Harry Rickards wrote:
On 12 May 2009, at 07:42, JoeHill wrote:
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Just an update on this. I have asked on #gnucash if the patch for this
bug can be backported to 2.2.6 upstream and they say this is a Debian
problem as it is fixed in Gnucash. They will not do anything to
On 12 May 2009, at 07:42, JoeHill wrote:
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Just an update on this. I have asked on #gnucash if the patch for
this
bug can be backported to 2.2.6 upstream and they say this is a Debian
problem as it is fixed in Gnucash. They will not do anything to help.
Here's the sh
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Just an update on this. I have asked on #gnucash if the patch for this
> bug can be backported to 2.2.6 upstream and they say this is a Debian
> problem as it is fixed in Gnucash. They will not do anything to help.
>
> Here's the short conversation from #gnucash.
>
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 01:06:00PM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Michael Biebl wrote:
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I'm experiencing a bug in Gnucash that appeared a couple of days
ago on my system that makes Gnucash completely unusable for me. I
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 01:06:00PM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Michael Biebl wrote:
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I'm experiencing a bug in Gnucash that appeared a couple of days ago on
my system that makes Gnucash completely unusable for me. I turned i
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> I've never been pissed off at Debian before but I guess there is always
> a first.
>
> I'm experiencing a bug in Gnucash that appeared a couple of days ago on
> my system that makes Gnucash completely unusable for me. I turned in a
> bug report on Friday, checked on
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 01:06:00PM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Michael Biebl wrote:
> >Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> >
> >>I'm experiencing a bug in Gnucash that appeared a couple of days ago on
> >>my system that makes Gnucash completely unusable for me. I turned in a
> >>bug report on Fri
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 15:24:38 -0700, Mike Castle wrote:
[...]
> Perhaps the GC user community needs to petition the maintainer to
> explain the importance of this particular bug and that it would be
> worth while at least attempting the patch this particular fix into the
> current version rath
John Foster writes:
> What I can tell you is that a rant about any package maintainers efforts
> is not going to improve the situation. If you do not want to take charge
> of the situation and do something about it, then you have no alternative
> except wait until things catch up.
One way he could
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Do you think the bug report was not correctly handled by
> the maintainer?
Perhaps the GC user community needs to petition the maintainer to
explain the importance of this particular bug and that it would be
worth while at least attempting
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> As Sid is "only" 9 months behind Gnucash's release schedule at this point
> I guess the fact that all my business records for the last couple of
> years are in Gnucash means I'll be able to start doing my business
> accounting again sometime after the first of next year,
On Mon,06.Apr.09, 13:32:35, Jeff Chimene wrote:
> For this reason, I rarely rely on Debianized versions of packages
> important to my personal productivity. For example, Firefox, Java,
> OpenOffice, Eclipse, Google Web Toolkit, Thunderbird are all installed
> from their respective sites. I c
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 13:06 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> >
> >> I've never been pissed off at Debian before but I guess there is always
> >> a first.
> >>
> >
> > That's usually not a good way to start a discussion (ad
On 12/23/-28158 12:59 PM, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I've never been pissed off at Debian before but I guess there is
always a first.
I'm experiencing a bug in Gnucash that appeared a couple of days ago
on my system that makes Gnucash completely unusable for me. I turned
in a bug report on Fri
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Freddy Freeloader wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>>
>>> I've never been pissed off at Debian before but I guess there is always
>>> a first.
>>>
>> That's usually not a good way to start a discussion (admitted, you said it's
>> a
>> rant, but aI'll t
Michael Biebl wrote:
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Hi
I've never been pissed off at Debian before but I guess there is always
a first.
That's usually not a good way to start a discussion (admitted, you said it's a
rant, but aI'll try to answer anyway).
I'm experiencing a bug in Gnucas
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:23:00 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
[...]
> I'm experiencing a bug in Gnucash that appeared a couple of days ago on
> my system that makes Gnucash completely unusable for me. I turned in a
> bug report on Friday, checked on it yesterday, and by today the bug had
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 10:23 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> I've never been pissed off at Debian before but I guess there is always
> a first.
>
> I'm experiencing a bug in Gnucash that appeared a couple of days ago on
> my system that makes Gnucash completely unusable for me. I turned in a
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Hi
> I've never been pissed off at Debian before but I guess there is always
> a first.
That's usually not a good way to start a discussion (admitted, you said it's a
rant, but aI'll try to answer anyway).
> I'm experiencing a bug in Gnucash that appeared a couple of d
I've never been pissed off at Debian before but I guess there is always
a first.
I'm experiencing a bug in Gnucash that appeared a couple of days ago on
my system that makes Gnucash completely unusable for me. I turned in a
bug report on Friday, checked on it yesterday, and by today the bug h
20 matches
Mail list logo
