On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:20:26 -0400, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> Can we use a virtual qemu linux machine as a firewall for
> a real home network?
>
> I have a small network at home, with a few desktops and a DMZ and
> a linux firewall machine.
>
> Now that virtualization is wor
On 14:04 Sun 30 Mar , Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:20:26AM -0400, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> > Can we use a virtual qemu linux machine as a firewall for
> > a real home network?
>
> Well, on normal i386 hardware (unlike e.g. Zseries with LPARs),
>
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:20:26AM -0400, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> Can we use a virtual qemu linux machine as a firewall for
> a real home network?
Well, on normal i386 hardware (unlike e.g. Zseries with LPARs),
virtualization doesn't gain you any security really. Think of it this
wa
Can we use a virtual qemu linux machine as a firewall for
a real home network?
I have a small network at home, with a few desktops and a DMZ and
a linux firewall machine.
Now that virtualization is working for me, via qemu, I would like to get rid
of all the old equipment that I use for little
e DSL modem.
It's got dnsmasq and iptables. I'm saying that because I think it's
the firewall causing the problem, but I don't know for sure or why.
I am trying to run apache and tomcat servers to serve content and
apps for the internal LAN, and not externally.
Apache runs
d iptables. I'm saying that because I think it's
the firewall causing the problem, but I don't know for sure or why.
I am trying to run apache and tomcat servers to serve content and
apps for the internal LAN, and not externally.
Apache runs fine, but tomcat is very slow to load (3
think it's
the firewall causing the problem, but I don't know for sure or why.
I am trying to run apache and tomcat servers to serve content and apps
for the internal LAN, and not externally.
Apache runs fine, but tomcat is very slow to load (3 mins) when it
should be 1 or 2 seconds. I
On 03/14/2008 07:22 AM, Adam Hardy wrote:
I'm setting up a server which is a DNS server and broadband gateway for
a small LAN, having two NICs with one connected to the DSL modem.
It's got dnsmasq and iptables. I'm saying that because I think it's the
firewall causin
I'm setting up a server which is a DNS server and broadband gateway for a small
LAN, having two NICs with one connected to the DSL modem.
It's got dnsmasq and iptables. I'm saying that because I think it's the firewall
causing the problem, but I don't know for sure
Am 2008-02-24 14:24:12, schrieb steef:
> got a working firewall in my router plus shorewall installed and
> working. on my machine together no problem at all. why? the more
> security the better i guess. hope this guess is right. BTW i was under
> attack about a year ago. thi
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 06:31:08AM -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> I hope I may be allowed to expand a bit on the OP's question.
>
> What are the advantages of a hardware firewall over a firewall built
> into a router?
>
> Can one use both, or should the firewall in a rout
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 06:11:17PM +1100, Daniel Dalton wrote:
> Do I need any securety or firewalls on my debian box?
> I am going through a router.
>
> If I do what command line firewall or securety software can I use?
It depends. Do you have anything set to listen on outsid
Haines Brown wrote:
I hope I may be allowed to expand a bit on the OP's question.
What are the advantages of a hardware firewall over a firewall built
into a router?
Can one use both, or should the firewall in a router be disabled if there
is a hardware firewall?
If the OP finds th
I hope I may be allowed to expand a bit on the OP's question.
What are the advantages of a hardware firewall over a firewall built
into a router?
Can one use both, or should the firewall in a router be disabled if there
is a hardware firewall?
If the OP finds that he has a firewall i
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 06:11:17PM +1100, Daniel Dalton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do I need any securety or firewalls on my debian box?
> I am going through a router.
Many routers have integrated firewall. Does yours?
> If I do what command line firewall or securety software can I
Hi,
Do I need any securety or firewalls on my debian box?
I am going through a router.
If I do what command line firewall or securety software can I use?
Thanks,
--
Daniel Dalton
http://members.iinet.net.au/~ddalton/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
SafeSquid - Content Filtering Internet Proxy (http://
www.safesquid.com/) ?
