But I cannot find the file /boot/grub/menu.lst
Is there another more up to date documentation ?
Thanks !
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/ch05s01.html.en#boot-initrd
But I cannot find the file /boot/grub/menu.lst
Is there another more up to date documentation ?
Thanks !
Run update-grub as root
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
But I cannot find the file /boot/grub/menu.lst
Is there another more up to date documentation ?
Thanks !
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
, there was no option in grub for it.
I then followed instructions from:
http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/ch05s01.html.en#boot-initrd
But I cannot find the file /boot/grub/menu.lst
Is there another more up to date documentation ?
Thanks !
Run update-grub as root
Neat ! Thanks.
Why
). During
installation d-i properly reported finding Vista. However after
reboot, there was no option in grub for it.
I then followed instructions from:
http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/ch05s01.html.en#boot-initrd
But I cannot find the file /boot/grub/menu.lst
On Ma, 21 sep 10, 17:41:53, Eric Viseur wrote:
Since Squeeze Grub2 (1.98 actually) is used instead of Grub. Use
update-grub2.
,[ /usr/sbin/update-grub2 ]
| #!/bin/sh
| set -e
| exec update-grub $@
`
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
My bad. It was a hard day with lots of beer =D
But doesn't change the fact you shouldn't touch /boot anymore, everything is
done in /etc/default/grub and /etc/grub.d then processed by update-grub(2).
2010/9/21 Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com
On Ma, 21 sep 10, 17:41:53, Eric Viseur
/releases/testing/amd64/ch05s01.html.en#boot-initrd
But I cannot find the file /boot/grub/menu.lst
Is there another more up to date documentation ?
Thanks !
I have mentioned before, but I don't remember on which list, that the
PCLINUXOS live CD in the
live section (as well as the installed
2010/1/9 s. keeling keel...@nucleus.com:
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com:
What is your 40... entry?
Generic chainloader +1 stuff:
# OpenBSD 4.6 on /dev/hda1
title OpenBSD 4.6
root (hd0,0)
savedefault
makeactive
chainloader +1
This is on menu.lst:
title
' /boot/grub/menu.lst # or something
update-grub # less /boot/grub/grub.cfg
I hope that you are sed-ing
/etc/grub.d/40_custom
to correct your OBSD entry :)
That has no /dev/xxx anything in it.
Found out after some googling that update-grub does
noobs complain about. grub2 may be beta, but it's been
there some time now, yes?
I've a few leads to track down now:
sed '%s/hda/sda/g' /boot/grub/menu.lst # or something
update-grub # less /boot/grub/grub.cfg
Fun.
--
Any technology
What is your 40... entry?
Generic chainloader +1 stuff:
(1a) There is no (hd0,0) in grub2. sda = (hd0,1), etc
Ah! This is a most informative/educational reply, thanks.
You're welcome.
I've a few leads to track down now:
sed '%s/hda/sda/g' /boot/grub/menu.lst # or something
and OpenBSD 4.6.
How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before.
I can create it, but I'm expecting you to tell me it's been moved or
renamed or $(debian_gotcha\'d) or something.
Additionally, I think
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com:
What is your 40... entry?
Generic chainloader +1 stuff:
# OpenBSD 4.6 on /dev/hda1
title OpenBSD 4.6
root (hd0,0)
savedefault
makeactive
chainloader +1
Are you loading the ufs module(s)?
Never heard of 'em. Will research,
Klistvud quotati...@aliceadsl.fr:
Dne, 08. 01. 2010 01:32:32 je s. keeling napisal(a):
Thanks. That's looking very tempting at the moment. So far, I've not
solved it.
It would not be unwise to switch to Grub 2 (the new Grub that's slowly
becoming the default in many distros). It
What is your 40... entry?
Generic chainloader +1 stuff:
# OpenBSD 4.6 on /dev/hda1
title OpenBSD 4.6
root (hd0,0)
savedefault
makeactive
chainloader +1
Are you loading the ufs module(s)?
Never heard of 'em. Will research, thanks.
(1a) There is no
Dne, 08. 01. 2010 01:32:32 je s. keeling napisal(a):
Thanks. That's looking very tempting at the moment. So far, I've not
solved it.
It would not be unwise to switch to Grub 2 (the new Grub that's slowly
becoming the default in many distros). It stores its configuration in
the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before.
You might be interested in grub-legacy, which is the grub you are
used to.
