On Fri, 2024-03-15 at 09:12 +, Michael Grant wrote:
> I use tmux on my server. tmux creates multiple pttys. When I run
> finger, I see an error like this:
>
> $ finger
> finger: /dev//pts/6: No such file or directory
>
> and in the log, I see:
>
> /var/log/sys
I use tmux on my server. tmux creates multiple pttys. When I run
finger, I see an error like this:
$ finger
finger: /dev//pts/6: No such file or directory
and in the log, I see:
/var/log/syslog:Mar 15 05:06:18 strange kernel: [2740248.159942]
finger[1987858]: segfault at 1c ip
I'm seeing many of these in my log as we use the 'finger' program
(which essentially prints out who's logged in):
/var/log/syslog:Jan 21 17:24:02 hostname kernel: [994887.868396] Code: 7b 20 00
0f 85 cc fe ff ff 31 c0 48 8d 3d 80 18 00 00 e8 7e 0f 00 00 83 7b 08 01 0f 85
d0
Hi,
I encountered an issue with nautilus on Debian 11,
Steps to reproduce:
1. Connect a touchscreen.
2. Launch nautilus, switch to icon mode, and select an item.
3. Longpress(single finger) the item on the touchscreen, wait until context
menu popuped, then, release the finger.
Current behavior
Hi,
I've noticed an issue on my Thinkpad x250 running Debian 10 Buster.
I'm running the stock GNOME desktop environment (under Wayland) and
every time I suspend the laptop (by closing the lid), two-finger
scrolling just stops working.
I looked online and there appears to be confir
Hello!
Can you please paste the logs to pastebin and send the link here?
--
Mike
Shahryar Afifi napsal St, čec 10, 2019 v
7∶21 DOP.:
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 12:08:34AM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
> > > % who
> > > mgrant pts/12016-07-18 06:15 (2a00:S.1)
> >
> > I type "who" on Debian jessie and I do get the full IPv6 address:
> >
> > $ who
> > andy pts/62016-07-23 01:42 (2001:ba8:1f1:f019::2)
I just figured out what is going on. The problem is gnu screen.
It's screen that's truncating the address. When login and don't reattach
to my screen, I get the full address and "PROCPS_FROMLEN=40 w" prints the
expected full address.
>
>
>
> > % who
> > mgrant pts/12016-07-18 06:15 (2a00:S.1)
>
> I type "who" on Debian jessie and I do get the full IPv6 address:
>
> $ who
> andy pts/62016-07-23 01:42 (2001:ba8:1f1:f019::2)
> $ who --version
> who (GNU coreutils) 8.23
> Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Found
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 01:53:07AM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:57:32PM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
> > netstat does a little better still but not much:
> >
> > tcp6 0 2640 2600:3c00:::9:22 2a00:23c4:6d10:4d:36663
> > ESTABLISHED 12345/sshd: mgrant
>
> "--wide
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:57:32PM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
> Why is it w, who, and finger truncate an ipv6 address just after the first
> 4 characters of the address (the first :)?
It isn't a great answer but I'm guessing the honest one is that it's
because
Why is it w, who, and finger truncate an ipv6 address just after the first
4 characters of the address (the first :)?
% who
mgrant pts/12016-07-18 06:15 (2a00:S.1)
% w
18:37:31 up 4 days, 12:26, 4 users, load average: 0.05, 0.07, 0.05
USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:44:18PM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
>
> $ ls -al /usr/bin/w
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Feb 11 2014 /usr/bin/w -> /etc/alternatives/w
> $ ls -al /etc/alternatives/w
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Feb 11 2014 /etc/alternatives/w ->
> /usr/bin/w.procps
> $ w -V
> w f
$ ls -al /usr/bin/w
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Feb 11 2014 /usr/bin/w -> /etc/alternatives/w
$ ls -al /etc/alternatives/w
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Feb 11 2014 /etc/alternatives/w ->
/usr/bin/w.procps
$ w -V
w from procps-ng 3.3.10
$ who --version
who (GNU coreutils) 8.23
also "who --lookup" mak
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 01:32:16PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:50:17AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > > Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
> > >
> > > > So, long story short, last version of 'w' which printed hostnames
Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:50:17AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
> >
> > > So, long story short, last version of 'w' which printed hostnames by
> > > default should be squeeze's one, and even then they used compilation
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:50:17AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
>
> > So, long story short, last version of 'w' which printed hostnames by
> > default should be squeeze's one, and even then they used compilation
> > flag to make it do so.
