On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:48:43 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> Did I mention Christian at all?
>
> Christian is toe Owner/Responsable for the Domain D-M.
Yes, I know. But I did not mention anyone in special, my question was
rather generic.
>> If you read the full thread you'll find out what (
Hello Camaleón,
Am 2011-02-25 14:43:25, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> Did I mention Christian at all?
Christian is toe Owner/Responsable for the Domain D-M.
> If you read the full thread you'll find out what (and why) I was asking
> what I asked.
In my opinion, USERS which use external arc
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:25:51 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Camaleón,
>
> Am 2011-02-23 19:50:36, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
>> I wasn't saying that they *should* provide _packages_ for oldstable
>> releases but *notify* here -in this same mailing list, where people can
>> then sprea
Hello Camaleón,
Am 2011-02-23 19:50:36, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> I wasn't saying that they *should* provide _packages_ for oldstable
> releases but *notify* here -in this same mailing list, where people can
> then spread those changes elsewhere- for any update in D-M repositories.
WHY
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:32:53 +, Lisi wrote:
> On Thursday 24 February 2011 15:05:19 Camaleón wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:37:42 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> > On 02/23/2011 06:11 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
>> >> When I read it, I felt Camaléon meant ‘What do you guys think?’..
>> >> rather tha
On Thursday 24 February 2011 15:05:19 Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:37:42 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 02/23/2011 06:11 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
> >> When I read it, I felt Camaléon meant ‘What do you guys think?’..
> >> rather than suggest that the DM team was under any obligation to
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:32:05 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
Hello Camaleón,
> Let's give Christian a "big thanks" and help him as much as we can to
> spread here any important D-M change/notice.
There's also a "donate" (via PayPal) button on the D-M home page for
those that /really/ want to expre
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:34:36 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:26:39 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote:
>
> Hello Camaleón,
>
>> 1/ If that was going to be a "final" or just a "temporary" decision 2/
>> What was the problem ("broken" can mean many things)
>
> Indeed, neither point was
>On the 24/02/2011 15:51, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:36:36 +0100, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
>
>
>> Hi, since debian-multimedia is a side project and not Debian proper it
>> makes sense that news regarding d-m are posted on d-m list and not here.
>
> Yes, but not every Debian
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:26:39 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
Hello Camaleón,
> 1/ If that was going to be a "final" or just a "temporary" decision
> 2/ What was the problem ("broken" can mean many things)
Indeed, neither point was addressed by Christian, at the time of the
announcement.
It could h
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:14:12 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:51:46 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote:
>
>> When I first read D-M notice about discontinuation of lenny, I reviewed
>> D- M lists to find additional information or explanation about the
>> change but there was no post on t
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:51:46 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
Hello Camaleón,
> When I first read D-M notice about discontinuation of lenny, I
> reviewed D- M lists to find additional information or explanation
> about the change but there was no post on this matter or I couldn't
> find any :-(
Chri
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:06:56 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 February 2011 13:50:36 Camaleón wrote:
>> I wasn't saying that they *should* provide _packages_ for oldstable
>> releases but *notify* here -in this same mailing list, where people can
>> then spread those changes
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:37:42 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/23/2011 06:11 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
>> When I read it, I felt Camaléon meant ‘What do you guys think?’..
>> rather than suggest that the DM team was under any obligation to keep
>> us posted with regard to their progress.
>>
>> Yes..
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:36:36 +0100, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On the 23/02/2011 20:50, Camaleón wrote:
>> I wasn't saying that they *should* provide _packages_ for oldstable
>> releases but *notify* here -in this same mailing list, where people can
>> then spread those changes elsewhere-
On 02/23/2011 06:11 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 03:46:27PM EST, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/23/2011 01:50 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:34:05 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/23/2011 11:16 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Shouldn't D-M maintainers post here about any prob
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 03:46:27PM EST, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/23/2011 01:50 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:34:05 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> On 02/23/2011 11:16 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
Shouldn't D-M maintainers post here about any problem on the repos
or widespread
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:34:05 -0600
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/23/2011 11:16 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:30:04 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> >
> >> For those concerned about oldstable at Debian Multimedia, you'll be
> >> pleased to hear that it's being restored. So far, about 90%
On Wednesday 23 February 2011 13:50:36 Camaleón wrote:
> I wasn't saying that they *should* provide _packages_ for oldstable
> releases but *notify* here -in this same mailing list, where people can
> then spread those changes elsewhere- for any update in D-M repositories.
They have their own mail
On 02/23/2011 01:50 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:34:05 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/23/2011 11:16 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Shouldn't D-M maintainers post here about any problem on the repos or
widespread a bit more what is going on?
"Should"???
It would be *nice* and it would
On the 23/02/2011 20:50, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:34:05 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>> On 02/23/2011 11:16 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>>> Shouldn't D-M maintainers post here about any problem on the repos or
>>> widespread a bit more what is going on?
>>>
>>>
>> "Should"???
>>
>> It wo
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:34:05 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/23/2011 11:16 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> Shouldn't D-M maintainers post here about any problem on the repos or
>> widespread a bit more what is going on?
>>
>>
> "Should"???
>
> It would be *nice* and it would be *helpful* to do so, but
On 02/23/2011 11:16 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:30:04 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
For those concerned about oldstable at Debian Multimedia, you'll be
pleased to hear that it's being restored. So far, about 90% is
available, according to Christian.
Good.
Shouldn't D-M maintainer
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:16:35 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
Hello Camaleón,
> Good.
I knew somebody would appreciate it. :-)
> Shouldn't D-M maintainers post here about any problem on the repos or
> widespread a bit more what is going on?
That's up to Christian, not me. I'm not a member of t
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:30:04 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> For those concerned about oldstable at Debian Multimedia, you'll be
> pleased to hear that it's being restored. So far, about 90% is
> available, according to Christian.
Good.
Shouldn't D-M maintainers post here about any problem on the r
Hello All,
For those concerned about oldstable at Debian Multimedia, you'll be
pleased to hear that it's being restored. So far, about 90% is
available, according to Christian.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
Ju
26 matches
Mail list logo
