John Griffiths said:
But won't you need to do a dist-upgrade when the as-yet-unamed next unstable
comes out? so isn't it better to keep going on the dist name? and keep track
of developments?
Nope. On the day that potato froze, 'unstable' and 'frozen' were identical
(as far as I noticed,
Hi,
I upgraded from potato [Frozen] to woody just before potato [Frozen]
went stable.
I have continued to use the following URL's in /etc/apt/sources.list for
my apt-get upgrades:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian woody main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US
I know at some point I should change those URL's to unstable.
as long as it says woody, you will track the woody release. You only need to
edit it when a new release is due.
montefin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mf I upgraded from potato [Frozen] to woody just before potato [Frozen]
mf went stable.
mf
mf I have continued to use the following URL's in /etc/apt/sources.list for
mf my apt-get upgrades:
mf
mf deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian woody main contrib
At 07:53 PM 9/6/2000 -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
repeated 'apt-get upgrade's over time will leave you following the
woody distribution, even after it becomes frozen and eventually
stable. If you change it to unstable, you will always track the
release that is considered unstable; this will be a
5 matches
Mail list logo
