by creating or editing
> the local.conf file in the /etc/fonts/ directory.
>
> # Check The existing default font
>
> fc-match monospace
> NotoSansMono-Regular.ttf: "Noto Sans Mono" "Regular"
>
> # edit the configuration file
>
>
to something else
(e.g., IBM Plex Mono or Courier), you can do so by creating or editing
the local.conf file in the /etc/fonts/ directory.
# Check The existing default font
fc-match monospace
NotoSansMono-Regular.ttf: "Noto Sans Mono" "Regular"
# edit the configuration
IBMPlex.
IBMPlex is what I originally planned to use and I have downloaded and
installed the font variants on my system fonts directories. I also have
a ~./fonts directory containing the ttf versions. I have not knowingly
specified anywhere that IBMPlex is my preferred font for printing a text
On 02/05/2024 15:17, Richmond wrote:
It understands the font names from xfontsel which is a major improvement
on zutty.
I have nothing against raster fonts for terminal applications, but I am
surprised that support of X Logical Font Description may be considered
as an improvement in
Sirius writes:
> Good old urxvt is quite lightweight compared to kitty.
It understands the font names from xfontsel which is a major improvement
on zutty.
urxvt -bg black -fn -*-courier-*-r-*-*-24-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
8)
In days of yore (Thu, 02 May 2024), Sirius thus quoth:
> Tab-handling is one of the things that kitty does well that I
> really like. But when it takes over ten times the memory for a single
> instance compared to urxvt - I can forego the tab-handling and have
> multiple windows instead. (Not look
In days of yore (Wed, 01 May 2024), Karl Vogel thus quoth:
> On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 08:32:31AM -0400, Sirius wrote:
> > If Debian still packages it, look for rxvt instead, or use xterm. Both
> > are well tried and well tested for when you want something.. dated. ;)
>
> I resemble that remark.
On 02/05/2024 10:11, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 09:34:13AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 01/05/2024 21:58, Sirius wrote:
I was right about .Xresources that it is one of the files used for loading
settings into the X server, but urxvt looks at .Xdefaults instead.
It is a bit
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 08:32:31AM -0400, Sirius wrote:
> If Debian still packages it, look for rxvt instead, or use xterm. Both
> are well tried and well tested for when you want something.. dated. ;)
I resemble that remark. Xterm v390 was released on 19 Feb 2024, and
building it from source
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 09:34:13AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 01/05/2024 21:58, Sirius wrote:
> >
> > I was right about .Xresources that it is one of the files used for loading
> > settings into the X server, but urxvt looks at .Xdefaults instead.
>
> It is a bit strange. Applications should
On 01/05/2024 21:58, Sirius wrote:
I was right about .Xresources that it is one of the files used for loading
settings into the X server, but urxvt looks at .Xdefaults instead.
It is a bit strange. Applications should not read these files directly.
Content should be loaded during X session st
eems to be jagged by design, but I'm running
into issues. I thought about just using Noto Mono Regular for it, as
Noto is supposed to always work and a monospaced font is recommended
for easier setting of letters, as Grub uses bitmap fonts. Now my issue
is that on one hand, the conversion to
Sirius writes:
> I can get it working with "zutty -font 12x24" and other numerically
> named fonts.
Wow that one actually worked. That's the first time I've seen a
different font in zutty!
> Trying with something like 'lucidasans-24' will make it
on
Rxvt.scrollBar_right: on
Rxvt.scrollBar_floating: on
Rxvt.saveLines: 5000
Rxvt.termName: xterm-256color
Rxvt.disablePasteBrackets: off
As per usual, getting the fonts right was the hardest part. As for memory
use..
USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
sirius 5
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 02:31:49PM +0200, Sirius wrote:
> zutty is kind of only necessary when you want something *really*
> lightweight and you do not need to worry about UTF-8. Just writing this
> means a trip down memory lane and back to configuring CTWM on old Sun 5
> workstations back in the 9
In days of yore (Wed, 01 May 2024), Richmond thus quoth:
> I am puzzled by the zutty terminal emulator. I have tried:
>
> 1186 zutty -fontpath /usr/share/fonts/X11/ -fontsize 20
> 1187 zutty -fontpath /usr/share/fonts/X11/ -font adobe
> 1190 zutty -fontpath /usr/share
I am puzzled by the zutty terminal emulator. I have tried:
1186 zutty -fontpath /usr/share/fonts/X11/ -fontsize 20
1187 zutty -fontpath /usr/share/fonts/X11/ -font adobe
1190 zutty -fontpath /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc/ -fontsize 20
1191 zutty -fontpath /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc/ -fontsize
;m running into issues. I
thought about just using Noto Mono Regular for it, as Noto is supposed to
always work and a monospaced font is recommended for easier setting of
letters, as Grub uses bitmap fonts. Now my issue is that on one hand, the
conversion to a bitmap font seems to be quite bad, the lette
On 29/1/24 22:54, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:29:57PM +0100, Franco Martelli wrote:
On 26/01/24 at 20:50, David Wright wrote:
I'll give a shout-out for Hack,¹ which I can't fault for use in
xterms. Comparingxterm -geometry 80x25+0+0 -fa hack -fs 16
with xterm -geome
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:54:44PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:29:57PM +0100, Franco Martelli wrote:
> > Those symbols are very nice, which tool have you used to insert them?
>
> Easy. I configured my CAPSLOCK key (which is useless IMO) to be
> my X compose key. So
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:29:57PM +0100, Franco Martelli wrote:
> On 26/01/24 at 20:50, David Wright wrote: > I'll give a shout-out for Hack,¹
> which I can't fault for use in > xterms. Comparing xterm -geometry 80x25+0+0
> -fa hack -fs 16 > with xterm -geometry 80x25+0 Sangu verification:
> ⓘ No
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 03:29:57PM +0100, Franco Martelli wrote:
> On 26/01/24 at 20:50, David Wright wrote:
> > I'll give a shout-out for Hack,¹ which I can't fault for use in
> > xterms. Comparingxterm -geometry 80x25+0+0 -fa hack -fs 16
> > with xterm -geometry 80x25+0+0 -fa inconsolata -f
On 26/01/24 at 20:50, David Wright wrote:
I'll give a shout-out for Hack,¹ which I can't fault for use in
xterms. Comparingxterm -geometry 80x25+0+0 -fa hack -fs 16
with xterm -geometry 80x25+0+0 -fa inconsolata -fs 18
(to make the sizes roughly the same), I find the inconsolata
stroke widt
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 01:50:38PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 26 Jan 2024 at 07:25:13 (-0500), Dan Ritter wrote:
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:32:38PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
> > The current PSI works perfectly but I don't like the pale green prompt.
> >
> > Tried
n the size)
later in the table (eg 0x256–1312) are thicker or larger, and
many single-width characters are slightly oversize and get
truncated at the top & right (eg Ŵ at 0x372, Lj 456). Mixing
fractions is ugly, too: ½ ⅓ ⅔ ¼ ¾ ⅛ ⅜ ⅝ ⅞. The ‘’ quotes
are pretty, though.
Of course, these criticism
>> I think you'll want to read things like
>> https://wiki.debian.org/MonitorDPI
> That's a rather old reference and not particularly relevant to Debian 12 /
Sorry, the information I mean to convey is that your problem is probably
an incorrect DPI info (presumably one influenced by the displa
On 1/7/23 10:27, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I think you'll want to read things like
https://wiki.debian.org/MonitorDPI
That's a rather old reference and not particularly relevant to Debian 12
/ Bookworm, and certainly not relevant to Mate desktop. It also doesn't
fix the problem with Goog
> I recently upgraded my display to a 4K monitor.
[...]
> I had the immediate problem that most text was almost too small
> to view.
I think you'll want to read things like
https://wiki.debian.org/MonitorDPI
-- Stefan
I recently upgraded my display to a 4K monitor.
I am running it with a new instance of Debian 12 under the Mate desktop,
though I think the problem happens with other desktops.
I had the immediate problem that most text was almost too small to view.
This occurred in many different application
Huzzah! Thanks for the help, Darac!
-m
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 2:58 PM Darac Marjal
wrote:
>
> On 17/11/2022 19:32, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I've done some searching but came up empty with the correct way to
> > install missing unicod
On 17/11/2022 19:32, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
Greetings,
I've done some searching but came up empty with the correct way to
install missing unicode fonts.
