It seems I have found out the cause:
My script is simple:
It does Masquerading
It allows the client to visit ONLY one Web site.
So for FORWARD chain, all traffic is blocked except from/to the Web
site and 2 DNS servers. These are OK with sarge (kernel 2.4) and etch
(kernel 2.6)
for INPUT and OUTPU
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 08:49:23PM +, thveillon.debian wrote:
> Long Wind a écrit :
> > "nf_conntrack*" does not exist in "modprobe -l " listing
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:54 AM, thveillon.debian
> > wrote:
> >> I don't run Etch, but my guess would be to check the modules names with
>
Long Wind a écrit :
> "nf_conntrack*" does not exist in "modprobe -l " listing
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:54 AM, thveillon.debian
> wrote:
>> I don't run Etch, but my guess would be to check the modules names with
>> modprobe -l , see if the ip_conntrack* haven't been renamed in
>> "nf_conntra
"nf_conntrack*" does not exist in "modprobe -l " listing
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:54 AM, thveillon.debian
wrote:
> I don't run Etch, but my guess would be to check the modules names with
> modprobe -l , see if the ip_conntrack* haven't been renamed in
> "nf_conntrack*" for instance...
>
> Tom
>
Long Wind a écrit :
> I don't use KDE
> I hate those big software that are not very useful
> My requirement is simple: masquerading that allow clients to visit
> only some sites.
> My script works in sarge!
> Is there anyone that can make a few correction to make my script work in etch?
>
I don't
I don't use KDE
I hate those big software that are not very useful
My requirement is simple: masquerading that allow clients to visit
only some sites.
My script works in sarge!
Is there anyone that can make a few correction to make my script work in etch?
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 7:38 AM, thveillon
Long Wind wrote :
> I install shorewall on etch
> but I have not found it useful
> My configuration is Masquerade that allow client machine to visit only
> some sites.
>
> Can you recommend other frontends?
>
Hi, FWIW I have used "guidedog" as a masquerading frontend, together
with guarddog for
I have a script
>> It is copy and modify from IP Masquerade howto
>> It allows clients to visit only one site
>> It works in sarge (kernel 2.4), but not in etch (kernel 2.6)
>>
>> Attached is the script
>
> Instead of going with some script from some site you
On Sat,28.Mar.09, 03:20:25, Long Wind wrote:
> I have a script
> It is copy and modify from IP Masquerade howto
> It allows clients to visit only one site
> It works in sarge (kernel 2.4), but not in etch (kernel 2.6)
>
> Attached is the script
Instead of going with some scr
I have a script
It is copy and modify from IP Masquerade howto
It allows clients to visit only one site
It works in sarge (kernel 2.4), but not in etch (kernel 2.6)
Attached is the script
im2
Description: Binary data
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:19:14PM -0800, Ken Irving wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:44:57AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 08:13:29PM -0700, Serena Cantor wrote:
> > > I have set up IP Masquerade, but how can server find out all IPs clients
> >
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:44:57AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 08:13:29PM -0700, Serena Cantor wrote:
> > I have set up IP Masquerade, but how can server find out all IPs clients
> > visit?
> >
> > (I have read Network Admin Guide, but it's
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 08:13:29PM -0700, Serena Cantor wrote:
> I have set up IP Masquerade, but how can server find out all IPs clients
> visit?
>
> (I have read Network Admin Guide, but it's long and I'm busy. Hope someone
> can give short answer.
I have set up IP Masquerade, but how can server find out all IPs clients visit?
(I have read Network Admin Guide, but it's long and I'm busy. Hope someone can
give short answer.
Thanks!)
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail ha
Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 03:46:06PM +1100, Russell wrote:
Hi all,
I have a PC (PC_1) connected to the ISP via dialup ppp (DHCP assigned
address). PC_1 also has an ethernet card: 192.168.0.1
Another PC (PC_2: 192.168.0.2) connects to PC_1 via ethernet.
Can i access my ISPs DNS
I supposed you could set something up with ssh, so PC1 tunnels a port to
its own DNS port via sshd, but it's going to be significantly harder and
less useful than ipmasq.
ap
--
Andrew J Perrin - http://www.unc.edu/~aperrin
Assist
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 03:46:06PM +1100, Russell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a PC (PC_1) connected to the ISP via dialup ppp (DHCP assigned
> address). PC_1 also has an ethernet card: 192.168.0.1
>
> Another PC (PC_2: 192.168.0.2) connects to PC_1 via ethernet.