(No, it is not built on Squid-cache)
Proxy + cache + application layer firewall + built-in connectivity to
ClamAV daemon
Description - http://www.safesquid.com/html/portal.php?page=105
Using ClamAV - http
On 2008-02-13 06:27:56 -0900, "Dennis G. Wicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Greetings!
>
> It seems the time has come to build a dedicated
> firewall machine for myself. The win 2k machine I have
> been using is getting too flaky.
>
> I have a P-II HP box tha
Andrei Popescu wrote the following on 02/14/2008 06:24 AM:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 03:52:42AM +0200, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
>
>> Is combination (proxy and anti-virus) reliable enough for other programs
>> except web browsers and ftp clients ?
>>
>> I mean programs such as instant messengers f
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 03:52:42AM +0200, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> Is combination (proxy and anti-virus) reliable enough for other programs
> except web browsers and ftp clients ?
>
> I mean programs such as instant messengers for example.
... and torrents.
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't ex
Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
Georgi Naplatanov wrote the following on 02/13/2008
10:44 AM:
Ipcop is a good choice too, but i can not understand why you need
antivirus on firewall/router machine.
http://ipcop.org/
Regards
Georgi
I need anti-virus because I have five
Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
Georgi Naplatanov wrote the following on 02/13/2008
10:44 AM:
Ipcop is a good choice too, but i can not understand why you need
antivirus on firewall/router machine.
http://ipcop.org/
Regards
Georgi
I need anti-virus because I have five (today) Windows
systems behind
Georgi Naplatanov wrote the following on 02/13/2008
10:44 AM:
> Ipcop is a good choice too, but i can not understand why you need
> antivirus on firewall/router machine.
>
> http://ipcop.org/
>
> Regards
> Georgi
I need anti-virus because I have five (today) Windows
system
2008/2/13, Georgi Naplatanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ipcop is a good choice too, but i can not understand why you need
> antivirus on firewall/router machine.
Security Gateway ?
>
> http://ipcop.org/
>
> Regards
> Georgi
>
> Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
> > Greeti
Ipcop is a good choice too, but i can not understand why you need
antivirus on firewall/router machine.
http://ipcop.org/
Regards
Georgi
Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
Greetings!
It seems the time has come to build a dedicated
firewall machine for myself. The win 2k machine I have
been using is
On 13/02/2008, Dennis G. Wicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> It seems the time has come to build a dedicated
> firewall machine for myself. The win 2k machine I have
> been using is getting too flaky.
Not tried this but http://www.untangle.com looks very inte
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:45:48 +
Matthew Macdonald-Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:27:56 -0600
> "Dennis G. Wicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Greetings!
> >
> > It seems the time has come to build a dedicated
&g
Astaro Linux may still offer free home use licenses.
--
Neil Watson
System Administrator for hire
http://watson-wilson.ca
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:27:56 -0600
"Dennis G. Wicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> It seems the time has come to build a dedicated
> firewall machine for myself. The win 2k machine I have
> been using is getting too flaky.
>
> I have a P-II HP
On Feb 13, 2008 10:27 AM, Dennis G. Wicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> It seems the time has come to build a dedicated
> firewall machine for myself. The win 2k machine I have
> been using is getting too flaky.
>
> I have a P-II HP box that was a pret
Greetings!
It seems the time has come to build a dedicated
firewall machine for myself. The win 2k machine I have
been using is getting too flaky.
I have a P-II HP box that was a pretty solid performer
that I think will do for the hardware. (Agree/disagree?)
I need some suggestions for the
On Sunday 02 December 2007, John Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a 15K Mbs connection (up/down) to my house (fiber to the home).
>
> I have a Buffalo router that connects to my WAN and then one of the LAN
> ports on this router connects to my IPCOP firewall that is running on
On Dec 4, 2007, at 6:18 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Or OpenBSD. Has a much smaller memory footprint (means less swapping)
than linux and perhaps faster as well. Also, since its a firewall,
OpenBSD is supposed to be the most secure firewall to which regular
people have access.
