Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> LC_ALL=C diff -r dir1 dir2 | grep -v ^Only
>
> The size really doesn't matter for those extra large files.
>
This works only if the extra 950 files are in just one directory. If the
extra files are there in both the directories, then it does not m
pattern
> and are very large in size.
>
> Now is there any way to compare
>
> dir1/file1.txt and dir2/file1.txt
> dir1/file2.txt and dir2/file2.txt
>
> dir1/file50.txt and dir2/file50.txt
>
>
> Manually diffing the files 50 times is cumbersome. Somethi
pattern
> and are very large in size.
>
> Now is there any way to compare
>
> dir1/file1.txt and dir2/file1.txt
> dir1/file2.txt and dir2/file2.txt
>
> dir1/file50.txt and dir2/file50.txt
Something like:
#!/bin/bash
myday=`date +%y%m%d`
outfile="diff-check-$m
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>>
>> Manually diffing the files 50 times is cumbersome. Something like
>>
>> diff dir1/file*.txt dir2/file*.txt
>>
>> is what I am after. I do not want to do
>>
>> diff -r dir1 dir2
>>
>> since that compare
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
[...]
>> Manually diffing the files 50 times is cumbersome. Something like
>>
>> diff dir1/file*.txt dir2/file*.txt
>>
>> is what I am after. I do not w
es do not follow any pattern
> and are very large in size.
>
> Now is there any way to compare
>
> dir1/file1.txt and dir2/file1.txt
> dir1/file2.txt and dir2/file2.txt
>
> dir1/file50.txt and dir2/file50.txt
>
>
> Manually diffing the files 50 times is cum
ay to compare
dir1/file1.txt and dir2/file1.txt
dir1/file2.txt and dir2/file2.txt
dir1/file50.txt and dir2/file50.txt
Manually diffing the files 50 times is cumbersome. Something like
diff dir1/file*.txt dir2/file*.txt
is what I am after. I do not want to do
diff -r dir1 dir2
since
t and dir2/file1.txt
dir1/file2.txt and dir2/file2.txt
dir1/file50.txt and dir2/file50.txt
Manually diffing the files 50 times is cumbersome. Something like
diff dir1/file*.txt dir2/file*.txt
is what I am after. I do not want to do
diff -r dir1 dir2
since that compares the other 950 files as
On Saturday December 22 2007 13:32:32 Bogart Salzberg wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> >
> > Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> On Saturday December 22 2007 10:11:48 Sven Hoexter wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 04:45:25PM +0100, abdelkader
> >>> belahcene
> >>
> >>
On Saturday 22 Dec 2007, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
> HI,
> I have an AMD laptop,
> I downoloaded ia64 iso image , I thought it is the same,
> I can't boot with the CD;
> what is the difference between them?
> best regards
> bela
ia64 is the itanium processor
amd64 covers the 64bit intel and a
On Dec 22, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Saturday December 22 2007 10:11:48 Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 04:45:25PM +0100, abdelkader belahcene
wrote:
HI,
I have an AMD laptop,
I downol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Saturday December 22 2007 10:11:48 Sven Hoexter wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 04:45:25PM +0100, abdelkader belahcene
> wrote:
>>> HI,
>>> I have an AMD laptop,
>>> I downoloaded ia64 iso image , I thought it is the same,
On Saturday December 22 2007 10:11:48 Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 04:45:25PM +0100, abdelkader belahcene
wrote:
> > HI,
> > I have an AMD laptop,
> > I downoloaded ia64 iso image , I thought it is the same,
> > I can't boot with the CD;
> > what is the difference between them?
Just to announce, amd64 (x86_64) is used both on AMD's (Athlon/Opteron) and
Intel's (Pentium D/Core/Core 2 Duo...) CPUs.
So you need to download amd64 version anyway.
On Dec 22, 2007 5:11 PM, Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 04:45:25PM +0100, abdelkader belahcene
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 04:45:25PM +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
> HI,
> I have an AMD laptop,
> I downoloaded ia64 iso image , I thought it is the same,
> I can't boot with the CD;
> what is the difference between them?
