On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 08:44 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
netstat -atn
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:111 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:1 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:113 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN
tcp0 0
Checked:
IP_FORWARDING=On
Another things that bothering me
I am using class A network as 10.1.1.x/24, subnet 255.0.0.0
Isn't this is OK for private network?
I used this IP to set up few offices using Winblow AD and it is always working
OK
Anyone want to comment on this?
Off course any
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 04:58 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
Checked:
IP_FORWARDING=On
Another things that bothering me
I am using class A network as 10.1.1.x/24, subnet 255.0.0.0
~# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:4C:50:18:FD
is that?
Thanks
- Original Message
From: subscriptions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: Phillipus Gunawan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 25 November, 2008 3:17:31 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Shorewall with Debian
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 04:58 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 06:36 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
Thanks for the reply,
I admit, yes, it was mistake to create both NIC on the same subnet,
though I need to study more about this
'ping 10.1.1.5' on my Debian
- with eth0 only, resulting: From 10.1.1.4 icmp_seq=10 Destination
: Shorewall with Debian
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 06:36 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
Thanks for the reply,
I admit, yes, it was mistake to create both NIC on the same subnet,
though I need to study more about this
'ping 10.1.1.5' on my Debian
- with eth0 only, resulting: From 10.1.1.4
: Shorewall with Debian
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 07:00 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
Just to clear up bit mis-understanding
I did not put same IP on eth0 and eth1, they 10.1.1.1 and 10.1.1.4
But both did reside on the same subnet: 255.0.0.0
With this scenario, I assume you corrected me by saying
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 07:00 +0100, Phillipus Gunawan wrote:
Just to clear up bit mis-understanding
I did not put same IP on eth0 and eth1, they 10.1.1.1 and 10.1.1.4
But both did reside on the same subnet: 255.0.0.0
With this scenario, I assume you corrected me by saying this
configuration
8 matches
Mail list logo