I also found
Doug writes:
> ...OpenBSD is supposed to be the most secure firewall to which regular
> people have access.
It's also probably the most secure firewall to which regular people don't
have access.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
ffalo router that connects to my WAN and then one of the
> >>LAN ports on this router connects to my IPCOP firewall that is
> >>running on a PII -- 400 MHz box with 64 MB of RAM.
> >>
> >>When I do a speed test from my box behind my IPCOP firewall, I get
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/07 16:59, David Brodbeck wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>>
>> On 12/03/07 16:11, Ralph Katz wrote:
>> [snip]
>>>
>>> Maybe check your NIC. What do you get for this (etch):
>>> $ grep 'link up' /var/log/dmesg
>>>
On Dec 3, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/07 16:11, Ralph Katz wrote:
[snip]
Maybe check your NIC. What do you get for this (etch):
$ grep 'link up' /var/log/dmesg
Maybe the ancient PII has an ancient ethernet card!
My (just pur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/07 16:11, Ralph Katz wrote:
[snip]
>
> Maybe check your NIC. What do you get for this (etch):
> $ grep 'link up' /var/log/dmesg
>
> Maybe the ancient PII has an ancient ethernet card!
My (just purchased) system running kernel 2.6.22 descri
On Dec 2, 2007, at 8:22 PM, John Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I have a 15K Mbs connection (up/down) to my house (fiber to the home).
I have a Buffalo router that connects to my WAN and then one of the
LAN ports
on this router connects to my IPCOP firewall that is running on a
PII -- 400
MHz box
On 12/03/2007 02:03 PM, Peter Teunissen wrote:
>
> On 3-dec-2007, at 7:25, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 12/02/07 22:22, John Schmidt wrote:
>>> When I do a speed test from my box behind my IPCOP fir
this router connects to my IPCOP firewall that is running on a
PII -- 400
MHz box with 64 MB of RAM.
When I do a speed test from my box behind my IPCOP firewall, I get
about 10K
Mbs up/down.
If I move the connection to one of the Buffalo router LAN
connections, I get
the advertised 15K Mbs
On Sunday 02 December 2007, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 09:22:44PM -0700, John Schmidt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a 15K Mbs connection (up/down) to my house (fiber to the home).
>
> ---^^^
> I've never seen this. Do you mean 15 Gbps or what?
>
> Regards,
> Andrei
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/07 22:22, John Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a 15K Mbs connection (up/down) to my house (fiber to the home).
>
> I have a Buffalo router that connects to my WAN and then one of the LAN ports
> on this router connects to
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 09:22:44PM -0700, John Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a 15K Mbs connection (up/down) to my house (fiber to the home).
---^^^
I've never seen this. Do you mean 15 Gbps or what?
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well eno
Hi,
I have a 15K Mbs connection (up/down) to my house (fiber to the home).
I have a Buffalo router that connects to my WAN and then one of the LAN ports
on this router connects to my IPCOP firewall that is running on a PII -- 400
MHz box with 64 MB of RAM.
When I do a speed test from my box
Hello
I reinstall Debian again before few weeks ago. Now I can't use the
webcam with the amsn program.
I'm using Debian stable with kernel 2.6.18-5-686 and
gspca-modules-2.6.18-5-686 and my camera is Creative Notebook PD1171.
With the mplayer software I can player video:
> mplayer tv:// -t
2007/11/5, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Is shorewall masquerading for you?
> >
> > No, I have not a public IP address yet, so I don't need it.
>
> Yes, you do. You have three networks: 192.168.1.0, 192.168.2.0, and
> 10.91.0.0. The cable modem will route from the 10.91.0.0 but won
my ISP
>|
> Cable Modem connection to my ISP
>|
> eth3
>get an IP address
> from dhcp server of my ISP
>10.91.0.xxx
>|
> PC box-1 firewall/gateway
>
eth3
get an IP address
from dhcp server of my ISP
10.91.0.xxx
|
PC box-1 firewall/gateway
=
eth1eth2
192.168.1.1 192.168.2.1
| |
2007/11/4, Raj Kiran Grandhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> You did enable IP masquerading on your gateway machine, didn't you?