It's a different architecture.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IA64
http:
Heh, I had the same 'prob' :)
IA64 is Intel's 64bit technology for Itanium server architecture (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IA-64)
you need amd64 version for your notebook.
On Dec 22, 2007 4:45 PM, abdelkader belahcene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI,
> I have an AMD laptop,
> I downoloaded
HI,
I have an AMD laptop,
I downoloaded ia64 iso image , I thought it is the same,
I can't boot with the CD;
what is the difference between them?
best regards
bela
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le samedi 14 avril 2007 00:22, Greg Folkert a écrit :
> On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 17:41 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I've just been busy installing Xen, and noticed that there are two
> > different kernels available for the 686:
> >
> > xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-686
> > and
>
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 17:41 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I've just been busy installing Xen, and noticed that there are two
> different kernels available for the 686:
>
> xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-686
> and
> xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-vserver-686
>
> Both described as "X
Hi Folks,
I've just been busy installing Xen, and noticed that there are two
different kernels available for the 686:
xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-686
and
xen-linux-system-2.6.18-4-xen-vserver-686
Both described as "XEN system with Linux 2.6.18 image on i686."
which seem to depend on
linux
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 01:45:39 +0200, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> Something "differential" has been introduced: "apt-get update" downloads
> some kind of patches whose name contains date.
> Would you please indicate me a link that explain the change that have
> been made?
http://xpt.sourceforg
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:18:32AM +0200, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> I'am back now, and I see the way apt repo are dona is sloghtly
> different.
> Something "differential" has been introduced: "apt-get update" downloads
> some kind of patches whose name contains date.
> Would you please ind
Hi,
Six month ago, I used testing, and used to learn packaging for Debian on
a testing box.
I have been out for some mounths.
I'am back now, and I see the way apt repo are dona is sloghtly
different.
Something "differential" has been introduced: "apt-get update" downloads
some kind of patches whose
are made...
> Thank you.
Hi Mihamina,
you can continue to produce Debian repositories in the same way. These
new features were added to help reduce the size of Packages files over a
modem. They implement some kind of 'diff' between the current file and
some previous version. This feature
Hi,
Six month ago, I used testing, and used to learn packaging for Debian on
a testing box.
I have been out for some mounths.
I'am back now, and I see the way apt repo are dona is sloghtly
different.
Something "differential" has been introduced: "apt-get update" downloads
some kind of patches whose
Hi,
After installing an AMD XP 2700+ the CPU seemed too hot all the time.
I bought the processor and the heatsink/fan as a packaged deal.
Then I bought an Thermaltake Extreme Volcano 12 80mm 2 Ball Cooling Fan.
Turns out that makes a 10-20 degree difference!
This shows it:
http://img487.image
roberto wrote:
> Hi all,
> i know two different packages (among others) are downloadable for math
> computing:
> octave and octave-forge
>
> i have installed and currently using octave 2.1.69 but what are the
> differences with octave-forge??
> can i install octave-forge without conflict with octa
roberto wrote:
Hi all,
i know two different packages (among others) are downloadable for math
computing:
octave and octave-forge
i have installed and currently using octave 2.1.69 but what are the
differences with octave-forge??
can i install octave-forge without conflict with octave 2.1? (apti
Hi all,
i know two different packages (among others) are downloadable for math
computing:
octave and octave-forge
i have installed and currently using octave 2.1.69 but what are the
differences with octave-forge??
can i install octave-forge without conflict with octave 2.1? (aptitude
says yes...)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why
Well, maybe you could copy the error in your email? Provide information
about your system (is it woody/stable sarge/nearly-stable ??) and such ?
Joris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why
On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 04:07, cwinl wrote:
> hi,all
>
> http://ertw.com/blog/archives/make_bzimage_vs_make_zimage-170404.html
>
> someone tell me that the kernel made by 'make bzImage' is smaller then
> the one 'make zImage' made it.
>
> is it correct?
No. zImage and bzImage use the same compres
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:07:26 +0800, cwinl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,all
>
> http://ertw.com/blog/archives/make_bzimage_vs_make_zimage-170404.html
>
> someone tell me that the kernel made by 'make bzImage' is smaller then the one 'make
> zImage' made it.