Thanks. That's looking very tempting at the moment. So far, I've not
solved it.
--
Any
Paul E Condon pecon...@mesanetworks.net:
On 20100106_033032, s. keeling wrote:
first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6.
How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before
first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6.
How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before.
Testing uses grub2 by default.
# update-grubcr
creates a new grub.cfg file
I'm new to testing. I've been running stable on primary box and (eg.)
sid on sandbox for years. This is testing is on my sandbox for the
first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6.
How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
doesn't exist
s. keeling wrote:
I'm new to testing. I've been running stable on primary box and (eg.)
sid on sandbox for years. This is testing is on my sandbox for the
first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6.
How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before.
I can create it, but I'm expecting you to tell me it's been moved or
renamed or $(debian_gotcha\'d) or something.
Replaced by grub.cfg . But Grub2 is run by scripts in /etc/default
(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6.
How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before.
I can create it, but I'm expecting you to tell me it's been moved or
renamed or $(debian_gotcha\'d) or something
the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst
doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before.
I can create it, but I'm expecting you to tell me it's been moved or
renamed or $(debian_gotcha\'d) or something.
Additionally, I think you can drop the relevant boot line into
/etc
? /boot/grub/menu.lst
doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before.
I can create it, but I'm expecting you to tell me it's been moved or
renamed or $(debian_gotcha\'d) or something.
I've $(googled) site:lists.debian.org debian testing grub menu.lst
to no avail
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:17:40PM -0800, Alan Ianson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 20:52 -0800, Freeman wrote:
Grub2 is the recommended default but still considered under development. So
was legacy I guess, it never reached V 1.0 . However, legacy still gives me
control over the look of an
8.10, and even
there the kernel was listed as that of Ubuntu..!!!
How do I change this title to that of my own?
How to customize the kernel title in /boot/grub/menu.lst automatically
without user interven?
Its a fair thing that if i customize a kernel according to my need, I should
be able to use
Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.26 (single-user
mode)*in /boot/grub/menu.lst
I installed this kernel image on my live cd, and then installed it to my
hdd.
Inspite of me making modifications to the kernel, its still showing *title
Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.26 (single-user mode)* in the grub
Hello,
i'm wondering if there's a alternative groot directive similar to
altoptions in menu.lst?
Background:
I'm running /boot on a software RAID-1
md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1])
and i'd like to have a fallback menu item in menu.lst like this:
default 0
fallback1
Hello,
i'm wondering if there's a alternative groot directive similar to
altoptions?
Background:
I'm running /boot on a software RAID-1
md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1])
and i'd like to have a fallback menu item in menu.lst liek this:
default 0
fallback1
title
J'ai effectué les modifications dans menu.lst puis j'ai lancé un update-grub et
tout s'est bien passé.
J'en ai profité pour passer à grub2 et ça marche aussi bien que j'ai dû ajouter
à la main les options du noyeau, il n'y a pas de migration automatique.
Merci,
Mickaël
Selon Nicolas Dandrimont
proposer les choix lilo).
Du coup, je pense remettre un grub sur /dev/hda, avec un fichier de conf que
les upgrade ne toucheront pas (un menu.lst
sur /home par ex), et des grub normaux (avec conf dans /boot/grub/menu.lst)
pour chaque distrib dans les
différents /dev/hdaX, en cas de pb je pourrai
Bonjour,
J'ai fait un upgrade récemment sur ma lenny et au reboot suivant j'ai eu la
désagréable surprise d'avoir une erreur grub 15. Le fichier menu.lst de grub a
été modifié lors de l'upgrade, pas de la bonne manière et grub réinstallé.
Je suppose que j'ai modifié la configuration des mes
* vera.mick...@free.fr vera.mick...@free.fr [2009-03-28 20:14:53 +0100]:
Bonjour,
Bonsoir,
[...]
Où puis-je mettre à jour ces informations pour que cela se passe bien à la
prochaine mise à jour.
Autre question sur le même sujet, où renseigner les paramètres du noyeau pour
qu'ils ne
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:01:29PM +, andy wrote:
## If you want special options for specific kernels use kopt_x_y_z
## e.g. kopt=root=/dev/hda1 ro
## kopt_2_6_8=root=/dev/hdc1 ro
## kopt_2_6_8_2_686=root=/dev/hdc2 ro
# kopt=root=/dev/hda1 ro quiet
It is
Jeff D:
You really shouldn't have to add anything to see 2G of ram. If you
aren't I suspect that there is something else going on with your system.