No, I did not.
> Also output of "iptaples --list" on your gateway
Chain INPUT (policy DROP)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT 0-- anywhere
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 01:53:57AM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Sat Nov 03, 2007 at 19:49:40 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> > > You must chmod +x this script:
> > > # chmod +x script_name
> > >
> >
> > Thanks, but I was forced to +x the script in order to run it manually.
> > Something else is
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 07:46:20PM +0100, P?l Cs?nyi wrote:
>
> I have a Cable Modem connection to my ISP.
>
> my ISP
>|
> Cable Modem connection to my ISP
>|
> P
are executed by 'run-parts'. That
has some restrictions upon the filenames you may use. See
'man run-parts' for details.
My suggestion:
1. Name the script 'firewall'.
2. Make sure it is executable.
3. Make sure your firewall is flushed/off.
4. Run /etc/i
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 10:32:29PM +0100, Pál Csányi wrote:
> 2007/11/3, Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I use Etch. I want to install a firewall script. I found one in
> > www.debian-administration.org that establishes a transparent proxy for
> > web browsing. I
Pál Csányi wrote:
Hello!
I have a Cable Modem connection to my ISP.
my ISP
|
Cable Modem connection to my ISP
|
PC box-1 firewall/gateway
=
| |
LAN DMZ
2007/11/3, Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I use Etch. I want to install a firewall script. I found one in
> www.debian-administration.org that establishes a transparent proxy for
> web browsing. It is a script that seems to do what I want when I run
> it manually. debadm
2007/11/3, Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I use Etch. I want to install a firewall script. I found one in
> www.debian-administration.org that establishes a transparent proxy for
> web browsing. It is a script that seems to do what I want when I run
> it manually. debadm
I use Etch. I want to install a firewall script. I found one in
www.debian-administration.org that establishes a transparent proxy for
web browsing. It is a script that seems to do what I want when I run
it manually. debadmin article says to put it in /etc/network/if-up.d/
and it will be run
Hello!
I have a Cable Modem connection to my ISP.
my ISP
|
Cable Modem connection to my ISP
|
PC box-1 firewall/gateway
=
| |
LAN DMZ
| |
PC box-2
Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # Generated by iptables-save v1.3.6 on Mon Jun 18 09:55:18 2007
> *filter
> :INPUT DROP [0:0]
> :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [35639:3072343]
> -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
> -A INPUT -p icm
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:25:25AM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> Currently I'm using iptables as my main firewall, and I'm having no
> trouble with it whatsoever. But lately (Since college has started) I've
> been connecting to a lot more networks, with more peers connec
On 8/30/07, Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> I'm hoping some seasoned Debian sysadmins out there can help me by
> advising me on how to better setup iptables...My current setup is:
quite some info you can find here
Securing Debian howto
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Currently I'm using iptables as my main firewall, and I'm having no
trouble with it whatsoever. But lately (Since college has started) I've
been connecting to a lot more networks, with more peers connected. I'm
worried about someb
un with a 20 M drive?
>>> That was supposed to be 2G. Don't know where 20M came from. Wouldn't be
>>> hard, though (and it isn't running Etch).
>>>
>> You can *easily* run a Potato firewall/router on a 200MB HDD. ssh,
>> python, perl, nm
Wouldn't be
> > hard, though (and it isn't running Etch).
>
> You can *easily* run a Potato firewall/router on a 200MB HDD. ssh,
> python, perl, nmap, etc.
>
Potato is no longer supported by the secruity team. Would a potato
firewall be wise?
Doug.
--
To UNSUBSCR
h (and it isn't running Etch).
You can *easily* run a Potato firewall/router on a 200MB HDD. ssh,
python, perl, nmap, etc.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gnu
made
> for running OpenBSD on your firewall/router.