>
> is it correct?
Interesting art
hi,all
http://ertw.com/blog/archives/make_bzimage_vs_make_zimage-170404.html
someone tell me that the kernel made by 'make bzImage' is smaller then the one 'make
zImage' made it.
is it correct?
--
P4/2.4B
ELSA 528/128
512MB DDR333
240GB
MSI 845PE
BenQ FP557s
Pioneer DVD-120A
LG GCE-8320B
--
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 07:52:32AM +0100, Ralph Bacolod wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 07:12:06PM -0400, disciple wrote:
> > I'm installing debian on my laptop. The laptop uses a winmodem.
> > Downloaded the driver for it on my Windows box... XP (NTFS); ... The
> > file that I downloaded is
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 07:12:06PM -0400, disciple wrote:
> I'm installing debian on my laptop. The laptop uses a winmodem.
> Downloaded the driver for it on my Windows box... XP (NTFS); ... The
> file that I downloaded is a linux compressed file extension is
> .gz. The exact file name
--- disciple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it in debian which showed it as .gz.
It's probably a tar and a gzipped image. The "file" command can help you
there.
> Since I can see the file in debian, I should be able to extract and
> install right? How do I get the file from the floppy disk
I'm installing debian on my laptop. The laptop uses a winmodem.
Downloaded the driver for it on my Windows box... XP (NTFS); ... The
file that I downloaded is a linux compressed file extension is
.gz. The exact file name is pctel-0.9.7-9-rht-3.tar. This is
interesting because in wind
> And dist-upgrade is for when you want to get all the new funky features.
> Which many of us do :-). It only breaks things if the packages uploaded
> by the maintainers are broken. Ok, that occasionally happens, which is
> why you don't use "dist-upgrade" on your production servers except with
>
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 21:02, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 02:22:40AM -0500, dircha wrote:
>
> > An equally adequate reference is available as:
> > /usr/share/doc/aptitude/README
>
> ...which is not too hard to paste:
>
> aptitude dist-upgrade
>
> This command will also attempt
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 02:22:40AM -0500, dircha wrote:
> An equally adequate reference is available as:
> /usr/share/doc/aptitude/README
...which is not too hard to paste:
aptitude dist-upgrade
This command will also attempt to upgrade packages, but it is more
aggressive about solving depe
cwinl wrote:
hi all,
i'm confused about several aptitude param.
thank you all.
I see that while dist-upgrade is documented in the aptitude
documentation, it is not mentioned in the manual page.
The aptitude manual page references the apt-get manual page ('man
apt-get'). I suggest you take a look
hi all,
i'm confused about several aptitude param.
thank you all.
--
P4/2.4B
ELSA 528/128
512MB DDR333
240GB
MSI 845PE
BenQ FP557s
Pioneer DVD-120A
LG GCE-8320B
--
http://www.cwinl.com/
http://forum.lnnu.edu.cn/
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 04:30, Aaron Maxwell wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 June 2004 12:41 am, William Ballard wrote:
> > Am I correct in thinking XML::Diff from Perl:
> > http://search.cpan.org/~sdether/XML-Diff-0.04/Diff.pm
> > has not been packaged for Debian?
>
> I don&#
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 12:41 am, William Ballard wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking XML::Diff from Perl:
> http://search.cpan.org/~sdether/XML-Diff-0.04/Diff.pm
> has not been packaged for Debian?
I don't think it has been packaged. apt-file and apt-cache turn up
nothing, which m
Am I correct in thinking XML::Diff from Perl:
http://search.cpan.org/~sdether/XML-Diff-0.04/Diff.pm
has not been packaged for Debian?
apt-file search Diff.pm only turns up Text::Diff and some other things.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 02:23:11PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> I am looking for a program/script(?) which performs diff on parts of a
> file. Say I have a file of 100 lines. How to do diff on lines between
> 20-30, and 50-60 without writing them into separate files. Which
&
I am looking for a program/script(?) which performs diff on parts of a
file. Say I have a file of 100 lines. How to do diff on lines between
20-30, and 50-60 without writing them into separate files. Which
software should I learn for this? sed/awk/perl?
thanks for any ideas
raju
--
To
SMP is for multiprocessor systems ,
non-SMP is for 1 processor..
thats it. :)
cheers,
http://www.axeltabs.com/
__
axel
__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.
http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
cwinl wrote:
Thank you !!!
it works!
i mistake debian for redhat.