>
> I'm trying
Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
> So, long story short, last version of 'w' which printed hostnames by
> default should be squeeze's one, and even then they used compilation
> flag to make it do so.
I'm trying to follow this, but it doesn't seem to square with my own
observations.
I've edi
address here for 10.20.30.40)
> >
> > But yes, getent resolves my host ip to a name. who/w/finger/last all
> still do not resolve the host.
>
> Ok, then we'll have to do it the hard way.
>
> Please post the output of 'strace w'.
>
>
> $
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 10:46:53AM +0100, Michael Grant wrote:
> (I of course edited my own host's ip address here for 10.20.30.40)
>
> But yes, getent resolves my host ip to a name. who/w/finger/last all still
> do not resolve the host.
Ok, then we'll have to do it
(I of course edited my own host's ip address here for 10.20.30.40)
But yes, getent resolves my host ip to a name. who/w/finger/last all still
do not resolve the host.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 12:39:06PM +0100, Michael Grant
Sat07 26:48m 0.09s 0.09s /bin/bash
> $ finger
> Login Name Tty Idle Login Time Office Office Phone
> mgrant Michael Grant pts/1 1d Sep 5 07:30 (10.20.30.40:S.1)
> mgrant Michael Grant pts/2 14:12 Sep 5 07:30 (10.20.30.40:S.2)
>
)
$ w
07:34:29 up 3 days, 6 min, 4 users, load average: 0.03, 0.06, 0.05
USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT
mgrant pts/1*10.20.30.40*:S. Sat07 26:48m 0.09s 0.09s /bin/bash
$ finger
Login NameTty Idle Login Time Office Office
On 05/09/15 23:21, Michael Grant wrote:
I have to say in some ways this seems like a feature not a bug! I've
long missed the option some other unixes have to inhibit resolving the
name. But at the moment the hostname! Frankly, there should be an
option to w, who, finger, and last t
I'm running debian testing. Just did an apt-get update. who, w, finger,
and last are all now printing the ip address instead of the hostname. the
wtmp seems to have the ip address now instead of the hostname. Last shows
hostnames up to when I did the apt-get update today and then ip addr
Dan Hitt:
>
> So . . . i'd like to get a laptop for my personal use, but of course
> running a free OS.
>
> Does this exist, with the two finger gesture use?
My Thinkpad X240 supports two-finger scrolling and a few other gestures.
J.
--
When standing at the top of beachy h
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:28:32 -0700
Dan Hitt wrote:
> So . . . i'd like to get a laptop for my personal use, but of
> course running a free OS.
>
> Does this exist, with the two finger gesture use?
MSI has such machines (at least in EU); it uses a synaptics
touchpad with this
Hi Debian List,
At work, i've got a mac book pro laptop, which for the first time in
my life is a laptop that i can use like a serious computer. Prior to
this, i refused to use a laptop because they are so much worse than
desktops.
Part of the appeal for me is the two-finger gesture
GrabEventDevice = 1
hth,
Jerome
Stackpole, Chris wrote:
From: Sjoerd Hardeman [mailto:sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: Synaptics touchpad two-finger scrolling
Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
Hi list,
I had two-finger scrolling working with explicit lines in
Stackpole, Chris wrote:
From: Stackpole, Chris [mailto:cstackp...@barbnet.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:44 AM
Subject: RE: Synaptics touchpad two-finger scrolling
[snip]
I usually don't advocate talking to the devs ( as I don't want to
bother
them with trivial problems ) bu
> From: Stackpole, Chris [mailto:cstackp...@barbnet.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:44 AM
> Subject: RE: Synaptics touchpad two-finger scrolling
[snip]
> I usually don't advocate talking to the devs ( as I don't want to
bother
> them with trivial problems ) but t
> From: Sjoerd Hardeman [mailto:sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 7:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Synaptics touchpad two-finger scrolling
>
> Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I had two-finger scrolling working with explicit lines in t
Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
Hi list,
I had two-finger scrolling working with explicit lines in the xorg.conf.