I'm not convinced that it is really more secure (except perhaps through
obscurity).
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 07:13:18AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Ivan Glushkov writes:
> > ISP <-> DSL Modem <-> Firewall <-> Router <-> home desktop & laptops
>
> You won't need a seperate router. The Debian box you are going to use as a
> fire
er I started thinking of
> adding a firewall. Since connecting my desktop between the router and
> the modem is not an option (it must run windowz due to other members of
> my family), I am thinking of buying the cheapest possible second hand
> computer which still has two free PCI s
Ari Constancio wrote:
Hi,
Wireless routers such as the venerable Linksys WRT54GL can use
3rd-party firmware like OpenWRT and voilá... instant Linux router
(with iptables and such).
Some, like the Netgear DG834, is already running Linux with iptables.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
routers should also have built-in firewall and dhcp
> > functionality.
>
> A crappy firewall with no security support made by people with a reputation
> for shipping buggy software.
> --
> John Hasler
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Ron Johnson writes:
> Most "home market" routers should also have built-in firewall and dhcp
> functionality.
A crappy firewall with no security support made by people with a reputation
for shipping buggy software.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ebody hacked into my windowz computer I started thinking of
> adding a firewall. Since connecting my desktop between the router and
> the modem is not an option (it must run windowz due to other members of
> my family), I am thinking of buying the cheapest possible second hand
> comput
Ivan Glushkov writes:
> ISP <-> DSL Modem <-> Firewall <-> Router <-> home desktop & laptops
You won't need a seperate router. The Debian box you are going to use as a
firewall will do everything the router does.
> The question is actually what is the min
sorry not celeron it is pentium-s sorry for my fault.
On 27/07/07, Semih Gokalp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have used same system in my home and i have used Celeron 133 Mhz,32 MB
> SD-Ram,2 ethernet card,1.2 and 2.1 Gb HDD for firewall(iptables for local
> LAN and W
I have used same system in my home and i have used Celeron 133 Mhz,32 MB
SD-Ram,2 ethernet card,1.2 and 2.1 Gb HDD for firewall(iptables for local
LAN and WAN) and other some services.Its enought for me.I haven't got a
problem.
On 27/07/07, Ivan Glushkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I have a 2 MBit DSL connection at home and I have more or less classical
scheme ISP <-> DSL Modem <-> Router <-> home desktop & laptops. Since
recently somebody hacked into my windowz computer I started thinking of
adding a firewall. Since connecting my desktop
Hello!
I have apache2 behind a firewall. I want to setup firewall so, that one
can it reach from the internet.
I red the documentations:
Linux 2.4 Packet Filtering HOWTO from Rusty Russell
Linux 2.4 NAT HOWTO from Rusty Russell
man iptables
Setting up a simple Debian gateway
<http://www.deb
Firewall prevented new reserved addresses (10.55.1.* and 192.168.*.*),
although it still allowed former standard IP addresses on printers.
Rather than roll with my own iptables firewall script;
on this new computer, I had used the firewall "firestarter".
I had forgotten that I even i
000 Controller (PHY/Link)
> ---
>- I've installed from the netinst cd for debian 4.0
Argh! I did a typo in the subject, should have been "firewire" not
"firewall"
Sorry.
tj
--
Tim Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Palmer
Hello:
References:
Generally: Subject - PCI controller issues and stable Debian vs latest ubuntu
Specifically: message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I disabled the onboard lan chip and put in a standalone ethernet card.
Here's two relevant lines from a current dump of lspci:
(This dump was made from a
On Thu, 03 May 2007 17:30:47 -0700, Tom Furie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
You might as well put some iptables-restore at the endo of the "up"
of each interface in /etc/network/interfaces. This lets you control
y
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> You might as well put some iptables-restore at the endo of the "up"
> of each interface in /etc/network/interfaces. This lets you control
> your firewall per interface and have only the needed rules alive.
Wou
On Wed, 02 May 2007 04:06:13 -0700, Vladi Lemurov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Distro etch, stable, i386.