Thank you all!
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: what's the diff between non-SMP and SMP kernel
Thank you !!!
it works!
i mistake debian for redhat.
Thank you all!
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: what's the diff between non-SMP and SMP kernel?
>
; with message detail.
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "debian- -user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 4:04 PM
> Subject: Re: what's the diff between non-SMP and SMP kernel?
&g
i want to compile a kernel supporting SMP based on kernel-2.4.25.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "debian- -user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: what's the di
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "debian- -user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: what's the diff between non-SMP and SMP kernel?
> Simple - smp kernels support machines with more than one processor in
> them. SMP kernels have
Simple - smp kernels support machines with more than one processor in
them. SMP kernels have unneeded things compiled in if your machine, like
most home systems, only has one processor it.
cwinl wrote:
> I'm compiling kernel-source-2.4.25.
> I saw that it's different packages kernel-image-2.4.25-
I'm compiling kernel-source-2.4.25.
I saw that it's different packages kernel-image-2.4.25-1 and kernel-image-2.4.25-1-smp
in the result of command 'apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.25' .
I think that the original source package of kernel-2.4.25 must be the same,but i don't
know what's the differ
Try
apt-get -f install
and see if it fixes the problem.
> -Original Message-
> From: Karsten M. Self [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 November 2003 12:33
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Apt-get error with package diff
>
>
> on Mon, Oct 27,
on Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:01:05PM +0100, Juan Pablo Valenzuela ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hello:
> my pc frezze in a middle of a dist-upgrade so i must to restart. Now the
> apt-get doesn't work anymore... this is the message:
>
> # apt-get install diff
> Readin
Hello:
my pc frezze in a middle of a dist-upgrade so i must to restart. Now the
apt-get doesn't work anymore... this is the message:
# apt-get install diff
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be upgraded
diff
1 upgraded, 0 newly inst
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 at 16:40 GMT, Roberto Sanchez penned:
>
> Another way is to *always* run your source files (and have your
> colleagues do the same) through indent before committing changes. Of
> course, everyone needs to use the same options. This ensures
> consistent formatting, regardless
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 at 16:26 GMT, Nori Heikkinen penned:
>
> but (a) this is Java code; and (b) indent looks like it has so many
> tweakable options that to find every single preference the original
> coder used would take way too much reformatting, checking in, diffing
>=2E.. i'd just like to tur
dman, you rock as usual.
on Fri, 10 Oct 2003 12:33:17PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:48:34AM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> | hey all,
> |
> | this is kind of off-topic, but i figured this is the community most
> | likley to have dealt with this sort of th
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 11:28, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> on Fri, 10 Oct 2003 12:06:07PM -0400, Mental Patient insinuated:
> > Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> [...]
> > >now it's time to check it into CVS. i don't want every single line
> > >to show up as different just because of tab characters, so i need
> >
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:48:34AM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> is there some way to open the file in emacs (in which i assumer it was
> originally written; i use vim) and run it through a re-indentder with
> hard tabs on? or could i do this in vim?
In case this was not mentioned...
Also for y
Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> now it's time to check it into CVS.
Here's what I do in similar situations. Do a diff between your work
file and the latest in CVS with diff -cb (or diff -ub, according to
preference). The -b ignores changes in whitespace. Then
code before working on it, and
now I only want to commit the actual code changes. How do I do that?",
right?
I'm not sure how well this would work, but you could try something like
this:
Checkout the original, unaltered file you started with. Do a
diff -uNrw originalfile newfile > c
Mental Patient wrote:
I've done this with mixed results. In general if you're going to work on
projects, its a good idea to come up with your format conventions first. :)
However, sometimes you just inherit code and really there isnt much you
can do about it. Its right up there with cuddled els
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:48:34AM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| hey all,
|
| this is kind of off-topic, but i figured this is the community most
| likley to have dealt with this sort of thing in the past, and be
| opinionated about it.
|
| i've been editing a lot of code over the past few month
on Fri, 10 Oct 2003 12:06:07PM -0400, Mental Patient insinuated:
> Nori Heikkinen wrote:
[...]
