>> > > On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 02:50, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> > > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:04 PM Balaji G wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (
I did missed "LOWER_UP", then I noticed that `ifconfig` is used. More
on that later. Back to 'Subject: Re: Does the debian kernel sends the
gratuitous arp ?'
To me is the answer "Yes, Debian kernel sends gratuitous ARP when it
supposed to do". But we, this mailingl
rey Walton wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:04 PM Balaji G wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel version
> 5.16.12.
> > > >
Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 09:19:32PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 05:52:16PM +0530, Balaji G wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel
> > > version 5.1
t; > > >
> > > > I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel version 5.16.12.
> > > > When i do a link up/down i don't see any Gratuitous ARP being sent.
> > > >
> > > > # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eno5np0/arp_
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 09:19:32PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 05:52:16PM +0530, Balaji G wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel version 5.16.12.
> > When i do a link up/down i don't see any
On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 11:21:10AM +0530, Balaji G wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 02:50, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:04 PM Balaji G wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with k
Hi Jeff,
Do you mean this is a known issue & will be fixed in the future
releases ?
Thanks,
Balaji
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 02:50, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:04 PM Balaji G wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I am using "Debian GNU/Li
On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 1:38 AM wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 05:20:22PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:04 PM Balaji G wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel version
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 05:20:22PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:04 PM Balaji G wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel version 5.16.12.
> > When i do a link up/down i don't see any G
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:04 PM Balaji G wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel version 5.16.12.
> When i do a link up/down i don't see any Gratuitous ARP being sent.
>
> # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eno5np0/arp_not
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 05:52:16PM +0530, Balaji G wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel version 5.16.12.
> When i do a link up/down i don't see any Gratuitous ARP being sent.
ARP
> # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eno5np0/ar
Hi,
I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel version 5.16.12.
When i do a link up/down i don't see any Gratuitous ARP being sent.
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eno5np0/arp_notify
# ip link set down dev eno5np0
# ip link set up dev eno5np0
Captured a
still boot into my
laptop using the old version of my kernel (either
linux-image-6.1.0-11-amd64 or linux-image-6.1.0-10-amd64), I can no
longer use apt to upgrade other packages on my system. Furthermore
when I run
needrestart
I am informed that:
The currently running kernel version is 6.1
rrent kernel.
How did you install it?
Uninstall it, then run the kernel update again.
Run
dkms status
And try
sudo dkms remove rtl88x2bu/5.13.1 --all
Be aware that this drivers seems to be for wireless networking.
Most likely your WiFi with that Realtek adapter won't work.
We need to find
. Because of what seems like a bug in dkms, the
upgrade to linux-image-6.1.0-12-amd64 could not complete. Running
apt -f install
does not help. The uphshot is that, although I can still boot into my laptop
using the old version of my kernel (either linux-image-6.1.0-11-amd64 or
linux-image-6.1.0-10
Am 13.09.2023 19:07 schrieb M. Cuffaro:
> Consult /var/lib/dkms/rtl88x2bu/5.13.1/build/make.log for more
> information.
That drivers is incompatible with the current kernel.
How did you install it?
Uninstall it, then run the kernel update again.
Run
dkms status
And try
sudo dkms
,
the upgrade to linux-image-6.1.0-12-amd64 could not complete. Running
apt -f install
does not help. The uphshot is that, although I can still boot into my
laptop using the old version of my kernel (either
linux-image-6.1.0-11-amd64 or linux-image-6.1.0-10-amd64), I can no
longer use apt to
Yes, only. And no I can not.
/> Does your EEEPc only has an i686 CPU?/
/> Use lscpu to find out or google the name of the CPU./
/> Maybe you can install amd64 to verify it only occurs in i386./
No, there is no option to switch it off. It is (was) set by the OS (sincerly
Windo
Am Mittwoch, 13. September 2023, 11:47:11 CEST schrieb Marco:
Hi Marco,
yes, it is an old netbook. It has an Atom CPU from Intel, single core (with
hypertrheading two) and 2GB RAM.
But as it is small and has a long running time of about 8 hours, it is
perfectly usable for network analysis, fas
Am 13.09.2023 11:20 schrieb Hans:
> On none of my 64-bit systems this issue appeared, however, none of
> them are offering this "BIOS-RAM" the EEEPC does. And yes, it is deactivated
> in BIOS.
