Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. escribió:
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 01:51:12 Adrian Chapela wrote:
Hello,
I want to install the stable version (etch not lenny) of libc6.
Lenny is stable now. Etch is oldstable.
I have
installed a testing version of the package ( it is needed by ext4
ut
Adrian Chapela escribió:
Hello,
I want to install the stable version (etch not lenny) of libc6. I
have installed a testing version of the package ( it is needed by ext4
utils...) and now I want to downgrade. My problem is, if I try to
uninstall this package, I will lost apt utility, then I c
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 01:51:12 Adrian Chapela wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to install the stable version (etch not lenny) of libc6.
Lenny is stable now. Etch is oldstable.
> I have
> installed a testing version of the package ( it is needed by ext4
> utils...) and now I want to downgrade.
Hello,
I want to install the stable version (etch not lenny) of libc6. I have
installed a testing version of the package ( it is needed by ext4
utils...) and now I want to downgrade. My problem is, if I try to
uninstall this package, I will lost apt utility, then I can't reinstall
anything m
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 04:14:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> today, I aptitude installed apache2, which took a new libc6 with it.
> Now I can't link against one of my libs anymore:
>
> /usr/local/lib/libcpdbg.a(cpdebug.o)(.text+0x374): In function
> `dbgSprintx':
> : undefined reference t
Hello,
today, I aptitude installed apache2, which took a new libc6 with it.
Now I can't link against one of my libs anymore:
/usr/local/lib/libcpdbg.a(cpdebug.o)(.text+0x374): In function
`dbgSprintx':
: undefined reference to `__ctype_b'
./lib_x86/libtabe.a(tabe_zuyin.o)(.text+0x7c): In functio
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010929 07:09]:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 09:14:16PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> > Here's what happens when I try that:
>
> You might want to try 'apt-get install libc6=2.2.4-1 libc6-dev=2.2.4-1
> locales=2.2.4-1' to downgrade the various other packages that
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 09:14:16PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> Here's what happens when I try that:
>
> eeyore:/home/hall# apt-get install libc6=2.2.4-1
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
>
>
You might want to try 'apt
> Given the current interest in downgrading libc6, to enable unstable
> Konqueror, Mozilla or Galeon to function correctly, I thought I would
> post the simplest method of downgrade.
>
> # apt-get install libc6=2.2.4-1
>
> This of course assumes you have testing listed in your apt.sources:
>
> deb
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 09:49:42PM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Given the current interest in downgrading libc6, to enable unstable
> Konqueror, Mozilla or Galeon to function correctly, I thought I
> would post the simplest method of downgrade.
A little bit suprising for me is the fact that Konqu
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 09:49:42PM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Given the current interest in downgrading libc6, to enable unstable
> Konqueror, Mozilla or Galeon to function correctly, I thought I
> would post the simplest method of downgrade.
>
> # apt-get install libc6=2.2.4-1
Great! I dpkg -
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.
Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If yo
Given the current interest in downgrading libc6, to enable unstable
Konqueror, Mozilla or Galeon to function correctly, I thought I
would post the simplest method of downgrade.
# apt-get install libc6=2.2.4-1
This of course assumes you have testing listed in your apt.sources:
deb http://mirror.a
> Download manually .deb file and use
>
> dpkg -i libc6-VERSION.deb
>
> to install it.
>
> P.S. I assume that you understand implications of such
> downgrade. If you have installed any packages that was
> compiled with new libc then they all be breaked. Check
> first that no important packages u
TW> hello,
TW> i'm running potato r3. i upgraded libc6 2.1.3-18 to 2.2.2-4
TW> (as well as -dev & a couple of other packages along with
TW> it) from the "testing" tree. what's the best and quickest
TW> way to restore the original ver?
TW> i tried 'apt-get install libc6' from the "stable" tree
hello,
i'm running potato r3. i upgraded libc6 2.1.3-18 to 2.2.2-4
(as well as -dev & a couple of other packages along with
it) from the "testing" tree. what's the best and quickest
way to restore the original ver?
i tried 'apt-get install libc6' from the "stable" tree but
it complains that i
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 05:08:23PM +0200, Jaume Teixi wrote:
> It's right if I download potato versions (the ones I want) of libc6,
> lbnss-db, libc6-dev, locales
> then apt-get remove --purge of unstable versions (the ones I don't want)
Don't do this step unless you have a statically linked versi
It's right if I download potato versions (the ones I want) of libc6,
lbnss-db, libc6-dev, locales
then apt-get remove --purge of unstable versions (the ones I don't want)
dpkg -i each_potato_pkg.deb
thanks,
jaume
posted message -
I've upgraded libc6 to 2.1.95 but need to downgrade to 2.1
I've upgraded libc6 to 2.1.95 but need to downgrade to 2.1.3 due to
connection to a database
I've stable on sources.list but apt tells:
# apt-get -f install --reinstall libc6
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Sorry, re-installation of libc6 is not possible, it cannot
19 matches
Mail list logo