Re: Borked e-mail threading [Was Re: HylaFax receives rubbish]

2004-08-26 Thread S.D.A.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 11:50:39AM -0400 or thereabouts, Chris Metzler wrote: > On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:26:50 -0400 > "S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:01:00PM -0700 or thereabouts, Rodney D. Myers > > wrote: > > > >> Not according to Sylpheed. Both times he starte

Re: Borked e-mail threading [Was Re: HylaFax receives rubbish]

2004-08-26 Thread Wayne Topa
" where > I won't see it any more. Now all you have to do John if get them to fix the To: & Cc: problem. From: John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:38:35 +0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Borked e-mail threading [W

Re: Borked e-mail threading [Was Re: HylaFax receives rubbish]

2004-08-26 Thread Chris Metzler
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:26:50 -0400 "S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:01:00PM -0700 or thereabouts, Rodney D. Myers > wrote: > >> Not according to Sylpheed. Both times he started new threads > > That's one of the reasons why I dropped Sylpheed early on! Except I us

Re: HylaFax receives rubbish

2004-08-26 Thread Chris Metzler
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:01:00 -0700 "Rodney D. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:52:01 -0400 >Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:24:06 +1000 >>Clement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Wayne Topa wrote: On both occasions you hi-jacked ano

Re: Borked e-mail threading [Was Re: HylaFax receives rubbish]

2004-08-26 Thread John Summerfield
S.D.A. wrote: On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:01:00PM -0700 or thereabouts, Rodney D. Myers wrote: Not according to Sylpheed. Both times he started new threads That's one of the reasons why I dropped Sylpheed early on! If one has an e-mail client that does real threading, which uses the message-

Borked e-mail threading [Was Re: HylaFax receives rubbish]

2004-08-26 Thread S.D.A.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:01:00PM -0700 or thereabouts, Rodney D. Myers wrote: > Not according to Sylpheed. Both times he started new threads That's one of the reasons why I dropped Sylpheed early on! If one has an e-mail client that does real threading, which uses the message-id, then those m

Re: HylaFax receives rubbish

2004-08-26 Thread Clement
Tim Kelley wrote: On Tuesday 24 August 2004 10:56, Clement wrote: Just tried Hylafax. After spending hours to play around, I finally got Hyafax to receive fax. However, the pages received are just rubbish. When I setup Hylafax to email received fax as a PDF to me, that PDF is a totally white

Re: HylaFax receives rubbish

2004-08-26 Thread Wayne Topa
Rodney D. Myers([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:52:01 -0400 > Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:24:06 +1000 > > Clement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Wayne Topa wrote: > > >> > > >>On both occasions you hi-jacked another

Re: HylaFax receives rubbish

2004-08-25 Thread Rodney D. Myers
by "Replying" to an existing message in > the list rather than by posting an entirely new message. > > The first time you posted your HylaFax problems, you did so by > replying to a post of Paul Condon's in the "ALSA setup problem" > thread. This is made c

Re: HylaFax receives rubbish

2004-08-25 Thread Tim Kelley
On Tuesday 24 August 2004 10:56, Clement wrote: > Just tried Hylafax. After spending hours to play around, I finally got > Hyafax to receive fax. However, the pages received are just rubbish. When > I setup Hylafax to email received fax as a PDF to me, that PDF is a totally > white page. > > Do

Re: HylaFax receives rubbish

2004-08-25 Thread Wayne Topa
Clement([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > Wayne Topa wrote: > > >Clement([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > > > > >>Just tried Hylafax. After spending hours to play around, I finally got > >>Hyafax to receive fax. However, the pages received are just rubbish. > >>W

Re: HylaFax receives rubbish

2004-08-25 Thread Chris Metzler
ead. This is made clear by the "References:" header in that email: } From: Clement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> } Subject: HylaFax receives rubbish } References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> } } Just tried Hylafax. After spending hours to pla

Re: HylaFax receives rubbish

2004-08-25 Thread Clement
Wayne Topa wrote: Clement([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: Just tried Hylafax. After spending hours to play around, I finally got Hyafax to receive fax. However, the pages received are just rubbish. When I setup Hylafax to email received fax as a PDF to me, that PDF is a totall

Re: HylaFax receives rubbish

2004-08-25 Thread Wayne Topa
Clement([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > Just tried Hylafax. After spending hours to play around, I finally got > Hyafax to receive fax. However, the pages received are just rubbish. > When I setup Hylafax to email received fax as a PDF to me, that PDF is a > totally white page.

HylaFax receives rubbish

2004-08-25 Thread Clement
Just tried Hylafax. After spending hours to play around, I finally got Hyafax to receive fax. However, the pages received are just rubbish. When I setup Hylafax to email received fax as a PDF to me, that PDF is a totally white page. Do you know where can I start to find and fix the problem?

HylaFax receives rubbish

2004-08-24 Thread Clement
Just tried Hylafax. After spending hours to play around, I finally got Hyafax to receive fax. However, the pages received are just rubbish. When I setup Hylafax to email received fax as a PDF to me, that PDF is a totally white page. Do you know where can I start to find and fix the problem? De