Does your EEEPc only has an i686 CPU?
Use lscpu to find out or google the name of the CPU.
Maybe you can
Hi folks,
on my EEEPC with i386 I am running into a little issue since kernels
version 6.X.
When I am booting, then the kernel starts as soon it is started, I get a blank
screen and the boot is hanging forever.
I have to reboot then, but the boot is not stable. It can happen, I have to
On Friday, 1 September 2023 13:16:31 CEST Mario Marietto wrote:
> Hello to everyone.
>
> I've just installed Debian Buster on my ARM Chromebook,using this image :
>
> https://github.com/hexdump0815/imagebuilder/releases?page=12
>
> He says that the image is based o
Any suggestions to fix it ? thanks.
On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 5:10 AM Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 02/09/2023 04:15, Mario Marietto wrote:
> > I've got a crazy idea : I see that Ubuntu has a 5.4 kernel source and
> > header package. Is there a method or tool to convert these packages
On 02/09/2023 04:15, Mario Marietto wrote:
I've got a crazy idea : I see that Ubuntu has a 5.4 kernel source and
header package. Is there a method or tool to convert these packages to
debian packages so that I can use them on Debian ?
Kernel image from one project and headers+sources
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 11:15:38PM +0200, Mario Marietto wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I've got a crazy idea : I see that Ubuntu has a 5.4 kernel source and
> header package. Is there a method or tool to convert these packages to
> debian packages so that I can use them on Debian ? Tha
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 11:15:38PM +0200, Mario Marietto wrote:
> I've got a crazy idea : I see that Ubuntu has a 5.4 kernel source and
> header package. Is there a method or tool to convert these packages to
> debian packages so that I can use them on Debian ? That's becaus
Hello.
I've got a crazy idea : I see that Ubuntu has a 5.4 kernel source and
header package. Is there a method or tool to convert these packages to
debian packages so that I can use them on Debian ? That's because I prefer
Debian over Ubuntu. Thanks.
On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 10:25 PM
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 01:16:31PM +0200, Mario Marietto wrote:
> Hello to everyone.
>
> I've just installed Debian Buster on my ARM Chromebook,using this image :
>
> https://github.com/hexdump0815/imagebuilder/releases?page=12
>
> He says that the image is based o
Hello to everyone.
I've just installed Debian Buster on my ARM Chromebook,using this image :
https://github.com/hexdump0815/imagebuilder/releases?page=12
He says that the image is based on the kernel 5.4 and it is. Infact the
default running kernel is 5.4.14. But for the project tha
I am posting this to the list in the hope that it will help someone who
has encountered
the same issue I did.
I am running the testing stream and a few days back, during a regular
update, I encountered a
kernel panic. The error appeared to be in the r8168-dkms package.
I searched around for
Hi folks,
I discovered an issue on my ASUS EEEPC 1005HPX with the latest kernel in
bookworm.
This is a known issue:
When I boot, then the kernel hangs and it looks for me, that it is probing for
edd. However, this issue is not every time, but from time to time it hangs
over minutes or does
On Thu, 2023-08-24 at 10:06 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> I had an upgrade failure today, when upgrading kernel to 6.4.0-3 :
> virtualbox-dkms needs a function which disappeared from kernel headers.
>
> I opened the bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050406
>
I had an upgrade failure today, when upgrading kernel to 6.4.0-3 :
virtualbox-dkms needs a function which disappeared from kernel headers.
I opened the bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050406
--
Erwan David
Hi List,
I upgraded my Kernel and now after restarting my computer I have to go
into /proc/sys/user/max_*_namespaces and modify the value to something
other than 0 (zero). Where do I file a bug?
I'm on Debian Stable with Kernel version 6.1.0-11-amd64 if it helps
any.
Thanks!
--
Tim McConnell
minimal bash "load the kernel first"
after installing my live image via calamares installer
Thanks for the reply. I tried debian di too but wasn't successful in that
either it said that the kernel version for live and installer were not the
same.
- End forwarded message ---
- Forwarded message from Sakkra Billa -
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 21:35:33 +0530
From: Sakkra Billa
To: "Andrew M.A. Cater"
Subject: Re: Bootloader error grub minimal bash "load the kernel first" after
installing my live image via calamares installer
settings-debian and
.rsync . The live image works perfectly
So the aim of the tutorial was achieved.
