understand
On (01/08/06 17:10), K. Richard Pixley wrote:
Hello. I'm a long time unix/linux geek, debian newbie. And I'm
confused about installs.
OK :)
I understand that the stable distribution line is intended to be a
series of integrated packages.
sarge, the current stable, is a rock solid
Cary Pembleton
IT Consultant
PC Tech Help, LLC
32 Cove Lane
Campbellsville, KY 42718
(270) 789-0187 Office
http://www.pctechhelp.net
-Original Message-
From: Cary Pembleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 2:27 PM
To: 'Guillaume'
Subject: RE: Apache2 on Debian
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 09:02:20PM +0200, LeVA wrote:
Hi!
When my root's shell is `/bin/bash' in the /etc/passwd file, and I do
`su' as a simple user, then the root's .profile (/root/.profile) gets
executed.
After setting the root's shell to `/bin/sh', and do `su' as a simple
user, then
Hi!
When my root's shell is `/bin/bash' in the /etc/passwd file, and I do
`su' as a simple user, then the root's .profile (/root/.profile) gets
executed.
After setting the root's shell to `/bin/sh', and do `su' as a simple
user, then the root's .profile doesn't get executed until i run su as
'man bash' and read the section titled INVOCATION.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use a PC with a AMD Athlon64 3500+ chip and up-to-date Debian unstable
i386 port.
Each day I get an email from cron that says:
/etc/cron.daily/man-db:
mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man1x/xtrap.1x: No such file or directory
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/xtrapinfo.1x.gz: bad symlink
Edward C. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use a PC with a AMD Athlon64 3500+ chip and up-to-date Debian unstable
i386 port.
Each day I get an email from cron that says:
/etc/cron.daily/man-db:
mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man1x/xtrap.1x: No such file or directory
mandb: warning:
across due to the
partition usage size not changing. ( had booted into a XP partition on
the server to check that worked also check the partitions and they
seemed fine so i am completely confused.
Never seen this before, not sure entirely what the problem is or how to
fix it.
I hope somebody
fine so i am completely confused.
Never seen this before, not sure entirely what the problem is or how
to fix it.
When I got that error just over a month ago it was a dead SATA drive. I
would immediately do any backups you can and hope that you can claim
warranty on the drive. Booting your
to
feel that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support
available -
forums.debian.net http://forums.debian.net and other mailing
lists such as debian-user for example.
It's not an issue in my mind. However you can get the best answers to
your
PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all
I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to feel that users are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -
forums.debian.net http://forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:13:44AM -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to feel that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -
forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user for example
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:13:44AM -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to feel
that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support
available -
forums.debian.net and other mailing lists
Incoming from Willie Wonka:
Please trim extraneous text next time.
subscribing to it, thinking it was necessary to join/post on this list
(linux.debian.user)
This is the list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
They are the gatekeepers of the Usenet _newsgroups_ linux.debian.*
(and perhaps others)
Hi,
On forums.debian.net, people should be redirected to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
when they don't get an answer there, because debian-user has more
'powerusers' than forums.debian.net. The audiences of both support
resources are reasonably separate, because people tend to either swear
by forums, or
Hi all
I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to feel that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -
forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user for example.
For example, recently a post is made to debian-user
http
I did that on purpose because I find that often when I rely on one source for support I may not get a solution or even a reply...thus I feel it's best to post my question in multiple support avenues so I get the best chance for replies and help...I'm not confused between the different avenues, I
to feel that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user for example.For example, recently a post is made to debian-user
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2006/03/msg01447.htmland the same question is being
all
I might be acting a bit paranoid here but I am starting to
feel that
users are getting confused between multiple forms of support
available -
forums.debian.net http://forums.debian.net and other mailing
lists such as debian-user for example.
It's not an issue in my
paranoid here but I am starting to feel that users are getting confused between multiple forms of support available -
forums.debian.net http://forums.debian.net and other mailing lists such as debian-user for example.