Yet, trying to keep up and using hal instead I edited
/usr/share/hal/fdi/policy/20thirdparty/11-x11-synaptics.fdi and added
On
1
1
to the synaptics section. When
Hi list,
I had two-finger scrolling working with explicit lines in the xorg.conf.
Yet, trying to keep up and using hal instead I edited
/usr/share/hal/fdi/policy/20thirdparty/11-x11-synaptics.fdi and added
> On
> type="string">1
> type="string&
you are right:
# cat /etc/inetd.conf | grep finger
finger stream tcp nowait nobody /usr/sbin/tcpd
/usr/sbin/ffingerd
but interestingly enough:
#ls -la /usr/sbin/ffingerd
ls: /usr/sbin/ffingerd: No such file or directory
and
#dpkg -l ffingerd
pn ffingerd(no
Quoting Vadim Kutsyy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
For some reason I have inetd listening to port 79 (finger). Are
there any reason why it should be listening to port 79?
#lsof | grep finger
inetd 11048 root4u IPv4 827103602 TCP
*:finger (LISTEN)
Thanks,
For some reason I have inetd listening to port 79 (finger). Are there
any reason why it should be listening to port 79?
#lsof | grep finger
inetd 11048 root4u IPv4 827103602 TCP
*:finger (LISTEN)
Thanks,
Vadim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Monday, December 03, 2001 8:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I recently did a large mail upgrade and installed a new mail server that
> incorporates mail hashing (i.e /var/spool/u/s/user). As expected, my
> finger command on any user now reports that the user has no mail. Is
I recently did a large mail upgrade and installed a new mail server that
incorporates mail hashing (i.e /var/spool/u/s/user). As expected, my
finger command on any user now reports that the user has no mail. Is this
an actual finger problem, or does something have to be defined in the
users home
also sprach Nick Furman (on Tue, 11 Sep 2001 09:05:05PM -0400):
> > it's either mtime or atime of the inode of that user's mailbox.
>
> Could you share with me where that might be viewed? "ls -al" doesn't show
> me the desired information.
install the 'stat' package, then `stat filename`
martin
also sprach Nick Furman (on Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:50:30PM -0400):
> Can someone tell me where finger gets it's information on the system, when
> it displays when the user last checked their email. I guess it reads
> /var/spool/mail/(user) for the date of mail last received, but I am
&
Can someone tell me where finger gets it's information on the system, when
it displays when the user last checked their email. I guess it reads
/var/spool/mail/(user) for the date of mail last received, but I am
unclear where it gets the information for when the user last checked mail.
Than
on Sat, May 26, 2001 at 12:43:29PM +0200, Csontos B. Laszlo ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
> Dear List members,
>
> I've realized the following problem on my machine. When I perform a finger
> command, I'll get the following:
>
> LoginName Tty
Dear List members,
I've realized the following problem on my machine. When I perform a finger
command, I'll get the following:
LoginName Tty Idle Login Time Office Office Phone
adminSystem administra pts/1 May 24 19:01 (192.168.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 12:57:52PM -0500, MaD dUCK wrote:
> and a line for every terminal i opened on :0
>
> why is this? what's different about wtmp/utmp (i presume) on
> suse/redhat than on debian? i don't want finger to show 20+ logins of
> my account when all i did
MaD dUCK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>why is this? what's different about wtmp/utmp (i presume) on
>suse/redhat than on debian? i don't want finger to show 20+ logins of
>my account when all i did was login once and opened xterms
>otherwise...
You could try start
re,
Erdmut Pfeifer([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 07:21:09PM +0100:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 12:57:52PM -0500, MaD dUCK wrote:
> > why is this? what's different about wtmp/utmp (i presume) on
> > suse/redhat than on debian? i don't want finger to show 20+ logi
also sprach Erdmut Pfeifer (on Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:21:09PM +0100):
> rxvt has a compile-time option for wtmp/utmp support. Maybe that's
> where the distros differ...
the same happens when i use xterm. but i just now remembered that
i use aterm on suse, and with aterm, no additional utmp login is
r
.