I have a firewall script (based on iptables) and it works perfectly on
debian and other distros but where am I to put it? I found nothing in
debian-reference (at least gr
Well the same way, scripts and links. :) Anyway I did it the way you
offered, it works, hope I've chosen the proper place in startup sequence
:) Thanks to all!
02.05.2007 18:12:
Indeed,
try:
Put script in /etc/init.d and make it executable.
update-rc.d /etc/init.d/scriptname defaults
This a
> Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 18:06:13 +0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: debian
way to start firewall > > Hello! > Distro etch, stable, i386. > I have a
firewall script (based on iptables) and it works perfectly on > debian and
o
Hello!
Distro etch, stable, i386.
I have a firewall script (based on iptables) and it works perfectly on
debian and other distros but where am I to put it? I found nothing in
debian-reference (at least grepping "iptables" gave no answers). I
googled and found different solut
u, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:11:26AM +0200, Michael Dominok wrote:
> > >> Am Mittwoch, den 25.04.2007, 15:05 -0400 schrieb Celejar:
> > >>> Well, on this list our (including me) favorite firewall is
> > >>> Shorewall,
> > >> Well, is it? Mine's IPCop,
Firehol is pretty easy to configure for plain accept this and block that
usage.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
firewall is
Shorewall,
Well, is it? Mine's IPCop, though.
iptables here. It's a little bit tough to set up, but in the end it's
worth it in my opinion. Once you get used to the way iptables works
you can build a firewall for any system.
IPtables is *the* Linux firewall. Most of t
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 20:55 -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > Michael Pobega wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:11:26AM +0200, Michael Dominok wrote:
> > >> Am Mittwoch, den 25.04.2007, 15:05 -0400 schrieb Celejar:
> > >>> Well, on this li
r:
> >>> Well, on this list our (including me) favorite firewall is
> >>> Shorewall,
> >> Well, is it? Mine's IPCop, though.
> >>
> >
> > iptables here. It's a little bit tough to set up, but in the end it's
> > worth it
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 05:30:03PM -0500, Sam Leon wrote:
>
> Michael Dominok wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 25.04.2007, 15:05 -0400 schrieb Celejar:
>
> Well, on this list our (including me) favorite firewall is Shorewall,
>
> Well, is it? Mine's IP
Michael Dominok wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 25.04.2007, 15:05 -0400 schrieb Celejar:
Well, on this list our (including me) favorite firewall is Shorewall,
Well, is it? Mine's IPCop, though.
I have used smoothwall for 3 years now. I think I might change to
pfsense soon t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:11:26AM +0200, Michael Dominok wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, den 25.04.2007, 15:05 -0400 schrieb Celejar:
>>> Well, on this list our (including me) favorite firewall is
>>> Shorew
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:11:26AM +0200, Michael Dominok wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 25.04.2007, 15:05 -0400 schrieb Celejar:
> > Well, on this list our (including me) favorite firewall is Shorewall,
>
> Well, is it? Mine's IPCop, though.
>
iptables here. It's a lit
Am Mittwoch, den 25.04.2007, 15:05 -0400 schrieb Celejar:
> Well, on this list our (including me) favorite firewall is Shorewall,
Well, is it? Mine's IPCop, though.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:22:18AM +0100, Arnau wrote:
> Hi Philippe
> >> In my company they have a checkpoint firewall, there is a software
> >>for windows, securemote, to connect to it and stablish a VPN. I'd like
> >>to do the same from my debian box.
Hi Philippe
In my company they have a checkpoint firewall, there is a software
for windows, securemote, to connect to it and stablish a VPN. I'd like
to do the same from my debian box. I have checked on checkpoint's site
and the only thing related to linux is a quite old version f
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 08:14:29PM +0100, Arnau wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> In my company they have a checkpoint firewall, there is a software
> for windows, securemote, to connect to it and stablish a VPN. I'd like
> to do the same from my debian box. I have checked on checkpoi
701 - 800 of 2077 matches
Mail list logo