For example, in my terminal I type "exa -l --icons" and I see:
(that is a rectangle with the codepoint: F158)
I don
Greetings,
I've done some searching but came up empty with the correct way to install
missing unicode fonts.
For example, in my terminal I type "exa -l --icons" and I see:
(that is a rectangle with the codepoint: F158)
I don't see what F158 is supposed to represent
David Wright wrote:
...
> For 1280x720, you could try 1920x1080, or 960x540, according
> to how large you want the characters. With a screen having
> a wide aspect ratio, you might try 1600x900, 800x450, and
> so on (ie native resolution ÷ small integer).
thank you, i've already got that taken c
On Thu 10 Mar 2022 at 08:44:10 (-0500), songbird wrote:
> Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> > Did you take a look into `dmesg -l err` and `Xorg.log` in this case?
>
> no, i didn't, too hard for me to see or sit to squint at the
> screen to be able to read. the login prompt an
erminal I see a square following the face
> (screenshot attached).
To me, that's a boy chorister (butter wouldn't melt…),
except that the starched ruff should be white.
Sigh, more fonts … :)
Cheers,
David.
* On 2021 02 Dec 01:07 -0600, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:31:43PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > As for the firefox version, it manages to combine them, but
> > throws the emphasis onto the face, and just looks like a
> > mischievous kid's cartoon character.
>
> That's exa
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:31:43PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
As for the firefox version, it manages to combine them, but
throws the emphasis onto the face, and just looks like a
mischievous kid's cartoon character.
That's exactly what I look like ;)
--
Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to
avour of graphics that are gleefully being used to highlight them.
>
> My signature includes an emoji which is configured to be a reasonable
> approximation of my appearance.
… bearing in mind that what we see depends on the fonts we have
installed. Until Sunday, your emoji had the bouffant/f
On 2021-12-01, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Speaking of colour, I work at Red Hat and I have had 🎩 (U+1F3A9 TOP
> HAT) as the shell prompt character for the main RHEL virtual machine I
> use for work. At that time, my terminal did not support colour glyphs,
> and the font that was used to render th
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 09:49:15PM -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
My signature includes an emoji which is configured to be a reasonable
approximation of my appearance.
That does sound like fun, even though curmudgeons like me might consider
it frivolous. I doubt I'll have a hardware/software comb
On Tue Nov 30 11:54:48 2021 Jonathan Dowland
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 11:54:16AM -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>
>> Am I the only one who sees the irony in all this? We're living
>> in an era where the so-called "woke" generation is taking offence
>> at every perceived slight or sign of r
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 11:54:16AM -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
Am I the only one who sees the irony in all this? We're living
in an era where the so-called "woke" generation is taking offence
at every perceived slight or sign of racial or sexual discrimination,
however minor. Yet these same peo
;>
> >>>> I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA
> >>>> software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font
> >>>> installed, or do they see tofu?
> >>>
> >>> I use Gnus. I've never m
On Sun 28 Nov 2021 at 15:43:52 (-0500), Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 14:11:27 -0600 John Hasler wrote:
> > Celejar writes:
> > > ...or even "recommends" that one...
> >
> > I wrote:
> > > How do you know?
> >
> > Celejar writ
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 14:11:27 -0600
John Hasler wrote:
> Celejar writes:
> > ...or even "recommends" that one...
>
> I wrote:
> > How do you know?
>
> Celejar writes:
> > $ apt-cache rdepends fonts-recommended
> > fonts-recommended
> > R
on the desktop (who use MUA
>>>> software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font
>>>> installed, or do they see tofu?
>>>
>>> I use Gnus. I've never manually installed any emoji fonts
>>> (or any other fonts) but I see the glyphs,
Celejar writes:
> ...or even "recommends" that one...
I wrote:
> How do you know?
Celejar writes:
> $ apt-cache rdepends fonts-recommended
> fonts-recommended
> Reverse Depends:
That doesn't show recommends.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:38:19 -0600
John Hasler wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Do you have the "fonts-recommended" package installed?
>
> Celejar writes:
> > No, I had never heard of it. Do you?
>
> Yes.
>
> > No, I had never heard of it. Do you? No pack
On Sat 27 Nov 2021 at 21:50:22 (-0600), John Hasler wrote:
> Do you have the "fonts-recommended" package installed?