It's a hardware and/or Linux bug.
J.
--
I no longer believe in father christmas but have no trouble
comprehending a nuclear apocalypse.
Hi all
I'm seeking some advice on the best option to enable my 2.6.22-3-686
kernel to utilise the 2Gb RAM properly.
What is the best tweak to the /boot/grub/menu.lst file in order to
enable my kernel to recognise and utilise the additional RAM? Looking
through this file, the relevant
andy wrote:
Hi all
I'm seeking some advice on the best option to enable my 2.6.22-3-686
kernel to utilise the 2Gb RAM properly.
What is the best tweak to the /boot/grub/menu.lst file in order to
enable my kernel to recognise and utilise the additional RAM? Looking
through this file
Jochen Schulz wrote:
andy:
What is the best tweak to the /boot/grub/menu.lst file in order to
enable my kernel to recognise and utilise the additional RAM? Looking
through this file, the relevant section appears to be this commented
part:
## should update-grub create memtest86 boot
andy:
What is the best tweak to the /boot/grub/menu.lst file in order to
enable my kernel to recognise and utilise the additional RAM? Looking
through this file, the relevant section appears to be this commented
part:
## should update-grub create memtest86 boot option
## e.g
Jeff D wrote:
andy wrote:
Hi all
I'm seeking some advice on the best option to enable my 2.6.22-3-686
kernel to utilise the 2Gb RAM properly.
What is the best tweak to the /boot/grub/menu.lst file in order to
enable my kernel to recognise and utilise the additional RAM? Looking
through
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:35:14 -0400, KS wrote:
Is there a way that each of them can update grub (initrd, vmlinuz,
menu.lst etc.) automatically upon a kernel upgrade?
Simple, run
update-grub
after you've upgraded your kernel. Ref:
Bonsoir,
Suite à un upgrade je suis passé au noyau:
Linux ServerDebian 2.6.21-2-686 #1 SMP Wed Jul 11 03:53:02 UTC 2007 i686
GNU/Linux
et depuis je ne vois plus mon fichier /boot/grub/menu.lst !!!
Pire le répertoire /boot semble vide. !!!
very strange, je peut faire un cd /boot mais un ls
Mark a écrit :
Bonsoir,
Suite à un upgrade je suis passé au noyau:
Linux ServerDebian 2.6.21-2-686 #1 SMP Wed Jul 11 03:53:02 UTC 2007
i686 GNU/Linux
et depuis je ne vois plus mon fichier /boot/grub/menu.lst !!!
Pire le répertoire /boot semble vide. !!!
very strange, je peut faire un cd
Mark a écrit :
Bonsoir,
Suite à un upgrade je suis passé au noyau:
Linux ServerDebian 2.6.21-2-686 #1 SMP Wed Jul 11 03:53:02 UTC 2007 i686
GNU/Linux
et depuis je ne vois plus mon fichier /boot/grub/menu.lst !!!
[...]
PS en bootant avec un noyau 2.6.18 /boot/grub/menu.lst est normalement
Si tu as le choix du noyau au boot, c'est que grub voit bien son
/boot/grub/menu.lst.
Si tu ne le vois plus après le boot, c'est (comme disait Daniel)
probablement que /boot n'est pas monté.
Ou que tu as monté un répertoire vide par au-dessus de ton /boot
Amicalement,
Olivier
--
Lisez la
Hi all,
I have been trying to find out how to get grub updated for both
Debian(Sid) and the recently installed Gutsy(pre-release). Ubuntu's
installed installed Grub on hd0 automatically without prompting and I
had to reinstall it using Debian's /boot.
Is there a way that each of them can update
Hi,
Anybody understand the relation between these 2?
Mondo insists on /etc/grub.conf and that is what you get to edit on a
restore from CD.
But it seems that Debian only uses /boot/grub/menu.lst and that is what
update-grub updates.
Anybody?
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
I saw /etc/grub.conf once (maybe under Ubuntu). It seems that
/etc/grub.conf is just a link of /boot/grub/menu.lst or
/boot/grub/grub.conf.
On 9/2/07, Hugo Vanwoerkom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Anybody understand the relation between these 2?
