Re: Debianly Correct place to add ~/bin to $PATH ? a new problem

2014-01-25 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 04:05:55PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: Paul E Condon wrote: Andrei POPESCU wrote: Most display managers don't source ~/.profile (or /etc/profile). I tried to discuss this with developers, but there was hardly any interest so I settled for sourcing them in

Re: Debianly Correct place to add ~/bin to $PATH ? a new problem

2013-12-10 Thread Paul E Condon
On 20131210_015742, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Lu, 09 dec 13, 12:15:53, Paul E Condon wrote: I've just done a fresh netinst of Wheezy and want to proceed with my personal configuring in a way that is not fighting with the Debian view of how things should be done. I've used Debian since

Re: Debianly Correct place to add ~/bin to $PATH ? a new problem

2013-12-10 Thread Brian
On Tue 10 Dec 2013 at 14:58:57 -0700, Paul E Condon wrote: The bottom line is that I don't have an .xsessionrc , and therefore its not a good place for me to put profile files sourcing. Suggestions? You will only have one if you write it yourself. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Debianly Correct place to add ~/bin to $PATH ? a new problem

2013-12-10 Thread Bob Proulx
Paul E Condon wrote: Andrei POPESCU wrote: Most display managers don't source ~/.profile (or /etc/profile). I tried to discuss this with developers, but there was hardly any interest so I settled for sourcing them in ~/.xsessionrc instead (which is sourced by the X startup scripts):

backup files, was: Re: Debianly Correct place to add ~/bin to $PATH ? a new problem

2013-12-10 Thread Gregory Nowak
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 02:58:57PM -0700, Paul E Condon wrote: But I do have some strange files that I had notice for several months, namely #.Xresources# #.muttrc# #test# and #x# The contents of #.Xresources# and #x# are X resource definitions, but there are conflicting emacs.geometry