Obviously I'm doing something wrong (or not doing it),
as I have just installed all the fonts available in
buster that match fonts-recommended/bullseye, includin
I wrote:
> Do you have the "fonts-recommended" package installed?
Celejar writes:
> No, I had never heard of it. Do you?
Yes.
> No, I had never heard of it. Do you? No package depends on [it]...
True.
> ...or even "recommends" that one...
How do you know?
--
such a font
> > > installed, or do they see tofu?
> >
> > I use Gnus. I've never manually installed any emoji fonts (or any other
> > fonts) but I see the glyphs, not the tofu.
>
> Questions like this remind me how little I understand font handling.
> I
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 21:50:22 -0600
John Hasler wrote:
> Do you have the "fonts-recommended" package installed?
No, I had never heard of it. Do you? No package depends on or even
"recommends" that one, so I'm not sure how you would have ended up with
it insofar as y
On 2021-11-28 at 10:45, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2021 27 Nov 20:09 -0600, Celejar wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty sure Droid Sans Mono Slashed doesn't have the glyphs in
>> question, and that you must actually have the noto or similar fonts
>> installed, with som
* On 2021 27 Nov 20:09 -0600, Celejar wrote:
> I'm pretty sure Droid Sans Mono Slashed doesn't have the glyphs in
> question, and that you must actually have the noto or similar fonts
> installed, with some part of the Gnome infrastructure finding them when
> you select the
On 2021-11-27 at 22:36, Celejar wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 21:28:05 -0500
> The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2021-11-27 at 21:08, Celejar wrote:
>>> I'm pretty sure Droid Sans Mono Slashed doesn't have the glyphs in
>>> question, and that you m
. I've never manually installed any emoji fonts (or any other
> fonts) but I see the glyphs, not the tofu.
Questions like this remind me how little I understand font handling.
I read mail in mutt in xterm in fvwm in X, currently in buster, and
I see four glyphs. If I save the email in a
Do you have the "fonts-recommended" package installed?
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 21:00:35 -0600
John Hasler wrote:
> Celejar writes:
> > What does fc-list | grep noto return?
>
> 272 lines.
Sorry - see my other message in this thread. So you clearly have the
Noto fonts installed. They're not essential packages, so something you
> >> 🐮
> >
> > I'm pretty sure Droid Sans Mono Slashed doesn't have the glyphs in
> > question, and that you must actually have the noto or similar fonts
> > installed, with some part of the Gnome infrastructure finding them when
> > you select the glyph
Celejar writes:
> What does fc-list | grep noto return?
272 lines.
(No need to cc me)
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
;> I know that there is keyboard sequence in Gnome Terminal (Ctl-Shift-E
>> then Space) to bring up a menu to select Unicode glyphs.
>>
>> 🐮
>
> I'm pretty sure Droid Sans Mono Slashed doesn't have the glyphs in
> question, and that you must actually have the
27;m pretty sure Droid Sans Mono Slashed doesn't have the glyphs in
question, and that you must actually have the noto or similar fonts
installed, with some part of the Gnome infrastructure finding them when
you select the glyphs. What does "fc-list | grep noto" show? If you
have the noto fonts installed, try uninstalling them and then see if
your system can still display the glyphs.
Celejar
ch a font
> > installed, or do they see tofu?
>
> no idea what "most users" do; I am actually using sylpheed too, and I too
> have these "emoji fonts" installed. Makes life easier sometimes, when
> people use emoijis as a means of communication and just assume th
've never manually installed any emoji fonts (or any other
> fonts) but I see the glyphs, not the tofu.
What does
$ fc-list | grep noto
return?
Celejar
keyboard sequence in Gnome Terminal (Ctl-Shift-E
> > then Space) to bring up a menu to select Unicode glyphs.
> >
> > 🐮
> >
> > - Nate
>
> I use the cone e-mail client in rxvt-unicode with the Terminus bitmap font
> and I see only the icon next to `j...@debia
too use Sylpheed and get tofu. I must have mistakenly assumed emoji
> fonts would be installed by default hence this being a Sylpheed
> limitation. Thanks for enlightening!
:)
> Same issue with Sylpheed on Windows by the way, wonder if the same
> solution would work...