Mondo insists on /etc/grub.conf
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 09:54:07AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Mondo insists on /etc/grub.conf and that is what you get to edit on a
restore from CD.
Other distributions store it here; notably Fedora.
But it seems that Debian only uses /boot/grub/menu.lst and that is what
update-grub
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 09:54:07AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Anybody understand the relation between these 2?
Mondo insists on /etc/grub.conf and that is what you get to edit on a
restore from CD.
But it seems that Debian only uses /boot/grub/menu.lst and that is what
update-grub
应富鸣 wrote:
I saw /etc/grub.conf once (maybe under Ubuntu). It seems that
/etc/grub.conf is just a link of /boot/grub/menu.lst or
/boot/grub/grub.conf.
But if you make it a link you get an infinite loop when using the mondo
restore CD: it has to be a regular file.
On 9/2/07, Hugo
On 9/2/07, Hugo Vanwoerkom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
应富鸣 wrote:
I saw /etc/grub.conf once (maybe under Ubuntu). It seems that
/etc/grub.conf is just a link of /boot/grub/menu.lst or
/boot/grub/grub.conf.
I have no clue about mondo... But the thing is that grub-legacy (I
think it is still
on the partitions, so I went
back and reloaded sarge and changed the fstab to the LABEL configuration. When
I reboot everything works fine. However, when I then try changing the
/boot/grub/menu.lst to use the LABEL configuration, like so:
kernel/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.27-3-386 root=LABEL=root ro
and yes
using labels on
the partitions, so I went back and reloaded sarge and changed the fstab
to the LABEL configuration. When I reboot everything works fine.
However, when I then try changing the /boot/grub/menu.lst to use the
LABEL configuration, like so:
kernel/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.27-3-386 root
Suppose that a machine has Windows installed on
hda and Debian on hdb. The menu.lst on a grub
installation diskette is configured appropriately and
copied to /dev/hda/boot/grub/menu.lst.
grub-install /dev/hda is executed.
Will grub then know to use the menu.lst on hdb?
If so, how does grub
Suppose that a machine has Windows installed on
hda and Debian on hdb. The menu.lst on a grub
installation diskette is configured appropriately and
copied to /dev/hdb/boot/grub/menu.lst,
not to /dev/hda/boot/grub/menu.lst.
grub-install /dev/hda is executed.
Will grub then know to use
2006/8/4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Suppose that a machine has Windows installed on
hda and Debian on hdb. The menu.lst on a grub
installation diskette is configured appropriately and
copied to /dev/hda/boot/grub/menu.lst.
this is not a real path, how did you do it.
grub-install
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose that a machine has Windows installed on
hda and Debian on hdb. The menu.lst on a grub
installation diskette is configured appropriately and
copied to /dev/hdb/boot/grub/menu.lst,
not to /dev/hda/boot/grub/menu.lst.
grub-install /dev/hda is executed
Ola pessoal!
Como eu fasso para editar o boot/grub/menu.lst? Eu tentei o comando cat
e gedit mas ambos nao deram certo, apenas para visualizar...
[]s!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tem que ser como root.-- Hercules Ramos Veloso de Freitas
On 5/11/06, Alan Hoffmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ola pessoal!
Como eu fasso para editar o boot/grub/menu.lst? Eu tentei o comando cat
e gedit mas ambos nao deram certo, apenas para visualizar...
Voce quer editar ou visualizar?
Voce precisa usar editores de arquivos como o VI e o NANO
Em 11/05/06, Alan Hoffmeister[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Ola pessoal!
Como eu fasso para editar o boot/grub/menu.lst? Eu tentei o comando cat
e gedit mas ambos nao deram certo, apenas para visualizar...
tava logado como root?
o arquivo é texto normal. basta editar e pronto.
no máaaximo
Olá Alan,
Para editar o arquivo utilize um EDITOR e não um vizualizador.
Tente o vi, mcedit..
E defina fasso ?!?! -- catimLinux user #384150Seja livre! Use Linuxhttp://www.debian.org
Alan Hoffmeister escreveu:
Como eu fasso para editar o boot/grub/menu.lst? Eu tentei o comando cat
e gedit mas ambos nao deram certo, apenas para visualizar...
Provavelmente você estava acessando esse arquivo sem ser root.
Use o comando su e edite o arquivo com um editor de textos (VI/Vim
Alan Hoffmeister escreveu:
Ola pessoal!
