Petro, 2002-Jun-05 18:30 -0700:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:56:43PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Them and everyone else it seems. I gotta wonder if anybody from
California ever stopped to think that they're turning Oregon into what
they moved away from...
If they stopped to think, they
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:56:43PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Them and everyone else it seems. I gotta wonder if anybody from
California ever stopped to think that they're turning Oregon into what
they moved away from...
If they stopped to think, they wouldn't be the Californians that
Paul Johnson, 2002-May-31 20
...caught 23 roughly 14 long brook trout last Monday while everone
else was at work...
you bastard :-)
--
Jeff CoppockSystems Engineer
Diggin' Debian Admin and User
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:35:07PM -0700, Jeff wrote:
...caught 23 roughly 14 long brook trout last Monday while everone
else was at work...
you bastard :-)
Not really. The tradeoff is doing 10 hour shifts on Friday and Saturday
night. Portland has lots of clubs, but none of them very
On Friday 31 May 2002 10:52 pm, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:35:07PM -0700, Jeff wrote:
...caught 23 roughly 14 long brook trout last Monday while everone
else was at work...
you bastard :-)
Not really. The tradeoff is doing 10 hour shifts on Friday and Saturday
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:39:07PM -0700, ben wrote:
all of which goes to explain why you're on the list on a friday night, i
guess.
Well, even if I was doing what I want to be, sometimes the local furry
parties get a little slow for ten minutes or so as people geek out, so I
retreat back to
On Friday 31 May 2002 11:56 pm, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:39:07PM -0700, ben wrote:
all of which goes to explain why you're on the list on a friday night, i
guess.
Well, even if I was doing what I want to be, sometimes the local furry
parties get a little slow for ten
On Fri, 31 May 2002 23:56:43 -0700
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
definitely cute; married to the bass player, in fact. they used to be our
personal house band in sf, before they all, almost as one, realized they'd
had it with high rent and dotcom okies.
Them and everyone else
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 12:24:25AM -0700, Shawn Dunn wrote:
Try out Montana sometime, grew up there, and the Californians and
Easterners are doing their damnedest to remake in the image of the
places they left, and have been for round 20 years or so..
Heh, yeah. I just kinda wish the
On Saturday 01 June 2002 12:24 am, Shawn Dunn wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2002 23:56:43 -0700
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
definitely cute; married to the bass player, in fact. they used to be
our personal house band in sf, before they all, almost as one, realized
they'd had it with
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 01:16:21AM -0700, ben wrote:
californian. i think that, in a previous post, where i used the phrase
'dotcom okies,' i should have said dotcom migrants. perhaps i encouraged
interstate antipathy by that error. the point is that if i have a grievance
No, it was mention
Paul == Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul About the only good thing I can say about summer is I'm less
Paul likely to get poked in the eye by some tourist prick that
Paul doesn't realise it's considered rude to carry an open
Paul umbrella in a crowd. Get a raincoat and
Paul Johnson, 2002-May-31 22:52 -0700:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:35:07PM -0700, Jeff wrote:
...caught 23 roughly 14 long brook trout last Monday while everone
else was at work...
you bastard :-)
Not really. The tradeoff is doing 10 hour shifts on Friday and Saturday
night.
Paul Johnson, 2002-May-31 23:56 -0700:
Them and everyone else it seems. I gotta wonder if anybody from
California ever stopped to think that they're turning Oregon into what
they moved away from...
--
Baloo
No doubt! I'm a native Californian looking forward to the day I can
leave
Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or otherwise?
http://computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0%2C10801%2C71535%2C00.html?nlid=AM
...RickM...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or otherwise?
Why should there be? We are already the One True Linux Distribution.
8:o)
--
Baloo
pgpLNOmDUr8ri.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Paul Johnson said:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or
otherwise?
Why should there be? We are already the One True Linux Distribution.
8:o)
I wrote to Caldera asking if UnitedLinux is Debian based
On Friday 31 May 2002 09:01 am, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or otherwise?
Why should there be? We are already the One True Linux Distribution.
8:o)
yup. mono-linuxism. debian
On 31-May-2002 Rick Macdonald wrote:
Paul Johnson said:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or
otherwise?
Why should there be? We are already the One True Linux Distribution.
8:o)
I wrote to
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 11:26, Rick Macdonald wrote:
Paul Johnson said:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or
otherwise?
Why should there be? We are already the One True Linux Distribution.
8:o)
On 31-May-2002 ben wrote:
On Friday 31 May 2002 09:01 am, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or otherwise?
Why should there be? We are already the One True Linux Distribution.
8:o)
* Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020531 10:01]:
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 11:26, Rick Macdonald wrote:
Paul Johnson said:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or
otherwise?