> and the installation also finishes
> without errors but when i reboot my VM into the installed environment, it
> boots into grub minimal bash line editing mode. On typing boot it says
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 06:56:08PM +0530, Sakkra Billa wrote:
>when i reboot my VM into the installed environment, it boots into
>grub minimal On typing boot it says "load the kernel first".
What kind of VM is this? Which provider, if you are unsure.
Cheers,
Andy
--
htt
On 13 Aug 2023 18:56 +0530, from sakkrabi...@gmail.com (Sakkra Billa):
> but when i
> reboot my VM into the installed environment, it boots into grub minimal
> bash line editing mode. On typing boot it says "load the kernel first".
Sounds to me like GRUB can't find gr
rsync . The live image works
> perfectly and the installation also finishes without errors but when i
> reboot my VM into the installed environment, it boots into grub minimal
> bash line editing mode. On typing boot it says "load the kernel first". I
> did not change any of
errors but when i
reboot my VM into the installed environment, it boots into grub minimal
bash line editing mode. On typing boot it says "load the kernel first". I
did not change any of the calamares settings everything is default. Please
guide me that where did i go wrong.
except for the fact that a module fails to build for the
>> new kernel:
>>Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel:
>> 6.1.0-10-amd64 (x86_64)
>>Consult /var/lib/dkms/psmouse/alps-1.3/build/make.log for more
>> information.
> [...]
>
> Hello
Le 04/08/2023 à 11:44, Loris Bennett a écrit :
Hi,
I have a 10 year-old Dell E6230 laptop which I have updated regularly,
starting from Squeeze and have now updated to Bookworm. Everything
seems to work except for the fact that a module fails to build for the
new kernel:
Error! Bad return
Hi,
I have a 10 year-old Dell E6230 laptop which I have updated regularly,
starting from Squeeze and have now updated to Bookworm. Everything
seems to work except for the fact that a module fails to build for the
new kernel:
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 6.1.0-10-amd64
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 05:44:59PM +0100, piorunz wrote:
> Edit /etc/nfs.conf file:
> [nfsd]
> udp=y
>
> then:
> sudo systemctl restart nfs-server
Yes, that fixed my NFS problem.
Thank you very much
--
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
On 29/07/2023 16:00, Matthias Scheler wrote:
Hello,
after upgrading one of my systems from Debian 11 to 12 the kernel NFS server
doesn't seem to accept NFS requests over UDP on port 2049 anymore:
>rpcinfo -p | grep nfs
133 tcp 2
Hello,
after upgrading one of my systems from Debian 11 to 12 the kernel NFS server
doesn't seem to accept NFS requests over UDP on port 2049 anymore:
>rpcinfo -p | grep nfs
133 tcp 2049 nfs
134 tcp 2049 nfs
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 06:27:02PM +0200, Paul Leiber wrote:
> Just to state the obvious, what's bothering me is that my setup was working
> with kernel 5.10.0-21 and that it stopped working with kernel 5.10.178-3. So
> it seems that somewhere inbetween, changes have been i
eam source
and maybe build your own kernel as well, while attempting to
diagnose things.
Well, you did give me new information, so asking here was not in vain.
Going to xen-devel is indeed the next step.
You should be able to build an upstream 4.17.x Xen image (the xen.gz
file that goes into
full" entries while
> failing to load the driver during the boot process:
I don't think you'll get better response here than you will from the
Xen project. You might want to try asking on xen-devel as opposed to
xen-users, though they will expect you to use their upstream source
a
Hi list,
Since an update of package linux-image-amd64 to version 5.10.0-22
(kernel 5.10.178-3) and later, I am experiencing an issue with PCI
passthrough. A WiFi card is still visible in DomU, but it is not working
anymore with the previous settings. I would expect the card to continue
Hello Debian Community Support Team,
I was already installed and compiled Kernel with rtai patches of
4.9.146-rtai_5.2
Can you suggest me proper steps to follow debian packages load in my kernel
please let me know.
Thank you,
Manish D.