It's not an issue in my mind.However you can get the best answers toyour questions
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 03:03:18PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:42:30AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 06:55:39PM +, Adam Funk wrote:
It gives the information -- but not in a dumbed-down enough format for
me. For example, nowhere on
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:20:59 +
Adam Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-02-23, Justin Guerin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It gives the information -- but not in a dumbed-down enough format for
me. For example, nowhere on that page is the word Xeon mentioned,
so if I bought a Xeon
On 2006-02-17, Graham Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have a wide range of choices. You can go pure 32 bit and install the
standard i386 Debian, you can go mixed and have a 64 bit kernel an 32 bit
user space or you can go pure 64 bit. I've never tried a mixed system but
apparently it
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:42:30AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 06:55:39PM +, Adam Funk wrote:
It gives the information -- but not in a dumbed-down enough format for
me. For example, nowhere on that page is the word Xeon mentioned,
so if I bought a Xeon computer,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 06:55:39PM +, Adam Funk wrote:
It gives the information -- but not in a dumbed-down enough format for
me. For example, nowhere on that page is the word Xeon mentioned,
so if I bought a Xeon computer, for example, I wouldn't know from that
page alone to install
On Monday 20 February 2006 03:10, Adam Funk wrote:
On 2006-02-17, Graham Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Is there a table anywhere that lists processors by their common names
and tells which kernels will work on which ones?
Thanks,
Adam
I hope the list on http://www.debian.org/ports/
On 2006-02-23, Justin Guerin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a table anywhere that lists processors by their common names
and tells which kernels will work on which ones?
I hope the list on http://www.debian.org/ports/ gives you the information
you seek. If not, what is missing? It may
On Thursday 23 February 2006 11:55, Adam Funk wrote:
On 2006-02-23, Justin Guerin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a table anywhere that lists processors by their common names
and tells which kernels will work on which ones?
I hope the list on http://www.debian.org/ports/ gives you the
On 2006-02-23, Justin Guerin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It gives the information -- but not in a dumbed-down enough format for
me. For example, nowhere on that page is the word Xeon mentioned,
so if I bought a Xeon computer, for example, I wouldn't know from that
page alone to install AMD64.
running the 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8 kernel at the moment which is AMD64
specific. If you are confused just go for one of the generic kernels.
Is there a table anywhere that lists processors by their common names
and tells which kernels will work on which ones?
Thanks,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 2/20/06, Adam Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-02-17, Graham Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. The Althon 64 fully supports i386 through some fancy on chip emulation
that is as fast as a native 32 bit chip (I think all the 64 bit processors
you mention do this but don't quite me
I'm planning to buy a new home computer soon and am considering Xeon,
Athlon 64 and Opteron 64, but I'm not sure about the relevant Debian
architectures, ia64 and amd64. Which one applies to which of those
processors?
I'm also concerned about the potential shortage of 64-bit software for
a
On Friday 17 February 2006 10:02, Adam Funk wrote:
I'm planning to buy a new home computer soon and am considering Xeon,
Athlon 64 and Opteron 64, but I'm not sure about the relevant Debian
architectures, ia64 and amd64. Which one applies to which of those
processors?
I'm also concerned
On Friday 17 February 2006 11:02, Adam Funk wrote:
I'm planning to buy a new home computer soon and am considering Xeon,
Athlon 64 and Opteron 64, but I'm not sure about the relevant Debian
architectures, ia64 and amd64. Which one applies to which of those
processors?
I'm also concerned
On 2006-02-17, Graham Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having said that there is not really any advantage to running the 64 bit port
as there isn't any software that makes use of the extra features and the
Althon 64 in 32 bit mode is just as fast.
Does that mean I can just install Debian i386
-1-amd64-k8 kernel at the moment which is AMD64
specific. If you are confused just go for one of the generic kernels.
Graham
Thanks,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/17/06, Graham Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 17 February 2006 14:42, Adam Funk wrote: On 2006-02-17, Graham Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Having said that there is not really any advantage to running the 64 bit
port as there isn't any software that makes use of the extra
Mike McCarty wrote:
Alvin Oga wrote:
hi ya
forgot-who started it
Is there a good system for setting variables, aliases, etc that
need to be
set for user X, whether I log in at a login prompt or using su? I'm
confused by all the different .profile options (there are at least
3
On 2/2/06, Alvin Oga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- if you're confused .. do NOT change files in anything other
than your own home directory /home/you
once you get brave ... decide if you want to enforce others to
use bash or csh or tsch or zsh or hudred-other-sh
I am running sid with kde3.5. I have some aliases in /etc/bash.bashrc.
In konsole as user if I type alias I get all aliases. But in root
konsole, I don't get aliaes. Why?