>
> Can i access my ISPs DNS serv
Hi all,
I have a PC (PC_1) connected to the ISP via dialup ppp (DHCP assigned
address). PC_1 also has an ethernet card: 192.168.0.1
Another PC (PC_2: 192.168.0.2) connects to PC_1 via ethernet.
Can i access my ISPs DNS servers on PC_2 just with some static rules
set up on PC_1, or does PC_1 need
hat I can reference?
Yes there is - in fact b/c of your email last night i compiled a 2.4.20
kernel and followed the tldp howto:
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/other-formats/html_single/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO.html
I use rp-pppoe for my DSL connection so I also included the options
found
Please disregard my previous email. On my fifth kernel compile, I now
have ipmasquerading. I enabled and included everything under the sun
with regard to ppp, iptables, ipchains, and ipmasquerading. Undoubtedly,
I have a bloated kernel with features I don't need, but it works now.
I now need to
Thanks for the reply. I'm still in a quandary. I have installed
.deb packages for iptables and ipmasq. I believe I have enabled
the appropriate kernel options (there seem to be many more options
in the 2.4 series kernel). I regret to say that I am ignorant of
the intricacies of the iptables pac
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 09:21:03AM -0600, Russ Cook wrote:
> I recently took the plunge and upgraded the kernel on that machine
> from 2.2.19 to 2.4.20. Now, it no longer provides internet access
> for the lan. From the gateway's console, I can access the internet,
> so ppp is working. The machi
On 2002.12.22 15:21 Russ Cook wrote:
I have a home network of 5 machines running Linux (for me) and
Windows (for wife and son). I have a masquerading gateway machine
for internet access. I update this machine rarely, as problems
encountered affect the whole family.
I recently took the plunge an
Russ Cook wrote:
I have a home network of 5 machines running Linux (for me) and
Windows (for wife and son). I have a masquerading gateway machine
for internet access. I update this machine rarely, as problems
encountered affect the whole family.
I recently took the plunge and upgraded the kerne
I have a home network of 5 machines running Linux (for me) and
Windows (for wife and son). I have a masquerading gateway machine
for internet access. I update this machine rarely, as problems
encountered affect the whole family.
I recently took the plunge and upgraded the kernel on that machine
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:16:55AM -0400, Jim Hribar wrote:
> Installed ipmasq (apt-get install ipmasq) and it does not seem to be
> working. The error message that puzzles me is:
>
> Initializing IP Masquerading...IP Masquerade has not been enabled in the
> kernel.
>
Here's a set of rules I did for ipmasq.
Replace all the /etc/ipmasq/rules files with these ones to get
ip masquerade + packet filter.
it protects against spoof & flood, as well as against manyu other
attacks..
Sam
- Original Message -
From: "Osamu Aoki" <[EMAIL PR
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Richard Beri wrote:
> I would like to set up simple IP Masquerading on my machine for another
> machine on my network to connect to the internet via cable modem. In the
> past I used a nifty firewall/masquerade setup utility called PM Firewall, but
> it only works on 2.2 kern
hi ya richard...
is your ipmasq gateway to the outside world the same as your firewall ??
- if you know ipchains better than iptables, you can run ipchains
on 2.4 kernels by installing "ipchains" modules in the 2.4 kernels
insmod ipchains
ipchains -L
- several dozen config t
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:41:41PM -0400, Richard Beri wrote:
| I would like to set up simple IP Masquerading on my machine for another
| machine on my network to connect to the internet via cable modem. In the
| past I used a nifty firewall/masquerade setup utility called PM Firewall, but
| it
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:41:41PM -0400, Richard Beri wrote:
> I would like to set up simple IP Masquerading on my machine for another
> machine on my network to connect to the internet via cable modem. In the
> past I used a nifty firewall/masquerade setup utility called PM Firewall, but
> it
apt-get install ipmasq
-Justin
www.atomichamster.com
On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 21:41, Richard Beri wrote:
> I would like to set up simple IP Masquerading on my machine for another
> machine on my network to connect to the internet via cable modem. In the
> past I used a nifty firewall/masquerade s
www.shorewall.net
--
Sincerely,
David Smead
http://www.amplepower.com.
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Richard Beri wrote:
> I would like to set up simple IP Masquerading on my machine for another
> machine on my network to connect to the internet via cable modem. In the
> past I used a nifty firewall/m
I would like to set up simple IP Masquerading on my machine for another
machine on my network to connect to the internet via cable modem. In the
past I used a nifty firewall/masquerade setup utility called PM Firewall, but
it only works on 2.2 kernels. Is there any simple setup program for
fi
ntrol over my cable (I am using BNC it
is an small LAN by now) so the channel hosts->gateway were fast while the
gateway->hosts were completely inefficient..