@india
Hi,
I have been testing doing pxeboot using ipxe and had a couple of issues, the
main one being the kernel which is bundled in the netboot.tar.gz is older than
the bookworm release
Location of netboot.tar.gz:
http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/bookworm/main/installer-amd64/current/images
On 2023-04-22 12:13 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> There are many signs of a new kernel version in the latest updates:
> linux-libc-dev, linux-source, linux-kbuild all show an upgrade
> available from 5.10.162-1 to 5.10.178-2.
>
> Conspicuously absent are any of the linux-image pac
There are many signs of a new kernel version in the latest updates:
linux-libc-dev, linux-source, linux-kbuild all show an upgrade
available from 5.10.162-1 to 5.10.178-2.
Conspicuously absent are any of the linux-image packages; the most
recent ones are 5.10.162-1. I figured they might just be
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 12:19:05PM +0300, Anssi Saari wrote:
> Ram Ramesh writes:
>
> > How do I tie the install of linux-image to linux-header so that I cannot
> > install image without the headers.
>
> In my experience it's been enough to install linux-image-amd64 and
> linux-headers-amd64. Wh
Ram Ramesh writes:
> I have nvdia card that requires binary driver to work in my system. Xorg is
> unable display anything with free driver. Since nvidia-driver has to be
> built for each kernel install, I need to install headers also. This seem to
> work automatically for any sta
If I understand you correctly, you want to set it up so that for every
package pair
linux-image-
linux-headers-
attempting to install the former results in also installing the latter?
And you want this to apply not just for a specific version number, but
for every version number, including ones
On 2023-03-27 at 20:03, Ram Ramesh wrote:
> I have nvdia card that requires binary driver to work in my system.
> Xorg is unable display anything with free driver. Since nvidia-driver
> has to be built for each kernel install, I need to install headers
> also. This seem to work autom
I have nvdia card that requires binary driver to work in my system. Xorg
is unable display anything with free driver. Since nvidia-driver has to
be built for each kernel install, I need to install headers also. This
seem to work automatically for any standard kernel release in bullseye
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 11:33 PM Ram Ramesh wrote:
> Hi Ramesh,
>
> this might help. The bug is fixed with kernel 6.0.2-1
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/linux.debian.bugs.dist/c/p-sgJiTR00A?pli=1
>
> All the best to you
> Eike
>
> Elke,
>
> Thanks. v6.1 i
Hi Ramesh,
this might help. The bug is fixed with kernel 6.0.2-1
https://groups.google.com/g/linux.debian.bugs.dist/c/p-sgJiTR00A?pli=1
All the best to you
Eike
Elke,
Thanks. v6.1 is available on bullseye-backports. I installed it and the
trouble is gone now.
BTW, does non-free firmware
On Sonntag, 26. März 2023 18:08:15 -04 Ram Ramesh wrote:
> I wanted to upgrade my server from 10 year old HW to something newer.
> THis server runs debian bullseye with v5.19 kernel from backports.
[snip]
>
> The only trouble I have is that it refuses to
> reboot/shutdown/poweroff
I wanted to upgrade my server from 10 year old HW to something newer.
THis server runs debian bullseye with v5.19 kernel from backports. Here
is the list of items I got in the upgraded system
1. Intel z690 mother board (asrock steel legend)
2. Core i3-13100 cpu
3. Super Flower 650W PSU,
4
On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 21:39 +, KCB Leigh wrote:
> This message is related to the 'Re: solution to / full' thread.
>
> I am running my computer from a Debian 11.6 OS on a 25GB partition on
> a USB stick. The root partition is now 70% full, with over 4GB (16%)
> of
> the volume occupied by /usr
th the structure of the operating system & do not want to
delete a file which may be required by some other part of the system
that I've not also removed. Specifically, in the /boot/ directory
there are also files related to these older kernel versions:
config-5.10.0-*-amd64 (23
On Mon 20 Mar 2023 at 10:37:01 -0400, Default User wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I currently run Bullseye Stable using:
> linux-image-6.0.0-0.deb11.6-amd64 6.0.12-1~bpo11+1 amd64 Linux 6.0 for
> 64-bit PCs (signed) kernel.
>
> I plan to upgrade to Bookworm Stable shortly after re
Hi.
I currently run Bullseye Stable using:
linux-image-6.0.0-0.deb11.6-amd64 6.0.12-1~bpo11+1 amd64 Linux 6.0 for
64-bit PCs (signed) kernel.