>
> so on either suse or debian, i use xdm to start windowmaker after login
> and i have some 20 or so rxvt's created for my convenience at startup.
>
> on the suse machine, the finger output with a local windowmaker
> session and a remote ssh login looks as follows:
>
have some 20 or so rxvt's created for my convenience at startup.
on the suse machine, the finger output with a local windowmaker
session and a remote ssh login looks as follows:
Login Name Tty Idle Login Time Office Office Phone
madduck MaD dUCK *:0 Feb
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 02:00:11PM -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> I've replaced finger altogether for off-site finger requests with a nice
> little perl script guaranteed to confuse and amuse. Try fingering
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Try it several times :)
[fmp.com]
User account
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 02:00:11PM -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> I've replaced finger altogether for off-site finger requests with a nice
> little perl script guaranteed to confuse and amuse. Try fingering
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Try it several times :)
Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> I've replaced finger altogether for off-site finger requests with a nice
> little perl script guaranteed to confuse and amuse. Try fingering
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Try it several times :)
>
> I'll be glad to share the script with anyone who wants i
I've replaced finger altogether for off-site finger requests with a nice
little perl script guaranteed to confuse and amuse. Try fingering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Try it several times :)
I'll be glad to share the script with anyone who wants it.
Thus spake Will Lowe on Mon, May 22, 200
> I may have misspoken on this. I believe that there are exploits involving
> finger and executable code, but I'm not sure of the details since it's been
> a while. I gave the issue some thought last night after I posted this and
There have also been buffer overflows in
Thus spake Oswald Buddenhagen on Mon, May 22, 2000 at 07:17:55AM CDT
> > It's possible to make .plan or .project to be named pipes, which means that
> > the act of reading them can cause code to be executed. If finger executes
> > suid root, then said code can execute as r
> It's possible to make .plan or .project to be named pipes, which means that
> the act of reading them can cause code to be executed. If finger executes
> suid root, then said code can execute as root. The potential for mischief
> should be obvious.
>
could you explain
It's possible to make .plan or .project to be named pipes, which means that
the act of reading them can cause code to be executed. If finger executes
suid root, then said code can execute as root. The potential for mischief
should be obvious.
Thus spake Rostislav Vorobyev on Mon, May 22,
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 07:01:00AM +, Rostislav Vorobyev wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> Can someone explain me why people are not set 4755 permission on a finger
> program? I see good reasons to do that: if a user does not allow to see
> his/her ~user tree, finger will display .pla
Dear friends,
Can someone explain me why people are not set 4755 permission on a finger
program? I see good reasons to do that: if a user does not allow to see
his/her ~user tree, finger will display .plan, .project and maybe .pgp --
depends on finger version -- in any case. Maybe is there the
> > My host allow 'finger ' from any hosts~!
> >
> > How can I disallow doing it from others except my host ?
>
> In /etc/hosts.deny add something like the following:
> in.fingerd: ALL
>
> And then in /etc/hosts.allow add something like the following:
Thus said "ChangMin Oh" on Fri, 31 Mar 2000 16:40:16 +0900:
> My host allow 'finger ' from any hosts~!
>
> How can I disallow doing it from others except my host ?
In /etc/hosts.deny add something like the following:
in.fingerd: ALL
And then in /etc/hosts.allow add
My host allow 'finger ' from any hosts~!
How can I disallow doing it from others except my host ?
--
unsubscribe? mail -s unscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < dev/null
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 03:49:34PM -, Pollywog wrote:
> On 21-Mar-2000 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> I finally got around to trying out exim's built-in sorting, and
> >> it seems to be working great so far.
> >>
> >> [...
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 03:01:01PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> as for fingerd i see no reason it should be run as anything other then
> nobody, if at all.
