Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-23 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:44:48AM -0700, Steve C. Lamb wrote: | Nothing says exim must use port 25 and, IIRC, there's a recipe on the Exim | site which explains how to divert a copy of mail to another MTA for testing | purposes. Throw it on :2525 and see how it works? Just thinking aloud. If y

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-23 Thread Steve C. Lamb
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:39:28AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:21:35PM +0100, Pigeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > chroot? > No. > The ports aren't chrooted, so you're sharing the same :25 with the > parent. > However user-mode Linux would work, on a separat

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-23 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:21:35PM +0100, Pigeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:14:07PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 08:36:26PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:36:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > How wou

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim, (was Re: SWEN isn't slowing down)

2003-10-13 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
On Sunday 12 October 2003 13:28, Paul Johnson wrote: > This howto seems to assume Red Hat, and I've never used exiscan > before. I tried to adapt, but doing so breaks exim. Is there a > howto that doesn't assume a retarded (RPM-based) distro? It was really useful to me, I'm pretty sure my Exim c

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim, (was Re: SWEN isn't slowing down)

2003-10-12 Thread Steve C. Lamb
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 04:28:12AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > This howto seems to assume Red Hat, and I've never used exiscan > before. I tried to adapt, but doing so breaks exim. Is there a howto > that doesn't assume a retarded (RPM-based) distro? Odd. The how-to was straight forward fo

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim, (was Re: SWEN isn't slowing down)

2003-10-12 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 08:14:34AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 02:37:47 -0700 > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:12:41AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > > > There isn't, really. My approach was to tr

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-09 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:14:07PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 08:36:26PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:36:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > How would I install exim4 .deb on woody for testing (i.e. without > > > replacing the curr

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim, (was Re: SWEN isn't slowing down)

2003-10-08 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:09:25PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > It is compiled into exim4-daemon-heavy so just install that package. I > think I had read somewhere that Andreas might eventually include exiscan-acl > into exim4-daemon-light. I may b

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim, (was Re: SWEN isn't slowing down)

2003-10-08 Thread Steve Lamb
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:48:54 -0700 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yup, I found it. I like how KDE 3.2 finally has some kpdf > integration. > Question, though: Where do you get exiscan in debian form for exim4? It is compiled into exim4-daemon-heavy so just install that package.

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim, (was Re: SWEN isn't slowing down)

2003-10-08 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 08:14:34AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > > Close enough. Got a howto? > > I found a pretty good how-to on-line with Google. Search on "exiscan-acl > clamav pdf". It should be the 2nd link. Yup, I found it. I like how KDE

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-08 Thread moseley
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 08:36:26PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:36:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > How would I install exim4 .deb on woody for testing (i.e. without > > replacing the current exim package)? > > You don't. They're mutually exclusive. So to test

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-08 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:36:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How would I install exim4 .deb on woody for testing (i.e. without > replacing the current exim package)? You don't. They're mutually exclusive. - -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMA

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-08 Thread moseley
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:25:55AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:46:48PM -0700, Jeremy Brooks wrote: > > Is there a package of exim 4 for woody? My smtp server is woody, and I > > really have no desire to upgrade it to a more recent distro. > > Have you searched apt-get.

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-08 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 17:28, Steve Lamb wrote: > > and modifies the Subject-line > > to include *SPAM** rather than just add another one. > > Any ideas on how to do this? > > To be honest, no. Actually, I discovered at least how to rewrite the Subject line, it's in example 3 in

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-08 Thread Steve Lamb
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:20:00 +0200 Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, I think I would prefer that it behaved as the current > SpamAssassin do, that is, it makes an attachment out of the original > message, inserts the report in the body, and modifies the Subject-line > to inclu

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim, (was Re: SWEN isn't slowing down)

2003-10-08 Thread Steve Lamb
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 02:37:47 -0700 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:12:41AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > > There isn't, really. My approach was to try to create a new eval() > > test in SA which called clamav. I ended up installing > > exim4-daemon-heavy and usin

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-08 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 22:46, Steve Lamb wrote: > What do you want to do? exiscan-acl can also query Spamassassin > and reject at SMTP time. The main reason to go with sa-exim is to > get the extra features it offers. Those features being saving the > message easily, teergrubing and such

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim, (was Re: SWEN isn't slowing down)

2003-10-08 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:12:41AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 01:24:27 -0700 > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've been curious on how to tie in virus scanning to sa-exim as well, > > post it to this list if you figure

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-08 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 23:27, Alan Shutko wrote: > In my experience, still really, really good. I haven't been getting > any additional false possitives, and I haven't been missing any more > spam than normal. I see. Well, I haven't read up on how the Bayesian filter works (though I have b

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim, (was Re: SWEN isn't slowing down)

2003-10-08 Thread Steve Lamb
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 01:24:27 -0700 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been curious on how to tie in virus scanning to sa-exim as well, > post it to this list if you figure it out. There isn't, really. My approach was to try to create a new eval() test in SA which called clamav. I

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-08 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:46:48PM -0700, Jeremy Brooks wrote: > Is there a package of exim 4 for woody? My smtp server is woody, and I > really have no desire to upgrade it to a more recent distro. Have you searched apt-get.org yet? - -- .''`.

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim, (was Re: SWEN isn't slowing down)

2003-10-08 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 10:05:43PM +0200, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > Yeah, that's one option. I considered it, but the problem is, if you > feed the learner with tons of similar viruses, how good will it be to > kill spam...? Bayesian filtering goes o

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-07 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Jeremy Brooks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031007 17:04]: > Is there a package of exim 4 for woody? My smtp server is woody, and I > really have no desire to upgrade it to a more recent distro. Yes, courtesy of Andreas Metzler: # exim4 and gnutls from andreas metzler deb http://www.logic.univie.ac.at/

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-07 Thread Jeremy Brooks
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 16:06, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:27:31PM -0500, Alan Shutko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Tuesday 07 October 2003 19:48, Alfredo Valles wrote: > > > > >> I was near suicide when some good guy

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-07 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:27:31PM -0500, Alan Shutko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tuesday 07 October 2003 19:48, Alfredo Valles wrote: > > >> I was near suicide when some good guy in this list recommended me > >> spamassissin. It's so easy to

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim,

2003-10-07 Thread Alan Shutko
Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tuesday 07 October 2003 19:48, Alfredo Valles wrote: >> I was near suicide when some good guy in this list recommended me >> spamassissin. It's so easy to get to work and once that you train the >> bayesian filter bye bye to all the stupids swen ma

Re: Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim, (was Re: SWEN isn't slowing down)

2003-10-07 Thread Steve Lamb
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 22:05:43 +0200 Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, that's one option. I considered it, but the problem is, if you > feed the learner with tons of similar viruses, how good will it be to > kill spam...? Also, if you feed those to Vipul's Razor, what would it > me

Exim4, Clamav, SA-Exim, (was Re: SWEN isn't slowing down)

2003-10-07 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 19:48, Alfredo Valles wrote: > > I have added practically every major country suffix in my > > /etc/mail/access file and I am discovering new ones every day! > > Man, I am so close to blocking "net" and "com". Well, in that case > > I might just as well shutdown my email