I plan to upgrade to Bookworm Stable shortly after release. Will I need to
do anything differently?
Any "gotcha's"?
use the Qlogic module qlge.ko? Did you try compiling
without it?
Here the latest vanilla kernel compiles fine with it, so you are
probably missing some development packages. If the compilation fails too
with this module not selected you are probably missing some generic
dependencies.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 06:30:36AM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 03:13:40PM -0700, 43i3 Adam wrote:
> > The error :
> > ake[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:500: drivers/media] Error 2
> > make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
> > CC [M] drivers/staging/qlge/qlge
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 03:13:40PM -0700, 43i3 Adam wrote:
> hi, please a need help i never had this kind of error compile my own
> kernel. please you can find there the version of kernel and the command
> line a use for that. thanks ...
>
> kernel version: linux-6.1.12
&g
hi, please a need help i never had this kind of error compile my own
kernel. please you can find there the version of kernel and the command
line a use for that. thanks ...
kernel version: linux-6.1.12
os type: 64-bit
processors: intel i5 .2.7
gcc version 10.2.1 20210110 (Debian 10.2.1-6)
the
Hi,
it's been a while.
Am 14.06.2018 um 21:52 schrieb Sven Joachim:
On 2018-06-13 21:25 +0200, Robert Pommrich wrote:
I don't know how to find out, if the hardware is really supported, nor
how to build a mainline kernel and integrate it with Uboot.
Install the linux-image-mx5
)?
blkid -l -t UUID=---- -o device
It didn't produce any output.
Sorry, I have no motivation to dig into /usr/share/initramfs-tools
deeper. Perhaps you may try debug kernel option in combination with bad
UUID for resume from grub
... debug resume
>
> blkid -l -t UUID=---- -o device
>
> I would try it at first in normally running system. Perhaps some
> caches may be involved preventing query to the optical drive. I have
> no bright idea how to cause drop to initrd shell to try the command
> t
-o device
I would try it at first in normally running system. Perhaps some caches
may be involved preventing query to the optical drive. I have no bright
idea how to cause drop to initrd shell to try the command there, perhaps
root=... kernel command line parameter may be removed or changed to
note: DO NOT DO THIS ON A PRODUCTION SYSTEM.
last week i was running an unsigned kernel and went to upgrade it
to a signed version and it came back with asking me about removing
a running kernel. in recent times that hasn't been and issue so i
aborted the install and then downloade
/02/2023 01:47, Richmond wrote:
>>>>>>> It might be a good way for someone to reproduce the error on some
>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>> machine. I have no problems with the CD/DVD writer and have used it a
>>>>>>> few time
t;> >> It might be a good way for someone to reproduce the error on some
>> >> >> other
>> >> >> machine. I have no problems with the CD/DVD writer and have used it a
>> >> >> few times recently.
>> >> >
>> >> >
to reproduce the error on some
> >> >> other
> >> >> machine. I have no problems with the CD/DVD writer and have used it a
> >> >> few times recently.
> >> >
> >> > Do you see the same errors if kernel command line is edited from
ne. I have no problems with the CD/DVD writer and have used it a
>> >> few times recently.
>> >
>> > Do you see the same errors if kernel command line is edited from grub
>> > to pass non-existing UUID specified in the resume=UUID=... argument?
>> &g
Hi,
i wrote:
> > Maybe the script which runs blkid or alike has vanished during the recent
> > reconstruction of the initrd which fixed the problems ?
Richmond wrote:
> I didn't need to reconstruct initrd to cause the problems. As far as I
> remember all I did was destroy the swap space, having c
er and have used it a
> >> few times recently.
> >
> > Do you see the same errors if kernel command line is edited from grub
> > to pass non-existing UUID specified in the resume=UUID=... argument?
> > It might be a quick way to reproduce the issue.
>
> I looked i
Max Nikulin writes:
> On 03/02/2023 01:47, Richmond wrote:
>> It might be a good way for someone to reproduce the error on some
>> other
>> machine. I have no problems with the CD/DVD writer and have used it a
>> few times recently.
>
> Do you see the same errors
"Thomas Schmitt" writes:
> Hi,
>
> Richmond wrote:
>> /tmp/initrd21/scripts/local:[ "${quiet?}" != "y" ] && log_begin_msg
>> "Running /scripts/local-block"
>> [...]