Take care with this
See you!! ip-masquerade its working GREAT now!! :)
Regar
ake their way..
The fact is that in the gateway I have an old ISA ne2000 card and in the
host new pci cards so what I suspect is that the good cards are taking the
channel much more efficiently.
Anyway today I will buy a good network card and I will know..
IP masquerade works!! but it has taken two d
Hello Roberto,
Monday, August 13, 2001, 1:11:28 AM, you wrote:
RD> This is not ip-masquerade specific.. but somebody has some idea?
You might want to try out
http://www.pitpalme.de/debian/netio.tar.gz
It's a protocol independent (except it uses TCP, but independent in case of
HTTP p
help.. it is some kind of problem with my network
> > cards...
> >
> > It is quite strange.. if I try to send a huge file (using ftp) from my
> > host to the gateway it goes at the speed of light.. but if I try to take a
> > file from the gateway to the host it crawls.
Sounds like your gateway does not know its hosts
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Roberto Diaz wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 01:11:28 +0200 (MEST)
> From: Roberto Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: IP masquerade not working!! :( (fwd)
> Res
light.. but if I try to take a
file from the gateway to the host it crawls.. :???
This is not ip-masquerade specific.. but somebody has some idea?
Regards
Roberto
Roberto Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http:
Hi!
I have configured a linux box as a router for my home LAN using
ip-masquerade but now I am having some problems.
My configuration:
* 486/100Mhz 16 Mbytes ram debian potato as a router
* 56 k modem ppp link (it works fine from the router)
* Kernel 2.2.17
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 02:13:34AM +1000, Kevin Easton wrote:
> ipmasq is the go. ipmasq is cool. ipmasq rocks your world.
>
> Just setup your internet access on the gateway machine, then when it's all
> working, apt-get install ipmasq - and you'll have ipmasquerading for all
> your local networ
And if you want to add any custom firewall rules, just add your own script
to /etc/ipmasq/rules/).
- Original Message -
From: "D-Man" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 6:35 AM
Subject: ip masquerade : which one?
>
> I see there are 2 HOWTOS for IP M
On Monday 16 April 2001 18:07, D-Man wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:38:30AM +0200, Willi Dyck wrote:
> This doesn't quite answer my question, but it might be heading in the
> right direction. I want to know the difference between ipchains and
> ipmasq. Would I be correct if I said :
> F
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 06:50:32PM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> Now hold on there just a darn minute--
>
> In one sentence, you say that he doesn't want to have both, but in
That's right.
> another you acknowledge that ipmasq depends on ipfwadm or ipchains or
> iptables.
That's right, too. And wh
I got confused and made wrong comment under you.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 06:50:32PM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> The ipmasq package is not *REQUIRED* to set up MASQ rules, but is a
> tool which simplifies the process.
Yes. Correct. (Sorry, it's one of those day)
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~
Nope! IPMASQ is not required. I bet serious admin will not use it.
It's for ppl like me at home with cable modem and university student on
Ethernet.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 06:50:32PM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> The ipmasq package is not *REQUIRED* to set up MASQ rules, but is a
> tool which simp
ipmasq. Would I be correct if I said :
> > Firewalling and Masquerading are 2 different things, handled by 2
> > different apps, and I want both ipchains and ipmasq?
>
> No, you don't want to have both. Ipmasq is the short form of
> IP-Masquerade and can be h
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 06:38:10PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
|
| ipmasq is a convienience package which automatically configures kernel
| using either ipchains or iptables.
Ahh, that's the difference between 'ipchains' and 'ipmasq'. Thanks!
Thanks all for the info and explanations re firewalling
iptable is kernel 2.4 specific tool.
ipchain is 2.2 specific tool but I hear it works with 2.4 kernel since
kernel 2.4 has compatibility mode or something.
So, iptables and ipchains are similar tool and you need to decide which
one to use.
ipmasq is a convienience package which automatically co
different things, handled by 2
> different apps, and I want both ipchains and ipmasq?
No, you don't want to have both. Ipmasq is the short form of
IP-Masquerade and can be handeld by both, ipchains and iptables.
Masquerading, or simply MASQ, (used in FORWARD chains) is one of the
three
Hi
Yes, both ipchain and ipmasq about roughly the same things but I
think ipchain is a newer with more features and mainly for 2.2 kernel. (I
think ipmasq for 2.0 kernel, but I am not sure). For 2.4 kernel, iptable is
the recommended one. All these tools do packet filtering AFAIK. This
pa
Hi
Actually, you can use ipmasq and ipchain in 2.4 kernel if you
compile the corresponding module. On the other hand you can use iptable for
2.4 kernel. (it is the recommended way since it is native to 2.4 kernel.
