On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 08:36:53PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> What really bugs me is when the maintainers forget there are hosts file
> users, and do something that totally screws us up,
Gene, you're being irrational again. "Hosts file only" systems have been
supported since before Debian
On 10/22/23 18:45, John Hasler wrote:
I wrote:
It's for people who haven't a clue as to what a domainname or address
block is.
Gene writes:
If that is an insult, so be it.
I just meant to explain that though it is not a solution to your problem,
it is a solution to a problem some other
I wrote:
> It's for people who haven't a clue as to what a domainname or address
> block is.
Gene writes:
> If that is an insult, so be it.
I just meant to explain that though it is not a solution to your problem,
it is a solution to a problem some other people have.
--
John Hasler
On 10/22/23 14:19, John Hasler wrote:
Gene writes:
Chuckle. Looks like a solution looking for a problem. You can use
whatever domainname that tickles your fancy when your net is in an
un-routeable address block.
It's for people who haven't a clue as to what a domainname or address
block is.
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 2:33 PM Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> gene heskett wrote:
> > On 10/22/23 11:19, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 7:13 AM Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8375
> > >
> > Chuckle. Looks like a
gene heskett wrote:
> On 10/22/23 11:19, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 7:13 AM Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net>
> > wrote:
>
> > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8375
> >
> Chuckle. Looks like a solution looking for a problem. You can use whatever
> domainname
Gene writes:
> Chuckle. Looks like a solution looking for a problem. You can use
> whatever domainname that tickles your fancy when your net is in an
> un-routeable address block.
It's for people who haven't a clue as to what a domainname or address
block is.
On 10/22/23 11:19, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 7:13 AM Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net> wrote:
It's fairly recent (RFC 8375, May 2018) but this type of usage is
pretty much exactly what home.arpa is meant for.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8375
Chuckle.
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 7:13 AM Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net> wrote:
>
> On 21 Oct 2023 17:13 -0400, from poc...@columbus.rr.com (Pocket):
> > Why would I register a domain name for an internal network?
> > Any name will do. You could make the same argument if you just
> > makeup a
On 10/22/23 07:13, Michael Kjörling wrote:
On 21 Oct 2023 17:13 -0400, from poc...@columbus.rr.com (Pocket):
Why would I register a domain name for an internal network?
Any name will do. You could make the same argument if you just
makeup a domain to use as it could already be registered or
On 21 Oct 2023 17:13 -0400, from poc...@columbus.rr.com (Pocket):
> Why would I register a domain name for an internal network?
> Any name will do. You could make the same argument if you just
> makeup a domain to use as it could already be registered or someone
> my register it in the future.
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