>> local_block()
>> {
>>[ "${quiet?}" != "y" ] && log_begin_msg "Running /scripts/local-block"
>>run_scripts /s
Hi,
Richmond wrote:
> /tmp/initrd21/scripts/local:[ "${quiet?}" != "y" ] && log_begin_msg
> "Running /scripts/local-block"
> [...]
> local_block()
> {
>[ "${quiet?}" != "y" ] && log_begin_msg "Running /scripts/local-block"
>run_scripts /scripts/local-block "$@"
> [...]
> Then
On 03/02/2023 01:47, Richmond wrote:
It might be a good way for someone to reproduce the error on some other
machine. I have no problems with the CD/DVD writer and have used it a
few times recently.
Do you see the same errors if kernel command line is edited from grub to
pass non-existing
; (If not there, then in the /scripts/local-block directory of the
> > > >> > initrd ?)
> > > >>
> > > >> I don't know how I would look in that. Is it in RAM at boot time?
> > > >
> > > >Choose your kernel ↓
02 Feb 2023 at 21:58:54 (+), Richmond wrote:
> > >> "Thomas Schmitt" writes:
> > >> >
> > >> > (If not there, then in the /scripts/local-block directory of the
> > >> > initrd ?)
> > >>
> >
the initrd
> >> > ?)
> >>
> >> I don't know how I would look in that. Is it in RAM at boot time?
> >
> >Choose your kernel ↓↓Pick any name
> >
> > $ unmkinitramfs /boot/initrd.img-5.10.0-21-amd64 /tmp/ini
"Thomas Schmitt" writes:
> Hi,
>
> Richmond wrote:
>> No local block. :-?
>
> Maybe you can find our from where the message comes:
>
> grep -r 'Running.*scripts.*local-block' /tmp/initrd21
>
>
grep -r 'Running.*scripts.*local-block' /tmp/initrd21
/tmp/initrd21/scripts/local:[ "${quiet?}"
Hi,
Richmond wrote:
> No local block. :-?
Maybe you can find our from where the message comes:
grep -r 'Running.*scripts.*local-block' /tmp/initrd21
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
David Wright writes:
> On Thu 02 Feb 2023 at 21:58:54 (+), Richmond wrote:
>> "Thomas Schmitt" writes:
>> >
>> > (If not there, then in the /scripts/local-block directory of the initrd ?)
>>
>> I don't know how I would look in that. Is
Michel Verdier writes:
> Le 2 février 2023 Richmond a écrit :
>
>> There is no such file. Earlier I ran this:
>>
>> find / -print|grep "scripts/local-block"
>>
>> and it found nothing, which led me to believe it is some temporary file...
>>>
>>> (If not there, then in the /scripts/local-block dir
On Thu 02 Feb 2023 at 21:58:54 (+), Richmond wrote:
> "Thomas Schmitt" writes:
> >
> > (If not there, then in the /scripts/local-block directory of the initrd ?)
>
> I don't know how I would look in that. Is it in RAM at boot time?
Choose you
Le 2 février 2023 Richmond a écrit :
> There is no such file. Earlier I ran this:
>
> find / -print|grep "scripts/local-block"
>
> and it found nothing, which led me to believe it is some temporary file...
>>
>> (If not there, then in the /scripts/local-block directory of the initrd ?)
its part o
"Thomas Schmitt" writes:
> Indeed. But why should only the kernel be brain damaged ?
>
> (I expect some generic UUID searcher for block devices. Probably the sr
> devices are near the end of its iteration. So one would not see any
> protest in the log if the UUID is fou
t libblkid is involved.
But it was not clear what software wanted the service of libblkid.
Now we have a candidate for that.
> It seems a strange thing to do.
Indeed. But why should only the kernel be brain damaged ?
(I expect some generic UUID searcher for block devices. Probably the sr
devices are
piorunz writes:
> On 02/02/2023 14:05, Richmond wrote:
>> After I did this, the errors went away.
>> I don't know why the errors reference sr0, it's a mystery.
>
> They will most likely come back, this error is related to optical
> drive, nothing to do with swap space.
Perhaps the system was loo
201 - 300 of 24409 matches
Mail list logo