Edwin Lau
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:35:26 D-Man wrote:
>
> I see there are 2
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:38:30AM +0200, Willi Dyck wrote:
| On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:35:26PM -0400, D-Man wrote:
| >
| > I see there are 2 HOWTOS for IP Masquerading and (correspondingly) 2
| > packages. Should I be looking at "ipmasq" or "ipchains"? How much
|
| If you're using kernel vers
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:35:26PM -0400, D-Man wrote:
>
> I see there are 2 HOWTOS for IP Masquerading and (correspondingly) 2
> packages. Should I be looking at "ipmasq" or "ipchains"? How much
If you're using kernel versions older than 2.4.0 you're about to use
ipchains. The IPCHAINS HOWTO e
I see there are 2 HOWTOS for IP Masquerading and (correspondingly) 2
packages. Should I be looking at "ipmasq" or "ipchains"? How much
breakage (aka relearning) would I need to do if I went with a 2.4
kernel and iptables instead? (I don't know the masq stuff yet so that
would only be 'learning'
> Has anyone experienced configuring IP Masquerade with pptp and VMware ?
>
> My situation is :
>
> - Debian box running unstable and kernel 2.4.2
> - VMware + Windows 98 host system configured host-only
> - ADSL internet connexion using pptp protocol
>
> I would like my
Has anyone experienced configuring IP Masquerade with pptp and VMware ?
My situation is :
- Debian box running unstable and kernel 2.4.2
- VMware + Windows 98 host system configured host-only
- ADSL internet connexion using pptp protocol
I would like my Windows virtual machine to access the net
> does the standard potato install have ip-masquerade compiled
> into it as it comes from the Debian site, or do I need to recompile the
> kernel to to get this option?
>
recompile
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Linux - the last se
Can't seem to find the answer for this simple question in the FAQs and
HOWTOs: does the standard potato install have ip-masquerade compiled
into it as it comes from the Debian site, or do I need to recompile the
kernel to to get this option?
TIA!
Stan
pmasq deb package found on the debian site)
to truely check if ipmasq is enabled run the command:
"cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward" if the responce is a 1 then ipmasq
should be enabeled.
--- Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> I have a problem with IP Masque
"Robert" wrote:
>Hi
>
>
>I have a problem with IP Masquerade on Debian 2.2 kernel 2.2.14
>
>When Debian boot i have message
>
>IP Masquerade has not been enabled in the kernel.
>
>but i enable it.
Well, the kernel doesn't se
Hi
I have a problem with IP Masquerade on Debian 2.2 kernel 2.2.14
When Debian boot i have message
IP Masquerade has not been enabled in the kernel.
but i enable it.
> > The HOWTO suggested I should try something like
> >
> > ipfwadm -F -p deny (setting 'deny' as the default rule)
> > ipfwadm -F -a masquerade -P tcp 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 -D 0.0.0.0/0
> ^^^
> is there a typo here or you're using the entire
do everything as
> explained in the IP-Masquerade HOWTO, but for some reason things weren't
> running quite fine (well... not fine at all, as the packages coming from
> one adapter wouldn't see the other eth's)...
>
> I found a way to set things to work, but I
Guilherme Soares Zahn wrote:
>
> The HOWTO suggested I should try something like
>
> ipfwadm -F -p deny (setting 'deny' as the default rule)
> ipfwadm -F -a masquerade -P tcp 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 -D 0.0.0.0/0
> (and the same for udp)
>
The problem here is that packets are given permission to
Hi,
It sounds to me as if when you did the first set-up for some reason the packets
were getting through the rule and hitting the default deny. In the second
instance you have a default allow so it should match any traffic.
The first example is better as it is more specific. Hopefully the 192
Hi there,
today I was trying to set our computers to do IP-Masquerading (we'll
be changing our external provider, and while the old one did the
masquerading for us, the now one doesn't)... I tried to do everything as
explained in the IP-Masquerade HOWTO, but for some reason thin
At 18:17 25/05/1998 +1000, John Boggon wrote:
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Bruce Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: debian
>Date: Sunday, 24 May 1998 04:09:pm
>Subject: IP Masquerade and PPP
>
>
>>Has anyone got IP Masquerade to work with PPP. I have fo
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian
Date: Sunday, 24 May 1998 04:09:pm
Subject: IP Masquerade and PPP
>Has anyone got IP Masquerade to work with PPP. I have followed the
>how-to`s and looked all over the `net, but I still can`t get it
On Sat, 23 May 1998, Bruce Jackson wrote:
> You mean to tell me that with a simple firewall I will not be able to
> ping and traceroute. This does not seem logical to me that a firewall
> should prevent this. Anyways, I can`t surf the net, even using ip
> addresses.