You can report back once you try it ;)
> Sijmen
Celejar
hat, the
first line of the signature has two squares, the third line one and the post
by Nate has a single square, too.
I can view the glyphs correctly by saving the mail as text file and opening
it with mousepad. `aptitude search ~inoto` returns the following here:
| idA fonts-noto-col
Celejar writes:
> I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA
> software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font
> installed, or do they see tofu?
I use Gnus. I've never manually installed any emoji fonts (or any other
fonts) but I see the g
Celejar :
> I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA
> software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font
> installed, or do they see tofu?
I too use Sylpheed and get tofu. I must have mistakenly assumed emoji
fonts would be installed by defa
* On 2021 26 Nov 11:36 -0600, Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 +
> Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > 👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland
> > ✎j...@debian.org
> > 🔗 https://jmtd.net
>
> I finally got tired of seeing tofu for some of the glyphs in your sig,
> so I looked up their Unic
using sylpheed too, and I too
have these "emoji fonts" installed. Makes life easier sometimes, when
people use emoijis as a means of communication and just assume that you
are able to have them displayed.
Have a nice day :-)
Michael
.-.. .. ...- . .-.. --- -. --. .- -. -.. .--.
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:06:01 +0800
Bret Busby wrote:
> On 27/11/21 2:11 am, Tixy wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 12:36 -0500, Celejar wrote:
> >> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 +
> >> Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >>> 👱🏻Jonathan Dowland
> >>> ✎ j...@debian.org
> >>> 🔗
On Sat 27 Nov 2021 at 03:06:01 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 27/11/21 2:11 am, Tixy wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 12:36 -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 +
> > > Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > 👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland
> > > > ✎j...@de
On 27/11/21 2:11 am, Tixy wrote:
On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 12:36 -0500, Celejar wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 +
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
...
👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland
✎j...@debian.org
🔗 https://jmtd.net
[...]
I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use
On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 12:36 -0500, Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 +
> Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > 👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland
> > ✎j...@debian.org
> > 🔗 https://jmtd.net
>
[...]
>
> I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA
> software, as oppo
m/unicode/miscellaneous-symbols-and-pictographs/1f471/person-with-blond-hair/
https://www.unicodepedia.com/unicode/miscellaneous-symbols-and-pictographs/1f517/link-symbol/
My MUA is Sylpheed, and it would not display those glyphs, regardless
of which of my system fonts I selected as the Sylpheed dis
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 23:50 Teemu Likonen wrote:
>
> * 2021-07-26 16:15:01-0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> > Can anyone show how to script the above conversion?
> It's not good writing style to refer to a subject or heading.
True, I don't usually do that. I apologize.
> the script itself is simple
* 2021-07-26 16:15:01-0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> Can anyone show how to script the above conversion?
It's not good writing style to refer to a subject or heading. A reader
may need to skip back to it if he didn't expect it to be referred later.
Message or document content should be clear even wit
Can anyone show how to script the above conversion?
The output should at least have the first 256 glyps, but converting to
multiple Types 1 or an acceptable PostScript Level 2 or 3 advanced type is
better (as long it can be represented in a PS printer-acceptable text file).
I have had success cre
Ritter wrote:
Xianwen Chen (?) wrote: Hi,
When I hold Ctrl and right click on uxterm, a menu shows up, where I can
click to enable TrueType fonts.
I would like to enable TrueType fonts by default.
I guess I could do it by setting it up in ~/.Xresources and use xrdb to
merge it. However, I do
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020, Brian wrote:
On Mon 19 Oct 2020 at 07:18:39 -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
Xianwen Chen (?) wrote:
Hi,
When I hold Ctrl and right click on uxterm, a menu shows up, where I can
click to enable TrueType fonts.
I would like to enable TrueType fonts by default.
I guess
On Mon 19 Oct 2020 at 07:18:39 -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Xianwen Chen (?) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When I hold Ctrl and right click on uxterm, a menu shows up, where I can
> > click to enable TrueType fonts.
> >
> > I would like to enable TrueType fo
Xianwen Chen (?) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I hold Ctrl and right click on uxterm, a menu shows up, where I can
> click to enable TrueType fonts.
>
> I would like to enable TrueType fonts by default.