Or run cfingerd. It can be configured not to show the .forward.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 06:07:28PM -, Pollywog wrote:
>
> On 21-Mar-2000 George Bonser wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, David Karlin wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Obviously, finger could be disabled, but I'd like to keep it
> >> running on the interna
On 21-Mar-2000 George Bonser wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, David Karlin wrote:
>
>>
>> Obviously, finger could be disabled, but I'd like to keep it
>> running on the internal network.
>>
>> Is there a way to get finger to not show .forward?
>>
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 03:49:34PM -, Pollywog wrote:
> > simply "chmod 600 .forward" - at least on solaris this works ...
>
> I don't think that works on Linux; it did not work for me, anyway.
its not a linux issue its a MTA issue, finger is not a privileged
pr
On 21-Mar-2000 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I finally got around to trying out exim's built-in sorting, and
>> it seems to be working great so far.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Is there a way to get finger to not show .forward?
>>
>
> Hello,
> I finally got around to trying out exim's built-in sorting, and
> it seems to be working great so far.
>
> [...]
>
> Is there a way to get finger to not show .forward?
>
simply "chmod 600 .forward" - at least on solaris this works ...
--
H
Hello,
I finally got around to trying out exim's built-in sorting, and
it seems to be working great so far.
However, when I run finger against my username, it shows my
.forward file:
Mail forwarded to # Exim filter
if $h_X-Mailing-List: contains "ebian-"
hi,
Since I upgraded to slink, the command
'finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
doesn't work any longer, it simply says [localhost] and then returns
without error messages. I use cfingerd v1.3.2-18 and I didn't make any
changes to /etc/cfingerd/cfingerd.conf, the line +ALLOW_USER
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Frankie wrote:
> Cos I'm trying to set up a command with gw, you see.
try xterm -e sh -c "finger; read"
--
Madarasz Gergely [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's practically impossible to look at a penguin and feel angry.
Cos I'm trying to set up a command with gw, you see.
cheers in advance,
frankie.
P.S. I have tried using sh to execute the command, but sh closes afterwards as
well.
P.P.S. Please make it really complicated so I don't look stupid for missing
something obvious :-)
--
,
a problem with finger as well.
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[linux.ccil.org]
500:The name given for the Common DUA is not a known socket name.
Thanks,
Chuck
Ciao Mike,
> > On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> >
> > >On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, David Fries wrote:
> > >
>
> On my machine:
>
>
>mike:~$ finger
>No one logged on.
>mike:~$ finger @localhost
>[localhost]
>Us
ROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: finger return "No one logged on." and I am logged..
>
> On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, David Fries wrote:
> >
> >>Are you logged in at console or with an rxvt in
I am having a problem with the finger command on a system. Whenever I
finger someone who is currently logged in, the finger information is
accurate and correct. It show username, rela name, plan, and how long
they've been logged in and where from, etc. All fine.
However, when I finger the
On Thu, 26 Nov 1998, M.C. Vernon wrote:
> The log files are in binary format, and I have no idea about how to sort
> this out :(, so any assistance much appreaciated.
rm /var/log/wtmp
touch /var/log/wtmp
All done. Thats If you dont mind losing all the records. Otherwise, copy
the utmp file somew
On 26 Nov 1998, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>
> >> "MCV" == M C Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MCV> Which is not what I was asking. I was wondering how to deal with the "on
> MCV> since saturday", given he has no such process running.
>
> Most likely a corruption in utmp, wtmp or btmp (al
>> "MCV" == M C Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MCV> Which is not what I was asking. I was wondering how to deal with the "on
MCV> since saturday", given he has no such process running.
Most likely a corruption in utmp, wtmp or btmp (all located in
/var/log).
Is the output of last, lastb, w
On Thu, 26 Nov 1998, Mirek Kwasniak wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 1998 at 01:53:32PM +, M.C. Vernon wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > This is puzzling me:
> >
> > finger -l apc27 gives this:
> >
> >
> >
> > yet there are no processes
On Wed, Nov 25, 1998 at 01:53:32PM +, M.C. Vernon wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> This is puzzling me:
>
> finger -l apc27 gives this:
>
>
>
> yet there are no processes belonging to him running. How do I get rid of
> that on since sat message?