It sounds like you don't hav
On Fri, May 22, 1998 at 09:50:46PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Sat, 23 May 1998 09:21:08 +0530, Bruce Jackson wrote:
> >Has anyone got IP Masquerade to work with PPP.
> Yup, I've got a Linux and a WinNT/Win95 box behind another Linux
> IPMasqing system, works fine.
>
>> ipfwadm -F -p deny
>> ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.0.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>>
>> I copied them almost verbatium out of the IPMasqing HOWTO.
>
>I have used these exact same rules as well as using info I found on the
>Internet using Dejanews and I have tried the dotfile maker. All with
>now succes
> "BJ" == Bruce Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BJ> blocking everything. I have not seen any modules for ping, or
BJ> traceroute. I have seen modules for quake, raudio, etc. Maybe I am
BJ> missing something, but basic services like ping and traceroute should
BJ> not be denied. These a
On Sat, 23 May 1998 16:25:17 +0530, Bruce Jackson wrote:
>Steve Lamb wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 May 1998 12:44:16 +0530, Bruce Jackson wrote:
>> As I said, ping, FTP, ICQ chat/file requests, DCC all require
Jeezus, talk about open mouth insert foot. :(
ping and traceroute should work,
Steve Lamb wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 May 1998 12:44:16 +0530, Bruce Jackson wrote:
>
> >You mean to tell me that with a simple firewall I will not be able to
> >ping and traceroute. This does not seem logical to me that a firewall
> >should prevent this.
>
> Why doesn't it seem logical? Withou
On Sat, 23 May 1998 12:44:16 +0530, Bruce Jackson wrote:
>You mean to tell me that with a simple firewall I will not be able to
>ping and traceroute. This does not seem logical to me that a firewall
>should prevent this.
Why doesn't it seem logical? Withouth the proper Masquerading modules
wrote:
>
> >Has anyone got IP Masquerade to work with PPP.
>
> Yup, I've got a Linux and a WinNT/Win95 box behind another Linux
> IPMasqing system, works fine.
>
> >the Internet using PPP I can`t ping, traceroute, etc the Internet. Says
>
> Of cour
On Sat, 23 May 1998 09:21:08 +0530, Bruce Jackson wrote:
>Has anyone got IP Masquerade to work with PPP.
Yup, I've got a Linux and a WinNT/Win95 box behind another Linux
IPMasqing system, works fine.
>the Internet using PPP I can`t ping, traceroute, etc the Internet. Says
Has anyone got IP Masquerade to work with PPP. I have followed the
how-to`s and looked all over the `net, but I still can`t get it to
work. I have compiled the kernel with IP Masquerade and all the
assorted options. My network is working properly. When I connect to
the Internet using PPP I can
Automatiskt svar
Angånde: Problem with IP-Masquerade 97-12-03
Hi Debian folks
I have a problem.. don´t we all..
I have a machine with two netcards, eth0 and eth1
eth0 is connected to the internet with ip
Hi Carey,
Sorry for a long silence, did not have time to check mails...
and now I have thousands of them...
Thank you very much for your suggestion. It works!
ZORO
On 26 Oct 1997, Carey Evans wrote:
> Lazar Fleysher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What I can not do (and what the question
Lazar Fleysher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I can not do (and what the question is about) is run an X-Windows
> application off remote host on my second computer. I mean the following.
> If I telnet from my second computer to, say, my university account and run
> xclock off my university it
> I know that the question I am asking most probably have "It is impossible"
> as an answer. But still
I won't be impossible... just might not be coded yet :-)
> What I can not do (and what the question is about) is run an X-Windows
> application off remote host on my second computer. I mean
Hello to everybody,
I know that the question I am asking most probably have "It is impossible"
as an answer. But still
I have two computers connected to each other. Both run Linux and
X-Windows. One is configured to provide IP Masquerade and is connected to
the Internet. I can t
At 15:25 20-1-97 +, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
> I'm planning to set a linux box as a IP-Masquerade and I was
>wondering if the PC's under Linux will be able to connect to Netware
>servers, that is, will the Netware packets be forwarded by Linu
Hi,
I'm planning to set a linux box as a IP-Masquerade and I was
wondering if the PC's under Linux will be able to connect to Netware
servers, that is, will the Netware packets be forwarded by Linux?
The design of the network is something like this:
-
87 matches
Mail list logo
