I suspect, if you're running Sid, that you've run into a fairly commonissue of /tmp/.ICE-unix file not belonging to root. "chmod -R
root.root/tmp/.ICE-unix" should fix this is this is the problem.I looked at the files in that folder and the folder itself. They all belong to root.
If KDM is runnin
Kent West wrote:
>There are sights ...
>
D'oh! "sites".
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David R. Litwin wrote:
>
> AFAIK
>
>
> What does that mean?
As Far As I Know.
There are sights that list the common acronyms. I don't have a link, but
if you're interested, you can just google for it.
BTW, "btw" is a TLA, just FYI.
(Sorry.)
> There is another problem, though. KDE does not
AFAIKWhat does that mean? Nonetheless, thank you for that information. It's nice to know that it won't break in the cold.
I've actually solved the mystery. It was the programme Azureus. My computer is very allergic to it. It froze every time. At least that is solved.There is another problem, though
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, David R. Litwin wrote:
> I have an interesting update. I normally use my laptop in my room, which I
> like to keep between 11 and 15 degrees centigrade. However, in the kitchen,
No current consumer computer hardware will fail to work on that temperature
range, unless it is def
I have an interesting update. I normally use my laptop in my room, which I like to keep between 11 and 15 degrees centigrade. However, in the kitchen, where I am currently, it is around 22 degrees centigrade. After three or so hours of usage, it has yet to freeze.
Could it be that the temperature i
Are you using ATI or nVidia proprietary kernel modules? If so, get rid ofthem and see if the crash goes away. If it does, you know where to direct
your complains.If you are rederening to what is currently in my kernel, I am using the standard linux-image from the Debian repository and, subsequent
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005, David R. Litwin wrote:
> I have a multithreading processor. After doing more research, I finaly
> figured out that the smp is the kernel for me.
Only if it runs whatever you like to do with your computer faster than a
non-SMP kernel. SMT (multithreading) is not always faster.
I haven't had the pleasure of running an smp kernel. Those are for Symmetricmulti processing if I'm not mistaken, and you need two processors or maybe a
dual core cpu.I have a multithreading processor. After doing more research, I finaly figured out that the smp is the kernel for me.So, I highly do
But, I do not know how> to start KDE from a console: Doing startx gives Gnome, which is not what I
> use.IIRC it's startkde (or possibly start-kde, it's been a while).This may be totally off the wall but I was recently unable to log onvia kdm after an upgrade and, to cut a long story short, it even
On Sun November 6 2005 06:30 pm, David R. Litwin wrote:
> I have a Pentium Four processor with 3.06GHz speed. As far as I can tell,
> this means that I am eligible to use a 686-smp kernel. Though in comparison
> to the non smp kernel it seems to be much faster, an odd thing is also
> happening whic
On 06/11/05, David R. Litwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a Pentium Four processor with 3.06GHz speed. As far as I can tell, this means that I am eligible to use a 686-smp kernel. Though in comparison to the non smp kernel it seems to be much faster, an odd thing is also happening which I can
I have a Pentium Four processor with 3.06GHz speed. As far as I can tell, this means that I am eligible to use a 686-smp kernel. Though in comparison to the non smp kernel it seems to be much faster, an odd thing is also happening which I can only attribute to the smp (since I have not really seen
13 matches
Mail list logo