> >now it's time to check it into CVS. i don't want every single line
> >to show up as different just because of tab characters, so i need
> >to find a good solution on how to transform my indents back i
on Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:44:14AM -0400, Roberto Sanchez insinuated:
> Nori Heikkinen wrote:
[...]
> >now it's time to check it into CVS. i don't want every single line
> >to show up as different just because of tab characters, so i need
> >to find a good solution on how to transform my indents back
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:48:34AM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> i've been editing a lot of code over the past few months that was
> originally saved to disk with hard tabs for indenting. i can't work
> with hard tabs, and so managed to reformat the entire thing to use
> spaces (basically a "s,^I
Nori Heikkinen wrote:
hey all,
this is kind of off-topic, but i figured this is the community most
likley to have dealt with this sort of thing in the past, and be
opinionated about it.
i've been editing a lot of code over the past few months that was
originally saved to disk with hard tabs for in
Nori Heikkinen wrote:
hey all,
this is kind of off-topic, but i figured this is the community most
likley to have dealt with this sort of thing in the past, and be
opinionated about it.
i've been editing a lot of code over the past few months that was
originally saved to disk with hard tabs for in
hey all,
this is kind of off-topic, but i figured this is the community most
likley to have dealt with this sort of thing in the past, and be
opinionated about it.
i've been editing a lot of code over the past few months that was
originally saved to disk with hard tabs for indenting. i can't wor
From: Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Re: Diff btw GeForce4 and RIVA TNT2?
>> Quod erat demonstrandum!
>The nvidia-using-TNT2 will *smoke* the
nv-using-GeForce4.
Unfortunately with Backstreet Ruby I cannot mix nvidia
and nv, so both the figures are with nvidia.
Unfortunatel
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 08:59, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Thanks for those answers!
>
> So... apt-getted xscreensaver-gl. gears -fps -delay 0
> indeed is the most straightforward app. to show the
> difference.
>
> Left monitor, with the GeForce4: 155 fps.
> Right monitor, with RIVA TNT2:
Hi all!
Thanks for those answers!
So... apt-getted xscreensaver-gl. gears -fps -delay 0
indeed is the most straightforward app. to show the
difference.
Left monitor, with the GeForce4: 155 fps.
Right monitor, with RIVA TNT2: 50 fps.
Quod erat demonstrandum!
Hugo
_
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 12:42, David Z Maze wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The monitors are samsungs 17" but the cards are
> > different: one is a RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 and
> > the other a GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x.
> >
> > I notice no difference between the 2 other th
Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The monitors are samsungs 17" but the cards are
> different: one is a RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 and
> the other a GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x.
>
> I notice no difference between the 2 other than that I
> paid $25 more for the MX440.
The last time I boug
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 17:00, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I have Backstreet Ruby installed so I have 2 monitors
> with kbds/mice that each have a user.
>
> The monitors are samsungs 17" but the cards are
> different: one is a RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 and
> the other a GeForce4 MX
Hi all!
I have Backstreet Ruby installed so I have 2 monitors
with kbds/mice that each have a user.
The monitors are samsungs 17" but the cards are
different: one is a RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 and
the other a GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x.
I notice no difference between the 2 other than that I
paid
Hi,
Micha Feigin wrote:
> Currently I am trying to build the diff for the source trio
> (orig.tar.gz/diff.gz/.dsc). The problem is that using the standard diff
> arguments diff -ruN doesn't work. dpkg-source -x returns an error for
> the diff line (the first one in the file)
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:35:11PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> I am trying to build my own version of a package and I am trying to
> reuse the existing package files since I don't know how to create them
> myself.
> Currently I am trying to build the diff for the source tr
I am trying to build my own version of a package and I am trying to
reuse the existing package files since I don't know how to create them
myself.