Como eu fasso para editar o boot/grub/menu.lst? Eu tentei o comando
cat e gedit mas ambos nao deram certo, apenas para visualizar...
[]s!
usa o mcedit na linha de comando ou usa mc para navegar até o arquivo e
depois f4 para editar.
--
Cap Geovani
Hercules Ramos Veloso de Freitas escreveu:
Tem que ser como root.
--
Hercules Ramos Veloso de Freitas
como root:
vi /boot/grub/menu.lst
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am rebuilding a 2.6.5 Debian system and everything is
working properly so far. The system had ext2 file systems and used
lilo and now has a ext3 journalling file system on the master drive.
It also uses the grub boot loader and appears to be healthy.
Before I rebuilt it, I used scsi
: : UC ::: :
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 02:29:48PM -0500, David Rios wrote:
Hola listeros.
Hace algún tiempo me he preguntado por qué en Debian el
archivo de configuración de inicio con Grub, menu.lst,
se encuentra en /boot y no en /etc
Hola listeros.
Hace algún tiempo me he preguntado por qué en Debian el
archivo de configuración de inicio con Grub, menu.lst,
se encuentra en /boot y no en /etc tal como lo indica
el Filesystem Hierarchy Standard?
--
David Rios R.
Ingeniero I+D
Satrack Inc. de Colombia
El mar, 08-03-2005 a las 14:29 -0500, David Rios escribió:
Hola listeros.
Hace algún tiempo me he preguntado por qué en Debian el
archivo de configuración de inicio con Grub, menu.lst,
se encuentra en /boot y no en /etc tal como lo indica
el Filesystem Hierarchy Standard?
Puede ser
Le Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 12:36:57AM -0800, Freddy Freeloader ecrit :
Francois Cerbelle wrote:
Except one thing : both kernel certainly dont have support for you
root partition filesystem, but the Debian one can find the appropriate
module in its initrd. I bet that your kernel doesnt have either
Francois Cerbelle wrote:
Le Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 12:36:57AM -0800, Freddy Freeloader ecrit :
Francois Cerbelle wrote:
Except one thing : both kernel certainly dont have support for you
root partition filesystem, but the Debian one can find the appropriate
module in its initrd. I bet that your
Francois Cerbelle wrote:
Le Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 03:42:27PM -0800, Freddy Freeloader ecrit :
I made a dual boot system out of a Win2K box I had. I installed sarge
and everything worked great. I could boot to both Debian and Win2K.
I did that install with the sarge installer and the 2.4.26
Eriberto wrote:
A suggestion. Why you don't install kernel wich apt-get install
kernel-image-2.6.8-1-i686? I think your compilation don't has success.
Freddy Freeloader escreveu:
I did that install with the sarge installer and the 2.4.26 kernel. I
later installed the 2.6.9 kernel from source.
Ok, I understand. However, I use kernel-images and I don't have
problems. My USB ports works fine!
Regards,
Eriberto
Freddy Freeloader escreveu:
I don't like the pre-compiled kernel-images. I have tried three of
them and have had a lot of problems with each of them. I've compiled
about a
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I made a dual boot system out of a Win2K box I had. I installed sarge
and everything worked great. I could boot to both Debian and Win2K.
I did that install with the sarge installer and the 2.4.26 kernel. I
later installed the 2.6.9 kernel from source. My problem is
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I made a dual boot system out of a Win2K box I had. I installed sarge
and everything worked great. I could boot to both Debian and Win2K.
I did that install with the sarge installer and the 2.4.26 kernel. I
I made a dual boot system out of a Win2K box I had. I installed sarge
and everything worked great. I could boot to both Debian and Win2K.
I did that install with the sarge installer and the 2.4.26 kernel. I
later installed the 2.6.9 kernel from source. My problem is that now I
get a kernel
A suggestion. Why you don't install kernel wich apt-get install
kernel-image-2.6.8-1-i686? I think your compilation don't has success.
Freddy Freeloader escreveu:
I did that install with the sarge installer and the 2.4.26 kernel. I
later installed the 2.6.9 kernel from source. My problem is
Le Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 03:42:27PM -0800, Freddy Freeloader ecrit :
I made a dual boot system out of a Win2K box I had. I installed sarge
and everything worked great. I could boot to both Debian and Win2K.
I did that install with the sarge installer and the 2.4.26 kernel. I
later
82 matches
Mail list logo