>
> Th
Dear all,
This is puzzling me:
finger -l apc27 gives this:
yet there are no processes belonging to him running. How do I get rid of
that on since sat message?
Thanks,
Matthew
Login: apc27Name: Andrew Cowley
Directory: /home/apc27 Shell
Hi!
> looks like your utmp file is mangled. the easiest way is to just wipe it
> out entirely. (try as root: "> /var/run/utmp") it's also possible to
> fix the utmp file by manipulating it's contents - depending on the number
> of users on your system this may be better, or simply wiping the u
On Thu, 1 Oct 1998, Pere Camps wrote:
>Hi!
>
>$ ps ax | grep S1
>
>11680 S1 S0:00 /sbin/getty -L -f /etc/issue.ttyS1 ttyS1 9600 vt100
>
>$ finger
>
>castor25 Jose Castor pbOct 1 17:40 (minxo.upc.es)
>ceo Cercle d'Estudis Orien S1
Hi!
$ ps ax | grep S1
11680 S1 S0:00 /sbin/getty -L -f /etc/issue.ttyS1 ttyS1 9600 vt100
$ finger
castor25 Jose Castor pbOct 1 17:40 (minxo.upc.es)
ceo Cercle d'Estudis Orien S1 2 Oct 1 13:57
david25 David Moya Rubiop1 6 Oct 1 13:52 (dt
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 12:26:34AM -0400, Paul Miller wrote:
>
> Are there any finger daemons available that do not require home
> directories world readable+executable? I want to beable to have a .pgpkey
> file in my home directory without being world readable+executable -- it
&g
Are there any finger daemons available that do not require home
directories world readable+executable? I want to beable to have a .pgpkey
file in my home directory without being world readable+executable -- it
doesn't even have to be suid root, all my home directories are group
rea
Fuzzy,
> we use kfingerd instead of fingerd to do that, you can set defaults as
> to what is displayed we have only fingername/account name displayed by
> default and each user can create a .fingerrc that tells the daemon
> what to return for themselves. I belive there are other similar
> products
Ben,
> I think that you want to take a look at the cfingerd package. It
> looks to me like it can do everything you want.
I will. Thanx.
Salutacions, Pere __o mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2:343/108.91 - _`\<;_ http://casal.upc.es/~pere/
PGP key
How does a user deny the information given by the finger command?
More concisely, I want the fingerd daemon running, but I do not want the
"no mail" and .plan et al info shown. I just want to tell the client that
the user is logged on. It would be better if this cou
Hi!
How does a user deny the information given by the finger command?
More concisely, I want the fingerd daemon running, but I do not want the
"no mail" and .plan et al info shown. I just want to tell the client that
the user is logged on. It would be better if this could be d
Will Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Users who are logged onto my machine in X on the console (running xdm)
> don't have a utmp (or wtmp?) entry -- they don't show up in "who" listings
[snip]
> Is this normal?
Yes. You can try adding a line "use-sessreg" to /etc/X11/config,
which the /etc/X11
Users who are logged onto my machine in X on the console (running xdm)
don't have a utmp (or wtmp?) entry -- they don't show up in "who" listings
and "finger user" shows
"last logged in (sometime) "
rather tha
On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, Mike Schmitz wrote:
>
>mike:~$ finger
>No one logged on.
>mike:~$ finger @localhost
>[localhost]
>Username Real name Idletime TTY Remote console
> location
>root root
On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, Mike Schmitz wrote:
> On Aug 14, Andrea Arcangeli wrote
> > Anybody can report my same problem?
> >
> > >arca:~$ finger
> > >No one logged on.
> > >
>
>mike:~$ finger
>No one logged on.
>mike:~$ fing
ROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: finger return "No one logged on." and I am logged..
>
> On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, David Fries wrote:
> >
> >>Are you logged in at console or with an rxvt in
Anybody can report my same problem?
Andrea Arcangeli
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 16:22:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: finger return "No one log
A. M. Varon writes:
> > directories -- I noticed that adding support to open user files as root
> > and then switch to nobody was *LAST* on their TODO list. Are there any
> > other finger daemons that have this support and are as good as cfingerd?
> >
> > Also,
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