Hmm, I dunno. My bash.bashrc on my desktop just has source /root/bash
in it. The /root/bash file has all my alias's
Alvin Oga wrote:
hi ya
forgot-who started it
Is there a good system for setting variables, aliases, etc that need to be
set for user X, whether I log in at a login prompt or using su? I'm
confused by all the different .profile options (there are at least 3 for
bash, why is that?)
why
QUOTE:
Mark Wright wrote: Is there a good system for setting variables, aliases, etc that need to be set for user X, whether I log in at a login prompt or using su? I'm confused by all the different .profile options (there are at least 3 for
bash, why is that?)I don't know
hi ya
forgot-who started it
Is there a good system for setting variables, aliases, etc that need to be
set for user X, whether I log in at a login prompt or using su? I'm
confused by all the different .profile options (there are at least 3 for
bash, why is that?)
why ?? because
Hi,
I've been trying to play around with mdadm and software raid, but got
some problems, I have two sata disks(80gb) which Im trying to mirror, i
did it during the installation of debian testing. And it seems like it
worked well, but then I started testing to unplug one disk at the
time(with
On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 21:20 -0700, Cam wrote:
My ultimate goal is to run patched versions of modules hermes, orinoco
and orinoco_cs so I can run kismet or prismstumbler. I am presently
running 2.4.26 that came with Sarge but Debian doesn't offer 2.4.26
kernel sources so I apt-got 2.4.27 kernel
My ultimate goal is to run patched versions of modules hermes, orinoco
and orinoco_cs so I can run kismet or prismstumbler. I am presently
running 2.4.26 that came with Sarge but Debian doesn't offer 2.4.26
kernel sources so I apt-got 2.4.27 kernel sources, did the
configuration (including
I click on I386 on the bit torren debian page.
I see a list of files, none two large.
What do I need to do next?
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/20/05, Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I click on I386 on the bit torren debian page.
I see a list of files, none two large.
What do I need to do next?
Use a bittorrent client. You need to download one.
If had a Debian installation around, you would do
something
like:
# apt-get install
On 9/20/05, Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 18:22 -0500, Nelson Castillo wrote:
On 9/20/05, Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I click on I386 on the bit torren debian page.
I see a list of files, none two large.
What do I need to do next?
(cut)
$ btdownloadcurses
On 9/20/05, Nelson Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/20/05, Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 18:22 -0500, Nelson Castillo wrote:
On 9/20/05, Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I click on I386 on the bit torren debian page.
I see a list of files, none two large.
bittorrent and bittorrent-gui are also available. However, I'm
wondering why not using jigdo. It's supposed to be the preferred
method to download debian iso's, and it doesn't congest the servers
either. The mechanism is a bit different since the packages are
separately downloaded, but
subscribe sheep-subscribe
returns no errors. But I get no acknowledgement and subsequent mails to
sheep are not mailed to me as a subscriber.
Confused :-( I need an idiots guide.
Joe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 06:06:07PM +0100, Joe Mc Cool wrote:
so far I have:
apt-get install mailman
I've read:
http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/108
and carried out all the instructions except adding the following lines
to my apache config file:
Alias /pipermail/
phyrster wrote:
Out of a rackless upgrade, 'df' command shows the following line:
|/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2 ext38.0G 4.1G 3.6G 53% /
instead of /dev/hda2.
I think I deleted some packages but I can't trace back.
My question is:
will udev change the situation?
(I am
Hi Debianers,
Out of a rackless upgrade, 'df' command shows the following line:
|/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2 ext38.0G 4.1G 3.6G 53% /
instead of /dev/hda2.
I think I deleted some packages but I can't trace back.
My question is:
will udev change the situation?
(I am
Luis Finotti wrote:
Dear Basajaun and all,
Basajaun wrote:
[snip]
Well, you could try the old link trick. First of all locate the biggest
directory(ies) residing in /, e.g.
du -sh /*
then, move that directory and all of its contents to a bigger
partition, where space is not a
Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
Leonard Chatagnier said:
tar: ./lib/modules/2.6.8-2-686/modules.symbols: Cannot write: No space
left on device
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
I chacked partition space with df and seem to have ample room as shown
ChatagnierL-Home:~# df
Filesystem
Joris Huizer wrote:
Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
Leonard Chatagnier said:
tar: ./lib/modules/2.6.8-2-686/modules.symbols: Cannot write: No
space left on device
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
I chacked partition space with df and seem to have ample room as shown
[snip]
Phil said:
Your / partition is where /lib lives, and you've only got ~18MB. I'd say
your modules directory should take up more than that. 30MB+. Prolly not
enough space.
Hey Phil, thanks, that explains it. Now how to get more space on /? I
could resize partitions with cfdisk and
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:36:21AM -0400, Tom Allison wrote:
if resizing / really cannot be done, maybe create a new /lib partition
instead
Don't do this! /lib, /bin and /etc MUST be on your root filesystem or
the system won't boot.
Frank
--
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code
201 - 300 of 593 matches
Mail list logo
