ous state in case of issues.
>
> The article is about Ubuntu on raspberry pi, but may relate to debian in
> general.
This is technically accurate, but I would like to add two reservations:
1. 60% sounds optimistic, but possibly realistic if you're talking
about the OS install that will have a lot
really like a pointer to a non-technical how to set it all up, if
accurate
Thanks
All the best
Keith BAINBRIDGE
+61 (0)447 667 468
keithr...@gmail.com
UTC + 10
>From my Apad
As requested, here is the information on this year's medical professional
databases:
Database 1: 780,000 Physicians in the USA
Arranged by State
Sortable by First name, Last name, Title, Specialty, Address
(city, state, zip,
county), Medical
Doo likee savory Bitch doinng superlative blowjobb?
http://kenelements.info
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench
Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et
Reply-To:
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Scheduled scan and automatic removal features.
http://www.antispywarecash.com/bill/
Man is the only animal that blushes -- or needs to.
What sane person could live in this world and not be crazy?
Self-sacrifice enables us to sacrifice other people without blushing.
--
Haeufig
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 06:29:39PM -0500, Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
Is there a way to get a more accurate time value, preferably to a
nanosecond, using the system clock? I need to write a program that needs to
output the time it takes various sorting algprithms to sort various numbers
Dave Sherohman writes:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 06:29:39PM -0500, Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
to a nanosecond, using the system clock? I need to write a
program that needs to output the time it takes various sorting
algprithms to sort various numbers of integers. For smaller
numbers of
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 09:06:29AM -0700, Andrew Agno wrote:
Dave Sherohman writes:
faster than a quicksort.) If you are required to use a small data
set, just perform more repetitions to get measurable data.
This also allows you to obtain statistics like standard deviations and
-Original Message-
From: Dave Sherohman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:58 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: More accurate time feedback
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 09:06:29AM -0700, Andrew Agno wrote:
Dave Sherohman writes:
faster
Is there a way to get a more accurate time value, preferably to a
nanosecond, using the system clock? I need to write a program that needs to
output the time it takes various sorting algprithms to sort various numbers
of integers. For smaller numbers of integers on algorithms like
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 06:29:39PM -0500, Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
| Is there a way to get a more accurate time value, preferably to a
| nanosecond, using the system clock? I need to write a program that needs to
| output the time it takes various sorting algprithms to sort various numbers
I sent this directly to Ian (damn reply vs. reply all) , its probably
usefull for everyone to see as well.
- Original Message -
From: Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ian Patrick Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: More accurate time feedback
okay, i've been playing around iwth it a bit, and here's what i think
ineed to do: make sure the directory is browsed by the network (the
X11R6 (?) one, i think). how would i do this? if that doesnt work, any
other suggestions? i've installed the x-vgaserver and xsvga...
thanks in advance,
Alan
13 matches
Mail list logo
