Juan Nin wrote:
> Yesterday morning I downloaded a Sarge unofficial ISO from
> ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial/sarge/
Don't use these images, and tell us if you find any links to them
somewhere. They are unofficial and status is unknown (apparently
broken); official and workin
t;
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 12:46 AM
Subject: Re: Sarge install - where are ext3 and reiserfs?
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 03:00:57PM +0800, cwinl wrote:
> > i think the freshest disto is that made by jigdo.
> > just download the jigdo file
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 03:00:57PM +0800, cwinl wrote:
> i think the freshest disto is that made by jigdo.
> just download the jigdo file from http://www.debian.org/CD/jigdo-cd/ which
> regenerated weekly.
> i think the mirror site always older then jigdo.
>
You can save a bit of time by using wha
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: Sarge install - where are ext3 and reiserfs?
> Juan Nin wrote:
>
> > Yesterday morning I downloaded a Sarge unofficial ISO from
> > ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial/sarge/
>
> > I liked
Juan Nin wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday morning I downloaded a Sarge unofficial ISO from
ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial/sarge/
I haven't install it yet, but I booted my pc with it so as to see how
the new debian-installer was
I liked it, but saw something strange...
Download it from
s, fat16 and fat32. This was booting with expert26 or
> linux26
>
> doing normal boot (kernel 2.4 I presume) offered just ext2, fat16 and
> fat32
>
> whay does this happen?
>
> is it that as the debian-installer is not finished yet, it does not yet
> support ext3 and reiserf
pport ext3 and reiserfs? I don't think so...
what's the problem then??
thanks in advance,
Juan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 19:53, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:53:08AM +0300, Chavdar Videff wrote:
>
> > Is there any problem giving it a go with debian and format all with
> > ext 3.
>
> I don't have experience with ReiserFS, but have been using ext3 for
> quite a while now
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 01:53, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:53:08AM +0300, Chavdar Videff wrote:
>
> > Is there any problem giving it a go with debian and format all with
> > ext 3.
>
> I don't have experience with ReiserFS, but have been using ext3 for
> quite a while now
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:53:08AM +0300, Chavdar Videff wrote:
> Is there any problem giving it a go with debian and format all with
> ext 3.
I don't have experience with ReiserFS, but have been using ext3 for
quite a while now, on all my systems. I haven't had a single file
system problem th
"Chavdar" == Chavdar Videff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chavdar> Is there any problem giving it a go with debian and
Chavdar> format all with ext 3. In the manuals the primary concern
Chavdar> is the partitioning pattern not the choice of file
Chavdar> systems.
ext3 is well s
Dear list,
I went through most of the documentation at
debian.org, however I could not find any reference to which file systems are
best supported by Woody 3.0. I had a hard disk failure that of course was not
caused by any file system corruption but I guess physical damage. But
nonetheles
12 matches
Mail list logo