>
> I guess I could do it by setting it up in ~/.Xresources an
Hi,
When I hold Ctrl and right click on uxterm, a menu shows up, where I can
click to enable TrueType fonts.
I would like to enable TrueType fonts by default.
I guess I could do it by setting it up in ~/.Xresources and use xrdb to
merge it. However, I do not know which TrueType font(s
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020, at 11:47 AM, didier gaumet wrote:
> Le 19/04/2020 à 18:45, didier gaumet a écrit :
>
> > [...] to link is to copy:[...]
>
>
> sorry: to link is not to copy
>
>
Thank you Didier, you are right, linking is not copying. Linking works for me
actually, and the article you lin
Le 19/04/2020 à 18:45, didier gaumet a écrit :
> [...] to link is to copy:[...]
sorry: to link is not to copy
Le 19/04/2020 à 16:34, Anil F Duggirala a écrit :
> Thank you Richard. As far as I can see in this link, they simply
> recommend making a link between my system fonts and the famous Fonts
> folder in drive_c/windows. My OP was about not having to do that [...]
Hello Anil,
You did men
On Fri, 2020-04-17 at 04:39 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 04/17/2020 03:01 AM, didier gaumet wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Wine#Fonts
>
> Thank you. That page and it's links seem to provide a good
> introduction
> to W
On 04/18/2020 03:15 AM, didier gaumet wrote:
there is a Debian Wiki page about Wine:
https://wiki.debian.org/Wine
(I did not provide this link before because it is less specific about fonts)
Thank you.
That answers most of the questions raised while reading
https://wiki.archlinux.org
there is a Debian Wiki page about Wine:
https://wiki.debian.org/Wine
(I did not provide this link before because it is less specific about fonts)
On 04/17/2020 03:01 AM, didier gaumet wrote:
Hello,
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Wine#Fonts
Thank you. That page and it's links seem to provide a good introduction
to WINE. Installing WINE has been on my to-do list but I never got
around to searching out suitable references.
Hello,
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Wine#Fonts
hello,
I would like to ask anyone using wine, if its possible for Wine to use
the fonts in my system?; short of copying those fonts into the
.wine/drive_c/windows/Fonts folder.
I don't know why Wine won't see fonts in my /usr/share/fonts or even in
the /usr/share/wine/fonts (which I b
Darac Marjal wrote:
>> Is there an "official" way to accomplish this via hooks in
>> initramfs-tool? Are there user/system hooks that would be preserved
>> across initramfs-tool updates and a correct/conventional way of
>> implementing them?
>>
>> This is initramfs-tools 0.13deb10u1
I don't have
On 22/02/2020 20:57, Alex Yuriev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a 4K laptop in a 12" package with Intel HD520. I have been
> running Debian 7 and Debian 8 on it for a while and now I have updated
> to Debian 10.
>
> I'm sure that you already have an idea of the issue - the
Alex Yuriev composed on 2020-02-22 15:57 (UTC-0500):
> I have a 4K laptop in a 12" package with Intel HD520. I have been running
> Debian 7 and Debian 8 on it for a while and now I have updated to Debian 10.
> I'm sure that you already have an idea of the issue - the consol
Hi,
I have a 4K laptop in a 12" package with Intel HD520. I have been running
Debian 7 and Debian 8 on it for a while and now I have updated to Debian 10.
I'm sure that you already have an idea of the issue - the console fonts on
4k are tiny, barely usable even at 32px ( does anyon
nsole-setup for installed
systems. What can I put on kernel cmdline to block this switchover to low
visibility fonts from happening in text mode installation environments?
Live Clonezilla is an easier test for this than Debian installation media, since
it allows access to a multi-vtty environment relat
; rather than relying on others to provide every last detail.
>
>
> I think I understand. I am new to debian from the Ubuntu world...
> So to sum it up... I was wanting the non contrib repos so I could download
> the TTF-MSCORE-Installer fonts aka Windows fonts. And then the oth
ebian from the Ubuntu world...
So to sum it up... I was wanting the non contrib repos so I could download the
TTF-MSCORE-Installer fonts aka Windows fonts. And then the other posters
were telling me to remove the src source line because I wouldn't need them
unless I was downloading packages
1 - 100 of 3594 matches
Mail list logo