Why should there be? We
Ron Johnson wrote:
Is there a url describing Debian 3.0's conformance with or
roadway to conformance with the LSB?
http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/lsbtest/
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 11:52, ben wrote:
On Friday 31 May 2002 09:01 am, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:02:27AM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
Has there been any Debian disscussion about this, official or otherwise?
Why should there be? We are already the One True Linux
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 12:07, Joey Hess wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Is there a url describing Debian 3.0's conformance with or
roadway to conformance with the LSB?
http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/lsbtest/
Thanks. From
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 12:21:37PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Unfortunately, if I wanted a hamburger in Minnesota in February,
you wouldn't fire up your grill.
Um, speak for yourself. Grilling is a year-round thing for some up us
Minnesotan's! Neither rain nor sleet nor snow shall keep us from
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020531 10:15]:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Is there a url describing Debian 3.0's conformance with or
roadway to conformance with the LSB?
http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/lsbtest/
looked at ~taggart/lsb/ lately? It seems to me
I'm sure that it won't make a whole lot of difference, but RedHat asked me to
fill out a survey last week (I used to run all RedHat servers), I answered the
survey and explained that I had converted all my servers (15) to debian because
RPM just does not cut it. I would not expect RedHat to
Grant Bowman wrote:
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020531 10:15]:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Is there a url describing Debian 3.0's conformance with or
roadway to conformance with the LSB?
http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/lsbtest/
looked at
Ron Johnson wrote:
I also see a lot of foo bar not part of debian base install.
No problem. To my untrained eye, that looks like a dodge
No, it's a recognition of a crummy test suite. The lsb does not itself
mention, eg, /etc/gettydefs -- which cannot be a part of debian since
the gettyps
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020531 11:47]:
Grant Bowman wrote:
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020531 10:15]:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Is there a url describing Debian 3.0's conformance with or
roadway to conformance with the LSB?
http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
And what exactly is LSB?
Grant Bowman wrote:
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020531 10:15]:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Is there a url describing Debian 3.0's conformance with or
roadway to conformance with the LSB?
http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
On 31-May-2002 Quenten Griffith wrote:
And what exactly is LSB?
Linux Standards Base. It is defining what a linux distribution has to have.
see http://www.linuxbase.org.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 31 May 2002 12:29 pm, Quenten Griffith wrote:
And what exactly is LSB?
[snip]
http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/lsbtest/
you see those linky type things? they're actually addresses you can go to on
the web. you know what the web is,
You know Ben its people like you that make posting anything to newsgroups
unenjoyable. I did go to those links and they don't really give a great
description exactly what it is. Did someone wake up on the wrong side of the
bed
or are you always just completely rude to other people?
ben wrote:
Google is so amazing I hardly need to post to lists anymore. Sometimes I
try it before looking at man pages. ;-) Entering lsb gives this as the
first hit:
Linux Standard Base
Latest Happenings, About the LSB. Specification Proposals The latest draft of
various specification proposals are now
On Friday 31 May 2002 01:23 pm, Quenten Griffith wrote:
You know Ben its people like you that make posting anything to newsgroups
unenjoyable. I did go to those links and they don't really give a great
description exactly what it is. Did someone wake up on the wrong side of
the bed or are
To true, I was misspoken I should not of said people like you because it was
unfair of me to judge someone just by one post for that I apologize.
ben wrote:
On Friday 31 May 2002 01:23 pm, Quenten Griffith wrote:
You know Ben its people like you that make posting anything to newsgroups
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 31 May 2002 12:59 pm, ben wrote:
On Friday 31 May 2002 12:29 pm, Quenten Griffith wrote:
And what exactly is LSB?
[snip]
http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/lsbtest/
you see those linky type
On Fri, 31 May 2002 14:18:44 -0700
it was a mild rebuke. things can get quite heated on
this list sometimes. on behalf of people like me, don't let it put
you off.
Yeah I felt like I was taken to the woodshed once or twice this
week, but I was not put off by it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Friday 31 May 2002 02:52 pm, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 31 May 2002 12:59 pm, ben wrote:
On Friday 31 May 2002 12:29 pm, Quenten Griffith wrote:
And what exactly is LSB?
[snip]
http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 09:52:42AM -0700, ben wrote:
yup. mono-linuxism. debian is the standard. unitedlinux is a business
venture, that's all. it's like comparing shaolin monks to tele-evangelists.
Don't get me started on that Pat Robertson thief...trying to cheat the
Red Cross out of
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 10:41:37AM -0700, Walter Reed wrote:
Um, speak for yourself. Grilling is a year-round thing for some up us
Minnesotan's! Neither rain nor sleet nor snow shall keep us from our appointed
burger filpping... :-)
Same here with Oregonians. Who needs a patio cover? Grab a
43 matches
Mail list logo
