Well, I don't known, but now I'm using iceweasel for a while and now I'm not
taking unresponsable behaviour from him any more.
Maybe an upgrade would solved the issue
Thanks all people wanted to help
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/5/16 Celejar
Mumia W.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05/14/2008 08:57 AM, Javier Barroso
wrote:
Hi list,
Hi Javier.
Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes [unresponsive] during
three or four seconds.
First I experiment it with swiftfox, then I used Firefox (iceweasel) 2 and
the
joseph lockhart wrote:
*/Mumia W.. [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:
On 05/14/2008 08:57 AM, Javier Barroso wrote:
Hi list,
Hi Javier.
Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes
[unresponsive] during
three or four seconds.
First I experiment it
2008/5/16 Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I agree that not visiting youtube is generally good advice, independent
of its deleterious effects on FF, but on those occasions that one does
visit it, one can view the site using the browser without flash, and
download videos with youtube-dl or clive.
Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 08:21:43AM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:32:22PM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
FF, Iceweasel, Konqueror same battle (perhaps slightly better for
On Thu, 15 May 2008 02:49:13 -0500
Mumia W.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/14/2008 08:57 AM, Javier Barroso wrote:
Hi list,
Hi Javier.
Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes [unresponsive] during
three or four seconds.
...
Do what I do: disable flash, disable
Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:32:22PM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
FF is just a memory cpu hog, I used to have a machine working OK with
my own optimized kernel but QT and xfce4 + FF are just eating all and I
swap like crazy... The recommendation I collected is just add few
On 05/14/2008 08:57 AM, Javier Barroso wrote:
Hi list,
Hi Javier.
Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes [unresponsive] during
three or four seconds.
First I experiment it with swiftfox, then I used Firefox (iceweasel) 2 and
the problem didn't go out. Then I switch to
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 08:21:43AM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:32:22PM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
FF, Iceweasel, Konqueror same battle (perhaps slightly better for
konqueror but por flash support).
Well I do not want to argue no more,
Carl Fink wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 08:21:43AM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:32:22PM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
FF, Iceweasel, Konqueror same battle (perhaps slightly better for
konqueror but por flash support).
Well I do not want
Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 08:21:43AM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:32:22PM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
FF, Iceweasel, Konqueror same battle (perhaps slightly better for
konqueror but por flash
Hi list,
Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes irresponsible during
three or four seconds.
First I experiment it with swiftfox, then I used Firefox (iceweasel) 2 and
the problem didn't go out. Then I switch to iceweasel 3 from experimental,
and I see this again.
I don't know how
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:57:43PM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes irresponsible during
three or four seconds.
I think you mean nonresponsive, but I love the comment that
firefox/iceweasel is irresponsible. Perhaps its web designers who are
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:57:43PM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes irresponsible
during three or four seconds.
If you mean unresponsive, I've often found that firefox is
unresponsive during heavy I/O, especially disk I/O. There are settings
you
Javier Barroso wrote:
Hi list,
Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes irresponsible during
three or four seconds.
[snip]
I didn't install any plugin recently (only tamper data and developer
extension installed on my iceweasel)
Please double-check that you haven't got
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:57:43PM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes irresponsible
during
three or four seconds.
I think you mean nonresponsive, but I love the
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Todd A. Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:57:43PM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes irresponsible
during three or four seconds.
If you mean unresponsive, I've often found that firefox
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Kim
Please double-check that you haven't got Tamper Data enabled when you
experience these irresponsible (sic, couldn't resist...) moments of
browsing.
I disabled both, but I'm sure tamper was off when it occurs
This extension can be pretty heavy on
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:57:43PM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
Since one week ago I'm noticing firefox is sometimes irresponsible during
three or four seconds.
I think you mean nonresponsive, but I love the comment that
firefox/iceweasel is irresponsible. Perhaps its
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:32:22PM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
FF is just a memory cpu hog, I used to have a machine working OK with
my own optimized kernel but QT and xfce4 + FF are just eating all and I
swap like crazy... The recommendation I collected is just add few more
add-on
Javier Barroso wrote:
Somebody with the same problem ? Any workarround ?
I'm on dialup. Its normal for me to wait for iceweasel to grab a page
and display it.
Well, firefox load pages fast, but sometimes It takes various seconds
while I can't click any link / bookmark or google
21 matches
Mail list logo