Currently I am trying to build the diff for the source trio
(orig.tar.gz/diff.gz/.dsc). The problem is that using the standard diff
arguments diff
ation has been added since yesterday. So, I would
think that "diff File2 File1" should provide me with that information.
But all I ever get is a message that the files differ. I have tried
with various arguments, but no luck.
Does the message you get actually say: "*Binary* f
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 02:55:26PM -0800, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> I must be really stupid, so forgive me, but I can't figure out for the
> life of me how to use the diff command. I've read the man pages and
> looked at some stuff on the internet, but I can't get it to do
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 14:55:26 -0800 Curtis Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I must be really stupid, so forgive me, but I can't figure out for the
>
> life of me how to use the diff command. I've read the man pages and
> looked at some stuff on the internet, but
Curtis Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, I would think that "diff File2 File1" should provide me with
> that information. But all I ever get is a message that the files
> differ.
In general, it's helpful to show exactly what you typed and what the
error m
* Curtis Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030318 15:24 PST]:
> I must be really stupid, so forgive me, but I can't figure out for the
> life of me how to use the diff command. I've read the man pages and
> looked at some stuff on the internet, but I can't get it to do
ormation has been added since yesterday. So, I would
> think that "diff File2 File1" should provide me with that information.
> But all I ever get is a message that the files differ. I have tried
> with various arguments, but no luck.
Does the message you get actually s
"Gary Hennigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> Hmm. You got somethin' funky going on! What you describe should only
> happen if you're specifying the "-q" or "--brief" option to diff. What
> does "diff --version" give you? Ma
Curtis Vaughan said:
> Both are text files. File1 was File2 a day ago. Since then File2 has had
> additional information tagged on to it (it's a log file). All I want to
> see is what information has been added since yesterday. So, I would
> think that "diff File2 File1&q
"Curtis Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I must be really stupid, so forgive me, but I can't figure out for the
> life of me how to use the diff command. I've read the man pages and
> looked at some stuff on the internet, but I can't get it to do wh
I must be really stupid, so forgive me, but I can't figure out for the
life of me how to use the diff command. I've read the man pages and
looked at some stuff on the internet, but I can't get it to do what I
want it to do. But then maybe it doesn't do what I want it to
rce).
>
> last i checked apt-get source automatically extracted and patched
> the source with the diff, you can see if this is the case by checking
> to see if there is a debian/ directory within the extracted source tree
> of the app you apt-get source'd.
>
> in any case, the u
omatically extracted and patched
the source with the diff, you can see if this is the case by checking
to see if there is a debian/ directory within the extracted source tree
of the app you apt-get source'd.
in any case, the usual command to use with a diff is patch, be sure
to decompress i
Hello to everyone.
I have downloaded the source file of an application (apt-get source
appl). Along with the .tar.gz file, I got and diff.gz file which I don't
know how to apply it to the .tar.gz file (after the extract of cource).
Can you please help me?
TIA,
Mihalis.
-
:wq
--
To UNSUBS
newer upstream tar ball was only slightly different
> from Debian's (old) .orig.tar.gz.
> Anyway, what I did was:
>
> 1. gunzip -c nut_1.2.1-2.diff.gz > nut_1.2.1-2.diff
> 2. tar -xzf nut-1.2.2-pre2.tar.gz
> 3. (cd nut-1.2.2; ./configure)
> 3. patch --verbose -p1
(old) .orig.tar.gz.
Anyway, what I did was:
1. gunzip -c nut_1.2.1-2.diff.gz > nut_1.2.1-2.diff
2. tar -xzf nut-1.2.2-pre2.tar.gz
3. (cd nut-1.2.2; ./configure)
3. patch --verbose -p1 -d nut-1.2.2 < nut_1.2.1-2.diff
--
Shaul Karl, [EMAIL PROTECTED] e t
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Hi, i have a nice little problem of mine. My router at home has 3 nics.
2 external and 1 internal for my local lan.
Eth0 has my Fixed Adsl Connection 194.236.xx.xx adress
Eth1 has my Cable Modem Connection (dynamic address)
Eth2 has my local lan connection. 192.168.110.1 address
Everything is jus
201 - 300 of 385 matches
Mail list logo
